• Non ci sono risultati.

How Do We Assess China’s Foreign and Security Policy?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "How Do We Assess China’s Foreign and Security Policy?"

Copied!
15
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

S

(2)
(3)

Re s e a rc h In s tit u te f o r P e a c e a n d S e c u rit y ( R IP S ) is a n in d e p e n d e n t r e se a rc h in stit u tio n e sta b lis h e d in T o ky o in O cto b e r 1 9 7 8 . T h e R IP S c o n d u cts re se a rc h o n is su e s o f nat ional and int er nat ional peac e and sec ur ity , publ is hes res ear ch repor ts , and pr opos es pol ic y r ec o mme n d a tio n s. Th e in sti tu te p u b lis h e s a n a n n u a l r e p o rt, Aj ia n o a n ze n h o sh o (A sia n S e cu ri ty ), w h ic h su rv e ys th e ch a n g in g se cu rit y e n vir o n m e n t o f th e A si a -Pa cif ic re g io n . W e ll r e g a rd e d b y b o th th e a ca d e m ic a n d th e se cu rity co m m u n iti e s, th e in sti tu te a ls o o rg ani zes sem inar s for sp e ci a list s a n d th e p u b lic o n n a tio n a l, r e g io n a l, a n d in te rn a tio n a l se cu rit y a n d sp o n so rs jo in t re se a rc h p ro je cts w ith in sti tu te s i n o th e r co u n tri e s. In a d d iti o n to its re se a rc h a cti viti e s, th e in sti tu te , to g e th e r w ith th e J a p a n F o u n d at ion' s Ce n te r fo r G lo b a l P a rtn e rs h ip , o ffe rs fe llo ws h ip s to yo u n g sc h o la rs wi sh in g to p u rs u e se cu rit y st u d ie s. M a n y o f th e se r e ci p ie n ts h a ve si n ce b e co m e v a lu a b le co n trib u to rs to se cu rit y st u d ie s in Ja p a n . The RI P S P o lic y P e rs p e c tiv e s is in te n d e d to p ro vid e tim e ly a lte rn a tiv e s to a n d anal ys es of ex is ting peac e and sec ur ity pol ic ies , t her eby c ont ribut ing to fur ther debat e. T he vi e w s o f t h e a u th o rs a re th e ir o w n a n d d o n o t r e p re se n t t h e o ffic ia l p o sit io n o f t h e R IP S . Re se a rc h In sti tu te fo r P e a ce a n d S e cu rity Me is a n T a me ik e Bu ild in g 8 F 1 -1 -12 A kas ak a, M inat o -ku , T o ky o 1 0 7 -0052, J apan Te l: 8 1 -3 -3560 -3288 F ax :81 -3 -3560 -3289 E -ma il: rip s-in fo @ rip s.o r.jp URL : h ttp :// www. rip s.o r.jp © Re se a rc h In sti tu te fo r P e a ce a n d S e cu rity 2 0 1 7 Al l ri g h ts re se rv e d . No p a rt o f t h is b o o kle t m a y b e re p rin te d o r r e p ro d u ce d wi th o u t p e rm is sio n in wr itin g fr o m th e p u b lis h e r.

(4)
(5)

RI

PS

Po

lic

y Pe

rsp

ect

ive

s N

o. 2

5

Re

stl

ess

Ri

va

ls:

Tr

um

p,

C

hi

na

and

the

im

pl

icat

ions

for

Japan

and

Eas

t A

sia

Ger

m

an

In

stitu

te f

or I

nter

natio

nal an

d S

ec

ur

ity

A

ffair

s

(S

tif

tu

ng

Wis

sen

sch

af

t u

nd

P

olitik

: S

WP

)

K

on

rad

A

den

au

er

F

ou

nd

atio

n

(K

on

rad

-A

den

au

er

S

tif

tu

ng

: K

A

S)

an

d

R

es

ear

ch

In

stitu

te f

or P

eac

e an

d S

ec

ur

ity

(R

IP

S)

