Review
–
Andrology
Sexually
Transmitted
Disease
and
Male
Infertility:
A
Systematic
Review
Mikkel
Fode
a,b,*
,
Ferdinando
Fusco
c,
Larry
Lipshultz
d,
Wolfgang
Weidner
eaDepartment of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark;bDepartment of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark;
cDepartmentofNeurosciences, HumanReproductionand Odontostomatology,Universityof Naples‘‘Federico II,’’Naples, Italy;dScottDepartment of
Urology,BaylorCollegeofMedicine,Houston,TX,USA;eDepartmentofUrology,PediatricUrologyandAndrology,JustusLiebigUniversityofGiessen,Giessen,
Germany a v ai l a b l e a t w w w . s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m j o u r n al h o m e p a g e : w w w . e u r o p e an u r o l o g y . c o m / e u f o c u s Articleinfo Articlehistory: AcceptedAugust4,2016 AssociateEditor: JamesCatto Keywords: Infertility
Sexuallytransmittedinfections
Abstract
Context: Theoretically, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have the potential to disruptmalefertility;however,thetopicremainscontroversial.
Objective: TodescribethepossibleassociationbetweenSTDsandmaleinfertilityandto explorepossiblepathophysiologicmechanisms.
Evidenceacquisition: Weperformedasystematicliteraturereviewinaccordancewith thePRISMAguidelines.PubMed,Embase,andtheCochraneLibraryweresearchedfor articlespublishedbeforeJanuary1,2016,usingtheMeSHtermsforavarietyofSTDsand infertility.Thesearchwasrestrictedtohumanstudiesperformedinmenandpublished inEnglish.Studieswereincludediftheycontainedoriginaldataonapossibleassociation or a cause-and-effect relationship between STD and male infertility. Studies were consideredonlyiftheyincludedanappropriatecontrolgroupand/orcomprehensive laboratory data. Due to heterogeneity in the literature, a qualitative analysis was performed.
Evidencesynthesis: RelevantstudiesonChlamydiatrachomatis,genitalmycoplasmas, Neisseriagonorrhoeae,Trichomonasvaginalis,andviralinfectionswereidentified.Forall pathogens,thestudieswerecontradictoryandgenerallyoflimitedquality.Instudies confirming an association, there was a tendency for authors to perform multiple analyseswithoutappropriatecorrectionsandtosubsequentlyfocussolelyonoutcomes thatseemedtosuggestapositiveassociation;however,thebodyofliteraturethatdoes not confirman associationbetween STDs andmale infertility is alsoof inadequate quality.Thedataregardingpossiblepathophysiologicmechanismsareinconclusive.
Conclusions: There may be an association between STDs and male infertility of unknown genesis and possibly with different pathogenic mechanisms for different pathogens.Alternatively,someSTDsmaycausemaleinfertility,whereasothersmay not;however,thereishardlyastrongcorrelation.High-qualitystudiesofthesubjectare needed.
Patient summary: Sexuallytransmitted diseasesmaycause maleinfertility through unknownmechanisms;however,fromtheavailableresearch,wecannotbesurethat thereisanassociation,andmorestudiesareneeded.
#2016EuropeanAssociationofUrology.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
* Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Sygehusvej
10,Dk-4000Roskilde,Denmark.Tel.+4526213800.
E-mail address:mikkelfode@gmail.com(M. Fode).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.08.002
1. Introduction
Infertilityisdefinedastheinabilityofacoupletoachieve pregnancydespiteunprotectedintercourseforaperiodof >12mo[1].Approximately15%ofallcouplesareinfertile, anditisestimatedthatamalefactorplaysaroleinabout halfofthecases[2].Thecomponentsofmalereproductive functionincludehormonalregulationofthehypothalamic– pituitary–gonadal axis, complete spermatogenesis, and unobstructed normalsperm transportandstorage. Theo-retically, sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) have the potentialtodisruptseveralofthesesteps.Nevertheless,the mainfocusinstudiedSTD-inducedinfertilitytendstobeon the female partner. This review aimed to describe the possible association between various STDs and male infertility.Inaddition,possiblemechanismsbywhichSTDs may influence male fertility have been explored and discussed.
2. Evidenceacquisition
Weperformedasystematicliteraturereviewinaccordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the CochraneLibraryweresearchedforarticlespublishedbefore January1,2016,usingtheMeSHtermsforavarietyofSTDs andinfertility(Fig.1).Thesearchwasrestrictedtohuman studiesperformedinmenandpublishedinEnglish.Studies wereincludediftheycontainedoriginaldataonapossible associationoracause-and-effectrelationshipbetweenSTD andmaleinfertility.Toreducebias,studieswereconsidered onlyiftheyincluded anappropriatecontrolgroup and/or comprehensive laboratory data. Titles and abstracts were screened, and the full text of relevant articles was subsequentlyreviewedbeforeinclusion.Theprimaryauthor (M.F.) performed the initial screening, and all authors approvedthefinalselection.Resultsoftheliteraturesearch areillustratedinFigure2.Weextracteddataregardingthe prevalenceofrelevantSTDs,fertilitystatus,andtraditional semenparametersaswellasanydataonseminalfunctional statusorpresenceofantispermantibodies.When nothing elsewasmentionedinthetext,infertilitywasdefinedasthe inability to conceive for a period of at least 12 mo, and fertility was defined as a history of parenthood and/or a currentlypregnantpartner.Instudiesinwhichparticipants werereportedtohavesymptomaticurinarytractinfections, thisdetailisspecificallymentioned.Duetoheterogeneityof
the study methods and data, no meta-analyses were performed.
3. Evidencesynthesis
StudiesinvestigatingSTDsandfertilitystatusand/orsemen quality are summarized in Tables 1–4 according to pathogenic agents. The studies are further described in the text. Studies investigating possible causative links betweenSTDsandinfertilityaredescribedinthetextonly. 3.1. Chlamydiatrachomatis
3.1.1. Chlamydiatrachomatis:studiesinvestigatingassociationwith infertility
Some studies have indicated that the incidence of chla-mydiamaybehigherininfertilemencomparedwiththose with normal fertility. In one such study, serum samples wereobtainedfrommenfrom52coupleswithunexplained infertilityandfrom72expectantfathers[3].Menfromthe infertile couples were significantly more likely to be seropositive for chlamydia antibodies at a high titer; however, there wasno differencebetween groupsinthe
(((((((((((((“Sexually transmitted diseases”[Mesh]) OR “Chlamydia trachomatis”[Mesh]) OR “Neisseria gonorrhoeae”[Mesh]) OR “herpes genitalis”[Mesh]) OR “Ureaplasma
urealyticum”[Mesh]) OR “Mycoplasma hominis”[Mesh]) OR “hepatitis B”[Mesh]) OR “hepatitis C”[Mesh]) OR “HIV”[Mesh]) OR “Treponema pallidum”[Mesh]) OR “herpes simplex”[Mesh]) OR “cytomegalovirus”[Mesh]) OR “Trichomonaas vaginalis”[Mesh]) AND “infertility”[Mesh]
Fig.1–ThefullsearchstrategyofMeSHtermsusedforsearchingPubMed.
