Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Physics
Letters
B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Measurement
of
the
B
0
–B
0
and
B
0
s
–B
0
s
production
asymmetries
in
pp
collisions
at
√
s
=
7 TeV
.
LHCb
Collaboration
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Articlehistory: Received1August2014
Receivedinrevisedform23September 2014
Accepted1October2014 Availableonline31October2014 Editor:L.Rolandi
The B0–B0and B0
s–B0s productionasymmetries, AP(B0)and AP(B0s),aremeasuredbymeansofa time-dependent analysis of B0→ J/ψK∗0, B0→D−
π
+ and B0s →D−s
π
+ decays, using a data sample corresponding toanintegratedluminosity of1.0 fb−1,collectedbyLHCbin pp collisionsata centre-of-massenergyof7 TeV.Themeasurementsareperformedasafunctionoftransversemomentumand pseudorapidity of the B0 and B0s mesons within the LHCb acceptance. The production asymmetries, integrated over pT and
η
in the range4<
pT<30 GeV/c and2.5<
η
<4.5,are determinedto beAP(B0) = (−0.35±0.76±0.28)% and AP(B0s) = (1.09±2.61±0.66)%,wherethefirstuncertaintiesare statisticalandthesecondsystematic.
©2014TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.
1. Introduction
Theproductionratesof
b and
b hadrons¯
inpp collisions
arenot expectedtobeidentical.Thisphenomenon,commonlyreferredto astheproductionasymmetry,isrelatedtothefactthattherecan be coalescence between a perturbatively produced b or b quark¯
andthe
u and d valence
quarks inthebeamremnant. Therefore, one can expect a slight excess in the production of B+ and B0mesonswithrespectto
B
−andB
0mesons,ande.g. of
Λ
0 b baryonswith respect to
Λ
0b baryons. As b and b quarks¯
are almost en-tirelyproduced inpairsviastronginteractions,theexistenceofB
+andB0 productionasymmetriesmustbecompensatedbyopposite productionasymmetriesforother B-meson and
b-baryon
species. Theseasymmetriesareroughlyestimatedtobeatthe1%levelforpp collisions at LHC energies, andare expected to be enhanced at forward rapidities and small transverse momenta. Other sub-tle effects of quantum chromodynamics, beyond the coalescence between beauty quarks and light valence quarks, may also con-tribute[1–3].
Theproductionasymmetryisoneofthekeyingredientsto per-formmeasurementsof
CP violation
inb-hadron
decaysattheLHC, since CP asymmetries must be disentangled from other sources. TheproductionasymmetryforB0andB
0s mesonsisdefinedas AP
B0(s)≡
σ
(
B 0 (s))
−
σ
(
B0(s))
σ
(
B0(s))
+
σ
(
B0(s))
,
(1)where
σ
denotes the production cross-section. Similar asymme-tries are also expected when producing charmedhadrons. LHCbhas alreadyperformedmeasurementsof D+
−
D− and D+s−
D−sproduction asymmetries, finding values around the 1% level or less[4,5].
Inthispaper,thevaluesof AP
(
B0)
and AP(
B0s)
areconstrainedby measuring theoscillations of B0 and B0s mesonswitha time-dependent analysis of the B0
→
J/ψ(
μ
+μ
−)
K∗0(
K+π
−)
, B0→
D−(
K+π
−π
−)
π
+andB
0s
→
D−s(
K+K−π
−)
π
+decayrates,with-out tagging the initial flavour of the decaying B0(s) meson. The inclusion ofcharge-conjugate decaymodesisimpliedthroughout. Themeasurements areperformedasafunctionoftransverse mo-mentum, pT,andpseudorapidity,
η
,ofthe B0(s) mesonwithin theLHCb acceptance, and then integrated over the range 4
<
pT<
30 GeV
/
c and 2.
5<
η
<
4.
5.2. Detector,triggerandsimulation
The LHCb detector [6] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudorapidity range 2
<
η
<
5, designed for the studyofparticles containing b or c quarks. The detectorincludes a high-precision tracking systemconsisting ofa silicon-strip ver-tex detector surrounding the pp interaction region, a large-area silicon-strip detectorlocatedupstream ofadipole magnetwitha bending power ofabout4 Tm, and threestations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes placed downstream of the mag-net. The tracking systemprovides a measurement of momentum witha relative uncertaintythat variesfrom 0.4%atlow momen-tum to 0.6% at 100 GeV/c. The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex (PV), the impact parameter, is measured withhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.10.005
0370-2693/©2014TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.
a resolution of
(
15+
29/
pT)
μm, where pT is in GeV/c.Differ-enttypesofchargedhadronsaredistinguished usinginformation fromtwo ring-imagingCherenkovdetectors.Photon,electron and hadroncandidatesareidentifiedbyacalorimetersystemconsisting of scintillating-pad and preshower detectors, an electromagnetic calorimeterandahadroniccalorimeter.Muonsare identifiedbya systemcomposed ofalternatinglayers ofironandmultiwire pro-portionalchambers.Thetriggerconsistsofahardwarestage,based oninformationfromthecalorimeterandmuonsystems,followed byasoftwarestage,whichappliesafulleventreconstruction.
In the case of the B0
→
J/ψ
K∗0 decay, events are firstse-lected bya hardware trigger that requiresmuon candidates with
pT
>
1.
