• Non ci sono risultati.

Microfossil evidence for trophic changes during the Eocene-Oligocene transition in the South Atlantic (ODP Site 1263, Walvis Ridge)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Microfossil evidence for trophic changes during the Eocene-Oligocene transition in the South Atlantic (ODP Site 1263, Walvis Ridge)"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Supplement of Clim. Past, 11, 1249–1270, 2015 http://www.clim-past.net/11/1249/2015/ doi:10.5194/cp-11-1249-2015-supplement © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Supplement of

Microfossil evidence for trophic changes during the Eocene–Oligocene

transition in the South Atlantic (ODP Site 1263, Walvis Ridge)

M. Bordiga et al.

Correspondence to: M. Bordiga (manuela.bordiga@geo.uu.se)

(2)

Table S1. Planktonic foraminifer marker species at Site 1263 from 93.42 to 107.29 mcd. A:

absent; P: present.

250< >150 µm fraction 150< >125 µm fraction Sample ID Dept h (mc d ) Tur b o rot al ia c erro azul en si s Tur b o rot al ia c uni al ensi s Tur b o rot al ia c o co ae nsi s H antkeni n a sp p . tu b u lo sp in es H antkeni n a spp . sp ec im en s Pseud oha stig erin a m icra P seud oha stig erin a nag u ewich ien sis Tot al pl ankt oni c speci me ns Pseud oha stig erin a m icra P seud oha stig erin a nag u ewich ien sis Tot al pl ankt oni c speci me ns 1263A, 10H-3, 33-35 cm 93.42 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-3, 78-80 cm 93.87 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-3, 133-135 cm 94.42 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-4, 33-35 cm 94.92 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-4, 78-80 cm 95.37 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 2 300 1263A, 10H-4, 123-125 cm 95.82 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-5, 18-20 cm 96.27 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-5, 32-34 cm 96.41 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263B, 4H-CC 97.14 A A A A A 0 0 300 0 0 300 1263A, 10H-6, 32-34 cm 97.91 P P P P P 3 0 300 29 6 300 1263A, 10H-7, 32-34 cm 99.41 P P P P P 1 0 300 19 0 300 1263A, 10H-CC 99.97 A P A P P 0 0 300 61 2 300 1263A, 11H-1, 32-34 cm 101.29 P A P P P 5 0 300 22 0 300 1263A, 11H-3, 47-49 cm 104.44 A A A P P 1 0 163 4 0 67 1263A, 11H-4, 32-34 cm 105.79 P P P P P 0 0 300 11 0 300 1263A, 11H-5, 32-34 cm 107.29 P P P P P 0 0 300 44 0 207

(3)

Table S2. Factor scores obtained in the PCA performed with and without the presence of the

marker species for dataset A. The bold numbers are the most important loadings.

                  DATASET A Markers No Markers Species PC1 PC2 PC1 PC2 Braarudosphaera bigelowii -0.02 0.00 -0.02 0.00 Bramlettei serraculoides 0.16 0.09 0.17 0.08 Clausicoccus obrutus -0.63 0.08 -0.64 0.12 Clausicoccus subdistichus 0.15 0.04 0.15 0.03 Chiasmolithus spp. -0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.08 Chiasmolithus altus -0.02 -0.07 - - Coccolithus pelagicus (3-7µm) -0.09 0.22 -0.09 0.24 Coccolithus pelagicus (7-11µm) -0.02 0.19 -0.02 0.21 Coccolithus pelagicus (11-16µm) -0.16 -0.07 -0.16 -0.07 Coccolithus eopelagicus 0.01 0.08 0.01 0.08 Coccolithus cachaoi 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.03 Coccolithus formosus -0.10 0.27 - - Cyclicargolithus sp. (3-5µm) -0.13 -0.13 -0.13 -0.14 Cyclicargolithus sp. (5-7µm) 0.03 -0.05 0.02 -0.04 Cyclicargolithus sp. (7-10µm) -0.13 0.18 -0.13 0.17 C. floridanus (3-5µm) -0.29 -0.03 -0.29 -0.03 C. floridanus (5-7µm) -0.19 -0.21 -0.19 -0.20 C. floridanus (7-10µm) -0.08 0.03 -0.08 0.02 Dictyococcites stavensis 0.31 -0.22 0.30 -0.23 Dictyococcites bisectus 0.22 -0.15 0.22 -0.17 Reticulofenestra daviesii 0.22 -0.08 0.22 -0.10 Discoaster spp. 0.16 0.13 0.16 0.13 Hayella situliformis 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.10 Isthmolithus recurvus 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.20 Lanternithus minutus -0.11 -0.68 -0.12 -0.71 Reticulofenestra umbilicus 0.17 0.06 0.17 0.05 Reticulofenestra hillae -0.04 0.15 -0.03 0.12 Reticulofenestra sp1 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 Reticulofenestra scrippsae 0.09 0.03 0.09 0.03 Reticulofenestra samodurovii 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.03 Helicosphaera spp. 0.08 -0.10 0.08 -0.10 Sphenolithus spp. 0.02 0.20 0.02 0.22 Sphenolithus akropodus -0.01 -0.04 - - Sphenolithus tribulosus 0.00 -0.01 - - Zygrhablithus bijugathus 0.08 0.15 0.08 0.16