517
•Records idenfied through database searching
503
•Records aer duplicates removed
94
•Full-text arcles assessed for eligibility aer screening of tles and abstracts
41
•Studies included in qualitave synthesis
43
•Studies included aer final screening of reference lists
Table 1 – Studies investigating Chlamydia trachomatis and fertility status and/or semen quality
Study(year) Studycharacteristics Mainfindings Majorlimitations
Greendaleetal (1993)[3]
Case–controlstudy
52menfrominfertilecouplesand 72fertilemen
Questionnairesandbloodsamples
Infertilemenweremorelikelytobe seropositiveforchlamydiaantibodies atatiter1:64(OR:3.4;95%CI,1.3– 9.1)
Thetiterof1:64wasnotpredefined Multipleanalysesperformed
withoutcorrections Joki-Korpelaetal
(2009)[4]
Case-controlstudy
90menfrominfertilecouplesand 190fertilemen
Bloodsamples
ChlamydialIgG(27.8%vs6.3%)andIgA (22.2%vs6.2%)wereelevatedinmen frominfertilecouples(p<0.001)
67/90coupleshadconfirmed femalefactorinfertility
Mazzolietal (2010)[5]
Cohortstudy
454menwithprostatitisresulting fromchlamydiaand707menwith prostatitisresultingfromother bacteria
Bloodsamplesandsemensamples
68.5%inthechlamydiagroupvs1.9% inthenonchlamydiagroupwere subfertileaccordingtoWHOcriteria (p<0.003)
–
Vezniketal (2004)[6]
Cross-sectionalstudy 627healthyspermdonors Semensamples
Chlamydiadetectedin21.7% Spermmorphologyandmotility
reducedinsampleswithchlamydia 37.0%vs43.2%normalforms(p=0.01)
and48.4%vs52.0%vs48.4%motility (p=0.05)
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Ouzounova-Raykova etal(2015)[7]
Case–controlstudy
281infertilemenand100fertile controls
Semensamples
PCRdetectedchlamydiain13.9%of infertilemenvs2%offertilemen(nop valuegiven)
Nodefinitionoffertilityor descriptionofhowparticipants wereincluded
Unclearifgroupswereotherwise comparable
Ouzounova-Raykova etal(2009)[9]
Case–controlstudy
60menfrominfertilecouplesand 40healthycontrols
Urethralswabsfrominfertilemen
Chlamydiawasfoundin5menfrom theinfertilecouplesandin1fertile man:RR3.3(95%CI,0.4–27;p=0.26)
Unclearhowchlamydiainfections wereassessedinhealthycontrols Authorsconcludethatchlamydia
infectionisassociatedwith infertility,althoughthisisnot supportedbyresults Al-Sweihetal
(2012)[10]
Case–controlstudy
127menfrominfertilecouplesand 188fertilemen
Semensamples
ChlamydialDNAdetectedinsemenof 3.9%ofmenfrominfertilecouplesvs 3.7%offertilecontrols(p>0.05)
–
Abusarahetal (2013)[11]
Case–controlstudy
93infertilemenand70fertilemen Urinesamples
PCRdetectedchlamydiain4.3%of infertilemenand1.4%offertilemen (p=0.284)
–
Treietal (2008)[12]
Retrospectivecohortstudy 17764menwhoreceivedchlamydia
testingbetweenin2001and2002 Reviewofmedicaldatabasesfrom
2001to2005
Infertilitywasdiagnosedin1.27%of chlamydia-positiveand1.00%of chlamydia-negativemen
AdjustedHR1.36(95%CI,0.93–2.00; p>0.05)
Individualmedicalrecordsnot assessed
Chlamydiastatusbefore 2001unknown
Likelypresenceofunrecognized chlamydia
Karinenetal (2004)[13]
Nestedcase–controlstudyanalysisof aprospectivelyfollowedbirthcohort (n=12231)
181menwithself-reportedtimeto pregnancyof12moand2controls withnormalfertilityforeachcase Questionnairesandbloodsamples
Nodifferencesingenitalinfections Nodifferencesinpresenceof
chlamydiaIgGantibodies Subanalysesshowingdifferencesin
specificantibodyserotypes
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections Fewparticipantswithspecific
serotypes
Conclusionnotinlinewithresults
Karinenetal (2004)[14]
Nestedcase–controlanalysisofa prospectivelyfollowedbirthcohort (n=12231)
52menwithself-reportedtimeto pregnancyof12moand2controls withnormalfertilityforeachcase Questionnairesandbloodsamples
HighertitersofIgAantibodiesto chlamydiaHsp10infertilemen (p=0.048)
Nodifferencesinothertiters
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Samraetal (1994)[15]
Case–controlstudy
135menrecruitedatmaleinfertility clinicsand88fertilemen
Bloodsamples,semensamples,and urethralsmears
Chlamydiawasfoundin9.6%of infertilemenand5.7%offertilemen (p=0.29)
Severalotherpotentialcausesof infertilitypresentinbothmenand women
Liuetal (2014)[16]
Case–controlstudy
621menfrominfertilecouplesand 615fertilemen
Semensamples
Chlamydiafoundin2.58%ofinfertile menand2.28%offertilemen (p=0.732)
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
CI=confidenceinterval;HR=hazardratio;Hsp=heatshockprotein;Ig,immunoglobulin;OR=oddsratio;PCR=polymerasechainreaction;RR=relativerisk; WHO=WorldHealthOrganization.