Ma y 2 01 7

(6)
(7)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5

(8)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5

Ta

ble

o

f C

on

ten

ts

FO R EW O R D ... ... ... ... ... 1 1. T ru m p’s C hin a Po lic y: I m pli cat io ns o f an “A m er ica Fir st” Po lic y f or E as t A sia ... 1 Bo nni e G las er 2. H ow d o w e A ss es s C hin a’ s F or ei gn an d S ec ur ity P oli cy ? – A Ja pa ne se Vi ew ... 8 Hi de sh i T ok uc hi 3. H ow D o W e A ss es s C hin a’ s F or ei gn an d S ec ur ity P oli cy ? ... ... 13 Gi ov an i B . An do rn in o 4. C hin a’ s M ar iti m e Sec ur ity P oli cy : T ren ds in E ar ly 2017 ... ... 18 Ma th ieu D uc hâ tel 5. E as t A sia: T er rit or ial Is su es A nd R eg io nal S ec ur ity D ev el op m en ts: T he V iew F ro m Ja pa n’s A lli an ce P art ne r, W ith A F oc us O n T he S en ka ku Is la nd s D isp ute ... 22 Ro be rt D . E ld rid ge , P h.D . 6. T he K or ean P en in su la: F oc us o f T en sio ns ... ... ... 28 Ma sa sh i N ish ih ara ... ... ... ... ... 33

(9)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5

(10)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5 - 13 -

3.

Ho

w

D

o

W

e

A

sse

ss

C

hin

a’s

For

eig

n

and

Sec

ur

ity

Pol

icy?

Gi ov an i B . A nd or nin o Ch in a’s fo re ig n a nd se cu rit y p oli cy is p rim ari ly a fu nc tio n o f it s d om es tic p oli tic s, w ho se po lar s tar is the pr es erv ati on of the c ur re nt po liti ca l-in stit utio na l se tu p of th e C hin es e Pa rty -St at e. Th e C hin es e lead ers hip e xp lic itly ar tic ulat es th is pos tu re w he n re fer ring to Ch in a’s “ co re in ter es ts” , a s m os t r ec en tly d on e b y S ta te Co un cill or Y an g J iec hi du rin g h is me eti ng w ith P re sid en t D on ald T ru mp o n F eb ru ary 27 , 2 01 7. Su ch in ter es ts, hie ra rch ica lly or de re d, all ow for a pr og re ssi ve ly le ss com pr om isin g n eg ot iat in g s tan ce on p ar t o f B ei jin g th e fu rth er on e m ov es to th e to p o f th e th re e-it em lis t: 3 ) th e c on tin ue d s ta ble d ev elo pm en t of C hin a’s e con om y an d soc iet y; 2) na tion al sove re ig nty a nd te rri tor ial in teg rit y; an d 1) pr es erv ing C hi na ’s b as ic s tat e s ys tem and na tio na l s ec ur ity. Wh ile th e C hin es e C om m un ist P art y as su m es th at th e sta bil ity o f i ts po liti ca l r eg im e na tur all y equa tes w ith C hi na ’s s upr em e na tio na l int ere st, suc h pr em ise do es put C hi na o n a dif fer en t lev el v is-à-vi s m os t gl oba l p laye rs, de ter m ini ng a de gr ee o f he ter og ene ity in the in ter na tio na l s ys tem th at ap pe ars to b e d ee pe nin g in co nju nc tio n w ith C hin a’s re em erg en ce an d th e fray in g of th e es tab lis hed li ber al w or ld o rd er . C al ls fo r ad ju stm en ts to g lo bal go ve rna nc e ent ail ing ne w ap pr oa che s to so ve re ignt y - em br ac in g ob lig at io ns an d re sp on si bil itie s, as w ell as pre ro ga tiv es an d ri gh ts - fa ce C hin a’s in tr in sic all y i dio sy nc ra tic po stur e i n the re alm o f hi gh po liti cs. It thus se em s a ppr opr iat e t o a sse ss C hi na ’s fo re ig n an d sec ur ity p oli cy lo ok in g at tw o i nt erna l dyna m ics sha pi ng Be ijing’ s be ha vi our o n the gl oba l s ta ge : the ro le o f the le ad er and the evo lvi ng na tio na l id ent ity und erp inni ng C hi na ’s wo rld vie w.

