• Non ci sono risultati.

Combinational Verification

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Combinational Verification"

Copied!
3
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

1 Symbolic

Combinational Verification

Gianpiero Cabodi Stefano Quer

Politecnico di Torino Torino, Italy

{gianpiero.cabodi,stefano.quer}@polito.it http://staff.polito.it/{gianpiero.cabodi,stefano.quer}/

Reference

™ Paper

™ Books

C. Meinel, T. Theobald

“Algorithms and Data Structure in VLSI Design”

Springer-Verlag, Berlin, August 1998 ISBN 3-540-64486-5

G. D. Hachtel, F. Somenzi

“Loginc Synthesis and Verification Algorithms”

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Combinational EC

™ Industrial EC checkers almost exclusively use an combinational EC paradigm

‹sequential EC is too complex, can only be applied to design with a few hundred state bits

‹combinational methods scale linearly with the design size for a given fixed size and “functional complexity”

of the individual cones

™ Still, pure BDDs are plain SAT solver cannot handle all cones

‹BDDs can be built for about 80% of the cones of high- speed designs

‹less for complex ASICs

‹plain SAT blows up on a “Miter” structure

™ Contemporary method highly exploit structural similarity of designs to be compared

Combinational Verification

Combinational Verification

Verification (base method)

Compare output’s BDDs

Combinational Verification

(2)

2 Combinational Verification

Verification (base method)

Compare output’s BDDs Mi== M’i , ∀ i ?

(Mi⊕ M’i) == 0 , ∀i ? 0?

Combinational Verification

Testing

Fault

• Stuck-at 0/1

• Detectable faults (patterns)

• Undetectable faults

Verification (base method)

Compare output’s BDDs

Mi== M’i, ∀ i ?

(Mi⊕ M’i) == 0 , ∀i ?

Application of Pure BDDs

Statistics on a PowerPC processor design:

Application of Pure BDDs

Time for identical set of circuits:

Structural Similarity

Functional Equivalent Nets (%)

Circuit Size

Structural Similarity

Functional Equivalent Nets (%)

Circuit Size

(3)

3 History of Equivalence Checking

™ SAS (IBM 1978 - 1994)

‹standard equivalence checking tool running on mainframes

‹based on the DBA algorithm (“BDDs in time”)

‹verified manual cell-based designs against RTL spec

‹handling of entire processor designs

— application of “proper cutpoints”

— application of synthesis routines to make circuits structurally similar

— special hacks for hard problems

™ BEC (IBM 1991 - 1996)

‹workstation based re-implementation of SAS

‹mainly used in BooleDozer synthesis environment

™ Verity (IBM 1992 - today)

‹originally developed for switch-level designs

‹today IBMs standard EC tool for any combination of switch-, gate-, and RTL designs

™ Chrysalis (1994 - now Avanti)

‹based on ATPG technology and cutpoint exploitation

‹very weak if many cutpoints present

‹did not adopt BDDs for a long time

™ Formality (1997 - Synopsys)

‹multi-engine technology including strong structural matching techniques

™ Verplex (1998)

‹strong multi-engine based tool

‹to our knowledge heavy SAT-based

‹very fast front-end

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The diameter is the maximum length of the shortest path between any two states.  Worst case

Nel Sud Italia il percorso può essere descritto come un declassamento generale del livello di competenze richiesto nel mercato del lavoro mentre l’Italia Insulare presenta una

Purtroppo è così, siamo spinti dalla grande curiosità, dalla frenesia di poter disporre rapidamente di quel che si può (un po’ anche perché la stessa tecnologia non sta ad

gare il problema della fortuna del monumento di Roberto presso i contempora- nei, quelle visive offrono invece qualche spunto di riflessione. A una veduta d’in- sieme sulla

[r]

circles correspond to multiple images that the HFF modeling teams deemed were less secure than those in the Bronze sample so they were not used in the lens models. Green