proportions of patients whowere positive for chlamydia antibodies at any titer (54% vs 52%). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in semen characteristics betweenantibody-positiveand-negativeinfertilemen.The authorsspeculatedthathigh-leveltitersareamarkerofthe mostserious infectionswithpotentialtocauselong-term sequelae such as infertility. Nevertheless, there was no significantassociationbetweeneitherpreviousdiagnosisof genitourinarydiseaseorself-reportedgenitourinary symp-toms and infertility. Another study analyzed chlamydia immunoglobulin(Ig)GandIgAantibodiesintheplasmaof
90menfrominfertilecouplesandfrom190healthyblood donors[4].BothIgG(27.8%vs6.3%)andIgA(22.2%vs.6.2%) wereelevatedinmenfrominfertilecouples(p<0.001).In addition,semenmotilitywaslowerinmenfrom infertile coupleswithchlamydialantibodiesthanamongmenfrom infertilecoupleswithoutantibodies.Chlamydialantibodies werenotassociatedwithothersemenparametersanddid not affectresultsofinvitrofertilization.Interpretationof theresultsiscomplicatedbythereportthat23of90couples hadmalefactorinfertility,whereas67of90hadconfirmed femalefactorinfertility,withnosignificantdifferenceinthe
Table 2 – Studies investigating genital mycoplasma species and fertility status and/or semen quality
Study(year) Studycharacteristics Mainfindings Limitations
Samraetal (1994)[15]
Case–controlstudy
135menrecruitedatmaleinfertility clinicsand88fertilemen
Bloodsamples,semensamples,and urethralsmears
Mycoplasmaspecieswerefoundin31.8%of infertilemenand28.4%offertilemen(not significant)
Consideredalone,MHwasfoundin13.3%of infertilemenand1.1%offertilemen (p<0.0015)
Nodifferenceinprevalencewhenconsidering UUalone
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Liuetal (2014)[16]
Case–controlstudy
621menfrominfertilecouplesand 615fertilemen
Semensamples
MHfoundin5.98%ofinfertilemenand4.88% offertilemen(p=0.472)
UUfoundin26.57%ofinfertilemenandin 24.88%offertilemen(p=0.496)
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Leeetal (2013)[26]
Case–controlstudy
50menfrominfertilecouplesand 48fertilemen
Semensamples
MHfoundin48%ofinfertilemenand25%of fertilemen(p=0.022)
UUfoundin14%ofinfertilemenand6.3%of fertilemen(p=0.318)
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Xuetal (1997)[27]
Case–controlstudy
1461menwithidiopathicinfertility and375fertilecontrols
Semensamples
UUfoundin38.77%ofinfertilemenand9.06% offertilemen(p<0.001)
–
Zeighamietal (2007)[28]
Case–controlstudy
100infertilemenand100healthy controls
Semensamples
UUfoundin12%ofinfertilemenand3%of fertilemen(p<0.05)
AnincreasedincidenceofUUininfertilemen (12%vs3%,p<0.05)
Nodefinitionoffertilityor descriptionofhowparticipants wereincluded Nodemographicinformationon participants Wangetal (2006)[29] Cross-sectionalstudy
346menattendingandrologyclinics Questionnairesandsemensamples
UUfoundin12%
UUinfectionassociatedwithhighersemen viscosity,lowersemenpH,andreducedsperm concentration(allpvalues<0.05)
UUinfectionwasnotsignificantlyrelatedto othersemenparameters
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Pleckoetal (2014)[30]
Case–controlstudy
145infertilemenand49fertile controls
Questionnairesandurinesamples
HistoryofSTDreportedby55.8%ofinfertile menand24.4%offertilemen(p=0.0001) Infertilemenhadahighernumberoflifetime
sexualpartners(p<0.0001).
Ureaplasmaspeciesfoundin30%ofthe infertilemenand35%ofthefertilemen(not significant)
MHfoundin21%ofthe
infertilemenand20%ofthefertilemen(not significant)
Riskofrecallbias
MH=Mycoplasmahominis;STD=sexuallytransmitteddisease;UU=Ureaplasmaurealyticum.
Table3–StudiesinvestigatingNeisseriagonorrhoeaeandfertilitystatusand/orsemenquality
Study (year) Study characteristics Main findings Limitations
Abusarah etal(2013)[11]
Case–controlstudy
93infertilemenand70fertilemen Urinesamples
Neisseriagonorrhoeaefoundin6.5%ofthe infertilemenandinnoneofthefertilemen (p<0.05)
–
Osegbe(1991)[35] Prospectivecohortstudy
45menwithgonococcalepididymo-orchitis Questionnaires,semensamples,bloodsamples
14/45menhadpreviouslyfatheredchildren 2yrafterthegonococcalinfection,21%ofthe
fathersand40%ofthewholegroupshowed normalsemenparameters
Semenparametersbefore infectionunknown
prevalence of antibodies betweenthese groups. A larger studyinvestigatedsemen qualityinmen withprostatitis resultingfromchlamydia(n=454)andfromotherbacteria (n=707) [5]. Sperm concentration, sperm motility, and normalmorphology were all significantlyreduced in the chlamydia-infected group (all p values <0.001). Overall, 68.5%inthechlamydiagroupand1.9%inthenonchlamydia groupwereconsideredsubfertileaccordingtoWorldHealth Organization(WHO)criteria(p<0.003). Similarly,Veznik
etalfoundthatspermmorphologyandmotilitywerehigher insampleswithoutchlamydiacomparedwith chlamydia-positivesamplesin627healthyspermdonors,with43.2% versus 37.0% normal forms (p=0.01) and 52.0% versus 48.4% motility (p=0.05), respectively [6]. Therewere no statistically significant differences in volume of semen, densityofthespermatozoa,ormeasuredspermmotility.
Consideringmixedinfections,Ouzounova-Raykovaetal investigatedthe prevalenceof polymerasechainreaction
Table 4 – Studies investigating sexually transmitted viral infections and fertility status and/or semen quality
Study(year) Studycharacteristics Mainfindings Limitations
Naumenkoetal (2014)[39]
Cross-sectionalstudy
232menattendinginfertilityclinics Semensamplesincludingtestsfor
EBV,CMV,andHHV-6
CMVwasmoreprevalentinthegroupof infertilemenwithchronicinflammatory urogenitaltractdiseasescomparedwiththe othergroupscombined(18.5%vs5.4%, p=0.03)
CMVwasassociatedwithreducedsperm count(39.5vs72.5106/ml,p=0.036)
HHV-6wasmoreprevalentinfertilemen withchronicurogenitaltractinflammation thanintheothergroupscombined(19%vs 6.3%,p=0.018)
Noothersignificantrelationships
Nodefinitionoffertility Multipleanalysesperformed
withoutcorrections Forestaetal (2010)[40] Cross-sectionalstudy 200menaged18yr Semensamples
HPVwasassociatedwithreducedsperm motility(53.7%inHPV-negativevs37.7%in HPV-positive;p<0.05)
Othersemenparametersdidnotdifferwith orwithoutHPV
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Authorsdidnotinvestigatethe presenceofotherviruses Suetal(2014)
[41]
Retrospectivecase–controlstudy 5138menwithHBVand25
690noninfectedcontrols DatafromtheTaiwanNational
HealthInsuranceResearchDatabase
HBVinfectionassociatedwithanincreased 10-yrincidenceofinfertilitydiagnosis(HR: 1.52;95%CI,1.20–1.92;p<0.05)
Individualmedicalrecordsnot assessed
Likelypresenceofunrecognized HBV
Limitedcorrectionforconfounders Morettietal
(2008)[42]
Case–controlstudy
15menwithchronicHBV,13men withchronicHCV,and20fertile controls
Semensamples
Nodifferencesinspermconcentration, motility,ormorphologybetweenpatients andcontrols
Increasedincidencesofspermnecrosisin infectedmen(43.2%forHVC,35.86%for HBV,and15.57%fornoninfectedmen; p<0.01)
Increasedincidencesofspermapoptosisin infectedmen(6.76%forHVC,7.5%forHBV, and2.9%fornoninfectedmen;p<0.05)
Multipleanalysesperformed withoutcorrections
Hofnyetal (2011)[43]
Case–controlstudy
57HCVinfectedmenand40fertile controls
Semensamples
MeansemenvolumeincreasedwithHCV: 2.33vs2.15ml(p<0.05)
MeanspermcountreducedwithHCV: 40.1vs75.4106
/ml(p<0.01)
Meanspermabnormalformsincreasedwith HCV:40.35%vs12.6%(p<0.01)
MeanspermmotilityreducedwithHCV: 39.6%vs58.1%(p<0.01)
Controlparticipantshadconfirmed fertilitybeforeenrollment,whereas thefertilitystatusofparticipants withHCVwasunknown
Mulleretal (1998)[44]
Case–controlstudy
250HIV-seropositivemenand 38fertilecontrols
Semensamples
MediansemenvolumereducedwithHIV: 1.8vs2.9ml(p<0.0001)
Medianspermconcentrationreducedwith HIV(62vs100106
/ml,p<0.001) MedianspermmotilityreducedwithHIV:
52%vs64%(p<0.0001)
Medianrapidandlinearmotilityreduced withHIV:14%vs21%(p<0.05)
Controlparticipantshadconfirmed fertilitybeforeenrollment,whereas thefertilitystatusofparticipants withHIVwasunknown
Umapathy (2005)[46]
Cross-sectionalstudy
83apparentlyhealthymenattending ahospitalforundisclosedreasons Semensamplesandbloodsamples
36/83testedHIVpositive
MeanspermmotilityreducedwithHIV:34% vs53%(p<0.02)
Nodifferenceinspermcountandsperm morphologybetweeninfectedand noninfectedmen
Nodemographicknowledge provided
Unclearwhyhealthymenwould visitahospital
CI=confidenceinterval;CMV=cytomegalovirus;EBV=Epstein–Barrvirus;HBV=HepatitisBvirus;HCV=HepatitisCvirus;HHV-6=Humanherpesvirus6; HIV=humanimmunodeficiencyvirus;HPV=humanpapillomavirus;HR=hazardratio.