(4)

Table S3. Factor scores obtained in the PCA performed without marker species for dataset B.

The bold numbers are the most important loadings.

         DATASET B No Markers Species PC1 PC2 Bicolumnus ovatus 0.06 0.04 Bramlettei serraculoides 0.07 -0.33 Chiasmolithus spp. -0.03 -0.08 Clausicoccus obrutus -0.62 0.04 Clausicoccus subdistichus -0.05 0.00 Coccolithus pelagicus (<6µm) -0.03 0.16 Coccolithus pelagicus (6-10µm) 0.03 -0.04 Coccolithus pelagicus (>10µm) -0.10 -0.34 Coccolithus eopelagicus 0.03 -0.07 Cyclicargolithus sp. -0.28 0.08 Cyclicargolithus floridanus -0.16 0.21 Dictyococcites bisectus 0.22 -0.15 Discoaster spp. 0.41 0.02 Hayella situliformis 0.15 0.01 Helicosphaera sp. 0.08 0.02 Isthmolithus recurvus 0.13 0.03 Lanternithus minutus 0.12 0.71 Micrantolithus sp. -0.05 -0.04 Reticulofenestra daviesii 0.12 0.14 Reticulofenestra spp. (dissolved) 0.04 -0.01 Reticulofenestra dictyoda 0.03 -0.02 Reticulofenestra hillae -0.01 -0.01 Reticulofenestra samodurovii 0.11 -0.09 Reticulofenestra scrippsae 0.08 0.28 R. scrippsae-bisecta 0.14 -0.10 Reticulofenestra umbilicus 0.27 -0.14 Sphenolithus spp. 0.09 0.00 Zygrhablithus bijugathus 0.03 -0.07 Octolithus -0.03 -0.04 Discorhabdulus 0.03 0.03 Unknown 0.04 0.06 Dissolved shields 0.27 0.09

(5)

Taxonomic remarks: Taxonomic description of the group Reticulofenestra circus cited in the

text.

Description: Medium to large round-elliptical placolith with a wide collar around a small

central opening (<1/3 of the total length). All the segments are strongly birefringent. Similar

to Reticulofenestra hillae (size range: >14 µm), but with subcircular outline and smaller in

size.

Size: In dataset A, Reticulofenestra circus group includes specimens of R. circus and R.

circus

var. lata (size range: 8-14 µm). In dataset B, these two populations have been counted

separately as R. circus (size range: 8-9 µm) and R. hillae (elliptical to subcircular

reticulofenestrids, size range:10-14 µm).

Fig. S1. Most representative calcareous nannofossil species from the ODP Site 1263, light

microscope images. Scale bar is = 5 µm. 1. Isthmolithus recurvus, 1263B-5H-2/111-112 cm,

101.13 mcd, cross nicols (XN). 2. Coccolithus formosus, 1263B-5H-2/65-66 cm, 100.67 mcd,

XN. 3. Chiasmolithus altus, 1263B-4H-2/131-132 cm, 89.4 mcd, XN. 4. Chiasmolithus sp.

