In this section we give a brief overview on the photo-conductivity phenomenon.

A very short and schematic introduction to the argument could be represented by [36], but main references for this summary are [37–39].

### 3.2.1 Conductivity

*As reported in the section 1.2.3, the relation between the internal electric field*
and the current density in a semiconductor material is given by

*J~* *= σ ~E =*

*= q(nµ*e*+ pµ*h*) ~E* (3.3)

*where q is the electron charge. In general σ is a tensor, but because of CZT has*
isotropic transport properties, it will be considered as a scalar quantity. Now,
following the Bube’s example [37], for the sake of simplicity let’s assume the
case of one-carrier transport; in this case the conductivity can be written as

*σ*0*= qn*0*µ*0 (3.4)

When the material is illuminated, the conductivity is increased, so
*σ = σ*0*+ ∆σ =*

*= q(n*_{0}*+ ∆n)(µ*_{0}*+ ∆µ) = σ*_{0}*+ q (n∆µ + (n*_{0}*∆n)µ*_{0}) (3.5)
Because in equilibrium condition the carrier excess can be written as

*∆n = Gτ* (3.6)

*where G is the generation rate and τ the carrier life-time, we get*

*∆σ = qµ*0*Gτ + qn∆µ* (3.7)

So the conductivity could be modified because of three different mechanisms:

*•* *Variation in the generation rate G .*

*•* *Variation of the mean life-time τ = τ (G).*

*•* *variation of the mobility value µ = µ(G).*

When we deal with semi-insulator materials at sufficiently high photo-excitation rate we can write:

*σ ≈ ∆σ = Gq(µ**e**τ**e**+ µ**h**τ**h*) (3.8)

### 3.2.2 Photocurrent models

*As already said in the section 1.2.2, when a photon flux crosses any thickness*
of some material its intensity undergoes an exponential damping so the
photo-generation rate can be expressed as:

*G(x) = G*0exp

½

*−* *x*
*λ(E)*

¾

(3.9) If we want calculate the expected photocurrent, we must start from the Boltz-mann equation 1.22:

*∂n*

*∂t* *= G − U − ~∇ · ~J* (3.10)

where

*J = nµ ~~* *E − D ~∇n* (3.11)

*with D diffusion coefficient. Once we have the n(x, t) solution, exploiting the*
*Ramo-Shockley theorem (see the section 1.2.1), we can calculate the *
*contribu-tion to the current coming from each depth x (L ≥ x ≥ 0, where L is the*
detector thickness) and then integrating over all the thickness to get the
pho-tocurrent value. The procedure could be quite complicated (in the next chapter
we will expose a similar calculation), but sometimes imposing some hypotheses,
it is possible to achieve a simplify solutions as we will show in the next section.

For further insights about the photocurrent theory refer to [37].

*Many’s model The attenuation length λ is an energy function and, for a*
semiconductor with direct bandgap as CZT, the attenuation length collapses
when the photon energy reaches the value of the energy gap. At this wavelength
or just above, the value of the attenuation length is in the order of some microns,
so that the whole absorption process takes place in the surface layers. Supposing
*a planar geometry, the internal electric field becomes E = V /L (where L is the*
detector thickness) and the problem can be dealt as one-dimensional. Moreover
if we consider negligible the detrapping contribution and the diffusion current,
we can write the stationary Boltzmann equation as in [40]:

*G(x) = G exp*n

*−x*
*λ*
o

=*∂J*

*∂x* +*n*
*τ* =

*= µE∂n*

*∂x* +*n*

*τ* (3.12)

*Now introducing the hypothesis of strong light absorption, we can write G(x)*
as

*G(x) = G*0*δ(x)* (3.13)

*this hypothesis is equivalent to put G(x) = 0 inside the material and to impose*
*the boundary condition G(0) = G*0*. It is noteworthy that G*0 *and G(x) have*
not identical physical dimensions; indeed the Dirac’s delta function is not
di-mensionless. The physical dimensions of Dirac’s delta are the reciprocal of its
argument ones; this because the Dirac’s delta is an integral object and then its
integrated value must be dimensionless.