(PCR)–detectedchlamydia,Mycoplasmahominis(MH),and Ureaplasmaurealyticum(UU)insemenof281infertilemen and100fertilecontrols[7].Prevalenceofallpathogenswas increased in infertile men, with chlamydia, UU, andMH foundin13.9%,19.2%,and9.9%,respectively,versus2%,11%, and 3%, respectively, in fertile men (no p values given); however, the authors did not include their definition of fertilityorhowparticipantswereincluded.Inaddition,no descriptionofotherpossiblediscrepanciesbetween infer-tileandfertilemenwasgiven.Anotherstudyinvestigated whether coinfection with chlamydia andhuman papillo-mavirus(HPV)affectedspermparametersin1003menwith chronicprostatitis[8].Atotalof71.3%ofthepatientswere infectedwithchlamydiaonly,and28.7%wereinfectedwith bothchlamydiaandHPV.Onsemenanalysis,50.8%inthe chlamydia-onlygroupversus66.8%inthecoinfectedgroup weresubfertileaccordingtotheWHOcriteria(p<0.001). Thefindingthatalmostone-thirdofthechlamydia-infected menwerecoinfectedwithHPVunderscoresthatSTDsoften coexistandmaypotentiateeachother’sdetrimentaleffects. Thestudyislimitedbyalackofacontrol groupinfected with onlyHPV, whichmeansthat itis difficultto assess whether the reduced semen quality was caused by the coinfectionorbyHPValone.
Otherstudieshavebeenunabletoidentifyanassociation between chlamydia and male infertility. A study by Ouzounova-Raykovaandcoworkersinvestigatedthe preva-lenceofchlamydiain60malepartnersofinfertilecouples comparedwiththeprevalencein40healthycontrols[9].The authorstookurethralswabsfromallmaleparticipantsand cervicalswabsfromthefemalepartnersofinfertilecouples and used cultures and PCR for chlamydia detection. Chlamydiawasfoundinfivemenfromtheinfertilecouples andinonecontrolparticipant(p=0.26).Threeofthefemale partnersof chlamydia-positive men harboredsigns of an infection. For a similar study of 315 participants, the investigators detected chlamydial DNA in the semen of 3.9% of men from infertile couples versus 3.7%of fertile controls(p > 0.05)[10]. Thestudy showedbetter semen parametersinuninfectedmencomparedwithinfectedmen in the fertile subgroupbut not in the infertile subgroup. AbusarahetalalsousedurinePCRfordetectionofchlamydia in93infertilemenwithabnormalsemenparametersand 70menwhohadpreviouslyfatheredchildrenand/orhada normalspermevaluation[11].Theyfoundchlamydiain4.3% of infertile men and 1.4% of fertile men (p=0.284). It is unclear whether the groups were comparable because controlswererecruitedamong menpresentingaturology clinicsforundisclosedreasons.
Althoughmoststudiesarecomposedmainlyofclientsof infertility clinics who likely suffer competing causes of infertility, two database studies have looked at the association between chlamydia and the development of infertility.Treietalusedlaboratoryrecordstoidentifyall active-dutyAirForcemenwhoreceivedchlamydiatesting betweenin 2001and2002(n=17 764)[12].Participants weretrackedthrough2005,andinfertilitywasdiagnosedin 1.27% of chlamydia-positive and 1.00% of chlamydia-negative men. The difference did not reach statistical
significance.Karinenetalconductedasimilarstudywith data from a prospectively followed Finnish cohort of 12 231 men and women [13]. Participants consisted of thosewhobothdeliveredbloodsamplesandrespondedto questionsabouttheirtimetopregnancyattheageof31yr. Overall,181menand298womenhadself-reportedtimeto pregnancyof12mo.Tworandomcontrolswithnormal fertility werepicked for eachcase. The studyshowed no statistically significant differences in either self-reported genital infections or the presence of chlamydia IgG antibodies between the cases and controls. Only after various subanalyses of 10 different serotypes were the authors able to demonstrate an increased occurrence of antibodies in male cases demonstrating a C complex containingimmunotypesC,J,H,andI(7.7%inmalecases and3.0%incontrols;p=0.012)andinindividualserotypeH among men (p=0.036) and serotypes C (p=0.036), J(p=0.022),H(p=0.021),andI(p=0.025)amongwomen. Theremainingassociationswereinsignificant.Despitethe multipleanalysesperformedandthelowabsolutenumbers of participants with specific serotypes, the authors still hypothesizedthat‘‘chlamydiainfectionplaysanimportant roleinmaleinfertility.’’
In asubsequentstudyofthesamecohort, theauthors looked at a possible association between infertility and antibodiesto chlamydia heatshock protein(Hsp) 60and Hsp10 [14]. Using 146 cases (94 women and 52 men) and 278controls (188 women and90 men),the authors foundthatIgAantibodiestochlamydiaHsp60andHsp10 were significantly higher in female partners of infertile couples comparedwith controls (p=0.002and p=0.007, respectively),whereastherewasnostatisticallysignificant difference in IgGantibodies to the two proteins. Among men, thecontrolparticipantsshowed significantlyhigher titersofIgAantibodiestoHsp10(p=0.048),whereasthere werenodifferencesintheremainingtiters.Takentogether, thetwostudiesintheFinnishcohortdonotshowaclear linkbetweenchlamydiainfectionandmaleinfertility.