48 GeV/
c. Thesubsequentsoftwaretriggeriscomposedoftwo stages. The first stage performs a partial event reconstruc-tion and requires events to have two well identified oppositely chargedmuons, withinvariant mass largerthan 2
.
7 GeV/
c2.The secondstageperformsafulleventreconstructionandonlyretains events containing aμ
+μ
− pair that has invariant mass within 120 MeV/
c2 oftheknown J/ψ
mass[7]andformsavertexthatissignificantlydisplacedfromthenearestPV.
In the case of B0
→
D−π
+ and B0s→
D−sπ
+ decays, events are first selected by a hardware trigger requiring a high trans-verseenergyclusterinthecalorimetersystem.Eventspassingthe hardware trigger are further filteredby a softwaretrigger which requiresatwo-,three- orfour-tracksecondaryvertexwithalarge sumof pT of the tracks anda significant displacement fromthePVs.Subsequently, a multivariate algorithm [8]is applied, aimed atidentifyingsecondaryvertices,consistentwiththedecayofa
b
hadron.
Simulated events are used to determine the signal selection efficiency,acceptance as function of decaytime, decaytime res-olution,and tomodelthe background.Inthe simulation, pp
col-lisions are generated using Pythia 6.4 [9] with a specific LHCb configuration[10].Theinteractionofthegeneratedparticleswith thedetector,anditsresponse,areimplementedusingthe Geant4 toolkit[11]asdescribedinRef.[12].
3. Datasetandselection
Theselection of B0
→
J/ψ
K∗0 candidatesis basedon there-constructionof J
/ψ
→
μ
+μ
−andK∗0→
K+π
−decays.The J/ψ
candidatesare formed from two oppositely chargedtracks, iden-tified asmuons, having pT
>
500 MeV/
c and originatingfrom acommonvertex.Theinvariantmassofthispairofmuonsmustlie inthe range3030–3150 MeV
/
c2. The K∗0 candidatesare formedfromtwo oppositely chargedtracks,one identifiedasakaon and the other asa pion,originating froma common vertex. It is re-quired that the K∗0 candidate has pT
>
1 GeV/
c and that theinvariantmassliesintherange826–966 MeV
/
c2.The B0 candidates are reconstructed from the J
/ψ
and K∗0candidates,withtheinvariantmassofthe
μ
+μ
−pairconstrained tothe known J/ψ
mass.They are requiredto havean invariant massintherange 5150–5400 MeV/
c2.The decaytime ofthe B0candidateis calculatedfroma vertexandkinematic fitthat con-strainsthecandidatetooriginate fromits associatedPV[13].The
χ
2perdegreeoffreedomofthefitisrequiredtobelessthan10.OnlyB0 candidates witha decaytime greaterthan 0.2 psare
re-tained.Thislowerboundonthedecaytimerejectsalargefraction ofthepromptcombinatorialbackground.
Inthe case of B0
→
D−π
+ and B0s→
D−sπ
+ decays, the se-lectionof the B-meson candidateis based on the reconstruction ofD−→
K+π
−π
−and D−s→
K+K−π
− decays,respectively. Re-quirementsare madeonthe D−(s) decayproducts before combin-ing them to form a common vertex. The scalar pT sum of thetracks must exceed 1.8 GeV/c and the maximal distanceof clos-est approach between all possible pairs of tracks must be less than 0.5 mm. The D−(s) candidate is required to have a signifi-cantflightdistancewithrespecttotheassociatedPV,byrequiring a
χ
2 greater than 36 compared to the zero distancehypothe-sis. The masses of the D− and D−s candidates must lie within 1850–1890 MeV
/
c2and1949–1989 MeV/
c2,respectively.Theyare subsequently combinedwitha fourthparticle,the bachelor pion, toformtheB-meson
decayvertices.ThesumoftheD
−(s)and bach-elor pion pT valuesmust be larger than 5 GeV/c and the decaytime ofB-meson candidatesmustbegreater than0.2 ps.The co-sineoftheanglebetweenthe
B-meson
candidatemomentum vec-torandthelinesegmentbetweenthePVandB-meson candidate vertex is required to be larger than 0.999. Particle identification (PID) selection criteria are applied to the kaons and pions from the D−(s) candidate,and to the bachelor pion, inorder to reduce the backgroundfromother B-meson decayswitha misidentified kaonorpionandfromΛ
0b decayswithamisidentifiedprotontoa negligiblelevel.Afinalselectionisappliedtothecandidatesthatsatisfythe cri-teria described above.It uses amultivariate analysismethod [14, 15], optimized separately for each ofthe three decay modes, to rejectthecombinatorialbackground.Thevariablesusedinthe se-lection for the B decay products are the transverse momentum andtheimpactparameter.Forthe B candidates thevariables em-ployed are the transverse momentum, the distance of flight and theimpactparameter.
4. Fitmodel
Foreachsignalandbackgroundcomponent,thedistributionsof invariant mass and decay time of B-meson candidates are mod-elledbyappropriateprobabilitydensityfunctions(PDFs).We con-sidertwocategoriesofbackground:thecombinatorialbackground, dueto therandom association oftracks,and thepartially recon-structedbackground,duetodecayswithatopologysimilartothat ofthesignal,butwithoneormoreparticlesnotreconstructed.The latterispresentonlyfor
B
0(s)
→
D−(s)π
+decays.4.1. Mass model
Thesignalcomponentforeach decayismodelledconvolvinga doubleGaussianfunctionwithafunctionparameterizingthefinal stateradiation.ThePDFofthe
B invariant
mass,m,
isgivenbyg
(
m)
=
AΘ(
μ
−
m)(
μ
−
m)
s⊗
G(
m),
(2)where A is a normalization factor,
Θ
is the Heaviside function,G is the sum of two Gaussian functions with different widths and zero mean, and
μ
is the B meson mass. The parameters
−
0.