(central area dissolved), 1263A-10H-5/131-132 cm, 97.44 mcd, XN. 5. Clausicoccus obrutus,

1263A-10H-4/120-121 cm, 95.79 mcd, XN. 6. Discoaster saipanensis, 1263B-5H-5/50-52

cm, 105.02 mcd, parallel nicols (PN). 7. Discoaster barbadiensis, 1263B-5H-5/50-52 cm,

105.02 mcd, PN. 8. Sphenolithus akropodus, 1263A-9H-4/50-52 cm, 85.58 mcd, XN. 9-10.

Sphenolithus tribulosus

, 1263A-10H-3/100-101 cm, 94.09 mcd, XN (9) and PN (10). 11.

Cyclicargolithus floridanus

, 1263B-5H-1/101-102 cm, 99.7 mcd, XN. 12. Cyclicargolithus

sp.

(signs of dissolution), 1263A-10H-7/25-26 cm, 99.34 mcd, XN. 13. Cyclicargolithus sp.

(central area dissolved), 1263B-5H-2/11-12 cm, 100.13 mcd, XN. 14. Dictyococcites bisectus,

1263A-10H-5/11-12 cm, 96.19 mcd, XN. 15. Dictyococcites stavensis, 1263A-10H-5/30-31

cm, 96.39 mcd, XN. 16. Reticulofenestra daviesii, 1263A-10H-4/120-121 cm, 95.79 mcd,

XN. 17. Reticulofenestra umbilicus, 1263B-5H-1/55-56 cm, 99.24 mcd, XN. 18.

Reticulofenestra samodurovii

, 1263A-10H-5/20-21 cm, 96.29 mcd, XN. 19. Reticulofenestra

hillae

, 10H-5/0-1 cm, 96.09 mcd, XN. 20. Reticulofenestra circus var. lata,

1263A-10H-5/0-1 cm, 96.09 mcd, XN. 21. Coccolithus pelagicus, 126A-10H-4/90-91 cm, 95.5 mcd,

XN. 22. Sphenolithus pseudoradians, 1263A-10H-5/131-132 cm, 97.44 mcd, XN. 23.

Lanternithus minutus

, 1263B-5H-1/71-72 cm, 99.4 mcd, XN. 24. Zygrhablithus bijugatus,

1263B-5H-2/111-112 cm, 101.13 mcd, XN.

(6)

2 µm 2 µm 2 µm

8

11

12

13

5

7

9

1

2

3

4

14

15

16

17

2 µm

19

18

20

21

2 µm

23

22

24

21

6

Fig. S1

10

(7)

Coccolithuspelagicus Discoaster spp. 7-11 µm 3-7 µm 11-16 µm Eocene Oligocene C13n mcd 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 88 86 84 83 CNE21 CNO1 CNO2 *108 0 4 Bramletteius serraculoides 0 6% Clausicoccus subdistichus *108 0 6 0 6% Coccolithus formosus 0 12% Helicosphaera spp. *108 0 1.6 Clausicoccus obrutus 0 1.6% *108 0 2.5 Hayella situliformis Chiasmolithus spp. 0 1.6% *108 0 1.2 C. altus 0 2.5% Coccoclithus cachaoi *108 0 1.6 0 1.6% *108 0 10 0 16% *108 0 6 0 8% 0 30% *108 0 20 Coccolithus eopelagicus *108 0 1 0 2% Dictyococcites bisectus *108 0 12 0 16% *108 0 12 Dictyococcites stavensis 0 20% *108 0 8 7-11 µm 11-16 µm Blackites spp. *108 0 0.4 0 1% Braarudosphaera bigelowii *108 0 1 0 3% Cyclicargolithus spp. Cyclicargolithus floridanus 5-7 µm 3-5 µm 7-9 µm 5-7 µm 3-5 µm 7-9 µm *108 0 30 10 40% *108 0 20 0 25% Reticulofenestra daviesii Lanternithus minutus Isthmolithus

recurvus Reticulofenestraumbilicus Sphenolithusakropodus Sphenolithustribulosus

*108 0 3 0 5% Reticulofenestra samodurovii *108 0 3 *108 0 1.2 0 2% 0 4% Reticulofenestra scrippsae *108 0 5 0 5% *1082.5 0 3% 0 12% *108 0 8 Zygrhablithus

