• Non ci sono risultati.

Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field"

Copied!
17
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field

Outdoor propagation – cylindrical field

(2)

Line Sources Line Sources

Many noise sources found outdoors can be considered line sources: roads, railways, airtracks, etc.

Geometry for propagation from a line source to a receiver - in this case the total power is dispersed over a cylindrical surface:

d

R

r

dx X

O

) (

8 log

10

) (

6 log

10

emission coherent

d L

L

emission incoherent

d L

L

W p

W p

In which Lw’ is the sound power level per meter of line source

(3)

Coherent cylindrical field Coherent cylindrical field

• The power is dispersed over an infinitely long, pulsating cylinder:

   

 

r lg 10 8 ' L L

r lg 10 2

lg W 10

L lg W W 10

W I r L 2

W lg

I r L 10 2

W lg

I 10 lg I 10 L

L r 2

W S

I W

W I

o o

o o

o o

I

r

L

In which Lw’ is the sound power level per meter of line source

(4)

“ “ discrete” discrete ” (and incoherent) linear sources (and incoherent) linear sources

Another common case is when a number of point sources are located along a line, each emitting sound mutually incoherent with the others:

Geometry of propagation for a discrete line source and a receiver

- We could compute the SPL at the receiver as the energetic (incoherent) summation of many spherical wavefronts. But at the end the result shows that SPL decays with the same cylindrical law as with a coherent source:

Lw’

The SPL reduces by 3 dB for each doubling of distance d.

Note that the incoherent SPL is 2 dB louder than the coherent one!

d

R

1

r 1 r i

S

r i-1

i

a

  a 10 log   d 6 [ dB ]

log 10

L

L pWp   

(5)

Example of a discrete line source: cars on the road Example of a discrete line source: cars on the road

Distance a between two vehicles is proportional to their speed:

In which V is speed in km/h and N is the number of vehicles passing in 1 h

The sound power level LWp of a single vehicle is:

- Constant up to 50 km/h

- Increases linearly between 50 km/h and 100 km/h (3dB/doubling) - Above 100 km/h increases with the square of V (6dB/doubling)

] m [ 1000 N

/ V

a  

(6)

Example of a discrete line source: cars on the road Example of a discrete line source: cars on the road

• Hence there is an “optimal” speed, which causes the minimum value of SPL, which lies around 70 km/h

• Modern vehicles have this “optimal speed” at even larger speeds, for example it is 85 km/h for the Toyota Prius

(7)

Outdoors propagation – excess attenuation

Outdoors propagation – excess attenuation

(8)

Free field: excess attenuation Free field: excess attenuation

Other factors causing additional attenuation during outdoors progation are:

• air absorption

• absorption due to presence of vegetation, foliage, etc.

• metereological conditions (temperature gradients, wind speed gradients, rain, snow, fog, etc.)

• obstacles (hills, buildings, noise barriers, etc.)

All these effects are combined into an additional term L, in dB, which is appended to the free field formula:

• LI = Lp = LW - 20 log r - 11 + 10 log Q - L (dB)

Most of these effects are relevant only at large distance form the source.

The exception is shielding (screen effect), which instead is maximum when the receiver is very close to the screen

(9)

Excess attenuation: temperature gradient Excess attenuation: temperature gradient

Figure 1: normal situation, causing shadowing

Shadow zone

(10)

Excess attenuation: wind speed gradient Excess attenuation: wind speed gradient

Vectorial composition of wind speed and sound speed

Effect: curvature of sound “rays”

(11)

Excess attenuation: air absorption Excess attenuation: air absorption

Air absorption coefficients in dB/km (from ISO 9613-1 standard) for different combinations of frequency, temperature and humidity:

Frequency (octave bands)

T (°C) RH (%) 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

10 70 0,12 0,41 1,04 1,93 3,66 9,66 32,8 117,0

15 20 0,27 0,65 1,22 2,70 8,17 28,2 88,8 202,0

15 50 0,14 0,48 1,22 2,24 4,16 10,8 36,2 129,0

15 80 0,09 0,34 1,07 2,40 4,15 8,31 23,7 82,8

20 70 0,09 0,34 1,13 2,80 4,98 9,02 22,9 76,6

30 70 0,07 0,26 0,96 3,14 7,41 12,7 23,1 59,3

(12)

Excess attenuation – barriers

Excess attenuation – barriers

(13)

Noise screens (1) Noise screens (1)

A noise screen causes an insertion loss L:

L = (L0) - (Lb) (dB)

where Lb and L0 are the values of the SPL with and without the screen.

In the most general case, there arey many paths for the sound to reach the receiver when the barrier is installed:

- diffraction at upper (B) and side (C,D) edges of the screen - passing through the screen (SA),

- reflection over other surfaces present in proximity (building, etc. - SEA).

(14)

Noise screens (2): the MAEKAWA formulas Noise screens (2): the MAEKAWA formulas

If we only consider the enrgy diffracted by the upper edge of an infinitely long barrier we can estimate the insertion loss as:

• L = 10 log (3+20 N) for N>0 (point source)

L = 10 log (2+5.5 N) for N>0 (linear source)

where N is Fresnel number defined by:

in which  is the wavelength and  is the path difference among the diffracted and the direct sound.

 

SB BA SA

N  2   2   

(15)

Maekawa chart

Maekawa chart

(16)

Noise screens (3): finite length Noise screens (3): finite length

If the barrier is not infinite, we need also to consider its lateral edges, each with its Fresnel number (N

1

, N

2

), and we have:

• L = L

d

- 10 log (1 + N/N

1

+ N/N

2

) (dB) Valid for values of N, N

1

, N

2

> 1.

The lateral diffraction is only sensible when the side edge is closer to the source-receiver path than 5 times the “effective height”.

S

heff R

(17)

Noise screens (4) Noise screens (4)

Analysis:

The insertion loss value depends strongly on frequency:

• low frequency  small sound attenuation.

The spectrum of the sound source must be known for assessing the insertion loss value at each frequency, and then recombining the values at all the frequencies for recomputing the A-weighted SPL.

SPL (dB)

f (Hz)

No barrier – L0 = 78 dB(A)

Barrier – Lb = 57 dB(A)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Consequently, there are significant differences in spatial amplitude-phase phenomena in ordinary and anomalous geomagnetic conditions at frequencies of 11.9 and 14.88 kHz

 Create a clear correlation between temperature profiles and noise levels (similar profiles ↔ average noise).  Time and meteorological

The results presented show how positive thermal gradients have a significant impact on environmental noise propagation, producing an important level increase. Since

The estimation of the SWE, the product between the height of the snow cover and the ratio between snow and water densities, is usually based on punctual measures with

 The numerical simulation at medium and high frequency was conducted with the Pyramid Tracing program Ramsete, which produced reasonable results (as of

In the second case it can be seen that, by taking the signed values, it is not possible to obtain values of the sound reduction index at many frequencies, while with unsigned

The new ISO-DIS 9613 (parts 1 and 2) standard contains a detailed method for computing the sound propagation outdoors, taking into account also the effects caused by the

Finite Element models have been used for a while with the goal of predicting the noise produced by the engine and other mechanical parts inside the compartment [2], but they are