99 governs the amount of final state radiation, and is determined using simulated events for each of the three decay modes.Thecombinatorialbackgroundismodelledbyan exponen-tial function for all final states.In the case of B0→
D−π
+ andB0
s
→
D−sπ
+decays,abackgroundcomponentduetopartiallyre-constructed B0 andB0
s decaysisalsopresentinthelowinvariant
mass region. The main contributions are expectedto come from decays witha missing
γ
orπ
0: B0→
D∗−(
D−γ
,
D
−π
0)
π
+ de-cays with D−→
K+π
−π
−; B0→
D−(
K+π
−π
−)
ρ
+(
π
+π
0)
de-cays; B0s
→
D∗−s(
D−sγ
,
D−sπ
0)
π
+ decays with D−s
→
K+K−π
−; B0s→
D−s(
K+K−π
−)
ρ
+(
π
+π
0)
decays.We parameterize the partially reconstructed components by means of a kernel estimation technique [16] based on invariant mass distributions obtainedfrom full simulation,using the same selection as for data. In the case of B0
isalso abackgroundcomponentdueto B0
→
D+s
π
− decays.Weaccountforthiscomponentinthefitsusingthesame parameteri-zationadoptedforthesignal.The B0
→
D+sπ
−yieldisfixedusingtheratiobetweenhadronizationfractions measuredby LHCb
[17,
18]andtheworldaverageofbranchingfractions[7].4.2. Decay time model
Thetime-dependentdecayrateofaneutralB(0s)or B0(s) meson toaflavour-specific f or
¯
f final stateisgivenbythePDFh
(
t, ψ )
=
K(
1− ψ
ACP)(
1− ψ
Af)
×
e−ΓtΛ
+coshΓ
t 2+ ψΛ
−cos(
mt)
⊗
R(
t)
(
t),
(3)where
K is
anormalizationfactor,(
t)
istheacceptanceasa func-tionofthedecaytime, R(
t)
isthedecaytime resolutionfunction,m
≡
mH−
mLandΓ
≡ Γ
L− Γ
Harethemassanddecay-widthdifferencesofthe
B
0 (s)−
B0
(s)systemmasseigenstatesand
Γ
istheaveragedecaywidth.ThesubscriptsH andL denotetheheavyand light eigenstates, respectively. The two observablesare the decay time
t and
thetagofthefinalstateψ
,whichassumesthevaluesψ
=
1 ifthefinalstateis f andψ
= −
1 ifthefinalstateistheCP
conjugate
¯
f . ThetermsΛ
+andΛ
−aredefinedasΛ
±≡ (
1−
AP)
qp 1−ψ± (
1+
AP)
qp −1−ψ,
(4)where p and q are complexparametersentering thedefinitionof thetwo masseigenstates ofthe effectiveHamiltonianinthe B0(s)
system, p
|
B0(s)
±
q|
B0(s). The symbol AP denotes the productionasymmetryofthe givenB meson, and Af isthedetection
asym-metryofthefinalstate,definedintermsofthe f and
¯
f detectionefficienciesas
Af
≡
¯f
−
f
¯f
+
f
.
(5)Thedirect
CP asymmetry
ACPisdefinedasACP
≡
B
(
B0(s)→ ¯
f)
−
B
(
B0(s)→
f)
B
(
B0(s)→ ¯
f)
+
B
(
B0(s)→
f)
.
(6)Trigger andevent selectionslead to distortions in the shapes ofthedecaytimedistributions.Thesignaldecaytimeacceptances are determined fromsimulatedevents. Foreach simulated decay weapplytriggerandselectionalgorithmsasinrealdata.
Concerning the combinatorial and the partially reconstructed backgrounds,empiricalparameterizationsofthe decaytime spec-tra are determined by studying thelow andhighinvariant mass sidebandsfromdata.Partially reconstructedbackgroundsareonly presentinthecaseof
B
0→
D−π
+andB
0s
→
D−sπ
+decays.Inthecaseof
B
0s
→
D−sπ
+decays,theadditionalbackgroundcomponentdueto B0
→
D+sπ
−decaysismodelledusingthesamefunctional formasthatofthe B0s→
D−sπ
+signal, andthevalueofthepro-ductionasymmetryisfixedtothatobtainedfromthe
B
0→
D−π
+fit.
4.3. Decay time resolution
Thestrategyadoptedtostudythedecaytimeresolutionofthe detectorconsistsofreconstructingthedecaytimeoffake
B
candi-datesformed froma D− decayingto K+
π
−π
− andapiontrack,Table 1
Valuesofthevariousphysicalinputsusedinthefits.
Parameter Value Reference
md[ps−1] 0.510±0.004 [7] ms[ps−1] 17.768±0.024 [19] Γd[ps−1] 0.6583±0.0030 [7] Γs[ps−1] 0.6596±0.0046 [7] Γs[ps−1] 0.081±0.011 [7] |q/p|B0 0.9997±0.0013 [20] |q/p|B0 s 1.0003±0.0030 [21]
both coming from the same PV. The bachelor pion must be se-lected withoutintroducing biases on the decaytime, hence only requirements on momentum and transverse momentum are ap-plied, avoiding theuse of impact parametervariables. The decay time distributionofthesefake B candidates yieldsan estimateof thedecaytime resolutionofa realdecay.Inordertovalidate the method,simulatedeventsareusedforbothsignalsandfake
B
de-cays. The resolution is found to be overestimated by about 4 fs. This difference is taken into account as a systematic effect. The simulation also indicates that a dependence ofthe resolution on the decay time must be considered. Taking this intoaccount, an average decay time resolution of 49
±
8 fs is estimated. A reso-lution model, R(
t)
, consisting of a triple Gaussian function with zero mean and three different widths, characterized by an aver-agewidthof49 fs,isused.Theuncertaintyof8 fsontheaverage widthistakenintoaccountasa systematicuncertainty.Itis esti-matedfromsimulationthatthemeasurementofthedecaytimeis biasedby nomorethan2 fs,andtheeffectisaccountedforasa systematicuncertainty.5. Determinationoftheproductionasymmetries
The productionasymmetry foreachof thethreedecaymodes isdeterminedbymeansofasimultaneousfittotheinvariantmass anddecaytimespectra.Toaccountforthedependenceofthe pro-ductionasymmetriesonthekinematicsofthe
B
0 andB
0s mesons,
eachdatasamplemustbedividedintobinsof(pT,
η
),performingthesamefitforeachbin.
Inorderto validatethefitmodel,a seriesoffits tothe distri-butions ofeventsobtainedfromfastsimulations isusedtoverify theaccuracyofthecentralvaluesandthereliabilityofthe uncer-tainties.Noevidenceofbiasesoncentralvaluesnorofuncertainty misestimationsisfound.Furthermore,aglobalfittothetotal sam-ple of selected events is performed for each of the three decay modes. The massdifferences
md and
ms,themixing
parame-ters
|
q/
p|
B0 and|
q/
p|
B0s,theaveragedecaywidths
Γ
d andΓ
s,and the width differenceΓ
s are fixed to the central values of themeasurements reported in Table 1. The width difference
Γ
d isfixedtozero.
According to Eq.(3), forsmall values of ACP and Af, to first
order the decay rate is only sensitive to the sum of these two quantities. Forthisreason, we fix ACP tozeroand leave Af asa
freeparameterinthefits.Itisempiricallyverifiedthatthechoice ofdifferentACP values,uptothefewpercentlevel,leadsto
negli-giblevariationsofAP,asexpected.
Fig. 1 shows the J
/ψ
K+π
−, K+π
−π
−π
+ and K+K−π
−π
+invariantmassanddecaytimedistributions,withtheresultsofthe globalfits overlaid.
Fig. 2
showstherawasymmetries,definedas theratiosbetweenthedifferenceandthesumoftheoveralldecay time distributions, as a function of decay time for candidates in thesignal massregion.Thesignalyields, AP valuesanddetectionasymmetriesobtainedfromtheglobalfitsarereportedin
Table 2
. The AP valuesobtained fromtheglobal fitsare not well definedFig. 1. Distributionsof(left)invariantmassand(right)decaytimefor(top)B0→J
/ψK∗0,(middle)B0→D−π+and(bottom)B0
s→D−sπ+decays,withtheresultsofthe
fitoverlaid.Thecontributionsofthevariousbackgroundsourcesarealsoshown.
Fig. 2. Time-dependentrawasymmetriesforcandidatesinthe(a)B0→J/ψK∗0,(b)B0→D−π+and(c)B0
s→D−sπ+signalmassregionswiththeresultsoftheglobal
fitsoverlaid.In(c)theasymmetryisobtainedbyfoldingtheB0
s and B0s decaytimedistributionsintooneoscillationperiod,andtheoffsett0=0.2 ps correspondstothe
Fig. 3. DistributionsofpTand
η
,wherethebackgroundcomponentsaresubtractedusingthesPlot technique[22],for(a)B0→J/ψK∗0,(b)B0→D−π+and(c)B0s→D−sπ+decays.Thedefinitionofthevariouskinematicbinsissuperimposed.
Table 2
Valuesofsignalyields, AP, Af and ofthe correlations
ρ
(AP,Af) obtainedfromglobalfits.Thesmallervalueofthecorrelationinthe B0
s caseisduetothemuch
largermixingfrequencyofB0
smesons. Parameter B0→J /ψK∗0 B0→D−π+ B0 s→D−sπ+ Nsig 93 627±360 76 682±308 16 887±174 AP −0.0116±0.0063 −0.0058±0.0070 −0.0032±0.0166 Af −0.0086±0.0046 −0.0151±0.0049 −0.0110±0.0086 ρ(AP,Af) −0.65 −0.64 −0.01
pTand
η
needtobeapplied.Theyarereportedhereforillustrativepurposesonly.
Fig. 3 shows the two-dimensional distributions of (pT,
η
) for B0→
J/ψ
K∗0, B0→
D−π
+ and B0s→
D−sπ
+ decays. The back-groundcomponentsare subtracted usingthesPlot technique
[22]andthechosendefinitionofthevariouskinematicbinsisoverlaid. Forthetwo B0 decaysweuseacommonsetofbins,asreported
in
Table 3
,inordertoallowa simplecombinationofthetwo in-dependent AP measurements. In the case of the B0→
J/ψ
K∗0,two additional binsat small pT andlarge
η
are also defined. Anaccurate knowledgeof thedecaytime resolutionisimportantfor
B0
s
→
D−sπ
+ decay, dueto the fast oscillation ofthe B0s meson.Forthisreasonwedeterminethedecaytimeresolutionusingthe methodpreviously described,appliedto eventsbelongingtoeach
(
pT,
η
)
bin,whereadoubleGaussianfunctionwithzeromeanandvaluesofthewidthsdependingonthegivenbinisused.