Xi J

in

pin

g as

a “p

rim

us

in

ter

in

fer

io

res

"

The sa lie nc e o f a na tio na l le ade r’s input in fo re ig n po lic y de fini tio n and im ple m ent ati on is g en era lly h ard to a sse ss, e xc ep t in re tro sp ec t, an d be co m es e sp ec ia lly im pe rv io us to an al ys is w hen d ec isio n-ma kin g pr oc es se s are a s op aq ue a s th ey a re in C hin a. A lso , a le ad er’s im pa ct is m os t o bv io us d ur in g m ajo r c ris es , wh ich h av e no t r ea lly ta ke n pla ce dur ing X i Ji npi ng ’s f irs t te rm in off ice (2 01 2-2017) . Xi Ji np in g’s le ad ers hip , ho w ev er, d oe s se em to le nd it se lf to s om e co ns eq ue nti al ob se rva tion s. For on e th in g, it m ay b e arg ue d th at, d es pit e th e ab se nc e of im m ed iat e fo re ig n p oli cy em erg en cie s, th e c ur re nt in te rn ati on al e nv iro nm en t in an d o f its elf is l oo kin g in cre as in gly w or ris om e f ro m B eij in g’s st an dp oin t. M ark ed b y a d is tu rb in g le ve l o f p ow er

(11)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5 - 14 - di ffus io n (inc ludi ng po tent ial ly di srupt iv e i ndi vidua l e m po w erm ent ) a nd un pr ec ede nt ed unc ert aint y o ve r t he shi fting po stur e o f the U S a nd Eur ope - th e k ey a nc ho rs of th e o rd er wh ich h as a llo we d C hin a to d ev elo p ov er th e pa st fo ur d ec ad es - gl oba l po liti cs is be co m ing m or e a nd m or e c om ple x p re cis ely at a t im e w he n C hi na ’s lea de rshi p ne eds to so ft-la nd it s o ve r-in ve ste d e co no m y in to a “ ne w n or m al” eq uilib riu m . Wh ile B eiji ng ’s as se ssm en t of th e sta te of th e w or ld h as n ot ye t ch an ge d in it s fu nd am en ta l co m po ne nts - “i nter nat io nal m ult ip olar isat io n, th e glo bal isat io n of th e ec on om y an d the de m oc ra tis ati on of int erna tio na l r ela tio ns ” r em ain the de fini ng tr ends - cl ea rly th e m ed iu m -te rm te nd en cie s be in g ob se rv ed re qu ire a b re ak w ith th e pr ud en t co nd uct o f t he re ce nt pa st . In th is co nte xt, o n F eb ru ary 1 7 X i Ji np in g h as use d h is ro le as ch ai rm an o f th e St at e Sec ur ity C om m iss io n t o i nd icat e fo r t he fir st tim e th at C hin a sh ou ld “g uid e” th e sh ap in g a “n ew w or ld o rd er ” an d “s af eg uar d i nter nat io nal sec ur ity ”. Se con dly , th e e vol uti on of X i’s ow n p ol itic al -in stit utio na l p hy sio gn om y o ffe rs in sig hts as to th e tr an sfo rm ati on o f to p po lic y-ma kin g in to da y’s C hin a, a d yn ami c t ha t is lik ely to be co m e m or e e vi de nt a fte r t he X IX C ongr ess o f t he C C P in au tu m n, w he n the o ngo ing pe rso nne l r es huf fle w ill re ac h its cl im ax w ith the re ne w ed m em be rshi p of the Po litb ur o an d i ts St an din g C om m ittee, lik el y af fo rd in g X i ev en g rat er p oli tic al leew ay . T he ou tco m e of th is c rit ica l tr an sit ion w ill se t th e s ta ge for th e n ext h alf -de ca de o f g ov ernm ent ac tio n in Ch in a, w hic h m an y d ee m to b e t he tim efr am e w ith in w hic h Ch in a h as to ei th er ro bu st ly re fo rm it s gro w th m od el, or fa ce a m ore ra dic al an d po ten tia lly d iso rd erl y ad ju st m en t do w n the ro ad. G re ate r c ohe siv ene ss in the “c oll ec tiv e w isdo m ” o f the inc om ing le ade rshi p an d i ts w ill (an d c ap ac ity ) to see su bs tan tial im plem en tat ion of th e b ol d d ec ision s ou tlin ed in th e 3 rd Pl ena ry Se ssi on in N ov em be r 2 01 3 w ill funda m ent all y i nf lue nc e C hi na ’s do m es tic st ab ilit y a nd h en ce its pro pe nsi ty to w alk th e w alk o f a m ore “ in cl usi ve g lo ba lisa tio n” (a s op pos ed to - sa y sl id in g t ow ard p op uli st re va nch ism ). Cl ea rly , X i’s h yp erb oli c e nh an ce m en t o f h is ow n p os itio n o nc e a pp oin ted at th e a pe x o f po liti ca l po w er in C hi na co nf irm s t he re m ark ab le ins titut io na l fl ex ib ilit y o f the Pa rty -St at e, wh ich h as b ee n s tre tch ed to th e p oin t wh ere th e r ole o f G ene ra l S ec re tar y of the Pa rty and Pr es ide nt o f the Pe opl e’s R epub lic - fo rm erl y a p rim us in te r p are s in th e P oli tb ur o S ta nd in g Co m m itte e ha s m or phe d int o a co ndi tio n of pr im us int er inf eri or es . W ith the as sum pt io n of th e C ha irm an sh ip of th e C en tra l M ilit ary C om m issi on s at th e v ery o nse t o f h is first te rm in o ffic e, X i up en de d th e p re vio us p ra ctic e, se ttin g th e s ta ge fo r h is u np re ce de nte d an d ve ry pu bl ic p roc lam ati on as “C om m and er-in -ch ief o f th e C M C Jo in t O pe ra tio ns C en ter ” i n Ap ril 20 16 . W hil e X i’s d ete rm in atio n t o c on ce ntr ate p ow er in h is h an ds h as cle arly m et a de gr ee o f re sis tanc e - as s ug ges ted b y th e lac k of pr og res s in th e im plem en tat io n of ec on om ic ref or m s, bu t al so b y th e en du rin g an d hig hly d isc ret io nar y an ti-co rru pti on ca m pa ig n, ub iq uit ou s ca lls fo r un qu es tio nin g lo ya lty to th e Pa rty , an d in cre as in gly

