• Non ci sono risultati.

Diffraction line profiles from polydisperse crystalline systems. Corrigenda

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Diffraction line profiles from polydisperse crystalline systems. Corrigenda"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

electronic reprint

ISSN: 2053-2733

journals.iucr.org/a

Diffraction line profiles from polydisperse crystalline systems.

Corrigenda

Paolo Scardi

Acta Cryst.

(2021). A77, 232

IUCr Journals

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY JOURNALS ONLINE

Copyright c International Union of Crystallography

Author(s) of this article may load this reprint on their own web site or institutional repository provided that this cover page is retained. Republication of this article or its storage in electronic databases other than as specified above is not permitted without prior permission in writing from the IUCr.

For further information seehttps://journals.iucr.org/services/authorrights.html

(2)

232

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273321002813 Acta Cryst. (2021). A77, 232

addenda and errata

Diffraction line profiles from polydisperse

crystalline systems. Corrigenda

Paolo Scardi*

Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 via Mesiano 77, Trento, Italy. *Correspondence e-mail: Paolo.Scardi@unitn.it

Equation (16) and some entries in Table 1 in the article by Scardi & Leoni [(2001), Acta Cryst. A57, 604–613] are corrected.

The variable  in equation (16) of Scardi & Leoni (2001) is missing a superscript to indicate that this term should be squared. The correct expression is

Ml;n¼ exp½n þ ðn2=2Þ2: ð16Þ As mentioned previously in Leonardi et al. (2012), there are also some errors in the common volume function (CVF) of the octahedron in Table 1 of Scardi & Leoni (2001). The same errors are found in Stokes & Wilson (1942). The coefficients for the case A B + C should read

H0¼ 1; H1¼  3ðA þ B þ CÞ=81=2; H2¼  3 A2þ ðB  CÞ 2 2AðB þ CÞ   =4; H3¼ A3þ B3þ C3 3ABC=21=2; KcðhklÞ ¼ ðA þ B þ CÞ=21=2: References

Leonardi, A., Leoni, M., Siboni, S. & Scardi, P. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 1162–1172.

Scardi, P. & Leoni, M. (2001). Acta Cryst. A57, 604–613.

Stokes, A. R. & Wilson, A. J. C. (1942). Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 38, 313–322.

ISSN 2053-2733

Received 12 March 2021 Accepted 12 March 2021

Keywords:line profile analysis; LPA; whole powder pattern modelling; WPPM; crystalline domain size; corrigenda

# 2021 International Union of Crystallography

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

[9] Druet, O., Hebey, E., and Vaugon, M., Pohozaev type obstructions and solutions of bounded energy for quasilinear elliptic equations with critical Sobolev growth - The

The research question is: how is the concept of conditionality, as a means to achieve greater tenants’ responsibilisation, shaping recent approaches towards the allocation

By correlating local lattice tilts with the obtained crystal A symmetric reflection is typically used for the determinashape in three-dimensional slices, the distribution of

In the near-threshold operating range, where the body bias technique is more effective, RBB provides up to 10x reduction of leakage power, while FBB provides an increase of

We show that the celebrated robustness property of the linear regulator, namely the “internal model principle” stated by Francis, Wonham and Davison in the 70’s, can be generalized

The latter consisted of a Public Good Game (PGG), in which roughly half the subjects participated, and a Trust Game (TG) in which the remaining participated; the goal of these

In Table I , we can see the number oflogical lines of source code for the LARA strategies, as well as for the input code and generated output code (the SLoC-L columns).. In the last

Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional