H
H
YPERTENSION
YPERTENSION
I
I
N
N
T
T
HE
HE
I
I
NPATIENT
NPATIENT
S
S
ETTING
ETTING
Mechanisms and Pharmacologic Management
Dedicated to the memory of
L
EON
I
.
G
OLDBERG,
MD
,
P
H
D
A pioneer in the research of dopamine
receptor pharmacology and physiology
Learning Objectives
Outline the prevalence, pathology, and pathophysiology of hypertension in the inpatient setting.
Identify treatment goals and treatment options for the severely hypertensive patient.
Discuss the pharmacologic profile and potential benefits of fenoldopam in the treatment of hypertension.
Situations Requiring Inpatient
Antihypertensive Treatment
Preexisting Hypertension • Primary / Essential • Secondary No Preexisting Hypertension • Acute Crisis • Perioperative• At least 45% of hospitalized patients have preexisting hypertension
• About 25% of surgical patients have preexisting hypertension
• Hypertensive patients frequently have coexisting cardiac and vascular disease
Goldman L, et al. N Engl J Med 1977;297:845-850
• EM • MICU • SICU • OR • PACU • Obstetrics Suite
Parenteral Treatment of Hypertension
May be Required in ...
• Uncontrolled or Malignant Hypertension • Drug-Induced Hypertension – cocaine, amphetamines – drug withdrawal – drug-drug interactions • Endocrine Disorders
Parenteral Treatment of Hypertension
Parenteral Treatment of Hypertension May Be
Required During/After Perioperative Period
• Cardiac Surgery
• Major Vascular Surgery
– carotid endarterectomy – aortic surgery
• Neurosurgery
• Head and Neck Surgery • Renal Transplantation
Factors in the Development of
Acute Hypertension
PACU PACU Pain Anxiety Distended Bladder Hypervolemia Vasoconstriction ER/CC ER/CC Myocardial Ischemia Hypercarbia/ Hypoxemia Reduced organ perfusion -Renal -Cerebral OR OR Vascular clamping (afterload) Hyperdynamic Myocardium Malignant Hyperthermia Diastolic DysfunctionAdverse Consequences of
Uncontrolled Hypertension
• Postsurgical – Hemorrhage
– Suture line disruption – Aortic dissection
• End Organ Injury – Myocardial ischemia – Stroke
– Renal failure
Adrenergic Tone Baroreceptor Reflexes Volume/Pressure Renin/Angiotensin Preload Cardiac Output
Blood Pressure
Catecholamines Adrenal Gland CNS Veins Arteries Capacitance ResistanceSympathetic Nervous System Regulation of Blood Pressure
Heart Kidney
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Regulation of Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure
Kidney Vasoconstriction Angiotensin I Renin Substrate Angiotensin II ReninSodium & Water Reabsorption
Aldosterone
Preoperative Hypertension
“Effective intraoperative management may be more important than preoperative hypertensive control in terms of decreasing clinically
significant blood pressure lability and
cardiovascular complications in patients who have mild to moderate hypertension.”
Therapy
– Treat the underlying cause
– Provide adequate anesthesia/analgesia – Administer antihypertensive medications
Inpatient Hypertension:
Therapeutic Considerations
50 million adults have high blood pressure 25% are unaware of this condition
72.6% are not well controlled at goal of <140/90 Majority have additional CV risk factors
Hypertension in the United States
Classification of Blood Pressure*
Hypertensive+
Stage 1 140-159 Or 90-99
Stage 2 160-179 Or 100-109
Stage3** 180 Or 110
*When SBP and DBP fall into different categories, use higher classification. +Based on average of at least two readings or at least two visits.