(12)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5 - 15 - pa ra no id m ea sur es o f s oc ial co nt ro l - hi s a ut ho rit y w as fur the r e nha nc ed by the de cis io n of th e C C P C en tr al C om m itte e to ele va te h im to “c or e” o f th e fi fth g en era tio n o f le ad ers , a ti tle th at ha d e lu de d hi s pr ede ce sso r H u Jint ao . C oupl ed w ith hi s he adi ng se ve ra l k ey Le adi ng Sm al l G rou ps of th e C C P C en tral C om m itte e, su ch d ev elop m en t has le d in flu en tial sch ola rs to re fer to h im as th e “ Im pe ri al P re si de nt” . Xi ’s a uth or ity is an yth in g b ut titu lar , e sp ec ial ly in th e fo rei gn an d s ec ur ity p oli cy real m s. No t o nly h as h e de lib era tel y ch os en to c as t h im se lf as a tr an sfo rm ati ve le ad er (wi th a pe rv as iv e m edi a pr es enc e e cho ing w ha t ha s b ee n de scr ib ed as a supr em ely se lfc onf ide nd pe rso na lity ): he ha s ac tiv ely s oug ht ow ne rsh ip o f all m ajo r fo re ig n po lic y do ssi ers , in clu din g s om e p re vio us ly h an dle d b y t he P R C P re m ie r (n ota bly E ur op e a nd th e W es t A sia , No rth ern A fric a re gio n). F ro m a sy m bo lic -no rm ati ve pe rspe cti ve , X i ha s qui ckl y br oke n wi th h is pr ed ec es so r’s d efi nin g tifa (o ffi cia l d isc ou rse ) by a dv an cin g his o w n ke yw or ds , ch ief ly th e “ C hin a d re am ” o f th e “ re ju ve na tio n o f th e C hin ese n ati on ”. I t is no tew or th y t ha t th e fi rst in sta nc e o f P arty -St at e t ifa gai nin g e nou gh sy m bol ic-no rm ati ve tr ac tio n as to sha pe th e glo ba l d is co ur se to ok p la ce u nd er X i’s te nu re , a nd p re cis ely in th e fo re ig n po lic y do m ain: the N ew S ilk R oa d pr oje ct - th en re na m ed “O ne B elt O ne R oa d” an d fi na lly “B elt an d R oad In itiat iv e” (B R I) is v ery m uc h X i Jin pin g’s sig na tu re fo re ig n p olic y p ro po sit io n, and w hi le no t qui te a gr and str ate gy in its elf , it sur ely is a t es t c as e o f C hi na ’s suc ce ss in br ea ki ng W est ern he ge m ony in the p ro du cti on of gl oba lly inf lu ent ial sym bo lic ca pit al.

