• Non ci sono risultati.

Where we are in training of residents: results from a standardized evaluation approach

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Where we are in training of residents: results from a standardized evaluation approach"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

letters to tHe eDitor

916 Minerva anestesiologica august 2016

10. cattano D, sridhar s, cai c, Mullaly a, Kainer l, spar-kle t, et al. assessing risk of obstructive sleep apnea by stoP-Bang questionnaire in an adult surgical popula-tion screened in the preoperative anesthesia clinic. Min-erva anestesiol 2016;82:605-6.

11. Hiremath as, Hillman Dr, James al, noffsinger WJ, Platt PR, Singer SL. Relationship between difficult tracheal intubation and obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J anaesth 1998;80:606-11.

Conflicts of interest.—The authors certify that there is no conflict

of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Article first published online: April 13, 2016. - Manuscript ac-cepted: april 12, 2016. - Manuscript received: March 21, 2016. (Cite this article as: Dette Fg, graf J, cassel W, lloyd-Jones c, Boehm s, Zoremba M, et al. Low specificity needs to be considered when stoP-Bang or Mallampati score are used to identify patients at risk for sleep apnea. Minerva anestesiol 2016;82:915-6)

© 2016 eDiZioni Minerva MeDica online version at http://www.minervamedica.it Minerva anestesiol 2016;82(8):916-7

Where we are in training residents:

results from a standardized

evaluation approach

Dear editor,

the european Diploma in anaesthesiology and inten-sive care (eDaic) is a multilingual, end-of-training, two-part examination covering the relevant basic sci-ences and clinical subjects appropriate for a specialist anaesthesiologist. it has been created by the european society of anaesthesiology (esa) in 1984 to achieve a uniformly high standard of knowledge throughout eu-rope as judged by an independent Board of examiners.1

it is endorsed by the european Board of anaesthesiol-ogy (eBa) of the european Union of Medical speci-alities (UeMs) 2 and his achievement is mandatory to

work as anaesthesiologists in a number of european country.

on-line assessment (ola), has been introduced by esa in 2011 to help anaesthesiologists to identify areas where their knowledge needs improving and up-dating in preparation of eDaic.

on april 17, 2014 ten italian residency training schools involved their resident in anesthesia and inten-sive care to participate to the ola proposed by esa.

one hundred twenty-six candidates attended obtain-ing an overall mean score of 61% for section a (Basic sciences) and 68% for section B (clinical Practice). these results were almost in line with the ones obtained tions associated with osa and patients with no risk.

More recently, stoP-Bang has been used to identify patients with osa in pre-anesthesia consultation, and we are concerned that the use of this score for this kind of screening may result in missing patients at risk and in unnecessary over-monitoring of patients with-out osa.

Frank g. Dette

1

*, Juergen graF

2, 3

,

Werner cassel

3

, carla lloYD-Jones

2

,

stefan BoeHM

4

, Martin ZoreMBa

2

,

Patrick scHraMM

1

, gunther Pestel

1

,

serge c. tHal

1

1Department of anesthesiology, University Medical center of the Johannes gutenberg University, Mainz, germany; 2Department of anesthesiology and intensive care, Philipps University, Marburg, germany; 3Klinikum stuttgart, stuttgart, germany; 4Department of internal Medicine - Pneumology, Philipps University, Marburg, germany *corresponding author: Frank Dette, Department of anesthe-siology, University Medical center of the Johannes gutenberg University, langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, germany. e-mail: Frank.Dette@web.de

References

1. sparkle t, sridhar s, corso rM, castriotta r, court-ney s, Mullaly a, et al. screening for sleep apnea in the perioperative setting: looking for the right compromise. Minerva anestesiol 2016;82:914-5.

2. Dette Fg, graf J, cassel W, lloyd-Jones c, Boehm s, Zoremba M, et al. combination of stoP-Bang score with the Mallampati score fails to improve specificity in the prediction of sleep-disordered breathing. Minerva anestesiol 2016;82:625-34.

3. american academy of sleep Medicine. international Classification of Sleep Disorders. Third edition. Darien, il: american academy of sleep Medicine; 2014. 4. arzt M, Young t, Finn l, skatrud JB, Bradley tD.

asso-ciation of sleep-disordered breathing and the occurrence of stroke. am J respir crit care Med 2005;172:1447-51. 5. Hwang D, shakir n, limann B, sison c, Kalra s, shul-man l, souza ade c, greenberg H. association of sleep-disordered breathing with postoperative complications. chest 2008;133:1128-34.