Regarding mixed infections, Samraet allooked atthe prevalence ofchlamydia,UU,andMHininfertile couples (n=135)andfertilecouples(n=88)[15].Amongthemenin infertile couples, oligoteratoasthenozoospermiawas diag-nosedin62.9%,with28.9%havingavaricocele.Inaddition 21.5%ofthemenwerediagnosedwithprostatovesiculitis, antispermantibodies,orboth.Amongwomenfrominfertile couples, ovulatory dysfunction was diagnosed in 31.8%, tuboperitoneal adhesionsand/orendometriosiswas diag-nosed in 6.7%, and uterine adhesions or myomata were diagnosedin5.2%.Thedegreeofoverlappingpathologyin couples is unclear. Antichlamydia IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodiesweretestedinbloodandsemen,whereassemen, urethral, and cervical smears were cultured for bacteria. Chlamydiawasfoundin9.6%ofmenand10.4%ofwomenin theinfertilegroupandin5.7%ofmenand4.5%ofwomenin thefertilegroup(p=0.29andp=0.12,respectively).More infertile women were positive for serum chlamydia IgG compared with fertile women(11.9% vs 3.4%, p<0.015). Likewise,specificsemenIgAwashigherininfertilethanin fertilemen(8.9%vs1.1%,p<0.015).However,therewere
nodifferencesintheprevalenceofremaining immunoglo-bulins, and no corrections were made for multiple comparisons.AsimilarstudyusingPCRfoundnosignificant differences in the prevalence of the three pathogens in semenbetween 621men from infertile couples (34.93%) and615fertilecontrols(32.03%)[16].
3.1.2. Chlamydiatrachomatis:studiesinvestigatingpossible causativelinkstoinfertility
Despite the questionable link between infertility and chlamydia, several studies have attempted to identify causative mechanisms. A direct toxic effect has been suggested by in vitro experiments. In one such study, Galdiero and coworkers showed that lipopolysaccharide extractedfromchlamydiacausedspermatozoamortalityof 100%within 60min ofincubation [17]. Likewise, another studyfoundthatincubatingspermatozoafrom normosper-matic men with chlamydia elementary bodies caused a declineinmotilespermcellsandanincreaseindeadcells
[18].Whenincubatingspermwithdeadelementarybodies, thedetrimentaleffectswereabolished,indicatingthatthese detrimental events were caused by live bacteria only. Regarding advanced sperm function, limited data from a study of 293 infertile men of whom 13% had signs of previouschlamydiainfectiondidnotpointtoanassociation between chlamydia and reduced sperm DNA integrity
[19]. Meanwhile, astudyassessingtheacrosomereaction insemenfromchlamydia-negative(n=46)and chlamydia-positive (n=30) male partners of infertile couples and healthy men (n=53) suggested that sperm functional capacity may be reduced with infection [20]. Other researchers have investigated a possible autoimmune responseagainstspermcells,withunconvincingresults[21]. An alternative theory of cause and effect is that chlamydial infections may cause damage to the ductal system.Totestthistheory,SripadaetalusedPCRtodetect chlamydia DNA in testicular/epididymal biopsies and aspirateof14menwithidiopathicobstructiveazoospermia and22menseekingvasectomyreversal[22].No chlamydia-specific DNA was detected in any of these participants, making the hypothesis that asymptomatic chlamydial infectioncanleadtoobstructionofthemalegenitaltract unlikely.However,thislackofcausationmaynotapplyto menwithsymptomatic chlamydiainfections.In addition, theprevalenceofchlamydiainthebackgroundpopulation wasuncertain, andthe authorsdid notperform a power analysis,meaningthatthestudy couldhavebeen under-powered. Looking for more subtle signs of damage, Gonzalez-Jimenezetalfoundthatinfertilemenwithfree stereociliainsemenhadincreasedprevalenceofchlamydia, MH,andUUonsemenculture[23].Thisresultwastakenas indirectevidencethatinfectionsmaycausedamagetothe ductal system. However, the small number of highly selectedparticipants makesthe study prone to bias, and theauthorsconcludedthatprospectivetrialsareneededto confirmthehypothesis.
Yetanothertheoryrevolvesaroundthefemalepartner. Eggert-Kruseetalfoundasignificantrelationshipbetween thepresenceofchlamydiaantibodiesinmen’ssemenand
tubalinfertilityintheirfemalepartners(n=197)[24].The finding was confirmed in a subsequent study with 1303couplesconsultingforinfertilitytreatment[25].There wasnorelationbetweenchlamydiaantibodiesandgeneral semenquality,spermfunctionalcapacity,orthepresenceof antispermantibodiesineitherofthestudies.Thefindings suggestthatchlamydiadoesnothaveadirecteffectonmale fertilitybutratherhasanindirecteffectthroughinfectionof thefemalepartner.
3.2. Genitalmycoplasmaandureaplasmaspecies 3.2.1. Genitalmycoplasmaandureaplasmaspecies:studies investigatingassociationwithinfertility
InthestudybySamraetal,describedabove,mycoplasma specieswerefoundin31.8%ofmenand25.9%ofwomenin infertilecouplesandin28.4%ofmenand26.2%ofwomenin fertile couples [15]. Neither difference was statistically significant. However, when considered alone, MH was foundin13.3%ofinfertilemenand10.4%ofinfertilewomen and in only 1.1% each of fertile men and women (p<0.0015 and p<0.01, respectively). In contrast, Lee etalfoundthatUUwasmorefrequentinsemenfromthe men from 50 couples with idiopathic infertility (48%) compared with 48 fertile men (25%; p=0.022), whereas there were no significantdifferences betweenthe occur-renceofMH[26].
AlargerstudylookedatUUin1461menwithidiopathic infertilityand375fertilecontrols,allwithnormalsemen parametersaccordingtoWHO1987criteria[27].Therewas a significantly higher frequency of UU infection among infertile men compared with fertile controls (38.77% vs 9.06%, P<0.001). Examination of eight specimens from infertilemenandeightspecimensfromfertileparticipants byelectronmicroscopy,immunogold,and immunofluores-cence techniques demonstrated adhesion of UU to the membranes of spermatozoa and exfoliated germ cells, which the authors proposed as a possible cause of the infertility. An increased incidence of UU in semen from 100infertilemencomparedwith100healthycontrols(12% vs 3%, p<0.05) analyzed using PCR was also found by Zeighami etal [28]. In theUU-positive infertile patients, semen volume, count, and normal morphology were reducedcomparedwithUU-negativeinfertilemen. Unfor-tunately,thestudydidnotprovidedemographic informa-tionontheparticipants,andthestudydefinitionsofinfertile and fertile men were not provided. These findings are somewhat contradictedby anearlier study in whichthe relationshipbetweenUUandsemenqualitywasassessedin 346menattendingChineseandrology clinics[29].Inthis study, 39.3% had positive semen UU cultures, and on multivariate analysis, this was associated with higher semen viscosity, lower semen pH, and reduced sperm concentration (allpvalues<0.05).However,UUinfection was not significantly relatedto othersemen parameters. Another studycomparedtheoccurrenceofgenital myco-plasmasinfirst-voidurinesamplesfrom145infertilemen withreducedsemenqualityand49fertilecontrols[30].The infertile men were significantly more likely to report a
history of STD (p=0.0001) and had a higher number of lifetime sexual partners (p<0.0001). Nevertheless, the studyrevealednostatisticallysignificantdifferencesinthe occurrenceofMHandUUbetweenthegroups.