C

hin

a’

s ev

olv

in

g n

atio

nal id

en

tity

an

d wo

rld

view

Be side s ho ldi ng the m ono po ly o ve r p olit ic al po w er, th e C C P j ea lo us ly p re se rv es it s r ole as th e so le au th or ity p er m itted to m ou ld C hin a’ s o ffic ial id en tity an d w or ld view . O ver th e pa st fiv e ye ars the Pa rty ’s cul tur al he ge m ony ha s be en m ark edl y re inf or ce d: in the bu re au cra tic sp he re , ve ter an lea de r L iu Y uns ha n ha s c om m and ed ove r a tight ly int egr ate d sy st em co m bin in g ort ho do xy -de fini ng ins titut io ns (C ent ra l Pa rty S cho ols ), pr opa ga nda ch an ne ls (tr ad itio na l m ed ia at ho m e an d ab ro ad , w ith a sp eci al eff or t m ad e to ta rg et ove rse as C hin es e), an d t oo ls t o r ep res s v iew s c on tes tin g t he St at e-sa nct io ne d n arra tiv e. Op era tio na lly , n ot ev en th e m os t p re sti gio us u niv ers itie s a nd re se arc h i ns titu tio ns h av e be en sp are d f ro m the fo rce d na rro w ing of the sp ec tru m o f id ea s t ha t m ay legi tim ate ly be de ba ted in p ub lic . S om e a na ly se s r ela te th is tig hte nin g id eo lo gic al gr ip to th e a m bit io us re ba lan cin g C hin a ne ed s to im ple m en t in th e co m in g ye ars. Th is lin e of th ou gh t, po pul ari se d in the 19 80 s a s ne o-au th or itar ian ism , p os its th at th e str uc tu ral ref or m s n eed ed to fu lly m od ern ise C hin a r eq uir e a ro bu st ce ntr al au th or ity to re du ce th e tr an sa cti on co sts of m ajor ad ju stm en t. Ho we ve r, wh ile ef fic ien t in su pp re ssi ng p oli tic al pa rtic ip ati on , th is ap pr oa ch h as so fa r be en les s tha n su cc ess fu l in cu rbi ng the m os t im m ed iat e thr ea t to e co no m ic re fo rm s,

(13)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5 - 16 - na m ely ve ste d int ere sts c onc ent ra ted in the Pa rty -St at e ap par at us . Bar rin g sig nif ica nt di sco nt inui ty af ter the X IX C ong re ss, it w oul d appe ar tha t the o ffic ial ide nt ity b eing cr aft ed fo r C hin a a s it he ad s fo r th e tw o c en te nn ial s (2 02 1 a nd 20 49 ) is o ne co m bin in g L en in ism in th e po liti ca l sp he re , a te ch no lo gic al clo se d so cie ty m oll ifi ed b y sa nit ize d co nfu ci an at trib utes , an d sem i-co nte nd ib le eco no m ic an d fin an ci al pla yin g f iel ds he av ily p op ula ted by Pa rty -co ntr oll ed n ati on al co rp or ate ch am pio ns. T his tra ject or y, ad vo ca ted b y m em be rs of X i J in pin g’s cl os es t e ntou ra ge su ch a s W an g H un in g, ha s se ve ra l im pli ca tio ns fo r th e fo re ig n a nd se cu rity p oli cy d om ain s. Fi rst ly, the inc re as ingl y fo ca l r ole o f the P art y, as re m arke d by X i d ur ing the 20 14 C ent ra l Co nfe re nc e o n W or k R ela tin g t o F or eig n A ffa irs , li es a t t he h ea rt of Ch in a’s q ue st fo r i ts ow n qu int es se nt ial ly C hi ne se - ve rsi on of m od erni ty. Fa r f rom be ing a p ur ely dom es tic go al, thi s pr oje ct re fle cts a n ove ra rchi ng fo re ign po lic y obj ec tive : C hi na ’s ins ist enc e on in clu siv en es s a nd es pe cia lly “ ha rm on y” (h e e r b uto ng ) in w or ld a ffa ir s e ffe ctiv ely im pli es th e e nd o f th e W este rn h eg em on ic pr ero ga tiv e to d efi ne th e c on to ur s o f th e “ in te rn ati on al co m m un ity ”, an d th e re co gn itio n th at alt ern ati ve so ci al, eco no m ic an d po liti ca l m od els ma y c oe xis ts w ith eq ua l le git ima cy . Se con dly , th e pr om ot ion of c on fo rm ism a nd a cti ve d isc ou ra ge m en t of sy st em ati c en gag em en t w ith fo rei gn id eas - es pec ial ly am on g C hin a’ s yo uth , al read y per vas iv el y so ci ali se d t o t he te ne ts of pa tri oti c ed uca tio n ma y i n t he lo ng ru n r es tric t th e s pe ctr um of po lic y o pt io ns fe d to the le ade rsh ip . W hil e X i Ji np in g h as re ce ntl y e xp re sse d h is visi on fo r “ag glo m er at in g tal en t in to res ear ch in sti tu tio ns ” an d “b reak in g in sti tu tio nal b ou nd ar ies ” to a llo w fo r a n e xc ha ng e o f ta len t be tw ee n th e p riv ate se cto r, th e g ov ern m en t, a nd th in k ta nk s, th e b en efi t of “re vo lv in g d oo rs” is ea sily o ffs et w he n s ch ola rs are in tim id ate d an d re se arc h g ra nts fo st er ge ne ra lise d sy co ph an cy . Thi rdl y, as g re ate r em pha sis is pl ac ed on the “ C hi ne se c ha ra cte ris tic s” o f C hi na ’s so ci ali st m ark et eco no m y - pa rtic ul arl y the r ole of n ati on al cor por ate c ha m pion s in sp ea rh ea din g glo ba l in ve st m en t, m ark et pe ne tra tio n, st ra teg ic asse ts acq uisi tio n, an d pr oduc tiv ity a cc ele ra tio n - a nu m ber o f pr ac tic al im pli cat io ns ar e lik el y to c hal len ge es tab lis hed p rac tic es an d ex ac er bat e dep ar tm en tal fra gm en ta tio n a cro ss th e P art y-St at e: a) th e g ro w in g s to ck o f C hin a’s o utb ou nd fo re ig n d ire ct in ve stm en t is o utp ac in g th e ca pa ci ty o f th e st ate an d P LA to p ro vid e n ece ssa ry p ro tect io n a nd su pe rv isi on to C hin ese ci tiz en s, p erso nn el a nd asse ts ov erse as; b) pub lic o pin io n in k ey co un trie s a pp ea rs t o r efle ct in cre as in g d iffid en ce to w ard s C hin a, es pec ial ly in E ur op e, w her e Bei jin g’s lac k o f r ec ip ro cit y i n s ev er al tr ad e an d i nv es tm en t do m ains is fr us tra ting g ov ernm ent s to o;

