1
Vincere la sfida di qualità, costo e produttività per competere con la strada
Irmtraut Tonndorf ERFA Chair
Milano, 24.2.2016
2
Costi elevati per superare le barriere infrastrutturali
e normative del traffico merci internazionale
Corridoi: sì alle infrastrutture, ma attenzione alle regole operative da sviluppare e standardizzare!
Necessità di standardizzazione
infrastrutturale, operativa, normativa Il potere decisionale è spesso
all’esterno dei Corridoi (ministeri, agenzie sicurezza…)
Modifiche normative riguardano non solo il corridoio ma tutta le rete
>> riluttanza a cambiare le regole Gli Stati sono focalizzati più sui pas- seggeri (< 10% internazionale) e meno sulle merci (> 50% internazionale) I clienti – driver principali! – sono esclusi dai processi decisionali
3
Direttiva 913/2010: fatta la legge, ma i risultati sono ancora molto parziali
4
Field of regulation 913/2010 Current status
Designation of freight corridors (Articles 3 to 5)
Corridors are defined and stable
J
Consultation of applicants (Article 10)
Has not yet taken place
L
Investment planning (Article 11)
Better international cooperation and view of corridor
requirements, but implementation is often lacking
L
Coordination of works (Article 12)
Planned works are published, but “corridor effects” are not
sufficiently taken account of.
L
One-Stop Shop (Article 13)
Corridor One-Stop Shops are in place, but their powers and
added value leave room for improvement
K
Capacity allocation (Article 14)
PaPs, FlexPaPs and reserved capacity ensure capacity for
freight trains, but result is still suboptimal for all partners
K
Traffic management (Article 16)
Different approaches in different countries, no coordinated
“corridor view”
L
Traffic management in case of disturbance (A. 17)
Different approaches in different countries, no coordinated
“corridor view”
L
Conditions of use (Article 18)
Available, but not fully harmonised
K
Quality of service (Article 19)
Lack of monitoring; no satisfying data
L
Plan, do, check: gestire lo sviluppo in un’ottica europea
:
5
Cluster Planning Reliability of the timetables given to the market, measured in track access punctuality and order punctuality
Travel time
Arrival punctuality of all freight trains which use a significant part of the RFC, including how much of delays are caused by each freight RU and IM
Cluster Dispatching Breakdown standstill times
Spare capacity as train-km in duty (peak load number and average number) Spare capacity given into the market for extra trains
Cluster Construction Age of network subdivided in asset groups
Technical reliability as time to failure for components (switches, tracks etc.) Availability of market oriented network:
> normal train length (740m) as a % of whole Corridor
> heavy paths (25t axle load) as a % of whole Corridor
> high cube (P400? paths as a % of whole Corridor Number of unplanned against planned breakdowns Cluster Services Length of spare tracks along the corridor
Number of stabling zones provided along the corridor
Satisfaction survey of the users of the RFC, according to current regulation Cluster Cost Infrastructure costs for a typical mix of freight trains in the RFC