**Assess for presence of risk factors and target organ disease.
Uncomplicated Stage 3 HTN Hypertensive Crises
urgencies
emergencies
Classification of Severe Hypertension
Hypertension with
Progressive target organ damage
Hypertensive Urgencies:
Severe HTN with acute end organ damage:
Central nervous system
Myocardial ischemia or heart failure Renal damage
Active hemorrhage Eclampsia
Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia Aortic dissection
Hypertensive Emergencies:
Defined by Effects
Hypertensive Emergencies Are More Than
Blood Pressure Measurement
Kincaid-Smith P. Aust N Z J Med 1981;11(Suppl 1):64-68
• Hypertensive emergencies generally occur with DBP 140 mm Hg, but can be much lower
• Baseline level of hypertension and rate of rise are also important
• There is much overlap between groups and categories, i.e., cannot be defined by BP alone
Hypertensive Emergencies:
Common Etiologies
• Medication noncompliance / withdrawal
• Accelerated hypertension in a patient with preexisting hypertension
• Renovascular hypertension • Acute glomerulonephritis
Sympathomimetic drug poisonings Eclampsia
Pheochromocytoma
MAO inhibitor interactions
Hypertensive Emergencies:
Other Etiologies
Hypertensive Emergencies
Initiate treatment immediately Hypertensive Urgencies
Reduce BP within a few hours
Non-urgent Stage 3 Hypertension Reduce BP within one week
Treatment Guidelines*
Multiple confirmations of BP, including all four extremities
Assess target organ involvement Frequent monitoring of vital signs Initiate treatment immediately
Use titratable therapy (parenteral)
Hypertensive Emergencies:
Initial Approach
Endpoints of Antihypertensive
Therapy
Reduce MAP by 20-25% or Reduce MAP to 110-120 mmHg (whichever is higher)Achieve target BP within 2-4 hours
Reduce MAP by 20-25%
or
Reduce MAP to 110-120 mmHg
(whichever is higher)
Hypertensive Emergencies:
Control the BP for Patients with . . .
• Aortic dissection
• Active arterial hemorrhage
• Acute myocardial infarction • Intracranial hemorrhage
IV Therapeutics
• Alpha Blockers • ACE Inhibitors • Beta Blockers
• Calcium Channel Blockers • Diuretics
• Dopamine-1 Agonists • Ganglionic Blockers • Nitrovasodilators
Common Vasodilators
Intravenous Agents for Hypertensive Emergencies
Agent
Agent Onset Duration Disadvantages
Cyanide, Thiocyanate 1-2 min 3-5 min 5-10 min 3-8 hrs 1-4 hrs 6 hr Immediate 2-5 min <5 min 10-20 min 5-15 min 15-30 min Nitroprusside Nitroglycerin Fenoldopam Hydralazine Nicardipine Enalaprilat Advantages Tolerance, Variable Efficacy Increased IOP Tachycardia, Headache Avoid in CHF or Cardiac Ischemia Avoid in MI Potent, Titratable Coronary Perfusion Renal Perfusion Eclampsia CNS Protection CHF, Acute LV Failure
Adrenergic Antagonists
Intravenous Agents for Hypertensive Emergencies
Agent
Agent Onset Duration Disadvantages
Beta Blocker Effects Heart Block, Acute CHF 3-6 hrs 3-10 min 10-20 min 5-10 min 1-2 min 2 min Labetalol Phentolamine Esmolol
Modified from the 6th Joint National Commission Reports, NIH, 1997
Advantages Tachycardia Beta Blocker Effects Heart Block, Acute CHF Combines Beta Blockade With Vasodilation Catecholamine Excess Aortic Dissection, Perioperative
Parenteral administration
Rapid onset and offset (minutes) Easy titratability
Reliable efficacy
Safe across patient populations Ease of use
Cost effectiveness
Acute Hypertensive Situations
Ideal Therapeutic Agent
Sodium Nitroprusside Profile
Advantages
• Immediate onset
• Short duration of action • Potent
Limitations
• Light sensitive
• Arterial catheter usually recommended • ICU-level care usually required
Sodium Nitroprusside Adverse Effects
•Excessive Hypotension
•Tachyphylaxis (hyperdynamic response) •Redistribution of Flow
• Intrapulmonary Shunt • Coronary Steal
• Reduced Renal Blood Flow
•Platelet Dysfunction •Toxicity
• Cyanide
• Thiocyanate
•Excessive Hypotension
•Tachyphylaxis (hyperdynamic response) •Redistribution of Flow
• Intrapulmonary Shunt • Coronary Steal
• Reduced Renal Blood Flow
•Platelet Dysfunction •Toxicity
• Cyanide
Metabolism of Sodium Nitroprusside
Tinker JH, Michenfelder JD. Anesthesiology 1976;45:340-354
Thiocyanate (SCN-) Thiosulfate Renal Excretion Cytochrome Oxidases Inactive Cytochromes
CN
-TOXICITY Hepatic Rhodanase Nitroprusside Nitroprusside Radical Oxyhemoglobin Methemoglobin Non-enzymatic Cyanmethemoglobin2
Na+ NO+ CN -CN -Fe++ CN -CN -CN-44% of fractional weight is cyanide
4 of the 5 CN ions are promptly released
Signs Of Cyanide Toxicity
• Increased mixed venous saturation • Increased metabolic acidosis
• Loss of consciousness and abnormal breathing patterns
Additional Costs Often Associated With
Nitroprusside Infusions
• Arterial blood gas measurements • Lactate concentrations
• Cyanide / thiocyanate monitoring • Invasive blood pressure monitoring
Nitroglycerin
• Coronary vasodilator
• Direct venodilator (variable arterial effects) • Requires special tubing for administration • Side effects: headaches and tachycardia • Variable efficacy and tachyphylaxis
Esmolol: Characteristics
• Easy to titrate
• Short t½ (8 min.)