6. Systematicuncertainties
Severalsourcesofsystematicuncertaintythataffectthe deter-minationoftheproductionasymmetriesareconsidered.Forthe in-variantmassmodel,theeffectsoftheuncertaintyontheshapesof all components(signals,combinatorialandpartially reconstructed backgrounds)areinvestigated.Forthedecaytimemodel, system-atic effects related to the decay time resolution and acceptance arestudied.Theeffectsoftheuncertaintiesontheexternalinputs usedinthefits,reportedin
Table 1
,areevaluatedbyrepeatingthe fitswitheachparametervariedby±
1σ
.Alternative parameteriza-Table 3CombinedvaluesofAP(B0)fromB0→J/ψK∗0andB0→D−π+decays,correspondingtothevariouskinematicbins.Thefirstuncertaintiesarestatisticalandthesecond
systematic.Forcompleteness,thevaluesobtainedeitherfromB0→J/ψK∗0orB0→D−π+decaysarealsoreportedinthelasttwocolumns,withstatisticaluncertainties only.ThevaluesofthelasttwobinsareobtainedfromB0→J
/ψK∗0decaysalone. pT(GeV/c) η AP(B0) AP(B0→J/ψK∗0) AP(B0→D−π+) (1.0,4.0) (4.5,5.2) 0.0016±0.0253±0.0016 0.0037±0.0260 −0.0331±0.1044 (1.0,4.0) (3.7,4.5) −0.0158±0.0162±0.0015 −0.0161±0.0170 −0.0130±0.0519 (2.0,4.0) (3.0,3.7) 0.0055±0.0254±0.0016 0.0078±0.0271 −0.0114±0.0738 (4.0,12.0) (4.5,4.7) 0.0160±0.0736±0.0067 −0.0489±0.0840 0.2353±0.1529 (4.0,7.0) (3.7,4.5) −0.0189±0.0158±0.0032 −0.0221±0.0184 −0.0099±0.0310 (4.0,7.0) (3.0,3.7) −0.0311±0.0132±0.0014 −0.0342±0.0160 −0.0245±0.0232 (4.0,7.0) (2.5,3.0) 0.0556±0.0254±0.0020 0.0703±0.0324 0.0321±0.0408 (7.0,12.0) (3.7,4.5) −0.0145±0.0205±0.0027 −0.0364±0.0269 0.0161±0.0316 (7.0,12.0) (3.0,3.7) −0.0142±0.0111±0.0015 −0.0067±0.0173 −0.0196±0.0146 (7.0,12.0) (2.5,3.0) −0.0236±0.0138±0.0014 −0.0341±0.0228 −0.0175±0.0173 (7.0,12.0) (2.2,2.5) −0.0190±0.0348±0.0034 −0.0397±0.0623 −0.0096±0.0420 (12.0,30.0) (3.7,4.5) −0.0550±0.0473±0.0020 −0.0195±0.0649 −0.0951±0.0690 (12.0,30.0) (3.0,3.7) 0.0067±0.0180±0.0021 −0.0193±0.0311 0.0199±0.0220 (12.0,30.0) (2.5,3.0) 0.0177±0.0162±0.0023 0.0295±0.0314 0.0134±0.0190 (12.0,30.0) (2.0,2.5) −0.0018±0.0236±0.0020 0.0031±0.0485 −0.0033±0.0270 (0.2,1.0) (4.5,6.0) −0.0391±0.0501±0.0016 −0.0391±0.0501 – (1.0,2.2) (5.2,6.0) 0.0523±0.0684±0.0025 0.0523±0.0684 –
tionsofthe backgroundcomponentsare alsoconsidered. To esti-matethecontributionofeachsingle source,we repeatthefitfor each(pT,
η
) binafterhavingmodifiedthebaselinefitmodel.Theshiftsfromtherelevantbaselinevaluesaretakenasthesystematic uncertainties.To estimate a systematicuncertaintyrelatedto the parameterizationoffinal stateradiationeffectsonthesignalmass distributions,the parameter s of Eq.(2) isvaried by
±
1σ
ofthe correspondingvalueobtainedfromfitstosimulatedevents.A sys-tematicuncertaintyrelatedtotheinvariantmassresolutionmodel isestimatedby repeatingthefitusingasingle Gaussianfunction. Thesystematicuncertaintyrelatedto theparameterizationofthe mass shape for the combinatorial background is investigated by replacing the exponential function with a straight line. Concern-ingthepartiallyreconstructedbackground,weassessasystematic uncertainty by repeating the fits while excluding the low mass sideband,i.e. applying therequirements m>
5.
20 GeV/
c2 fortheB0
→
D−π
+ decays and m>
5.