3.2.2. Genitalmycoplasmaandureaplasmaspecies:studies investigatingpossiblecausativelinkstoinfertility
As with chlamydia, the possible pathophysiology behind MH-or UU-relatedinfertility hasbeen investigatedin in vitro studies. Dı´az-Garcı´a and coworkers showed that clustersofMHattachtospermatozoaandlocate intracellu-larly[31]. Interestingly, theMH–spermatozoa interaction reachedamaximumwithinthefirsthourandthenstarted to decline. Sperm viability did not decline significantly comparedwithuninfectedspermatozoa.Likewise, Nunez-Calongeetalfoundasignificantreductioninspermmotility aswellassignsofmembranealterationswhenincubating spermatozoawithUU[32]. Scanningelectronmicroscopy showed that clusters of UU attached to the deformed spermatozoa. In a more complex study, Reichart et al furtherconfirmedthatUUadheretospermcellsinvitroand thatinfectioncauseddose-andtime-dependentchromatin decondensation and DNA damage [33]. Surprisingly, infectedcellsexhibitedhigherratesofviabilityandmotility than uninfected cells. The study also investigatedsperm chromatinstabilityandDNAintegrityinsemenfromeight men with UU-positive cultures. Initially, the sperm cells exhibited a low percentage of stable chromatin, as determined by nuclear chromatin decondensation assay (42%,n=8),andahigh percentageof denaturedDNA, as determined by sperm chromatin structure assay (60.9%, n=7).Asignificantimprovementinbothparameterswas observedfollowing10dofdoxycyclinetreatment.Contrary to this finding, another study measured susceptibility of DNAstrandbreaksinsperm nuclearchromatinto insitu denaturationin293menandfoundnooverallassociation with chlamydia, UU, and MH infection [19]. Antibiotic therapywasinitiatedandfollowedupin47oftheinfected menwithnoapparenteffectonsemenparameters.
Adifferentapproach wastaken by Shiandcoworkers whorecruitedhealthydonorsandinfertilepatientsinfected with UU [34]. Using western blot analyses, the authors confirmedtheexistenceofpossiblecross-reactiveantigens betweenUU and human sperm membrane proteins. The authors were able to purify one of the cross-reactive antigens and identify a common pentapeptide between urease complex component UreG and human nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein. The clinical significance of thisfindingisunclear.
3.3. NeisseriagonorrhoeaeandTreponemapallidum
Our search yielded only two studies demonstrating a possible association between Neisseria gonorrhoeae and male infertility. In the Jordanian study, previously de-scribed,involving93infertilemenand70fertilecontrols, NeisseriagonorrhoeaeDNAwasdetectedinsemenfrom6.5% ofinfertile menandinnoneofthefertile men(p<0.05)
[11].Inanother study,thefertilitystatusof45 menwho
developed gonococcal urethritis and subsequent epidi-dymo-orchitiswere followedprospectively[35].Fourteen ofthemenhadpreviouslyfatheredchildren;however,2yr afterthegonococcalinfection,only21%ofthesefathersand 40%ofthewholegroupshowednormalsemenparameters. Althoughseveresyphilisinfectionscanlikelycauseductal obstruction and/or testicular damage, no studies on Treponema pallidum were deemed appropriate for this review.Thelackofstudies onthetwopathogensislikely duetotherarityofinfectionsindevelopedcountries. 3.4. Trichomonasvaginalis
Limited evidence from in vitro studies suggests that Trichomonas vaginalis may have detrimental effects on sperm motility [36,37]. Onlya singlestudy investigating possible in vivo effects was identified, but the authors selected an inappropriate control group with confirmed normalsemenparameters[38].
3.5. Sexuallytransmittedviralinfections
3.5.1. Epstein–Barrvirus,cytomegalovirus,humanherpesvirus,and humanpapillomavirus
Naumenko et al looked at Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6)DNAinsemensamplesof232menattendinginfertility clinics [39]. This cohort consisted of infertile men with varicocele, men with idiopathic infertility, infertile men with chronic urogenital tract inflammation, fertile men withchronicurogenitaltractinflammation,andmenwhose partners had a history of pregnancy loss. The total prevalence of PCR-detected viral DNA was 17.7%. CMV was more prevalent in the group of infertile men with chronic inflammatoryurogenital tract diseasescompared withtheothergroupscombined(18.5% vs5.4%,p=0.03). Furthermore, CMVinfectionwasassociated withreduced spermcount(39.5vs72.5106/ml,p=0.036).Incontrast,
HHV-6 was more prevalent in fertile men with chronic urogenital tract inflammation than in the other groups combined(19%vs6.3%,p=0.018),buttheinfectionwasnot associated with any differences in semen parameters compared with the remaining groups. No associations betweenEBVandinfertilityorurogenitaltract inflamma-tion werefound.The studyislimitedbythefactthatthe authorsfailedtodescribehowfertilemenweredefinedand why fertile men would visit an infertility clinic. No corrections for multiple comparisons were performed. In abetterdesignedstudy,Forestaandcoworkersinvestigated theprevalenceofHPVin200volunteersaged18yr,100of whom had previously had sexual intercourse [40]. Not surprisingly, none of those without intercoursehad HPV DNAintheirsemen.Theprevalencewas10%inthesexually activeparticipants.Seminalvolume,pH,sperm concentra-tion, viability, and normal morphology did not differ betweenHPV-infectedandnoninfectedparticipants; how-ever,HPVwasassociatedwithsignificantlyreducedsperm motility(53.7% inHPV-negative vs37.7%in HPV-positive participants; p<0.05). Although the authors excluded
bacterialinfectionsbymicrobiologicalspermculture,itis importanttonotethattheydidnotinvestigatethepresence ofotherviruses,meaningthatcoinfectioncouldbepresent insomeoftheparticipants.
3.5.2. Hepatitis
SuetaluseddatafromtheTaiwanNationalHealthInsurance ResearchDatabasetocomparetheincidenceratesofmale infertility in5138 men withnewly diagnosed Hepatitis B virus(HBV)and 25690 noninfectedcontrols[41]. With a follow-up period of 10 yr, the study found a 1.59-times increased crude incidence rate of infertility in the HBV patients, corresponding to an overall risk in the infected group of 1.83% versus 1.15% in the noninfected group (p<0.05). Theassociation remained significanton multi-variateanalysis(hazardratio:1.52;95%confidenceinterval, 1.20–1.92).Inamuchsmallerstudy,thespermqualityfrom patientswithchronicHBV(n=15)orHepatitisCvirus(HCV; n=13)andunknownfertilitystatuswascomparedwiththat of 20 fertile controls [42]. There were no statistically significant differences in traditional semen parameters, but increased incidences of apoptosis and necrosis were observedininfectedmenbyelectronmicroscopy.Another study looked at the possible effect of HCV on semen parametersin57infectedmenand40fertilecontrols[43].In thatstudy, the duration ofHCV infection was negatively correlatedwithsemenvolumeandspermmotility,andthe viralloadwasnegativelycorrelatedwithspermcountand spermmotility.HCV-infectedpatientsalsohadsignificantly lowertotal serum testosterone and higherserum E2 and prolactinlevelscomparedwithhealthycontrols.