Because of the stationary conditions it should be

*G*_{0}*= n(0)µE + R*_{0} (3.14)

*If we suppose a surface recombination rate R*0 proportional to the carrier
con-centration

*R*0*= n(0)s* (3.15)

*where s is a constant called recombination speed*^{1}, we can re-write the problem
as:

*µE*^{∂n}* _{∂x}* +

^{n}*= 0*

_{τ}*n(0) =*

_{µE+s}*and we achieve the system solution*

^{G}*n(x) =* *G*0

*µE + s*exp

½

*−* *x*
*µτ E*

¾

(3.16)
*where s has the physical dimensions of a velocity and is called surface *
recombi-nation velocity. Applying the R-S theorem and remembering that, for a planar
detector, the weighting field is equal to _{L}^{1}, we can write the current density as

*J* *= qµE*
*L*

Z _{L}

0

*n(x)dx =*

= *qG*0

1 +_{µE}^{s}*µτ E*

*L*

·
*1 − exp*

½

*−* *L*
*µτ E*

¾¸

(3.17)

achieving in this way the Many’s solution [4].

Modified models As underlined by Nemirowsky in [32], the internal electric field in the detector could be affected by the presence of spatial charge that polarizes the detector. In this case, the Many’s equation could be not appro-priated to fit the experimental data. This phenomenon, in very high resistivity material detector, is mainly due to the non-ideal contact quality. Recent studies (in particular the measurement of internal field through the Pockels-effect and the measures of local spectroscopy performed at the ESRF institute of Greno-ble) have shown the presence, in some of our detector, of a non-uniform electric

1Its physical dimensions are a velocity.

*field that drops to zero with a linear slope that intercepts the x-axis in x = x**n*,
*starting from the negative electrode (x = 0). Moreover the Many’s model, *
al-though is widely used in literature to fit the photocurrent data with good results
[40, 53], it makes large approximations and the bigger one is that, in a steady
state, the rate of trapped charge must be equal to the detrapping rate, so we
cannot neglect the detrapping phenomena. For these reasons lately we have
began to calculate some modified model to describe the new situations and fit
the new data. The calculation are still in progress and this model is not still
used to fit experimental data, so, for the sake of shortness, we describe only the
fundamental idea of this work. The starting point is described by Franc and
Kubat et al. in [11, 12]. Franc, Kubat et al. have developed a more accurate
model for photocurrent description based on the steady state Boltzmann
equa-tion and the Hall-Shockley-Read model for recombinaequa-tion taking into account
also the diffusion effects. The general solution has not an analytical finite form
and it needs numerical methods.

We are developing a simplified model as a starting from the one-dimensional Boltzmann equation and ignoring the diffusion contribution. In the steady state the rate of trapping and detrapping processes must be equal, so we get a sim-plified Boltzmann equation given by

*0 = G(x) − R(x) + D∂*^{2}*n**c*

*∂x*^{2} *+ k**c**µ**c**∂n**c**E*

*∂x* (3.18)

*where µ**c* *is a positive constant and k**c* is the carrier sign (+1 for the hole-case
*and −1 for the electron-case). If we neglect the diffusion current (that may *
be-comes important only with high polarized detectors), supposing strong absorbed
*radiation and a recombination rate R(x) negligible (because we are *
*consider-ing a semi-insulatconsider-ing material), the quantity G(x) − R(x) can be considered*
*as a boundary condition; indeed it is zero anywhere except for x = 0. In this*
condition the Boltzmann equation is further simplified and begins:

*µ**c**∂n**c**E*

*∂x* = 0 (3.19)

This equation states the continuity of the current through the material.

Now the third Maxwell’s equation, for a one-dimensional system can be write as:

*∂E*

*∂x* = *ρ*

*²* (3.20)

*Where ² is the dielectric constant of the material and ρ the charge density that*
in first approximation (if we suppose no polarization due to the contacts or
initial spatial charge) is given by the sum of drifting charge and trapped charge
*kq(n + n**t*)

*ρ = kq(n + n**t**) = Kqn*
µ

1 + *τ**d*

*τ**t*

¶

(3.21)

In this approximation it is possible to solve the system constituted by the
Boltz-mann and the Maxwell equations to obtain the stationary field profile and the
stationary carrier density. Besides when the internal field is dominated from
other factors (for example polarization due to the contacts), if we know the
field profile, supposing to not perturb too much the system, we can use the field
profile to calculate the photocurrent profile on varying the bias. This is mainly
*true in the X and γ-ray spectroscopy because of the much lower photon flux.*

For this reason in this case we must use the non stationary Boltzmann equation (as well as in the case of the pulsed photocurrent[43]). These results have not yet a final form, in some case we have found an approximated formula, in some other we have not yet reach the result: work are in progress.