bijugatus Other taxa

*108 0 2.5 0 4% *108 0 16 0 16% Reticulofenestra hillae *108 0 2.5 0 4% Reticulofenestra circus group *108 0 1.2 0 2% *108 0 0.5 0 2.5% *108 0 0.6 0 2% Sphenolithus moriformis *108 0 6 Sphenolithus predistentus *108 0 4 Sphenolithus pseudoradians *108 0 2.5 Sphenolithus radians *108 0 0.4 Sphenolithus spp. *108 0 1.6 0 8% 0 5% 0 4% 0 1% 0 2%

Fig. S2. Distribution curves of absolute (N g ) and relative (%) abundances of all the species and groups detected in dataset A.

-1

E/O Step 2 Eocene Oligocene C13n mcd 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 88 86 84 83 CNE21 CNO1 CNO2 E/O Step 2

(8)

Coccolithuspelagicus Discoaster spp. 6-10 µm <6 µm E/O Bramletteius serraculoides Clausicoccus subdistichus+ C. fenestratus Helicosphaera spp. Clausicoccus

obrutus Hayellasituliformis

Chiasmolithus

spp.

Coccolithus

eopelagicus Ericsoniaformosa

Blackites spp. Braarudosphaera bigelowii Cyclicargolithus spp. Cyclicargolithus

floridanus Isthmolithusrecurvus Lanternithusminutus

Fig. S3. Distribution curves of relative (%) abundances of all the species detected in dataset B.

Eocene Oligocene C13n mcd 101 99 97 95 93 91 89 87 85 83 CNE21 CNO1 CNO2 103 105 CNE20 0 0.3% 0 0.6% 0 20% 0 1.6% 0 12% 0 1.6% C. subdistichus 0 2.5% 0 25% 0 50% 0 5% 0 25% 0 16% Dissolved shields 0 8% 0 3% 0 2.5% 0 4% 0 16% 0 4% Micrantolithus spp. Reticulofenestra

daviesii Reticulofenestrahillae ReticulofenestrasamoduroviiReticulofenestrascrippsae Reticulofenestraumbilicus Sphenolithusakropodus Sphenolithusmoriformis Sphenolithustribulosus Zygrhablithusbijugatus Other taxa

Sphenolithus

predistentusSphenolithuspseudoradiansSphenolithusradians Sphenolithus

spp. Eocene Oligocene C13n mcd 101 99 97 95 93 91 89 87 85 83 CNE21 CNO1 103 105 CNE20 0 20% Dictyococcites bisectus Reticulofenestra circus 0 6% 0 4% 0 1.6% 0 4% 0 6% 0 12% Reticulofenestra spp. <5µm 0 2.5% Reticulofenestra spp.

with dissolution signs

0 2% 0 10% Sphenolithus compactus 0 4% Sphenolithus intercalaris 0 6% 0 5%0 4% 0 1.2% 0 1.6% 0 4% 0 5%0 20% 0 6% >10 µm E/O 0 0.6% Pontosphaera spp. Biozones Biozones Step 2 CNO2 Step 2

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Inspired by, but not limited to, Merleau-Ponty (1962 , 2004 ) perspective of “habitual knowledge of the world ”, Noë ’s (2006) perception as an action, Wacquant ’s (2015)

This process, that is shown in Figure 5.11 compared to standard operation mode, takes merely few seconds to change photon helicity on the sample and allowed us to design a

In the current experimental conditions in which repeated cocaine treatment was followed by a 1-week withdrawal period and a new cocaine challenge, our results showed that

By direct spin-coating of a series of complexated PS-b-PEO samples with different molecular weight and composition, films with the same morphology and orientation (i.e.

Riproducibilità del modello: All’interno del progetto di costruzione e monitoraggio della rete dei servizi preposti alla prevenzione e alla cura dei DA promosso

The first goal is to enable the BP analyst to write own metrics M and assertions A, to obtain a process execution log L, and to design own analysis reports r, so as to be able to

Paula Westerman, Group Crop Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Rostock, Germany.. Local

The effect of LU change is significative and depends on LU scenarios, but in terms of the modification of the shape