3.5.3. Humanimmunodeficiencyvirus
Apossibleeffectofhumanimmunodeficiencyvirus (HIV) was assessed by Muller and coworkers through semen analyses in 250 HIV-seropositive men and 38 fertile controls[44].Thefertilecontrolshadsignificantlygreater semenvolume(2.9vs 1.8ml, p<0.0001),sperm concen-tration(median100vs62106/ml,p<0.001),percentage
ofmotility(median64%vs52%,p<0.0001),andpercentage ofrapidandlinearmotility(median21%vs14%,p<0.05) than HIV-seropositive men. Nevertheless, there was no differencebetweenthegroupsintheproportionofsperm with normal morphology and the number of leukocytes insemen. InthegroupofHIV-positive men, CD4+ values
<200/mm3 were associated with significantly lower
proportions of motile spermatozoa, strictly normal mor-phology, and total morphologically normal spermatozoa. Likewise,based on clinical categories, healthiermen had significantlyhigherproportionsofstrictlynormal morphol-ogy, andfewer had azoospermia.The authors concluded that HIV-seropositive men with low CD4+ cell counts or
severe symptoms had reductions in semen quality that weresimilartothoseofothermenwithchronicdiseases. Similar findings were made in a subsequent study that investigatedtheeffectsofdifferentpatientcharacteristics on fertilizing capacity in 33 HIV-seropositive men
[45].Spermvitality,motility,andpenetrationratesassessed bythezona-freehamsteroocytepenetrationtestwereall
correlatedwithCD4+cellnumber,andtheparameterswere significantlyhigherinpatientswhoseCD4+countswereat
least 350/mm3compared withthose whose CD4+ counts
were<350/mm3(allpvalues<0.05).Interestingly,sperm penetrationrateinpatientsreceivingantiretroviraltherapy wassignificantlyhigherthaninthosenotreceivingantiviral therapy,implyingthatthetreatmentcouldbebeneficialfor fertility (p < 0.05). A simpler study was performed in Zimbabwe bycollectingspermandbloodfrom83 appar-ently healthy men attending a hospital for undisclosed reasons [46]. Sperm motility was impaired (34% vs 53%, p<0.02)inHIV-positivemen,whereasneitherspermcount norsperm morphologydifferedsignificantlybetweenthe groups.Thepaperdidnot provideinformationon clinical fertilitystatus.
4. Conclusions
The available literatureexploring a possible association betweenSTDsandmaleinfertilityisoflimitedquality,and the results are contradictory. Studies confirming an association more frequently tended to have significant drawbacks.Therewasatendencyforauthorstoperform multipleanalyseswithoutappropriatecorrectionsandto subsequently focus solely on outcomes that seemed to suggest a positive association; however, the body of literature thatdoes notconfirman association between STDsandmale infertilityisalsoofinadequatequalityto drawanyfinalconclusions.Asignificantlimitationinthe literature is that only a few studies have investigated symptomaticSTDs. Serum analysisforIgG, for example, may reflect an interaction with a pathogen but not necessarily a relevant inflammatory response that can altertheanatomy orphysiologyofthegenitaltract.This might contribute to the wide differences found in the literature.Forthesereasons,wecannotexpecttheexisting literature to unequivocally reveal whether STDs really causemale infertility.Insummary,theremaywellbean associationofunknowngenesisandpossiblywithdifferent pathogenicmechanismsfordifferentpathogens. Alterna-tively, some STDs may cause male infertility, whereas others may not; however, there is hardly a strong correlation.Toreachmorefirmconclusionsonthesubject, higherqualitystudiesareneeded.
Authorcontributions:MikkelFodehadfullaccesstoallthedatainthe
study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Fode, Fusco, Lipshultz, Weidner.
Acquisition of data: Fode.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Fode, Fusco, Lipshultz, Weidner.
Drafting of the manuscript: Fode.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Fode,
Fusco,Lipshultz,Weidner.
Statisticalanalysis:Fode.
Obtaining funding: None.
Administrative, technical, or material support: None.
Supervision: None.
Financial disclosures: Mikkel Fode certifies that all conflicts of interest,
including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations
relevanttothesubjectmatterormaterialsdiscussedinthemanuscript
(eg,employment/affiliation,grantsorfunding,consultancies,honoraria,
stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed,
received, or pending), are the following: None.
Funding/Supportandroleofthesponsor:None.
References
[1] Zegers-HochschildF,AdamsonGD,deMouzonJ,etal.International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART)andtheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)revised glos-saryofARTterminology,2009.FertilSteril2009;92:1520–4.
[2] ThomaME,McLainAC,LouisJF,etal.Prevalenceofinfertilityinthe UnitedStatesasestimatedbythecurrentdurationapproachanda traditionalconstructedapproach.FertilSteril2013;99:1324–31.
[3] GreendaleGA,HaasST,HolbrookK,WalshB,SchachterJ,PhillipsRS. The relationship of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and male infertility.AmJPublicHealth1993;83:996–1001.
[4] Joki-KorpelaP,SahrakorpiN,HalttunenM,SurcelHM,PaavonenJ, TiitinenA.TheroleofChlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninmale infertility.FertilSteril2009;91(Suppl):1448–50.
[5] MazzoliS,CaiT,AddonisioP,BechiA,MondainiN,BartolettiR. Chlamydiatrachomatisinfectionisrelatedtopoorsemenqualityin youngprostatitispatients.EurUrol2010;57:708–14.
[6] VeznikZ,PospisilL,SvecovaD,ZajicovaA,UnzeitigV.Chlamydiae intheejaculate:theirinfluenceonthequalityandmorphologyof sperm.ActaObstetGynecolScand2004;83:656–60.
[7] Ouzounova-RaykovaV,RangelovS,OuzounovaI,MitovI.Detection ofChlamydiatrachomatis,Ureaplasmaurealyticumand Mycoplas-mahominisininfertileBulgarianmenwithmultiplexreal-time polymerasechainreaction.APMIS2015;123:586–8.
[8] CaiT,WagenlehnerFM,MondainiN,etal.Effectofhuman papillo-mavirusandChlamydiatrachomatisco-infectiononspermquality inyoungheterosexualmenwithchronicprostatitis-related symp-toms.BJUInt2014;113:281–7.
[9] Ouzounova-RaykovaV,OuzounovaI,MitovI.Chlamydia tracho-matis infection asa problem among malepartners of infertile couples.Andrologia2009;41:14–9.
[10] Al-Sweih NA, Al-Fadli AH, Omu AE, Rotimi VO. Prevalence of Chlamydiatrachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium,andUreaplasmaurealyticuminfectionsandseminal qualityininfertileandfertilemeninKuwait.JAndrol2012;33: 1323–9.
[11]Abusarah EA, Awwad ZM, Charvalos E,Shehabi AA. Molecular detectionofpotentialsexually transmittedpathogensinsemen andurinespecimensofinfertileandfertilemales.DiagnMicrobiol InfectDis2013;77:283–6.
[12]TreiJS,CanasLC,GouldPL.Reproductivetractcomplications asso-ciatedwithChlamydiatrachomatisinfectioninUSAirForcemales within4yearsoftesting.SexTransmDis2008;35:827–33.
[13]Karinen L,Pouta A,Hartikainen AL, etal.Association between ChlamydiatrachomatisantibodiesandsubfertilityintheNorthern FinlandBirthCohort1966(NFBC1966),attheageof31years. EpidemiolInfect2004;132:977–84.
