• Non ci sono risultati.

Index Abstract.......................................................................................................................... 6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Index Abstract.......................................................................................................................... 6"

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Index

Abstract... 6 Acknowledgements ... 8 Index ... 10 List of tables ... 13 List of figures... 14 1 Introduction ... 16

1.1 The aims of the work ... 18

1.2 Methodology... 18

1.3 Terminology ... 19

2 Sustainable Development and Sustainability Indicators ... 21

2.1 Definition of sustainability ... 21

2.1.1 The origin of sustainability... 21

2.1.2 The concept... 22

2.2 Analysis of sustainability and sustainable water management definitions ... 23

2.2.1 Qualitative aspects: the concepts ... 24

2.2.2 Statistical aspects ... 25

2.2.3 Suggestions ... 26

2.2.4 Definitions of sustainable of water management systems... 28

2.3 Choice of general criteria ... 29

2.4 Sustainability indicators ... 32

2.5 Frameworks for sustainability indicators selection ... 33

2.5.1 Models with roots in economics ... 34

2.5.2 Models with roots in environmental sciences ... 35

2.5.3 Models that link societal activities and the environment ... 38

2.6 Lists from literature and analysis ... 39

2.7 Selection ... 91

2.7.1 Health and Hygiene criteria ... 92

2.7.1.1 Risk infection ... 92

2.7.2 Environment and Use of Resources... 94

2.7.2.1 Water bodies ... 95

2.7.2.2 Impact on environment ... 96

2.7.2.3 Use of Natural Resources ... 100

2.7.3 Economics... 102

2.7.3.1 Population ... 103

2.7.3.2 Utility ... 103

2.7.4 Institution, Society and Culture ... 104

2.7.4.1 Legislation... 104

(2)

2.7.5 Technology ... 109

2.7.5.1 Risk of failure ... 109

2.8 A first list of sustainability indicators ... 110

3 The Stockholm Water Company ... 113

3.1 Raw water ... 114 3.2 Drinking water ... 117 3.2.1 Waterworks... 118 3.2.2 The process ... 119 3.3 Wastewater ... 121 3.3.1 Henriksdal ... 122 3.3.2 Bromma ... 123 3.3.3 Loudden ... 124 3.3.4 The process ... 125

4 The case study ... 129

4.1 Selection of indicators ... 129

4.2 Indicator results ... 130

4.2.1 Drinking water quality tests within regulation ... 130

4.2.2 Intensity of use of water resources ... 132

4.2.3 Oxygen Consumption Potential... 132

4.2.4 Sludge quality ... 134

4.2.5 Percentage of sludge re-used ... 136

4.2.6 Energy use for wastewater treatment... 137

4.2.7 Energy use for water supply ... 138

4.2.8 Use of electricity and fossil fuel ... 139

4.2.9 Energy recovered ... 140

4.2.10 Costs per person... 141

4.2.11 Consumption of water... 142

4.2.12 Service complaints... 143

4.2.13 Number of employees... 144

4.2.14 Drinking water system interruptions ... 146

4.2.15 Wastewater activity interruptions ... 147

4.3 A model for assessing sustainable development ... 148

4.3.1 Application to the Stockholm Water Company case study ... 149

4.3.2 The first example ... 155

4.3.3 The second example ... 156

4.3.4 Interpretation of results... 160

5 Conclusions ... 166

6 References ... 169

APPENDIX A: List of Concepts in Sustainability Definitions ... 177

APPENDIX B: Collection of Data and Evaluation of Indicators ... 181

(3)
(4)

List of tables

Table 2-1: Suggested criteria and sub-criteria...31

Table 2-2: The list of indicators proposed by WHO...41

Table 2-3: The list of water-related indicators proposed by UNCSD. ...45

Table 2-4: The list of water-related indicators proposed by OECD. ...47

Table 2-5: The list of water-related indicators proposed by ESEPI...48

Table 2-6: The list of water-related indicators proposed by Plan Bleu. ...50

Table 2-7: The list of indicators proposed by the Sustainable Water Utilities project. ...52

Table 2-8: The list of indicators proposed by the WSM project. ...54

Table 2-9: A list of indicators suggested for the GOUVERNe project. ...55

Table 2-10: A list of water-related indicators suggested for the SIMO project. ...58

Table 2-11: The list of environmental water-related indicators proposed by Water UK...59

Table 2-12: The list of indicators proposed for the SWARD project...61

Table 2-13: The list of water-related indicators proposed by the Swedish EPA...66

Table 2-14: The list of criteria proposed by Kärrman et al. (1998)...67

Table 2-15: The list of indicators proposed by Hellström et al. (1998)...68

Table 2-16: The list of indicators proposed by Weigert and Steinberg. ...70

Table 2-17: The list of indicators proposed by Lundin et al. (1997; 1998)...71

Table 2-18: A further list of indicators selected by Lundin (1999). ...72

Table 2-19: The list of indicators proposed by Zinn...73

Table 2-20: The list of indicators proposed by Balkema (1998). ...74

Table 2-21: A further list of indicators proposed by Balkema (2003)...78

Table 2-22: Overview of indicators used in several publications (Balkema et al., 2003) ...79