6. Mokhlesi B, Hovda MD, vekhter B, arora vM, chung F, Meltzer Do. sleep-disordered breathing and postop-erative outcomes after elective surgery: analysis of the nationwide inpatient sample. chest 2013;144:903-14. 7. Sateia MJ. International classification of sleep

disor-ders-third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest 2014;146:1387-94.

8. Berry rB, gamaldo ce, Harding sM, Brooks r, lloyd rM, vaughn Bv, et al. aasM scoring Manual version 2.2 Updates: new chapters for scoring infant sleep staging and Home sleep apnea testing. J clin sleep Med 2015;11:1253-4.

9. chung F, liao P, elsaid H, islam s, shapiro cM, sun Y. oxygen desaturation index from nocturnal oxime-try: a sensitive and specific tool to detect sleep-dis-ordered breathing in surgical patients. anesth analg 2012;114:993-1000.

COPYRIGHT

©

2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

This document is protected b

y inter national cop yr ight la ws .

No additional reproduction is author

iz ed. It is per mitted f or persona l use to do wnload and sa v

e only one file and pr

int only one cop

y of this Ar ticle . It is not per mitted to mak e additional copies (either spor adically or systematically , either pr

inted or electronic) of the Ar

ticle f or an y pur pose . It is not per mitted to dis tr ib

ute the electronic cop

y of the ar

ticle through online inter

net and/or intr

anet file shar

ing systems , electronic mailing or an y other means which ma y allo w access to the Ar ticle .

The use of all or an

y par

t of the Ar

ticle f

or an

y Commercial Use is not per

mitted.

The creation of der

iv

ativ

e w

or

ks from the Ar

ticle is not per

mitted.

The production of repr

ints f

or personal or commercial use is

not per mitted. It is not per mitted to remo v e , co v er , o v er la y, obscure , b loc k, or change an y cop yr

ight notices or ter

ms of use wh

ich the Pub

lisher ma y post on the Ar ticle . It is not per mitted to fr ame or use fr

aming techniques to enclose an

y tr ademar k, logo , or other propr ietar y inf or

mation of the Pub

lisher

(2)

letters to tHe eDitor

vol. 82 - no. 8 Minerva anestesiologica 917

1Dipartimento di anestesia e terapia intensiva, a.o.U. città della salute e della scienza, turin, italy; 2Dipartimento di scienze chirurgiche, Università degli studi di torino, turin, italy; 3Dipartimento di scienze Mediche, orali e Biotecnologie, Università g.D’annunzio, chieti-Pescara, italy *corresponding author: luca Brazzi, Dipartimento di anestesia e terapia intensiva, a.o.U. città della salute e della scienza, corso Dogliotti 14, 10126 turin, italy.

e-mail: luca.brazzi@unito.it

References

1. european society of anaesthesiology (esa). european Diploma in anaesthesiology and intensive care (eDa-ic) [internet]. available from https://www.esahq.org/ education/edaic/; 2014 [cited 2016, Feb 16].

2. european Board of anaesthesiology of the european Un-ion of Medical specialities (eBa UeMs). UeMs anaes-thesiology section and Board [internet]. available from http://www.eba-uems.eu/; 2015 [cited 2016, Feb 16].

Conflicts of interest.—The authors certify that there is no conflict

of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Article first published online: March 18, 2016. - Manuscript ac-cepted: March 16, 2016. - Manuscript revised: March 1, 2016. - Manuscript received: november 20, 2015.

Group name.—Members of the ola for italy team and

co-authors of the present paper: Massimo antonelli (rome, italy), Marinella astuto (catania, italy), Michele Dambrosio (Foggia, italy), Mario Dauri (rome, italy), Francesco giunta (Pisa, ita-ly), Franco Marinangeli (l’aquila, itaita-ly), Paolo Pelosi (genoa, italy), Marco ranieri (rome, italy).

(Cite this article as: Brazzi l, Petrini F, Filippini c, sales g. Where we are in training of residents: results from a standard-ized evaluation approach. Minerva anestesiol 2016;82:916-7) by the international cohort composed by 588 candidates

coming form 58 centres located in 20 different coun-tries which obtained an overall mean score of 65 % for section a and 70% for section B.