33 GeV/
c2 for B0s→
D−sπ
+de-cays. Toestimate the uncertaintyrelated tothe parameterization of signal decay time acceptances, different acceptance functions areconsidered.Effectsofinaccuraciesintheknowledgeofthe de-cay time resolution are estimatedby rescaling the widthsof the baselinemodeltoobtainan averageresolutionwidthdiffering by
±
8 fs. Simulationstudies also indicate that there isa small bias inthereconstructeddecaytime. Theimpact ofsuch abiasis as-sessedbyintroducinga corresponding biasof±
2 fs inthedecay timeresolutionmodel.Thedeterminationofthesystematicuncertaintiesrelatedtothe
|
q/
p|
input value needs a special treatment, as AP is correlatedwith
|
q/
p|
.For thisreason, anyvariation of|
q/
p|
turns into the same shift of AP in each of the kinematic bins. Such acorrela-tionis takenintoaccount when averaging AP
(
B0)
measurementsfromB0
→
J/ψ
K∗0and B0→
D−π
+decays,orwhenintegratingover pT and
η
.Thevaluesofthe systematicuncertaintiesrelatedtothe knowledge of
|
q/
p|
are 0.0013 inthe caseof AP(
B0)
and0.0030inthecaseof AP
(
B0s)
.Thedominantsystematicuncertain-ties for the B0
→
J/ψ
K∗0 decay are related to the signal massshapeandto
|
q/
p|
.Forthe B0→
D−π
+decay,themostrelevantsystematicuncertainties are relatedtothesignal massshape and tothepartiallyreconstructedbackground.Systematicuncertainties associatedwiththedecaytime resolutionand
ms are themain
sourcesforthe
B
0s
→
D−sπ
+decay. 7.ResultsThe values of AP
(
B0)
are determined independently for B0→
J/ψ
K∗0 andB0→
D−π
+decaysineachkinematicbinandthen averaged. Table 3 reports the final results. The overall bin-by-bin agreement between the two sets of independent AP
(
B0)
measurementsisevaluatedby meansofa
χ
2 test,withaχ
2=
7for14 degreesoffreedom.Thevaluesof AP
(
B0s)
determinedfromthe
B
0s
→
D−sπ
+fitsarereportedinTable 4
.The integrationover pT and
η
ofthe bin-by-bin AP valuesisperformedwithintheranges4
<
pT<
30 GeV/
c and 2.
5<
η
<
4.
5.Theintegratedvalueof APisgivenby
AP
=
iNεiiAP,i
i Ni εi
,
(7)wheretheindex
i runs
over thebins, Ni isthe numberofsignaleventsand
ε
i istheefficiency, definedasthenumberofselectedeventsdivided bythenumberofproducedeventsinthe i-th bin. Thesignalyieldineachbincanbeexpressedas
Ni
=
L
·
σ
bb¯·
2·
fd(s)·
B
·
fi·
ε
i,
(8)Table 4
ValuesofAP(B0s)fromB0s→D−sπ+decays,correspondingtothevariouskinematic
bins.Thefirstuncertaintiesarestatisticalandthesecondsystematic.
pT(GeV/c) η AP(B0s) (2,4) (3.0,5.0) −0.1475±0.0895±0.0192 (4,8) (3.5,4.5) −0.0471±0.0513±0.0112 (4,8) (2.5,3.5) 0.0376±0.0467±0.0083 (8,12) (3.5,4.5) 0.0582±0.0537±0.0053 (8,12) (2.5,3.5) 0.0370±0.0332±0.0051 (12,30) (3.5,4.5) −0.0339±0.0750±0.0095 (12,30) (2.5,3.5) −0.0333±0.0309±0.0040 (8,30) (2.2,2.5) −0.0351±0.0485±0.0059 Table 5
Valuesof
ω
ideterminedfromsimulationandω
datai extractedfromdatausingB0→
J/ψK∗0decaysintwodifferentbinningschemes.The
ω
ivaluesandthedifference
between
ω
i andω
datai valuesareusedtodeterminetheintegratedresultsandtoevaluatetherelatedsystematicuncertainties,respectively.
pT(GeV/c) η ωi ωdatai (4,7) (3.7,4.5) 0.1698±0.0008 0.1946±0.0025 (4,7) (3.0,3.7) 0.2432±0.0009 0.2396±0.0036 (4,7) (2.5,3.0) 0.2222±0.0009 0.1976±0.0051 (7,12) (3.7,4.5) 0.0662±0.0006 0.0789±0.0016 (7,12) (3.0,3.7) 0.1129±0.0007 0.1129±0.0045 (7,12) (2.5,3.0) 0.1150±0.0007 0.1002±0.0019 (12,30) (3.7,4.5) 0.0113±0.0003 0.0160±0.0007 (12,30) (3.0,3.7) 0.0276±0.0004 0.0307±0.0028 (12,30) (2.5,3.0) 0.0318±0.0004 0.0296±0.0025 (4,8) (3.5,4.5) 0.2667±0.0009 0.3064±0.0020 (4,8) (2.5,3.5) 0.4766±0.0009 0.4644±0.0030 (8,12) (3.5,4.5) 0.0564±0.0005 0.0640±0.0015 (8,12) (2.5,3.5) 0.1295±0.0008 0.0873±0.0019 (12,30) (3.5,4.5) 0.0175±0.0003 0.0238±0.0008 (12,30) (2.5,3.5) 0.0532±0.0005 0.0541±0.0027
where
L
is the integrated luminosity,σ
bb¯ is the bb cross¯
sec-tion, fd(s) is the B(0s) hadronization fraction, fi isthe fraction ofB mesons producedinthe
i-th
binandB
isthebranchingfraction oftheB decay.
