• Non ci sono risultati.

ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY OF THE POTENTIAL ANATOMICAL SPACES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY OF THE POTENTIAL ANATOMICAL SPACES"

Copied!
9
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY OF THE POTENTIAL

ANATOMICAL SPACES

(2)

Endoscopic Surgery of the Potential Anatomical Spaces

Edited by

ATTILIO MARIA FARINON, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery and Chairman,

Department of Surgery,

University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

Department of Surgery,

University of Rome Tor Vergata , Rome, Italy

Assistant Editor:

FRANCESCO RULLI

(3)

A C.I.P. Catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress.

ISBN 1-4020-2809-1 (HB)

Published by Springer,

P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by Springer,

In all other countries, sold and distributed by Springer,

P.O. Box 322, 3300 AH Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Printed on acid-free paper

All Rights Reserved

No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted

in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception

of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered

and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.

Printed in the Netherlands.

ISBN 1-4020-2846-6 (e-book)

101 Philip Drive, Norwell, MA 02061, U.S.A.

© 2005 Springer

(4)

“And it ought to be remebered that there is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduc- tion of a new order of things. Because the in- novator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.”

N. Machiavelli: The Prince (Chapter VI), 1531

(5)

Contents

List of Contributors ix

Foreword xi

Chapter 1 1

Antomical Spaces Richard L. M. Newell

Chapter 2 9

Radiology of the anatomical compartments

Ettore Squillaci, Rita Cammarata, Giovanni Simonetti

Chapter 3 35

Surgical endoscopic access to potential anatomical spaces:

a multidisciplinary issue Attilio Maria Farinon

Chapter 4 39

Technical aspects for access into the neck (minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy-MIVAT)

Paolo Miccoli, Gabriele Materazzi

Chapter 5 47

Video-assisted thoracoscopic access to the mediastinum Tommaso Claudio Mineo, Eugenio Pompeo

Chapter 6 67

Minimally invasive access to the axilla Gianfranco Tucci, Claudio Amanti

Chapter 7 83

Video-assisted approach to the retroperitoneum Francesco Micali, Flavio Forte

Chapter 8 99

Extraperitoneal video-assisted approach to the abdominal aorta

John J. Castronuovo

(6)

Chapter 9 109 Total extraperitoneal approach (TEP) for inguinal hernia repair

Francesco Mosca, Andrea Pietrabissa, Carlo Moretto

Chapter 10 119

Video-assisted access to the subfascial space of the leg Francesco Rulli, Gabriele Galatà, Michele Grande

Chapter 11 131

New Technologies in minimally invasive surgery Angelo Benevento, Luigi Boni

Author index 147

Subject index 149

viii

(7)

List of contributors

C. Amanti

Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy A. Benevento

Professor of Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy L. Boni

Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

R. Cammarata

Resident, Institute of Radiology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, It- aly

J. J. Castronuovo

Clinical Professor of Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, Chairman, Division of Vascular Surgery, Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, New Jersey, USA

A. M. Farinon

Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

F. Forte

Clinical Researcher in Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy G. Galatà

Resident in General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

M. Grande

Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy G. Materazzi

Clinical Researcher in Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

(8)

F. Micali

Professor of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

P. Miccoli

Professor of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy T. C. Mineo

Professor of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy C. Moretto

Clinical Researcher in Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy F. Mosca

Professor of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy R. Newell

Clinical Anatomist, Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales; Honorary Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Royal Devon and Exeter Healthcare NHS, Trust Exeter, UK

A. Pietrabissa

Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy E. Pompeo

Assistant Professor of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

F. Rulli

Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy G. Simonetti

Professor of Radiology, Institute of Radiology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

E. Squillaci

Associate Professor of Radiology, Institute of Radiology, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy G. Tucci

Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rome

“Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy

x

(9)

Foreword

“Anatomical potential spaces” is an attractive and no more abstract concept that offers new perspectives to a surgical world that is rapidily changing and becoming more complex.

Powerful new technologies demand our attention and testify that our clinical work and research are deeply influenced by surgical innovations. These latter dramatically modified approaches to treatment through the introduction of en- tirely new interventions such as minimally invasive surgical procedures, whose real appeal is represented by less invasiveness.

This constantly evolving research environment has gained large acceptance by surgeons accustomed to prompt adaptation to a new trend and inclined to nim- ble behaviour in the face of innovations. This behaviour, however, requires a rigorous control in order to lead to more reliable, evidence-based practice and to slow or halt the enthusiasm for some harmful or unhelpful treatments, espe- cially if they are proven to be no better than standard procedures.

This particular area of concern has received our attention: to understand whether innovations should be considered as evolutionary variations on a standard procedure or the first stage of what should become recognized as a formal surgical research project.

ATTILIO MARIA FARINON A

A

Professor of General Surgery

University of Rome “Tor Vergata”

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

MATH@TOV is offering a unique opportunity to improve substantially the Master Programme in Pure and Applied Mathematics and make it internationally competitive. 1) MATH@TOV will

T 30 reverberation time as a function of frequency using the Genelec source, average data of positions A, B, C on stage (data taken at points 1, 2, 3 in the hall)... EDT as

A differenza di CONSTRUCT però, invece di specificare un template di costruzione del nuovo grafo, DESCRIBE recupererà tutte le informazioni connesse alle risorse unificate

quando si vuole rappresentare il comportamento sintattico delle lexical entry e la corrispondenza tra argomenti sintattici e semantici. • Le descrizioni delle lexical entry

Introduction: This is the report of the first official survey from the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (ISPS) to appraise the distribution and organization of bedside surgery

Focusing on rectal cancer including total mesorectal excision (TME), the literature was carefully reviewed to collect data on postoperative complications, long-term prognosis

Meier 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rate of LTME are well within the range of published open TME series [16–22], but fail to equal the exceptional results

The second time period comprises 332 patients with rectal tumours (including adenomas) having undergone endosonography by six different examiners after introduction of this