• Non ci sono risultati.

LEIT Information and Communication Technologies :

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "LEIT Information and Communication Technologies : "

Copied!
11
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Il processo di valutazione: punti di forza e criticità emersi sui singoli

criteri di valutazione

Beatrice Fraboni

Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Università di Bologna

LEIT Information and Communication Technologies :

Giornata Nazionale di Lancio dei Bandi 2016-17 in Horizon 2020

(2)

1 Excellence 2 Impact

3 Implementation

(3)

IMPACT

RIA:

show industrial commitment,

be driven by user needs

concrete business cases supported by strong exploitation strategies,

cover the value/supply chain as appropriate

Not expected to commit for commercialization

IA:

 Strong industrial commitment

 Ideally target medium volume markets (no niche markets)

 Provide evidence of strong commitment to bring the technology to the market(s)

 industrialise/manufacture targeted products in Europe

 Business plan

(4)

Target specifications

Complete and detail the list of your target specifications

(for a chip, module or subsystem) to be achieved by the end of the project

Specifications may not be complete from the very beginning of a project, however:

Do not focus only on those parameters which are to be improved only at chip /component level but also on other parameters, e.g., on a module or subsystem level

Include a reasonable comparison with regards to: packaging effort/cost, driving electronics, total module size, total power consumption, etc.

Non-provided or incomplete sets of specs

 low exploitation potential!

 Hard to monitor the project progress for referees/PO!

(5)

Exploitation potential

Show where / why there is real exploitation potential

Do not provide market potential in generic terms on possible sales:

Specify which fraction of these markets expected project outcomes will address

Include a reasonable comparison with competitors in the same technology and with solutions of competing technologies

Show where / why there is real competitive advantage and exploitation potential; identify the applications and business cases - foresee to regularly monitor the market

How to bring your technology targets to higher TRLs and ultimately to the market

Provide exploitation strategies /plans that are:

well thought-through, complete, and concrete enough (including possibly measurable targets)

coherent and consistent with the proposed implementation

(6)

Industrial Commitment

Industrial commitment may vary from substantial engagement in the relevant project work packages to essentially “giving advice on specifications” only.

For some actions which focus on more advanced topics (e.g., disruptive R&I actions), "giving advice on specs" may be fully sufficient.

In general however: “Giving advice” could simply mean that the partner under consideration is unwilling to contribute substantially to the project work

Substantial industrial engagement means:

–Show engagement in the expected project outcomes by having a

substantial participation in "important" project work packages and/or by leading essential project tasks (IMPLEMENTATION)

– include partner(s) with clearer commercialisation ability or to

incorporate activities in the project for ensuring commercialisation

 Identify in the project possible product owner(s)!

(7)

IPR issues

Do not postpone IPR issues to the consortium agreement but outline in the proposal your strategy for management of IPRs and their

protection For example:

–Check existing patents – state whether they can be a barrier to exploitation and how you intend to overcome it

–Clearly outline the expected IPRs from your project (capable of commercial/industrial exploitation)

–Outline how you will handle / share background information and

expected project results and how do you envisage to protect your

results

(8)

IMPLEMENTATION

Explitation plan regularly updated

Exploitation plan not only metioned in WP on

«Exploitation/Dissemination» but quantitative reference to it also in final prototype validation/assessment WP, (including industrial partner committment)

Quantitative targets specifications (also in excellence and coherent with them!)

Innovation Manager/ Board

(9)

Innovation

New key-word in H2020

Full implications still to be clearly defined

Declined according to the specific calls

Foresee an Innovation Manager, a Soeciic Advisory Board or include as a partner a Consultant/SME specifically addressing this issues

«Innovation radar» questionnaire to be filled by the

Consortium and regularly updated at each review meeting

(10)

Innovation questionnaire

Describe the innovation(s) in your project and the development stage

Describe the macro type and the nature of the innovation(s): Product, service, marketing method etc.

Will the innovation be introduced to the market? Has an owner been idenfitied?

Indicate the step(s) already done (or are foreseen) in the project in order to bring the innovation to (or closer to) the market : Tech

transfer, Business Angels, prototyping, market analysis etc..

How does the consortium engage end-users?: already in the

consrtium, later stage….

(11)

Thank you for your attention

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

However, while the model consistently describes the phenomena related to iodide oxidation by photogenerated holes, it is less reliable for modelling TA hydroxylation

Empoli è una città strana in cui pare non sia successo e non succeda mai niente eppure eventi locali hanno assunto una dimensione nazionale e internazionale: è stata un

When comparing the post-2009 eruption quiescent data to the pre-2009 eruption data we first note that the ESO-R data from 1986 February (see Section 3.5) are consistent with the

To address these limitations and to investigate factors potentially related to metabolic changes, we prospectively evaluated body weight and fat composition, and the glu- cose and

Secondo la teoria degli ambiti (Nucci, 2001; Smetana, 1995; Turiel, 2002), la capacità di comprendere ciò che è morale, non è l'esito ultimo di un processo di sviluppo del

Lina Panella (Univ.. “Sapienza” di Roma). 3) 25 febbraio 2016, incontro di studio organizzato dall’Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Dipartimento di Giiurisprudenza

“Una buona prova scientifica deve essere semplice e comprensibile. Lo