BysubstitutingN
i/
ε
i fromEq.(8)intoEq.(7),theintegratedvalueof APbecomes
AP
=
i
ω
iAP,i,
(9)where
ω
i=
fi/
i fi.Thevaluesof
ω
i aredeterminedusingsim-ulatedevents. Thedifference betweenthe valuesof
ω
i predictedby Pythia for B0 andB0s mesonsis foundto benegligible, ifthe samebins in pT and
η
would beused. Thesevaluesare alsoex-tractedfromdatausingB0
→
J/ψ
K∗0 decays.Inthiscaseω
data i is measuredasω
idata=
Niε
irecj Nj
ε
recj,
(10)where
N
iistheyieldinthei-th
binandε
reci istotalreconstructionefficiency.Thevaluesof
ε
reci aredeterminedusingbothsimulated
eventsanddatacontrolsamples.Thevaluesof
ω
i andω
datai ,sum-marizedin
Table 5
,exhibitsystematicdifferencesatthe10%level. The difference in the central value between AP(
B0→
J/ψ
K∗0)
calculated using either
ω
i orω
datai is found to be 0.0024 usingthe B0 binningscheme,and0.0034usingthe B0s binningscheme. These valuesare assignedas systematicuncertainties for AP
(
B0)
and AP
(
B0s)
.Table 6
summarizesthe systematicuncertaintiesas-sociated with the integrated measurements. In the first row, the combined systematic uncertainties estimated in each bin,as de-scribedintheprevioussection,arereported.
Using Eq. (9), the integrated measurements of AP
(
B0)
for B0→
J/ψ
K∗0andB
0→
D−π
+decaysarefoundtobeFig. 4. Dependence of (top) AP(B0)and (bottom) AP(B0s)on (left) pTand (right)η. The error bars include both statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Table 6
Absolutevaluesofsystematicuncertainties.Thetotalsystematicuncertaintiesare obtainedbysummingtheindividualcontributionsinquadrature.
Source Uncertainty
AP(B0) AP(B0s)
Combined systematic uncertainties from bin studies 0.0004 0.0048 Uncertainty on|q/p| 0.0013 0.0030 Difference betweenωiandωidata 0.0024 0.0034
Total 0.0028 0.0066
Table 7
Values ofthe production asymmetry AP(B0) in bins of pT and η from B0→
J/ψK∗0andB0→D−π+decays.Thefirstuncertaintiesarestatisticalandthe sec-ondsystematic. Variable Bin AP(B0) pT(GeV/c) (4,7) 0.0033±0.0111±0.0028 (7,12) −0.0167±0.0084±0.0028 (12,30) 0.0001±0.0130±0.0029 η (2.5,3.0) 0.0264±0.0161±0.0030 (3.0,3.7) −0.0232±0.0093±0.0028 (3.7,4.5) −0.0203±0.0125±0.0021 AP
B0→
J/ψ
K∗0= −
0.
0033±
0.
0096(
stat)
±
0.
0028(
syst),
AP B0→
D−π
+= −
0.
0038±
0.
0124(
stat)
±
0.
0029(
syst),
whichleadtotheaverage
AP
B0
= −
0.
0035±
0.
0076(
stat)
±
0.
0028(
syst).
TheintegratedvalueofAP
(
B0s)
isAP
B0s
=
0.
0109±
0.
0261(
stat)
±
0.
0066(
syst).
Finally,thedependenciesof
A
P(
B0)
andA
P(
B0s)
on pT,obtainedbyintegratingover
η
,andonη
,obtainedby integratingover pT,areshownin
Fig. 4
.Thecorresponding numericalvaluesare reported inTables 7 and 8
.Table 8
ValuesoftheproductionasymmetryAP(B0s)inbinsofpTand
η
fromB0s→D−sπ+decays.Thefirstuncertaintiesarestatisticalandthesecondsystematic.
Variable Bin AP(B0s) pT(GeV/c) (4,8) 0.0069±0.0351±0.0067 (8,12) 0.0435±0.0283±0.0039 (12,30) −0.0334±0.0296±0.0038 η (2.5, 3.5) 0.0315±0.0342±0.0060 (3.5, 4.5) −0.0286±0.0412±0.0088 8. Conclusions
The production asymmetriesof B0 and B0
s mesons havebeen
measured in pp collisions at
√
s=
7 TeV within the acceptance of the LHCb detector, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.
0 fb−1. The measurements have been performedinbinsofp
Tandη
,andprovideconstraintsthatcanbeusedtotestdifferentmodelsofB-meson production.Furthermore, once integrated using appropriate weights for any reconstructed
B0(s) decaymode,they can beused toderive effectiveproduction asymmetries, as inputs for CP violation measurements with the LHCbdetector.
The values of the production asymmetries integrated in the ranges4
<
pT<
30 GeV/
c and 2.
5<
η
<
4.
5 havebeendeterminedtobe AP
B0= (−
0.
35±
0.
76±
0.
28)
%,
AP B0s= (
1.
09±
2.
61±
0.
66)
%,
wherethefirstuncertaintiesarestatisticalandthesecond system-atic.Noclearevidenceofdependencesonthevaluesof pT and
η
hasbeenobserved.