But some differences come out if we take into ac-count the level of seniority of the candidates (<2 years; 2-4 years; >4 years). While in the international cohort no change in the results obtained by the tree levels of sen-iority was observed either in section a (67%, 64% and 65%, respectively) or in section B (70%, 70% and 70%, respectively), a progressive reduction in the section a results (64%, 61% and 60%, respectively) and a progres-sive increase in the section B results (67%, 68% and 69%, respectively) was observed in the italian cohort.

a more detailed analysis of the results obtained by the italian cohort in the different areas of competency composing the exam is reported in table i.

as shown, it seems that the higher the seniority of the candidates, the lower the competency in Basic sci-ence areas (i.e. physics, pharmacology, physiology) and the higher the competency in clinical Practice areas (i.e. emergency medicine, general and regional anesthesia).

although this observation is still preliminary and the sample size is still insufficient to provide statisti-cally significant evidence, we believe it is, as of now, important to think back the training programs of the italian residency training schools to avoid that the basic competencies acquired during the Master Degree course, and apparently still present in the early years of attendance, are likely to be lost with the progress of clinical training.

luca BraZZi

1, 2

*, Flavia Petrini

3

,

claudia FiliPPini

2

, gabriele sales

2

Table I.—Scores obtained by candidates in Paper A (basic sciences) and Paper B (clinical practice) and in the

dif-ferent areas constituting the exam.

competency area (N.=126)total

Mean±sD (%) stage of training P value <2 years (N.=13) Mean± sD (%) 2-4 years (N.=65) Mean± sD (%) >4 years (N.=48) Mean± sD (%) Paper a total 61±8 64±7 61±9 60±6 0.40 Paper B total 68±5 67±4 68±6 69±5 0.51 cardiorespiratory physiology 62±11 65±6 64±12 60±10 0.07 general pharmacology 63±10 65±10 64±11 62±8 0.31 general physics 59±13 64±8 60±15 59±12 0.45 general physiology 63±11 65±13 64±13 61±8 0.41 intensive care 65±8 65±9 66±10 65±6 0.83 internal medicine 72±8 74±9 73±7 71±8 0.38

local regional anesthesia 75±10 72±10 74±10 76±11 0.40

emergency medicine 68±10 64±11 67±11 71±9 0.05

general anesthesia 67±7 65±3 67±7 68±8 0.34

cardiovascular pharmacology 65±14 69±12 62±16 68±12 0.06

central nervous system pharmacology 63±13 67±8 62±14 64±11 0.23

clinical measurement 57±9 60±12 55±10 59±7 0.07

neurophysiology 63±13 61±12 66±14 59±12 0.03

special anesthesia and pain 68±7 67±5 67±8 68±6 0.64

statistics 48±22 49±18 51±21 45±23 0.32

COPYRIGHT

©

2016 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

This document is protected b

y inter national cop yr ight la ws .

No additional reproduction is author

iz ed. It is per mitted f or persona l use to do wnload and sa v

e only one file and pr

int only one cop

y of this Ar ticle . It is not per mitted to mak e additional copies (either spor adically or systematically , either pr

inted or electronic) of the Ar

ticle f or an y pur pose . It is not per mitted to dis tr ib

ute the electronic cop

y of the ar

ticle through online inter

net and/or intr

anet file shar

ing systems , electronic mailing or an y other means which ma y allo w access to the Ar ticle .

The use of all or an

y par

t of the Ar

ticle f

or an

y Commercial Use is not per

mitted.

The creation of der

iv

ativ

e w

or

ks from the Ar

ticle is not per

mitted.

The production of repr

ints f

or personal or commercial use is

not per mitted. It is not per mitted to remo v e , co v er , o v er la y, obscure , b loc k, or change an y cop yr

ight notices or ter

ms of use wh

ich the Pub

lisher ma y post on the Ar ticle . It is not per mitted to fr ame or use fr

aming techniques to enclose an

y tr ademar k, logo , or other propr ietar y inf or

mation of the Pub

lisher

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The features used for the attack and the defense model is only obtained by RSS channel model that use A+S, because the defense models that used RSS channel model with A+S+F are

• Dijkstra’s algorithm for the global navigation, that is used for compute the path from the current position and the local goal.. The local goal is selected using a greedy

• Length of segment between 15 and 60 seconds, normally used 30-second intervals As last point, we observe the power spectrum of the neural signals in these segments and we

It is recent news that the “New Guidelines for internal architectures in schools” (Italian Ministerial Decree April 11 th 2013) have been approved, whose inspiration is drawn from

(2013) predicts the trajectories of floating particles subjected to a uniform water flow in proximity of emerging stems, the computation assumes Re values lower than 48. The

Development of local approaches for fatigue life prediction of Austempered Ductile Iron-to-Steel dissimilar joints 6.16 S-N curve of full-penetration ground butt-joints

In this work, 316L stainless steel samples made with additive manufactur- ing powder bed fusion technology, have been characterized; focus has been given to laser power and to

Schuster [13] considered the problem of estimating the conditional regression function of [7] and established the joint asymptotic normality of the conditional regression