1 selective antagonist
• Quick onset of action
• Metabolized by red blood cell esterases • Myocardial depression
Labetalol: Characteristics
• Combined alpha-beta blocker • Half-life 4-6 hours
• Dose response is variable • Blunts reflex tachycardia • Myocardial depression
Provides non-oral route for NPO patients
Requires breaking capsule, sublingual administration Absorption variable
- Abrupt hypotension may occur
- May exacerbate myocardial ischemia
Nicardipine: Characteristics
• Dihydropyridine
• Water soluble and light stable (allows for IV infusion) • Slow onset and offset
• Arterial catheter not mandatory • May accumulate
Dopamine and Fenoldopam
HO HO DOPAMINE NH · CH3SO3H OH HO HO Cl FENOLDOPAM MESYLATE NH2Receptor Profiles of Dopamine and Fenoldopam
Similarities– Both drugs agonize peripheral DA1 receptors
• Blood pressure reduction (vasodilation)
• Increased renal blood flow and Na excretion • Maintenance of or increase in GFR
Differences
– Dopamine also agonizes DA2 receptors
• Blood pressure reduction (if high, norepinephrine) • Decreased renal blood flow and Na excretion
• Decreased GFR
– Dopamine also agonizes B1 and alpha1 receptors
• Blood pressure elevation (vasoconstriction) • Chronotropy
Dopamine Receptor Agonists
Dopamine Fenoldopam DA1 (vasodilation) +++ +++ DA2 (vasodilation, emesis +++ - inhibits prolactin) (vasoconstriction) ++ -1 (inotropic, chronotropic) +++ - 2 (vasodilation) +-Actions of Dopaminergic Agonists
+++ = Major action ++ = Moderate action + = Minimal action - = No action
Peripheral Dopamine Receptor Subtypes
DA
DA11 DADA22
Location
Location
• Postsynaptic smooth Postsynaptic smooth
muscle
muscle
• Proximal tubuleProximal tubule
• Cortical collecting ductCortical collecting duct
• Presynaptic Presynaptic
• GlomerulusGlomerulus
• Renal nervesRenal nerves
• Adrenal cortexAdrenal cortex
Secondary
Secondary
Messenger
Messenger G-protein linked increased adenylate cyclaseG-protein linked increased adenylate cyclase Inhibition of adenylate cyclase decreased NE releaseInhibition of adenylate cyclase decreased NE release
Systemic
Systemic
Effects
Effects Peripheral vasodilationPeripheral vasodilation Peripheral vasodilationPeripheral vasodilation
Renal Effects* Renal Effects* • Increased RBFIncreased RBF • Increased GFR or no Increased GFR or no change change
• Natriuresis Natriuresis (inhibition of NA/K (inhibition of NA/K ATPase via protein kinase C and
ATPase via protein kinase C and
NA/H exchanger via adenyl
NA/H exchanger via adenyl
cyclase)
cyclase)
• DiuresisDiuresis
• Decreased RBFDecreased RBF
• Decreased GFRDecreased GFR
• Decreased Na and HDecreased Na and H220 0 excretion
excretion
• Decreased aldosteroneDecreased aldosterone
Dopamine: Lack of Pharmacological
Specificity
• BP effects variable, dose-dependent
1: increased heart rate, tachyarrhythmias
1: vasoconstriction
• Minute ventilation decreases
Physiologic Effects Fenoldopam
Systemic Vasodilation Does not cross BBB • Coronary Vasodilation without “steal” (in animals) • Reflex tachycardia • Metabolized by conjugation • No P450 interaction • RBF • Na excretion • H2O excretion • Maintains GFR during BP lowering • Mesenteric vasodilation • Mucosal PO2 (in animals)Dopamine Receptor Affinities
Fenoldopam Receptor Activity
• Selective peripheral dopamine-1 (DA1) receptor agonism
– Systemic vasodilation
– Regional vasodilation (especially renal) – Renal proximal and distal tubular effects