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN ac-celerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC. WethankthetechnicalandadministrativestaffattheLHCb insti-tutes. WeacknowledgesupportfromCERNandfromthenational
agencies: CAPES,CNPq, FAPERJ andFINEP (Brazil); NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG, HGF and MPG (Germany); SFI (Ireland);INFN(Italy); FOMandNWO (TheNetherlands);MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MEN/IFA (Romania); MinES and FANO (Rus-sia);MinECo(Spain);SNSFandSER(Switzerland);NASU(Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); NSF (USA). The Tier1 computing cen-tres are supported by IN2P3 (France), KIT andBMBF (Germany), INFN(Italy),NWOandSURF(TheNetherlands),PIC(Spain),GridPP (United Kingdom). We are indebted to the communities behind the multiple open source software packages on which we de-pend.We are also thankful forthe computingresources andthe accesstosoftwareR&DtoolsprovidedbyYandexLLC(Russia). In-dividualgroupsormembershavereceivedsupportfromEPLANET, MarieSkłodowska-Curie Actions andERC (EuropeanUnion), Con-seilgénéraldeHaute-Savoie,LabexENIGMASSandOCEVU,Région Auvergne (France), RFBR (Russia), XuntaGal and GENCAT (Spain), Royal Society and Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851 (UnitedKingdom).
References
[1]M.Chaichian,A.Fridman,OnapossibilityformeasuringeffectsofCPviolation atpp colliders,Phys.Lett.B298(1993)218.
[2]E.Norrbin,R.Vogt,Bottom productionasymmetriesat the LHC, arXiv:hep-ph/0003056.
[3]E.Norrbin,T.Sjöstrand, Productionand hadronizationofheavyquarks,Eur. Phys.J.C17(2000)137,arXiv:hep-ph/0005110.
[4]LHCbCollaboration,R.Aaij,etal.,Measurementofthe D±production asym-metryin7TeVpp collisions,Phys.Lett.B718(2013)902,arXiv:1210.4112. [5]LHCbCollaboration,R.Aaij,etal.,MeasurementoftheD+s −D−s production
asymmetryin7TeV pp collisions,Phys.Lett.B713(2012)186,arXiv:1205. 0897.
[6]LHCbCollaboration,A.A.AlvesJr.,etal.,TheLHCbdetectorattheLHC,J. In-strum.3(2008)S08005.
[7]ParticleDataGroup,J.Beringer,etal.,Reviewofparticlephysics,Phys.Rev.D 86(2012)010001,and2013partialupdateforthe2014edition.
[8]V.V.Gligorov,M.Williams,Efficient,reliableandfasthigh-leveltriggeringusing abonsaiboosteddecisiontree,J.Instrum.8(2013)P02013,arXiv:1210.6861. [9]T.Sjöstrand,S.Mrenna,P.Skands,PYTHIA6.4physicsandmanual,J.High
En-ergyPhys.05(2006)026,arXiv:hep-ph/0603175.
[10]I. Belyaev, et al., Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCbsimulationframework,in:NuclearScienceSymposiumConference Record,NSS/MIC,IEEE,2010,p. 1155.
[11]GEANT4Collaboration,J.Allison,etal.,Geant4developmentsandapplications, IEEETrans.Nucl.Sci.53(2006)270;
GEANT4Collaboration,S.Agostinelli,etal.,GEANT4:asimulationtoolkit,Nucl. Instrum.Methods,Sect.A506(2003)250.
[12]M.Clemencic,etal.,TheLHCbsimulationapplication, Gauss:design,evolution andexperience,J.Phys.Conf.Ser.331(2011)032023.
[13]W.D.Hulsbergen,DecaychainfittingwithaKalmanfilter,Nucl.Instrum. Meth-ods,Sect.A552(2005)566,arXiv:physics/0503191.
[14]L.Breiman,J.H.Friedman,R.A.Olshen,C.J.Stone,ClassificationandRegression Trees,WadsworthInternationalGroup,Belmont,California,USA,1984. [15]R.E.Schapire,Y.Freund,Adecision-theoreticgeneralizationofon-linelearning
andanapplicationtoboosting,J.Comput.Syst.Sci.55(1997)119.
[16]K.S.Cranmer,Kernel estimationinhigh-energyphysics, Comput.Phys. Com-mun.136(2001)198,arXiv:hep-ex/0011057.
[17]LHCbCollaboration,R.Aaij,etal.,Measurementofthefragmentationfraction ratio fs/fd anditsdependenceonB mesonkinematics,J.HighEnergyPhys.
04(2013)001,arXiv:1301.5286.
[18]LHCbCollaboration,R.Aaij,etal.,Measurementofb hadronproduction frac-tionsin7TeVpp collisions,Phys.Rev.D85(2012)032008,arXiv:1111.2357. [19]LHCbCollaboration,R.Aaij,etal.,PrecisionmeasurementoftheB0
s–B¯0s
oscil-lationfrequencywiththedecayB0
s→D−sπ+,NewJ.Phys.15(2013)053021,
arXiv:1304.4741.
[20] HeavyFlavorAveragingGroup,Y.Amhis,etal.,Averagesofb-hadron,c-hadron, and
τ
-leptonpropertiesasofearly2012,arXiv:1207.1158,updateavailable on-lineathttp://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag.[21]LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij, et al., Measurement of the flavour-specific
CP-violatingasymmetryas
sl inB 0
s decays,Phys.Lett.B728(2014)607,arXiv:
1308.1048.
[22]M.Pivk,F.R.LeDiberder,sPlot:astatisticaltooltounfolddatadistributions, Nucl.Instrum.Methods,Sect.A555(2005)356,arXiv:physics/0402083.
LHCbCollaboration