Table 2-23: The list of indicators presented by Bracken. ...80

Table 2-24: The list of indicators proposed by Graf. ...82

Table 2-25: The list indicators proposed by Mayer-Spohn. ...83

Table 2-26: The list of indicators proposed by Nilsson and Bergström. ...87

Table 2-27: The list of indicators proposed by Holmberg et al. ...88

Table 2-28: The list of indicators proposed by Palme...89

Table 2-29: The list of indicators selected by Gumbo. ...90

Table 2-30: A further list of indicators proposed by Gumbo...91

Table 2-31: The first list of sustainability indicators...110

Table 4-1: Data used for the indicators’ assessment...129

Table 4-2: Classification of indicators on the basis of their impact...150

Table 4-3: Values of the normalized indicators in the considered period...152

Table 4-4: Comparison scale...154

Table 4-5: The evaluated sub-indices in the first example. ...155

Table 4-6: The composite sustainable development index in the first example...156

Table 4-7: Assessment of weightings for the health-related indicator in the second example. ...157

Table 4-8: Assessment of weightings for the environmental indicators in the second example...158

Table 4-9: Assessment of weightings for the economical indicator in the second example. ...159

Table 4-10: Assessment of weightings for the social indicators in the second example. ...159

Table 4-11: Assessment of weightings for the technological indicators in the second example. ....159

Table 4-12: The evaluated sub-indices in the second example...160

Table 4-13: The composite sustainable development index in the second example. ...160

Table 4-14: The sub-indices and the composite index trends in the first example. ...161

(5)

List of figures

Figure 2-1: Environment, Society and Economy links in the sustainable development

concept... 22

Figure 2-2: The PSR framework. ... 36

Figure 2-3: The DPSIR framework. ... 37

Figure 3-1: The Lake Mälaren region. ... 115

Figure 3-2: The Botkyrka region. ... 116

Figure 3-3: The Lake Bornsjön region. ... 116

Figure 3-4: The water consumption for the everyday life. ... 117

Figure 3-5: The Norsborg and Lovö waterworks coverage. ... 119

Figure 3-6: The purification process. ... 119

Figure 3-7: The wastewater treatment plants coverage. ... 121

Figure 3-8: The wastewater treatment process at the Henriksdal plant. ... 123

Figure 3-9: The general wastewater treatment process. ... 125

Figure 4-1: The “Drinking water quality tests within regulation” indicator. ... 131

Figure 4-2: The “Oxygen Consumption Potential” indicator... 133

Figure 4-3: The “Sludge quality” indicator (related to the content of mercury)... 134

Figure 4-4: The “Sludge quality” indicator (related to the content of cadmium). .. 135

Figure 4-5: The “Sludge quality” indicator (related to the content of lead). ... 136

Figure 4-6: The “Percentage of sludge re-used” indicator. ... 137

Figure 4-7: The “Energy use for wastewater treatment” indicator... 138

Figure 4-8: The “Energy use for water supply” indicator. ... 139

Figure 4-9: The “Use of electricity and fossil fuel” indicator. ... 140

Figure 4-10: The “Energy recovered” indicator... 141

Figure 4-11: The “Costs per person” indicator. ... 142

Figure 4-12: The “Consumption of water” indicator... 143

Figure 4-13: The “Service complaints” indicator... 144

Figure 4-14: The “Number of employees” indicator. ... 145

Figure 4-15: The “Drinking water system interruptions” indicator... 146

Figure 4-16: The “Wastewater activity interruptions” indicator. ... 147

Figure 4-17: Hierarchy scheme for the calculation of the combined sustainable development index. ... 149

(6)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Performance matrix of the Office for

Authors introduce the concept of political opportunity structure borrowed from the new social movement theory to explain the relationship and networking between local

188 we plot the contour map related to the second scenario for the Cansiglio source model, computed applied a uniform seismic moment distribution on the fault plane, but with

The proposed algorithm is based on a recent review of quality drug trials of anti-impulsive aggres- sive agents (AIAAs), to address efficacy of specific agents in the treatment

There are no particular clinical conditions that prevent this vaccine from being administered with the exception of subjects with a history of significant

Subjects 1-8 = Healthy controls; subjects 9-14 = Symptomatic HD subjects, subject 15 = asymptomatic subjects (positive genetic test of HD and unreported CAG

When an aqueous solution of metal ion is shaken with an immiscible organic solvent containing such an organic ligand, the metal-ion complex is distributed between the two phases..

Write an SQL script (createDB.sql) with the commands (i.e., CREATE TABLE) for creating the database corresponding to the logical schema described in Section 5..