Bibliografia
1. Kobayashi, S., Saito, N., Horiuchi, H., Iorio, R., & Takaoka, K. (2000). Poor bone quality or hip structure as risk factors affecting survival of total-hip arthroplasty.
Lancet, 355(9214), 1499–504. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02164-4. 2. Kroger H, Kotaniemi A, Kroger L, Alhava E. Development of bone
mass and bone density of the spine and femoral neck - a prospective study of 65 children and adolescents.
Bone Miner 1993; 23:171-182.
3. Santavirta S, Konttinen YT, Bergroth V, Eskola A, Tallroth K, Lindholm TS. Aggressive granulomatous lesions associated with arthroplasty. Immunopathological studies.
J Bone Joint Surg (A) 1990; 2:252-258.
4. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of pressfitt ingrown and cemented femoral stems.
Clin Orthop Res 1990; 261:27-38.
5. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller EJ, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical obsevations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop 1992; 274:79-96.
6. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodelling.
Clin Orthop Res 1996; 322:285-292.
7. Engh CA, MCGovem TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.
8. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cmentless femoral implants.
J Bone Joint Surg (B) 1993; 2:279-287.
9. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral densitometry by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
J Orthop Res 1992; 10:836-844.
10. Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer.
Calcif Tissue Int 1989; 44:228-232. 11. National Joint Registry, UK, 2012.
12. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five year survivorship of thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacement.
J Bone Joint Surg (A) 2002;2:171-17.
13. Malchau H, et al. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J bone Joint Surg (A) 2002; S2:S2-S20.
14. Karlson EW, Mandi LA, Aweh GN, Sangha O, Liang MH, Grodst ein F. Total hipreplacement due to osteoarthritis: The importance of age, obesity, and other modifiablerisk factors.
Am J Med 2003; 1:93-98.
15. Registro italiano artroprotesi (RIAP): stato dell’arte – GIOT Giugno 2013 XXXIX, Fascicolo).
16. Harkess JW. Arthroplasty of hip. Canale ST. eds.
Campbell's Operative Orthopedics. St. Luis, MI, USA; Mosby; 1998 381:424.
thop 1970;72:7.
18. PNLG-Revisione sistematica sulle protesi d’anca: affidabilità dell’impianto Programma nazionale per le linee guida Ministero della Salute-Pubblicazione Settembre 2004, Aggiornato Settembre 2007. 19. Registro Nazionale Artroprotesi RIAP (GIOT Giugno 2013; 39:90-95). 20. Roder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S, Berry DJ, Muller ME, Busato A.
Demographic factors affecting long term outcome of total hip arthroplasty
Clin Orthop Res 2003; 417:62-73.
21. Giuseppe Anastasi, et al., Trattato di anatomia umana, vol. 1, 4ª ed., Milano, Edi.Ermes, 2006, pp. 223-225, 240-242)
22. Giuseppe Anastasi, et al., Trattato di anatomia umana, vol. 1, 4ª ed., Milano, Edi.Ermes, 2006, pp. 229:230
23. Nigel Palastanga, Derek Field,Roger Soames. Anatomia del movimento umano. Struttura e funzione. Cap 3 arto inferiore, articolazioni 343-344).
24. Kapandji, IA. Fisiologia articolare, 2° vol sez. Anca. 25. Siopack JS, Jergesen HE. Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Western Journal of Medicine, 1995. 26. Wolff, J. The law of bone remodelling.
Berlin Heidelberg New York, Springer; 1986.
27. A. Surace, G. Mineo, AM. Previtera, G. Tandoi. Indicazioni, selezione e geometria impiantistica protesica nel trattamento delle fratture cervicali di femore.
Gior Ita di Ortop e Traumatologia 1990; vol16 - fascicolo3.
28. L’artropastica di rivestimento dell'anca con accoppiamento metallo-metallo: risultati clinici, radiologici e tribologici.
Dip di ricerca traslazionale e delle nuove tecnologie in medicina e chirurgia, 2013, N. Bianchi. Etd.
29. F.Falez et al. Role of cement fixation in early failures of resurfacing hip replacement.
GIOT 2008.
30. Kevin L. Ong, J. Day, MT. Kurtz. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Proximally Coated Femoral Stems. Effects of Stem Length and Surface Finish.
The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol 24, issue 5, pag 819-824; 2009.
31. Weinams H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Effects of fit and bonding characteristics of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling.
J Bio- mech Eng 1994;116(4): 393-400.
32. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces.
J Biomech 1993;26(11):1271-1281.
33. Giovanni Iolasco (ricercatore del Dipartimento di Chirurgia Ortopedica, Traumatologia e Riabilitazione, II Università di Napoli). Bisfosfonati e protesi articolari.
34. U.Andreus; M.Collaca. Analisi dello sforzo meccanico all'interfaccia osso corticale-stelo protesico nella protesi di anca mediante il metodo degli elementi finiti.