[14]KarinenL,PoutaA,HartikainenAL,etal.AntibodiestoChlamydia trachomatisheatshockproteinsHsp60andHsp10andsubfertility ingeneralpopulationatage31.AmJReprodImmunol2004;52: 291–7.
[15]SamraZ,SofferY,PanskyM.Prevalenceofgenitalchlamydiaand mycoplasmainfectionincouplesattendingamaleinfertilityclinic. EurJEpidemiol1994;10:69–73.
[16] LiuJ,WangQ,JiX,etal.PrevalenceofUreaplasmaurealyticum, Mycoplasmahominis,Chlamydiatrachomatisinfections,andsemen qualityininfertileandfertilemeninChina.Urology2014;83:795–9.
[17] GaldieroF,SommeseL,GorgaF,GaldieroE,RizzoA,AjelloM.Toxic effectonhumanspermatozoabyChlamydiatrachomatispurified lipopolysaccharide.FEMSMicrobiolLett1994;115:197–200.
[18] Hosseinzadeh S,Brewis IA, Eley A,PaceyAA. Co-incubationof humanspermatozoawithChlamydiatrachomatisserovarEcauses prematurespermdeath.HumReprod2001;16:293–9.
[19] RybarR,PrinosilovaP,KopeckaV,etal.Theeffect ofbacterial contaminationofsemenonspermchromatinintegrityand stan-dardsemenparametersinmenfrominfertilecouples.Andrologia 2012;44(Suppl1):410–8.
[20] Jungwirth A, Straberger A, Esterbauer B, Fink K, Schmeller N. AcrosomereactioninChlamydia-positiveandnegativepatients. Andrologia2003;35:314–6.
[21] Eggert-Kruse W, Batschulat K,Demirakca T, Strowitzki T. Male immunitytothechlamydial60kDaheatshockprotein(HSP60) -associatedwithsemenquality?Andrologia2015;47:66–76.
[22] SripadaS,AmezagaMR,HamiltonM,McKenzieH,TempletonA, BhattacharyaS.Absenceofchlamydialdeoxyribonucleicacidfrom testicular and epididymalsamples from men with obstructive azoospermia.FertilSteril2010;93:833–6.
[23] Gonzalez-JimenezMA,Villanueva-DiazCA.Epididymalstereocilia in semen of infertile men: evidence of chronic epididymitis? Andrologia2006;38:26–30.
[24] Eggert-KruseW,Buhlinger-GopfarthN,RohrG,etal.Antibodiesto chlamydiatrachomatisinsemenandrelationshipwithparameters ofmalefertility.HumReprod1996;11:1408–17.
[25] Eggert-KruseW,RohrG,DemirakcaT,etal.Chlamydialserology in1303asymptomaticsubfertilecouples.HumReprod1997;12: 1464–75.
[26] LeeJS,KimKT,LeeHS,YangKM,SeoJT,ChoeJH.Concordanceof Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in infertile couples:impactonsemenparameters.Urology2013;81:1219–24.
[27] XuC,SunGF,ZhuYF,WangYF.ThecorrelationofUreaplasma urealyticuminfectionwithinfertility.Andrologia1997;29:219–26.
[28] ZeighamiH, PeerayehSN, SafarluM. Detection ofUreaplasma urealyticum in semen of infertile men by PCR. Pak J Biol Sci 2007;10:3960–3.
[29] WangY,LiangCL,WuJQ,XuC,QinSX,GaoES.DoUreaplasma urealyticuminfectionsinthegenitaltractaffectsemenquality? AsianJAndrol2006;8:562–8.
[30] PleckoV,Zele-StarcevicL,TripkovicV,etal.Unusuallylow preva-lenceofMycoplasmagenitaliuminurinesamplesfrominfertile menandhealthycontrols:aprevalencestudy.BMJOpen2014; 4:e005372.
[31] Diaz-Garcia FJ,Herrera-Mendoza AP, Giono-Cerezo S, Guerra-InfanteFM.Mycoplasmahominisattachestoandlocates intra-cellularlyinhumanspermatozoa.HumReprod2006;21:1591–8.
[32] Nunez-CalongeR,CaballeroP,RedondoC,BaqueroF, Martinez-FerrerM,MeseguerMA.Ureaplasmaurealyticumreducesmotility andinducesmembranealterationsinhumanspermatozoa.Hum Reprod1998;13:2756–61.
[33] ReichartM,KahaneI,BartoovB.Invivoandinvitroimpairmentof humanandramspermnuclear chromatinintegrityby sexually transmittedUreaplasmaurealyticuminfection.BiolReprod2000; 63:1041–8.
[34] ShiJ, Yang Z, Wang M, et al. Screening of an antigen target forimmunocontraceptivesfromcross-reactiveantigensbetween humanspermandUreaplasmaurealyticum.InfectImmun2007; 75:2004–11.
[35] OsegbeDN,Testicularfunctionafterunilateralbacterial epididymo-orchitis. EurUrol1991;19:204–8.
[36]Tuttle Jr JP, Holbrook TW, Derrick FC. Interference of human spermatozoalmotilitybytrichomonasvaginalis.JUrol1977;118: 1024–5.
[37]Jarecki-BlackJC,LushbaughWB,GolosovL,GlassmanAB. Tricho-monasvaginalis:preliminarycharacterizationofaspermmotility inhibitingfactor.AnnClinLabSci1988;18:484–9.
[38]GopalkrishnanK,HindujaIN,KumarTC.Semencharacteristicsof asymptomaticmalesaffectedbyTrichomonasvaginalis.JInVitro FertEmbryoTransf1990;7:165–7.
[39]NaumenkoV,TyulenevY,KuriloL,etal.Detectionand quantifica-tion of human herpes virusestypes 4-6 in sperm samples of patientswithfertilitydisordersandchronicinflammatory urogen-italtractdiseases.Andrology2014;2:687–94.
[40] ForestaC,Garolla A,ZuccarelloD,etal.Humanpapillomavirus foundinspermheadofyoungadultmalesaffectstheprogressive motility.FertilSteril2010;93:802–6.
[41]SuFH,ChangSN,SungFC,etal.HepatitisBvirusinfectionandthe riskofmaleinfertility:apopulation-basedanalysis.Fertil Steril 2014;102:1677–84.
[42]MorettiE,FedericoMG,GianneriniV,CollodelG.Sperm ultrastruc-tureandmeioticsegregationinagroupofpatientswithchronic hepatitisBandC.Andrologia2008;40:173–8.
[43]HofnyER,AliME,TahaEA,etal.Semenandhormonalparametersin menwithchronichepatitisCinfection.FertilSteril2011;95:2557–9.
[44]Muller CH,CoombsRW, KriegerJN.Effectsofclinicalstageand immunologicalstatusonsemenanalysisresultsinhuman immu-nodeficiencyvirustype1-seropositivemen.Andrologia1998;30 (Suppl1):15–22.
[45]WangD,LiL,XieQ,etal.Factorsaffectingspermfertilizingcapacity inmeninfectedwithHIV.JMedVirol2014;86:1467–72.
[46]UmapathyE.STD/HIVassociation:effectsonsemencharacteristics. ArchAndrol2005;51:361–5.