• No binding to DA2 or beta-adrenergic receptors
• No alpha-adrenergic agonism, but is an alpha1 antagonist
Mechanism of Action of Fenoldopam
Fenoldopam infusionSelective stimulation of D1-dopamine receptors Adenylyl cyclase activation
Increase in intracellular concentration of cAMP Vascular smooth muscle relaxation
Vasodilation of renal arteries Vasodilation of coronary arteries Vasodilation of mesenteric arteries Vasodilation of systemic arteries Maintenance of blood flow
to vital organs Decrease in systemic vascular resistance Decrease in blood pressure Direct increase in sodium excretion
Fenoldopam Metabolism:
Conjugation Without Cytochrome P450 Interaction
NH OH Cl HO CH O3 NH OH Cl HO 3 CH O NH OH Cl HO HO NH OH Cl HO O SO3 2 NH OH Cl HO O SO3 2 NH OH Cl HO O OH OH HO COOH O Fenoldopam-8-O-Methyl Fenoldopam-7-O-Methyl Fenoldopam-8-Sulfate Fenoldopam-7-Sulfate (1R),(1S)Fenoldopam-7-O-B-Glucuronide
Fenoldopam Metabolism
• Metabolism via conjugation
• Metabolites pharmacologically inactive • No cytochrome P450 interactions
• No known metabolic drug interactions • 88% albumin bound
• Elimination: 90% urine, 10% feces
• No dose adjustment for renal or hepatic impairment
Pharmacokinetics
Time (hr) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 10 20 30 40 Onset P la sm a F en o ld o p am ( n g /m l) 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Dose 0.00 g/kg/min Dose 0.04 g/kg/min Dose 0.1 g/kg/min Dose 0.4 g/kg/min Dose 0.8 g/kg/min Offset 0 10 20 30 40 Time (hr)Time (Minutes) Time (Minutes) M ea n D ia st o li c B lo o d P re ss u re ( m m H g ) + S ta n d ar d E rr o r M ea n D ia st o lic B lo o d P re ss u re ( m m H g ) + S ta n d ar d E rr o r 65 65 70 70 75 75 80 80 85 85 90 90 95 95 10 10 2020 3030 4040 5050 6060
Fenoldopam Time of Onset Of Antihypertensive Effect
Fenoldopam Time of Onset Of Antihypertensive Effect
Time (hr) Time (hr) P la sm a F en ol d op am ( n g/ m l) P la sm a F en ol d op am ( n g/ m l) 0 0 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 0 0 66 1212 1818 2424 3030 3636 4242 4848 5454 6060 6666 7272 Dose 0.00 g/kg/min Dose 0.00 g/kg/min Dose 0.04 g/kg/min Dose 0.04 g/kg/min Dose 0.1 g/kg/min Dose 0.1 g/kg/min Dose 0.4 g/kg/min Dose 0.4 g/kg/min Dose 0.8 g/kg/min Dose 0.8 g/kg/min
Dose-Dependent Pharmacokinetics
Dose-Dependent Pharmacokinetics
t1/2 = 5 min t1/2 = 5 min Vd = 42 L Vd = 42 L t½ (~ 5 min)
Small volume of distribution
Rapid attainment of steady state (~ 30 min) Plasma concentrations proportional to dose No alteration in pharmacokinetics over 48 hr
infusion
Rapid elimination upon discontinuation
Predictable hemodynamic effect Rapid onset of effect
Predictable dose response for lowering BP No rebound hypertension
Rapid, predictable, dose-dependent blood pressure decrease (without overshoot)
Short t½, rapid attainment of steady state titration Linear pharmacokinetics
No cytochrome P450 interactions
Dose-response curves well defined
No dosing adjustment for pre-existing renal or hepatic impairment
Increases renal blood flow and maintains GFR Ease of use
Overall efficacy
Comparison of Fenoldopam and Nitroprusside:
Summary of Randomized Clinical Trials in Patients with Acute Severe Hypertension
Bednarczyk et al. Am J Cardiol 1989
Reisin et al.
Hypertension 1990 Panacek et al.
Acad Emerg Med 1995 Pilmer et al.
J Clin Pharmacol 1993
White et al.