Giot. 2006;32:198:204.
35. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller EJ, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of non cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop 1992; 274:79-96.
36. MIZ. Ridzwan, S. Shuib, AY Hassan et al. Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant design: A review.
J. Med. Sci, 7(3): 460-467. April 2007
37. Sychterz CJ et al. Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty.
Clin Orthop 2001, 389:218-227
38. Silva MJ et al. Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty.
J Orthop Res 1999, 17:525-531.
39. Wooley, Paul H., et al. Cellular immune responses to orthopaedic implant materials following cemented total joint replacement.
Journal of orthopaedic research 15.6 (1997): 874-880.
40. Mulroy WF et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation cementing tecniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996, 78:325-330.
41. Rae T. A study on the effect of particulate metals of orthopaedic interest on murine macrophage in vitro.
J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1975;57:444-450.
42. Pazzaglia UE, dell’Orbo C, Wilkinson MJ. The Foreign Body Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106:209-219
43. Pazzaglia UE, Pringle JAS. Bone resorption in vitro: macrophages and giant cells from failed total hip replacement versus osteoclasts. Biomaterials 1989;10
44. Maguire Jr JK et al. Foreign body reaction to polymeric debris following total hip arthroplasty.
45. Perry MJ et al. Analysis of cell types and mediator production from tissues around loosening joint implants.
Br J Rheumatol 1995, 34 :1127-1134 46. Eftekhar NS et al. Prosthetic synovitis.
Hip 1985:169-183
47. Lassus J et al. Macrophage activation results in bone resorption. Clin Orthop 1998, 352:7-15
48. Xu JW et al. Production of platelet-derived growth factor in aseptic loosening of total hip replacement.
Rheumatol Int 1998, 17:215-221
49. Denis Clohisy. Cellular Mechanisms of Osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003 Jan;85(suppl 1):S4-S6
50. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):500- 9.
51. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jul-Aug(150):263-70.
52. Stryker, Orthopaedics. Accolade® system: brochure. Cemented and cementless femoral hip system. pp 13-14, 19.
53. C. Faldini et al.Il ruolo dei rivestimenti di superficie in idrossiapatite in ortopedia e traumatologia.
Archivio di ortopedia e reumatologia, Dec 2012, Volume 123, Issue 3, pp 3-4.
54. Consoli V, Montano A, Alfieri P et al. Studio morfologico strumentale della cavità cotiloidea e della metaepifisi prossimale del femore.
55. Albanese CV et al. Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report.
Hip Int 2006, 16(suppl 3):S9-1.
56. Heikki Kröger et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Precision of the method and effect of operation on bone mineral density. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996, vol1, issue 10, pp 1526-1530
57. AD. Pérez, et al. Evaluation of Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound in a Primary Care Setting as a Screening Tool for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women.
Journal of clinical Densitometry, 2002 vol 6, issue 3, pp 237-245. 58. David S. et al. Morphology of the proximal femur differs widely in Age
and Sex: Relevance to design and selection of femoral prostheses. Pubblicato online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/jor.22052.
59. F.Pipino. Tissue-sparing surgery (T.S.S.) in hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology; March 2006, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 33-35.
60. Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS. Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995 Oct;24(10):766-70.
61. Jasty M, Krushell R, Zalenski E, O'Connor D, Sedlacek R, Harris W. The contribution of the nonporous distal stem to the stability of proximally porous- coated canine femoral components.
J Arthroplasty. 1993 Feb;8(1):33-41.
62. Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, et al. HA Femoral Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty 10-13 Year Follow-up. CORR. December, 2001.
63. McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients: 8-13 Year Results Using an Uncemented Stem.
CORR. 373: 153-163, 2000
64. Sakalkale D, Rothman R, et al. Minimum 10-Year Results of a Tapered Cementless Hip Replacement.
CORR. 362: 138-144, 1999
65. Santori et al. Possibilità di impiego di una protesi di anca corta in pazienti ultrasettantenni: risultati a breve termine.
GIOT 2014,
66. Sculco TP, Jordan LC. The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty.
Instr Course Lect 2004;53:141-7.
67. Dorr LD. The appeal of the mini-incision. Orthopedics 2004;27:937-8. 68. Kurtz SM et al. Future young patient demand for primary and revision
join replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(10):2606-2612.
69. 2008 Canada Joint Replacement Registry.
70. DiGioia AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ. Less invasive THA using navigational tools.
Instr Course Lect 2004;53:157-64.
71. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M. A conser- vative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:952-8.
72. Briem D, Schneider M, Bogner N, et al. Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a collum femoris preserving (CFP) short-stem prosthesis.
73. Ettinger M, Ettinger P, Lerch M, et al. The NANOS short-stem in total hip arthroplas- ty: a mid term follow-up.
Hip Int 2011;21:583-6.
74. Ong, K et al. Influence of length and medial-lateral Geometry on femoral stem biomechanics. Poster No. 2411, 55th Annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
