• Non ci sono risultati.

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti combinati

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti combinati"

Copied!
49
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Radiotherapy Unit, Meldola

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti combinati

Donatella Arpa

(2)

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti combinati

CHEMIOTERAPIA RADIOTERAPIA CHIRURGIA

IMMUNOTERAPIA

(3)

Definitive therapy for locally advanced NSCLC, generally combined with chemotherapy.

Definitive therapy for early stage .

Preoperative or postoperative therapy for selected patients treated with surgery.

Therapy for limited recurrence and metastases.

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti

combinati

(4)

Non-Small- Cell Lung Cancer

Unresectable IIIA-IIIB

Resectable IIIA

(5)

Locally Advanced Non-Small- Cell Lung Cancer

Unresectable IIIA –IIIB NSCLC

(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

Progression-free survival was significantly longer with durvalumab than with placebo.

The secondary end points also favored durvalumab, and safety was similar between the groups.

(Funded by AstraZeneca; PACIFIC ClinicalTrials.gov

number, NCT02125461

.)

(10)

Optimal RT dose:RTOG 0617

a median survival of 28 months.

(11)

MS continues to range from 10 to 26 mo with a 5- year survival rate of less than 25%.

Previous work has demonstrated that

Lengthening treatment time beyond 6 weeks has a negative impact on overall survival,

likely due to accelerated repopulation of tumor cells .

Optimal RT dose…….

IS IT ENOUGH ???

(12)

Hyperfractionation

hypofractionation

Optimal RT dose…….

the analysis of Machtay demonstrated a moderate

linear relationship between lesional BED and overall

survival: for every 1 Gy increase in BED, there was

an absolute overall survival benefit ranging from

0.36% to 0.7%.

(13)
(14)

Non-Small- Cell Lung Cancer

Unresectable IIIA-IIIB

Resectable IIIA

(15)

Definitive therapy for locally advanced NSCLC, generally combined with chemotherapy.

Definitive therapy for early stage .

Preoperative or postoperative therapy for selected patients treated with surgery.

Therapy for limited recurrence and metastases.

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti

combinati

(16)

Despite having complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy , up to 40% of

resectable stage IIIA patients experience local tumor recurrence.

In order to improve local tumor control and survival, post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) has long been utilized to intensify local therapy.

Postoperative therapy (PORT)

(17)

Postoperative therapy (PORT)

Adverse effect on survival by increasing the relative risk of death by 21%,

translating to a 7%

reduction in 2-year OS from 55% to 48%.

Subgroup analysis

indicated a detriment in OS for patients with stage I/II N0-1 due to excess of toxicity from PORT.

PORT for stage III-N2

disease trended toward, but did not reach, a significant survival benefit.

(18)

Is it true?

A significant flaw of the PORT Meta-analysis was the inclusion of historical series with patients

treatments utilizing antiquated techniques

that were potentially more toxic than modern radiation delivery with image

guidance, respiratory motion assessment, and higher dose conformality.

(19)

Lally BE.Postoperative radiotherapy for stage II or III nonsmall-cell lung cancer using the surveillance,

epidemiology, and end results database. J Clin Oncol 2006

Robinson CG. Postoperative radiotherapy for pathologic N2 non-small-cell lung cancer treated with adjuvant

chemotherapy: a review of the National Cancer Data Base.

J Clin Oncol 2015

Douillard JY Impact of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in patients with complete resection and stage I, II, or IIIA non-smallcell lung cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: the adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association (ANITA) Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008,

Postoperative therapy (PORT)

(20)

Postoperative therapy (PORT)

N2

In case of R1 resection (positive resection margin, chest wall),PORT should be considered

In completely resected early-stage NSCLC is not recommended

In case both ChT and RT are administered post- surgery, RT should be administered after ChT

Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Annals of Oncology 28 (Supplement 4): iv1–iv21, 2017

(21)

Preoperative therapy

Therapeutic management options for stage III non-small cell lung cancerWorld J Clin Oncol 2017 February 10; 8(1): 1-20 ISSN 2218-4333

(22)

Surgical resection may not improve treatment

outcomes compared to definitive

radiotherapy. Within the context that

radiotherapy leads to lower morbidity and

mortality compared to surgery, definitive

chemoradiation is a reasonable treatment

option for patients with stage IIIA-N2

disease.

(23)

5-year OS and MS were not improved with the induction chemoradiation.

Five-year PFS was significantly higher under the intervention arm (22.4%) compared to

chemoradiation arm (11.1%).

Relatively high treatment-related deaths were

observed in the trimodality arm (7.9%) compared

to definitive chemoradiation arm (2.1%).

(24)

No significant differences were found for either

OS or PFS between the two groups, thus making

either strategies acceptable for resectable stage

IIIA, and select inoperable IIIA or IIIB patients.

(25)

RT

Oligoprogressive disease

Oligometastatic disease

Neoplasie del polmone e trattamenti

combinati

(26)

Oligoprogressive and oligometastatic disease

Oligometastatic state : metastatic disease is

present at a limited number of anatomic sites is being increasingly recognized.