Nieren Hoch 1991
Reference n Mean dosage
g/kg/min Pre Post BP (mmHg) 17 16 75 78 15 18 9 9 6 5 FND 0.6 SNP 2.0 FND 0.41 SNP 1.67 FND 0.5 SNP 1.2 FND 0.1-1.5 SNP 0.5-3.5 FND 0.32 SNP 0.93 197/135 196/129 212/135 210/133 217/145 210/136 200/137 194/132 194/128 209/129 159/105 160/101 179/106 171/104 187/112 172/103 160/105 150/102 150/101 169/103 FNDSNP FNDSNP FNDSNP FNDSNP FNDSNP
Prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial
183 patients enrolled with balanced demographics (153 completed)
FND efficacy equal to SNP Similar adverse event profile
Randomized Prospective Trial
Fenoldopam vs. Sodium Nitroprusside in
Treatment of Acute Severe Hypertension
70 90 110 100 150 200 250
Baseline Start 0.5 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 End
Comparative Effects of Fenoldopam and Nitroprusside on BP and HR During 6 Hour Infusion
B lo o d P re ss u re ( m m H g)
Maintenance Time (Hours)
H e a rt R a te ( b p m ) = p < 0.05; FNP vs SNP Nitroprusside Fenoldopam * * *
Nitroprusside
Comparative Effects of Fenoldopam and Nitroprusside on BP and HR after 12 Hours of Infusion
Panacek EA, et al. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:959-965 9 229 ± 8 148 ± 6 94 ± 5 -54 ± 10 -45 ± 5 -7 ± 5 Fenoldopam 8 225 ± 10 134 ± 2 86 ± 4 -45 ± 10 -32 ± 6 -6 ± 4 Baseline (± SEM) Change (± SEM) n SBP DBP HR SBP DBP HR Regimen
Hypertensive Emergency Trial
Ellis D, et al. Crit Care Med 1998;26(Suppl):A23 (abstract)
Study Design
• Determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters
• Patients with end organ damage and DBP 120 mmHg • Double-blind, constant infusion, 4 rates
– 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 g/kg/min
• 24-hour infusion, transition to PO after 18 hours • No target BP specified
• Reduction in DBP at 4 hours primary endpoint • Statistical comparison vs. 0.01 dose group
Efficacy Endpoint
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 1 2 3 4 100 110 120 130 140 Infusion Time (Hr) P 0.01 µg/kg/min; comparator E 0.03 µg/kg/min; p = 0.06* G 0.1 µg/kg/min; p = 0.018* H 0.3 µg/kg/min; p = 0.0001*Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
* Paired t-test v ersus lowest dose group
N=94 N=89
Rx Fail AE Ex Ex AE
4 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 1 2 3 4 170 180 190 200 210 220 Infusion Time (Hr) P 0.01 µg/kg/min; comparator E 0.03 µg/kg/min; p = NS* G 0.1 µg/kg/min; p = NS* H 0.3 µg/kg/min; p = 0.0004* Mean Systolic Blood Pressure* Paired t-test v ersus lowest dose group
N=94 N=89
4 Hour Heart Rate
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H 0 1 2 3 4 70 80 90 100 110 120 Infusion Time (Hr) P 0.01 µg/kg/min; comparator E 0.03 µg/kg/min; p = NS* G 0.1 µg/kg/min; p = NS* H 0.3 µg/kg/min; p = 0.005*Mean Heart Rate
* Paired t-test v ersus lowest dose group
Objective End Organ Damage
Malignant Hypertension TrialHematuria CHF Papilledema Myocardial Ischemia Renal Insufficiency Retinal Encephalopathy 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Number of Patients (Confusion, TIA) (III-IV, hemorrhage) (Cr >2.4) (ECG, chest pain)
(Pulmonary) (edema, CXR, rales)
No evidence of rebound effects Rapid disappearance of drug Administration before or after discontinuation of infusion
Wide variety of drugs used
Generally successful transfer to oral drugs
Safety in Postoperative Hypertension Studies
Summary of SKF Studies: Overview
Number Patients 17 (23.5%) 126 (18.2%) 28 (10.7%)
(% female) (pilot 8, large study 20)
Mean Age (yrs) F 51.0 yrs F 62.8 ± 8 years F 58.6 yrs
Plc 47.4 yrs Nif 60 ± 9 yrs SNP 61.6 yrs
Design Randomized Randomized Randomized
Double-blind Single-blind Single-blind
Placebo-controlled Positive-control (Nifedipine i.v.) Positive-control (Nitroprusside)
Entry Criteria Surgery with 24 hours CABG within 24 hours Surgery with 24 hours SBP 20% preop baseline MAP 105 mmHg for 5 minutes SBP >130 mmHg requiring
IV therapy Baseline BP 121 (SBP) F 114.1 ± 9.1 (MAP) F 143 ± 3/81 ± 2.8 F (mmHg) 125 (SBP) P 114.2 ± 8.5 (MAP) Nifed 148 ± 2.9/82 ± 2.6 SNP Goldberg, et al. (General Surgery) Mathur, et al. (CABG) Hill, et al. (Cardiovascular)
A Comparative Trial of Fenoldopam and
Nifedipine in Postoperative Hypertension
• Prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter controlled trial
• Patient Population
– 126 postsurgical CABG patients – MAP >105 mmHg for >5 minutes – Adequate sedation / analgesia • Design
– Single-blind, drug randomization, dose titration • Dosing (up to 24 hours)
– IV fenoldopam: 0.1 - 1.6 g/kg/min – IV nifedipine: 0.6 - 1.25 mg/hr
Nifedipine (n=63) Fenoldopam (n=59) 118 112 106 100 94 88 82 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 120 240 360 post 60 post 180 post 360 end infusion * * * * * * * p < 0.0001, fenoldopam vs. nifedipine
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
Time (min) M ea n A rt er ia l B lo od P re ss ur e (m m H g) Mathur, et al.