(14)

RI PS P olic y P ers pec tiv es N o. 2 5 - 17 - c) th e in ve stm en ts th at w ou ld g iv e s ub sta nc e to th e B elt an d R oa d In iti ati ve re qu ire lo ng -te rm sta bil ity an d c oo pe ra tio n w ith m yr iad in te rlo cu to rs i n v ery co m ple x r eg io ns o f As ia t o g en era te r etu rn s: u nlo ck in g t he p ote nti al o f E ur as ian co nn ec tiv ity is as m uc h a po liti ca l-di pl om ati c c onundr um as it is a fin an cial an d i nfr as tru ctu ral ch al len ge; d) en co ur ag in g ec on om ic d ep en den cy o n C hin a in v olat ile co un tries w her e Bei jin g i s re lu cta nt to g et t oo in vo lv ed p oli tic all y ( i.e . th e M id dle E ast an d N ort h A fri ca ) m ay n ot sh iel d i t fro m th e p ub lic ho st ilit y o f n atio na lis t o r r ad ic al m ov em en ts, w ith p ote ntia l sp illo ve r e ffe ct s in si de C hin a ( th e re st iv e re gio n o f X in jia ng b ein g a ca se in p oin t).

(15)

S

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

[22] randomized 40 patients with severe ARDS who met extracor- poreal membrane oxygention (ECMO) entry criteria to one of two groups: 19 patients were ventilated with

The development of interethnic conflicts in the former Soviet Union and the looming perspective of NATO enlargement definitely delegitimized the liberal internationalist

Jordi Quero and Andrea Dessì, “Unpredictability in US Foreign Policy and the Regional Order in the Middle East: Reacting vis-à-vis a Volatile External Security-

Fragmentation undermines the authority of central states, the EU’s most natural counterparts, and distributes it amongst a great number of actors – including

migration, trade and enlargement shed light on the role of different domestic actors – from populist parties to civil society organisations – in the process of internal

An analysis of EU foreign policy in the Western Balkans and the Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) illustrates how differentiated cooperation can be effective or ineffective

It is no coincidence that the EU Global Strategy, the document that first popularised the term strategic autonomy, insisted extensively on the imperative to foster

Norway has no formal agreement with the EU on external policy co-operation, but the informal political dialogue accompanying the biannual meetings of the European Economic