Oligoprogressive state: disease progression at a limited number of anatomic sites, with continued response or stable disease at other sites of disease.

Such an oligoprogressive state is best described in patients with NSCLC treated with molecular

targeted therapy.

(27)

Oligoprogressive and oligometastatic

disease

(28)

Radiotherapy :“Therapeutic Ratio”

The concept of therapeutic ratio is best illustrated graphically, by making a direct comparison of dose-response curves for both tumor control and normal tissue complication rates plotted as a function of dose.

(29)

Precise targeting

(30)

Imaging

(31)

Imaging

(32)

Contouring

(33)

Treatment volume

Icru 50, 62

(34)

Intrafraction modifications

(35)

Interfraction modifications

(36)

IGRT

(37)

Our experience NSLC

25 Gy in 5 frazioni su T ed N 15 Gy in 3 frazioni

(con una disomogeneità interna sino a 37.5 Gy)

30 Gy in 5 frazioni su T

25gy in 5 frazioni su N

Ipofrazionamento della dose

Split course

(38)

I ciclo RT: 30 Gy in 5 frazioniT e 25 Gy in 5 frazioni N (24-30/05/16)

(39)

II ciclo RT: 15 Gy in 3 frazioni 7-11/07/16

(40)

Induction CT Radiotherapy Consolidation CT CDDP

75 mg/mq (1,21)

DOCETAXEL

75 mg/mq (1,21) (2 cycles)

Accelerated Hypofractio nated RT

(From 15th to 19th)

CDDP

75 mg/mq (1,21)

DOCETAXEL

75 mg/mq (1,21) (2 cycles)

FBS and/or TBNA PET CT scan Biopsy

Program protocol

T 30 Gy/5 fractions up to 40 Gy

N 25 Gy/5 fractions up to 37.5 Gy

(41)

cT4 cN2 M0 squamous carcinoma

ycTx ycN0 M0

cT4 cN3 M0 adenocarcinoma

ycTx ycN0 M0

(42)

30/01/14 FBS ; ADENOK ALK TRASLOCATO

RT 2009, PROTOCOLLO IRST

ycTx ycN0 M0

(43)

Dal 29/03/2014- 2/04/14 25 gy in 5 frazioni con dismogeneità 31.25 Gy

PD aprile 2015… avvio di crizotinib

(44)

ypT0 ypN0(0/34) ypMx

cT4 cN3 M0 squamous carcinoma cT4 cN3 M0 adenocarcinoma

ycT0 ycN0 yMx

(45)

cT4 cN3 cM0 adenocarcinoma

ycT4 ycN0 cM0 adenocarcinoma

cT3cN2 cM0 large cell carcinoma

ycT0 ycN0 cM1 large cell carcinoma

(46)

Grade (No. = 19)

1 2 3-4

Toxicity (WHO/RTOG) No. % No. % No. %

Neutropenia - - 2 12.5 11 68.8

Leucopenia - - 2 12.5 8 50.1

Anemia - - 2 12.5 - -

Creatinine - - 3 18.8 - -

Fatigue - - 2 12.5 1 6.3

Mucositis - - 1 6.3 - -

Overall Chemoteraphy and Radiotherapy Toxicity

No cases of acute pneumonia or esophagitis (G3/4)were observed

(47)

Overall Survival

(median follow-up : 23 months, range 2-42)

2012/10/14

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

OS

0 6 12 18 24 30

months

Median OS: 27.0 months (95% CI 9.6-not reached)

Pts at risk 23 20 11 10 6 4

(48)

Local Progression-Free Survival

2012/09/14

Metastasis-Free Survival

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

Relgional Free Survival

0 6 12 18 24 30

months

Median LPFS: 19.8 months (95% CI 9.7-not reached)

Pts at risk 17 16 10 7 3 2

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00

Metastasis Free Survival

0 6 12 18

months

Median MFS: 9.7 months (95% CI 5.8-not reached)

Pts at risk 17 13 5 4

Local Progression Free Survival

(49)

grazie

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The target of this paper is to define a practical stochastic approach which allows us to model realistically the residen- tial water demand in relation to the users number and thus

Feeding habits of Padogobius bonelli (Bonaparte, 1846) (Osteichthyes, Gobiidae): The importance of fish dimensions and hydrological conditions..

SC277 Impact of preoperative Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score on perioperative morbidity and survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer treated with

When we matched the clinical data of the whole patients cohort with molecular alterations, we found a trend towards a better prognosis for patients with MSI than for

If the whole cohort had had the probability of missing stage seen in CCGs with high completeness (low admin- istrative issues), an additional 64, 71 and 74% of patients with

Keller SM et al (2000) A randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with completely resected stage II or IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac

This sen- tinel report concluded that, based on the higher incidence of local recurrence and decreased 5- year survival in patients undergoing a limited pulmonary

Ran- domized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin following resec- tion in Stage IB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): report of Cancer