. time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 % o f p at ie n ts w it h n o r es p o n se 10 20 30 40 50 60 fenoldopam , n=59 nifedipine, n=63 p=0.0001, fenoldopam vs. nifedipine
Time to Blood Pressure Response
(MAP
(MAP << 90 mmHg or first MAP decrease by 90 mmHg or first MAP decrease by >> 15 mmHg) 15 mmHg)
Pulmonary Vascular Hemodynamics
• Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
decreased significantly
during fenoldopam but not during nifedipine treatment. • Pulmonary artery
pressures (PAP) did not change significantly during therapy with either drug.
120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 0 m in 1 5 m in 3 0 m in 6 0 m in 1 2 0 m in P V R ( d yn e s .s e c .c m -5 ) fenoldopam nifedipine * * * p < 0.05 * Mathur, et al.
. POST 360 POST 180 240 120 60 30 15 14 12 10 8 6 4 CO RAP PCWP fen nif fen nif nif fen time (minutes) P u lm o n ar y c ap ill ar y w ed g e p re ss u re , P C W P ( m m H g ) R ig h t at ri al p re ss u re , R A P ( m m H g ) C ar d ia c O u tp u t, C O ( L /m in ) 0 end infusion nif = nifedipine fen = fenoldopam * *p<0.02
Filling Pressures and Cardiac Output
Heart Rate
nifedipine fenoldopam 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 110 100 90 80 70 60 Time (min) p = NS, fenoldopam vs. nifedipine H e a rt R a te ( b p m ) Mathur, et al.RBF During General Anesthesia With
Induced Hypotension
Aronson S, et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1991;5:29-32
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Isoflurane Anesthesia (1 MAC)
% c h an g e fr om b as el in e FND SNP
(Results of Dog Studies)
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Halothane Anestheia (1 MAC)
% c h an g e fr om b as el in e FND SNP MAP 50-60 MAP 50-60
Aronson S, et al. Can J Anesth 1990;37(3):380-384
RBF During General Anesthesia RBF During Induced Hypotension
1. 1. 2.2. R en al B lo od F lo w R en al B lo od F lo w R en al B lo od F lo w R en al B lo od F lo w
Germann R, et al. Crit Care Med 1995;23:1560-1566
Figure 1: Values expressed as mean + SEM. Fenoldopam (solid squares), Placebo (open squares). P values for differences compared with placebo for mucosal pO2, <0.001; for mucosal HgB saturation, <0.001. #p<0.05, compared with baseline value.
Gut Mucosal Oxygenation
(in vivo pig study)
Placebo Fenoldopam 80 60 40 0 S cr os al P O2 ( to rr ) 40 30 20 0 M uc os al P O2 ( to rr ) 80 60 40 0 M uc os al H bo 2 ( % ) 0.0 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 9.6 Dose (g/min/kg) 0.0 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 9.6 Dose (g/min/kg) 0.0 0.6 1.2 2.4 4.8 9.6 Dose (g/min/kg)
0 0 20 20 40 40 60 60 80 80 100 100 120 120 140 140 -10 -10
Urinary Flow Rate
Urinary Flow Rate Sodium ExcretionSodium Excretion Creatinine ClearanceCreatinine Clearance
Fenoldopam
Fenoldopam NitroprussideNitroprusside
C ha ng e fr om B as el in e (% ) C ha ng e fr om B as el in e (% )
Bar graphs of relative effects of infusion of either fenoldopam or nitroprusside on renal
parameters, measured for each patients percent change from baseline (before infusion), and then averaged.
Bar graphs of relative effects of infusion of either fenoldopam or nitroprusside on renal
parameters, measured for each patients percent change from baseline (before infusion), and then averaged.
