• Non ci sono risultati.

Lecture 3 - Magnets

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Lecture 3 - Magnets"

Copied!
22
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Lecture 3 - Magnets

ACCELERATOR PHYSICS

MT 2004

E. J. N. Wilson

(2)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 2

Lecture 3 – Magnets - Contents

‹ Magnet types

‹ Multipole field expansion

‹ Taylor series expansion

‹ Dipole bending magnet

‹ Diamond quadrupole

‹ Various coil and yoke designs

‹ Power consumption of a magnet

‹ Magnet cost v. field

‹ Coil design geometry

‹ Field quality

‹ Shims extend the good field

‹ Flux density in the yoke

‹ Magnet ends

‹ Superconducting magnets

‹ Magnetic rigidity

‹ Bending Magnet

‹ Fields and force in a quadrupole

(3)

Components of a synchrotron

(4)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 4

‹ Dipoles bend the beam

‹ Quadrupoles focus it

‹ Sextupoles correct chromaticity

Magnet types

x By

x B

y

0 0

(5)

Multipole field expansion

φ (r ,θ)

Scalar potential obeys Laplace

whose solution is

Example of an octupole whose potential oscillates like sin 4θ around the circle

2

φ

x2 +

2

φ

y2 = 0 or

1 r2

2

φ

∂θ

2 +

1 r

r r

∂φ

r

⎝ ⎜ ⎞

⎠ ⎟ = 0

φ

=

φ

nrn sin n

θ

n=1

(6)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 6

Taylor series expansion

φ = φn

n=1

r nsin nθ

Field in polar coordinates:

Br = − ∂φ

∂r , Bθ = 1 r

∂φ

∂θ

Br = φnnr n−1sin nθ , Bθ = φnnr n−1 cos nθ

Bz = Br sin θ + Bθ cosθ

= −φnnrn−1[cosθ cos nθ + sinθsin nθ]

= φnnr n−1 cos n( − 1)θ = φnnxn−1 (when y = 0)

Taylor series of multipoles To get vertical field

Fig. cas 1.2c

Octupole

Sext

Quad

Dip.

! ...

3 2 1

! 1

1

...

4 . 3

. 2

.

3 3 3 2

2 2 0

3 4

2 3

2 0

∂ + + ∂

∂ + ∂

∂ + ∂

=

+ +

+ +

=

x x x B

x x B

x B B

x x

x B

z z

z

z

φ φ φ φ

(7)

Dipole bending magnet

(8)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 8

Diamond dipole

(9)

Diamond quadrupole

(10)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 10

Various coil and yoke designs

‹ ''C' Core:

Easy access Less rigid

‹ ‘H core’:

Symmetric;

More rigid;

Access problems.

‹ ''Window Frame'

High quality field;

Major access problems Insulation thickness

μ >>

g λ

1

NI/2

NI/2

(11)

Power consumption of a magnet

= σ A R N

2l 2

σ μ

A

B R g

I

o 2

2 2

2 2

Power = = l

μ >>

g λ

1

NI/2

NI/2

Bair = μ0 NI / (g + λ/μ);

g, and λ/μ are the 'reluctance' of the gap and iron. A is the coil area, l is the length σ is

conductivity

Approximation ignoring iron reluctance (λ/μ << g ):

NI = B g /μ0

(12)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 12

Magnet cost v. field

Variation of cost with field B

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1

Field B (T)

Coil costs Running costs Pole costs Yoke costs Total

‹ Pressure from need to save real estate

‹ Constraint from saturation or critical current, synchrotron radiation

(13)

0.0

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

Current density j

Lifetime cost

running

Coil design geometry

‹ Standard design is rectangular copper (or aluminium) conductor, with cooling water tube. Insulation is glass cloth and epoxy resin.

‹ Amp-turns (NI) are determined, but total copper area (Acopper) and number of turns (N) are two degrees of freedom and need to be decided.

Current density:

j = NI/Acopper Optimum j

determined from economic criteria.

(14)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 14

Field must be flat to 1 part per 10000

(15)

Shims extend the good field

To compensate for the non-infinite pole, shims are added at the pole edges. The area and shape of the shims determine the amplitude of error harmonics which will be present.

Shim

A Quadrupole

(16)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 16

Flux density in the yoke

(17)

Magnet ends

‹ The 'Rogowski' roll-off:

y = g/2 +(g/π) exp ((πx/g)-1);

‹ Three dimensional computer calculation

1 0

-1 -2

0 1 2

(18)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 18

Superconducting magnets

(19)

dp

dt = p dθ

dt = p dθ ds

ds

dt = p ρ

ds dt

= ev × B = eds dt B

Magnetic rigidity

1

ρ = d θ ds

Bρ

( )

[T.m] = pc eV[ ]

c m.s

[

−1

]

= 3.3356 pc

( )

[GeV]

Bρ

( )

= p

e = pc

ec = βE

ec = βγE0

ec = m0c

e

( )

βγ

d

θ

θ

(20)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 20

Bending Magnet

F Effect of a uniform bending (dipole) field

F If then

F Sagitta

θ << π / 2

( )

=

( )

ρ

= ρ

θ B

B 2 2 2

sin l l

( )

ρ

θ B

B 2

l

( )

( )

16 2 16

cos 2 1

2 = θ

≈ ρθ θ

ρ −

± l

(21)

Fields and force in a quadrupole

No field on the axis Field strongest here

B ∝ x

(hence is linear) Force restores Gradient

Normalised:

POWER OF LENS Defocuses in

vertical plane ( )

. y 1

k B

B

ρ

x f

= − ∂ =

∂ l l

( )

1 . y

k B

B

ρ

x

= − ∂

x By

(22)

ACINST3 - E. Wilson – 3-Oct--04 - Slide 22

Summary

‹ Magnet types

‹ Multipole field expansion

‹ Taylor series expansion

‹ Dipole bending magnet

‹ Diamond quadrupole

‹ Various coil and yoke designs

‹ Power consumption of a magnet

‹ Magnet cost v. field

‹ Coil design geometry

‹ Field quality

‹ Shims extend the good field

‹ Flux density in the yoke

‹ Magnet ends

‹ Superconducting magnets

‹ Magnetic rigidity

‹ Bending Magnet

‹ Fields and force in a quadrupole

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Cytokinin regulates the activity of reproductive meristems, flower organ size, ovule formation, and thus seed yield in Arabidopsis.. Cross talk between the sporophyte

Two families of non-overlapping coercive domain decomposition methods are proposed for the numerical approximation of advection dominated advection-di usion equations and

Let G n be the union of all closed line segments joining any two elements of [n] × [n] along a vertical or horizontal line, or along a line with

The strong foundations put in place by these masters have been built on more recently by sev- eral scholars, including Leonard Barkan, in the field of archaeology (1999);

Murat Somer, Koç University, Istanbul Paul Levin, Stockholm University Institute of Turkish Studies. Cengiz Günay, Austrian Institute for Interna- tional

DCs were generated from peripheral blood monocytes in the presence of feline IL4 and GM-CSF and after five days of colture,their maturation was induced alternatively

Moreover, the Monge–Amp`ere equations, written under the form of first order systems of PDE’s, can be reduced to linear form by means of invertible point transformations suggested

 The standard Logical Analysis of Data procedure, obtained from the former by not assigning values to binary attributes and solving an unweighted set cov- ering problem (1) for