• Non ci sono risultati.

Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Fulphila (pegfilgrastim)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Fulphila (pegfilgrastim) "

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

30 Churchill Place Canary Wharf London E14 5EU United Kingdom

An agency of the European Union Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555

Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact

© European Medicines Agency, 2017. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

15 September 2017 EMA/577551/2017 EMEA/H/C/004262

Questions and answers

Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Fulphila (pegfilgrastim)

On 3 August 2017, Mylan S.A.S. officially notified the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) that it wishes to withdraw its application for a marketing authorisation for Fulphila, for

reducing neutropenia in patients taking cancer treatments.

What is Fulphila?

Fulphila is a medicine that contains the active substance pegfilgrastim. It was to be available as a solution for injection under the skin.

Fulphila was developed as a ‘biosimilar’ medicine. This means that Fulphila was intended to be highly similar to a biological medicine already authorised in the European Union (the ‘reference medicine’) called Neulasta. For more information on biosimilar medicines, see here.

What was Fulphila expected to be used for?

Fulphila was to be used in cancer patients to reduce the duration of neutropenia (low levels of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell that fights infection) and the occurrence of febrile neutropenia (neutropenia with fever).

Neutropenia is a side effect of certain cancer treatments and can lead to development of serious infections.

How does Fulphila work?

The active substance in Fulphila and Neulasta, pegfilgrastim, consists of filgrastim that has been 'pegylated' (attached to a chemical called polyethylene glycol). Filgrastim is very similar to a human

(2)

Withdrawal of the marketing authorisation application for Fulphila (pegfilgrastim)

EMA/577551/2017 Page 2/2

protein called granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). It encourages the bone marrow to produce more neutrophils and improves the patient’s ability to fight off infections.

Because filgrastim is pegylated, its removal from the body is slowed down, allowing the medicine to be given less often.

What did the company present to support its application?

The company presented results of studies designed to show that Fulphila is highly similar to its

reference medicine Neulasta in terms of chemical structure, purity, the way it works and how the body handles the medicine. In addition, one study in 194 patients receiving cancer medicines compared the safety, effectiveness and immunogenicity, meaning the medicine’s ability to trigger the production of antibodies, of Fulphila and Neulasta.

How far into the evaluation was the application when it was withdrawn?

The application was withdrawn after the CHMP had evaluated the initial documentation provided by the company and formulated a list of questions. The CHMP was assessing the company’s responses to the questions at the time of the withdrawal.

What was the recommendation of the CHMP at that time?

Based on the review of the data, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP had some concerns and was of the provisional opinion that Fulphila could not have been approved to reduce neutropenia in patients taking cancer treatments.

One of the CHMP’s main concerns was the lack of a certificate of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for the manufacturing site of the product. Other concerns related to the description of the

manufacturing process, the control of impurities in the active substance and the sterilisation of the final product.

Therefore, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP was of the opinion that the quality of Fulphila had not been demonstrated.

What were the reasons given by the company for withdrawing the application?

In its letter notifying the Agency of the withdrawal of the application, the company stated that it was withdrawing the application because a GMP certificate for the manufacturing site of Fulphila could not be obtained in the time available.

The withdrawal letter is available here.

What consequences does this withdrawal have for patients in clinical trials?

The company informed the CHMP that the withdrawal does not impact ongoing clinical trials with Fulphila.

If you are in a clinical trial and need more information about your treatment, contact the doctor who is giving it to you.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

2 The second chapter, after a discussion on the model concept and a description of the OSEC model, focuses on what are the models of structural equations (MES), analyzing

References Study design and steroid regimen Participants and Intervention Survival Rejection Infections and other ADRs Authors’ conclusions Quality assessment [70]

But one of the most interesting one is if the old masons were aware about the ancient anti - seismic constructions details or they used those techniques according to other

Radio frequency identification systems consists of readers and transponders, that is RFID tags or contactless cards, containing an electronic circuit attached to an

The CHMP was of the opinion that the study results provided by the company were insufficient to determine the benefit of Raxone in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy..

In a third study, Ogivri in combination with a taxane was compared with Herceptin used in combination with a taxane in 500 patients with metastatic breast cancer whose tumour

Based on the review of the data and the company’s response to the CHMP lists of questions, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP had some concerns and was of the provisional

Based on the review of the data, at the time of the withdrawal, the CHMP had some concerns and was of the provisional opinion that Elmisol could not have been approved for