Comparison of Renal Effects in Severe Hypertension
Comparison of Renal Effects in Severe Hypertension
Fenoldopam: Renal Function in Hypertensives
Murphy MB, et al. Circulation 1987;76:1312-1318
Results 25 20 15 10 5 0
Baseline Experimental Recovery
30 90 150 210 270 V ( m L/ m in ) 0 30 90 150 210 270 U N a V ( E q/ m in ) 125 250 375 500 625 750 Placebo Fenoldopam
Urine volume (UV) and
urinary sodium (UNaV)
before, during and after infusion
Fenoldopam: Renal Function in Hypertensives
Murphy MB, et al. Circulation 1987;76:1312-1318
Results 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 B E R FND Placebo PAH 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 B E R IN C C m l/m in m l/m in B=baseline E=experimental data
R=values after termination of fenoldopam or dextrose
B=baseline
E=experimental data
R=values after termination of fenoldopam or dextrose
Reversal of Hemodynamic Effects of
Cyclosporine
In CsA-treated renal transplant patients • Renal plasma increased significantly
• FeNa in urine volume tended to increase
• GFR and free water clearance were unchanged • BP fell (mean of 18/6 mmHg)
• No change in CsA levels while on fenoldopam
The Multicenter PEEP Study
In respiratory failure patients on PEEP and pressors treated with fenoldopam
Schuster HP, et al. Intensivmedizin 1991;28:348-355
• CrCl increased significantly • Urine flow tended to increase
• Na and potassium excretion tended to increase • No significant change in blood pressure
• CrCl increased significantly • Urine flow tended to increase
• Na and potassium excretion tended to increase • No significant change in blood pressure
Efficacy: Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Shusterman NH, et al. Am J Med 1993;95:161-168
0 40 80 120
-20
Fenoldopam Sodium nitroprusside
C h an ge ( % ) 160 200 Creatinine
Fenoldopam: Renal Plasma Flow
Neurex: data on file
Dose Response of RBF in normotensives
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Baseline 0.03 0.1 0.3 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 * * *
Infusion Dose (mcg/kg/min)
F en o ld o p am C o n ce n tr at io n ( n g /m L ) R en al P la sm a F lo w ( m L /m in /1 .7 3m 2) Fenoldopam Placebo
Trials Using IV Fenoldopam
Disease State Disease State Number of Studies Number of Studies Hypertensive emergency 1 94 Severe hypertension 10 348 Mild-to-moderate hypertension 7 127 Postoperative hypertension 3 89 CHF 6 167 Renal failure 4 75 Hepatic disease 4 48 Transplant 2 21 Other 3 40 Total patients 1,009 Healthy subjects 258 Total Experience 1,267 Hypertensive emergency 1 94 Severe hypertension 10 348 Mild-to-moderate hypertension 7 127 Postoperative hypertension 3 89 CHF 6 167 Renal failure 4 75 Hepatic disease 4 48 Transplant 2 21 Other 3 40 Total patients 1,009 Healthy subjects 258 Total Experience 1,267 Number of Patients/Subjects Number of Patients/SubjectsFenoldopam: Indication
In-hospital, short-term (up to 48 hours)
management of severe hypertension when rapid, but quickly reversible, emergency
reduction of blood pressure is clinically
indicated, including malignant hypertension with deteriorating end organ function.
Transition to oral therapy with another agent can begin at any time after blood pressure is stable during fenoldopam infusion.
Fenoldopam: Contraindications
Fenoldopam: Warnings
Contains sodium metabisulfate, a sulfite that may cause allergic-type reactions, including anaphylactic symptoms and life-threatening or less severe asthmatic episodes, in certain
susceptible people.
Overall prevalence of sulfite sensitivity in
general population is unknown but probably low. Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in
Fenolodopam: Precautions
• Intraocular pressure that changes within diurnal variation • Tachycardia
• Hypotension • Hypokalemia
• Pregnancy category B • Nursing mothers
• Data suggests no carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, or impairment of fertility
• Safety and effectiveness in children has not been established
Fenoldopam: Precautions
• No formal interaction studies; intravenous fenoldopam has been administered safely with drugs such as digitalis and sublingual nitroglycerin.
• Limited experience with concomitant antihypertensive agents: beta blockers, alpha blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, and diuretics (both thiazide-like and loop).
• Use of beta-blockers in conjunction with fenoldopam not
studied in hypertensive patients: concomitant use should be avoided.
• Caution should be exercised: unexpected hypotension could result from beta-blocker inhibition of reflex response to
Adverse Events*
Adverse Events*
Event Event Nitroprusside (n=119) Nitroprusside (n=119) Fenoldopam (n=117) Fenoldopam (n=117) Hypotension/Decreased BP 10 15 Flushing 10 9 ECG abnormal 2 0 Nausea/vomiting 20 18 Headache 18 19 Dizziness 4 5 Hypokalemia (<3.0) 8 5*Neurex: data on file
Hypotension/Decreased BP 10 15 Flushing 10 9 ECG abnormal 2 0 Nausea/vomiting 20 18 Headache 18 19 Dizziness 4 5 Hypokalemia (<3.0) 8 5
Adverse Events*
Adverse Events*
Clinical Events (N = 1,009) Clinical Events (N = 1,009) Patients No. (%) Patients No. (%) Headache 116 (11) Flushing 53 (5) Nausea 52 (5) Hypotension 48 (5)Decreased serum potassium 36 (4)
ECG abnormalities 29 (3) Tachycardia 29 (3) Vomiting 29 (3) Dizziness 27 (3) Extrasystoles 23 (2) Dyspnea 16 (2) Headache 116 (11) Flushing 53 (5) Nausea 52 (5) Hypotension 48 (5)
Decreased serum potassium 36 (4)
ECG abnormalities 29 (3) Tachycardia 29 (3) Vomiting 29 (3) Dizziness 27 (3) Extrasystoles 23 (2) Dyspnea 16 (2)
Summary of All IV Studies
Summary of All IV Studies
Fenoldopam: Preparation
• Ampules MUST BE DILUTED before infusion • Diluted in:
– 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP – 5% Dextrose Injection USP
mL of Concentrate (mg of drug) Added to Final Concentration
4 mL (40 mg) 1000 mL 40 g/mL
2 mL (20 mg) 500 mL 40 g/mL
Fenoldopam: Dosage and Administration
Dosing Recommendations
• Usual starting dose = 0.1 g/kg/min
– Rapid titratable blood pressure control – Minimal increase in heart rate
• Higher starting dose recommended
– For more rapid onset of blood pressure control – For greater magnitude of effect
Fenoldopam: Dosage and Administration
• Fenoldopam should be administered by continuous intravenous infusion
• A bolus dose should not be used
• Initial dose should be titrated upward or downward, no more frequently than every 15 minutes
• Recommended increments for titration are 0.05 to 0.1 g/kg/min
• Use of infusion pump or syringe pump recommended
• Intraarterial hemodynamic monitoring at discretion of treating physician
Table 1. Causes of Acute Renal Failure
• Acute tubular necrosis – Ischemic
– Nephrotoxic
• Renal vascular injury
• Preexisting renal insufficiency • Systemic disease with renal
involvement
• Acute interstitial nephritis • Acute glomerulonephritis
Table 2. High-Risk Procedures and Events
• Cardiac surgery • Vascular surgery
• Biliary tract and hepatic surgery • Urogenital surgery
• Complicated obstetrics • Major trauma
Incidence of Acute Renal Failure:
Perioperative Risk Factors Requiring Dialysis
Chertow GM, et al. Circulation 1997;95:878-884
CR CL <60 Prior Heart Surgery IABP Valve NYHA IV NYHA IV PVD NYHA IV Valve Cardiomegaly 6.1% 2.1% 2.1% 0.9% Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No 0.4% 1.3% 2.8% 9.5% 5.0% 2.3% 1.1%
Considerations in Patient Selection for
Fenoldopam
• When maintenance of renal function (GFR) and increase in RBF is desired
• Patients at high risk for renal ischemia
• Patients with pre-existing hepatic or renal impairment • When increased urine flow and natriuresis/diuresis is
desired
• Patients on cyclosporine
Considerations when Choosing
IV Therapies
• Cost of drug
• Cost of intensive care setting (ICU vs. floor) • Cost of monitoring (A-line vs. cuff)
• Cost of medical personnel
• Cost of monitoring for side effects (lactate levels) • Cost of treating side effects (colloid/crystalloid for
The Cost of Renal Failure
Mangano CM, et al, Ann Intern Med 1998;(3):194-203
Variable
Variable Length of Stay in Critical Length of Stay in Critical Length of Stay in Hospital Length of Stay in Hospital Care Unit
Care Unit Ward Ward
Unadjusted Adjusted for Unadjusted Unadjusted Adjusted for Unadjusted Adjusted for Adjusted for
PreoperativePreoperative Preoperative Preoperative
FactorsFactors Factors Factors All patients All patients 1. No renal dysfunction 1. No renal dysfunction 2.02.0 3.13.1 5.95.9 7.57.5 2. Renal dysfunction 2. Renal dysfunction 4.84.8 6.56.5 10.010.0 11.711.7 3. Renal failure 3. Renal failure 11.611.6 14.914.9 12.412.4 13.913.9 days days