• Non ci sono risultati.

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures"

Copied!
39
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

International Workshop

Asphalt Recycling and Materials Re-Use in Asphalt Pavements

prof. Ezio Santagata Politecnico di Torino

Cold recycling of

bituminous mixtures

Università di L’Aquila - Facoltà di Ingegneria - 28 th June 2007

(2)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Self introduction

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Torino

(3)

• Give general overview of the topic

• Highlight interest/problems of society, users, road owners, designers and contractors

• Give some examples about specific solutions or problems

• Point out main key players in research

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Guidelines for presentation

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SPECIFIC AND OPEN QUESTIONS

RESEARCH NEEDS

(4)

• General description

• Critical issues derived from research experience

– Materials – Testing – Modelling

• Closure = Questions

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Presentation structure

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(5)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

General description

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• RAP (reclaimed asphalt pavement)

– bulk structure

• Bituminous emulsion

– binder

• Filler (usually Portland cement)

– filler and stiffening enhancement

• Added water

– Workability and emulsion dispersion

• Virgin aggregates

– integration to bulk structure

(6)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

General description

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

In-field recycling

(single or multiple unit)

In-plant recycling

(7)

• Advantages:

– Reduced use of raw materials – Reduction of disposal volumes – Lower environmental impact – Lower energy consumption

– Reduced impact on labour health and safety – Cost reduction

• Disadvantages:

– Reduced structural performance

– Problems in mix design, testing and modelling

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

General description

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

However, based on engineering experience,

there are guidelines and specifications!

(8)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Rehabilitation of motorway A4 Torino-Milano (1999-2001)

Conglomerato bituminoso

Misto granulare

Sottofondo

Riciclato a freddo Conglomerato bituminoso

Subgrade

Unbound foundation

Bitumen-bound layers 20 cm bituminous mixtures

20 cm cold-recycled mixture

(9)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Rehabilitation of motorway A4 Torino-Milano (1999-2001)

– Production homogeneity

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Day of monitoring

W at er c on te nt ( % )

Measured Expected

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Day of monitoring

T ot al b in de r co nt en t (% )

Measured

Expected

(10)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Rehabilitation of motorway A4 Torino-Milano (1999-2001)

– Production homogeneity

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Day of monitoring

W at er c on te nt ( % )

Measured Expected

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Day of monitoring

T ot al b in de r co nt en t (% )

Measured

Expected

(11)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Rehabilitation of motorway A4 Torino-Milano (1999-2001)

– Compaction

(12)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

High stiffness Low stiffness

• Load spreading function

EVALUATION OF

STIFFNESS AND STRENGTH

(13)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Problems to solve:

– Testing technique

– Sample preparation / coring

Selection of practical characterization techniques

Development of equipment and procedures

(14)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Field compaction

(static)

(15)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Field compaction

(static)

(16)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Laboratory compaction

(gyratory)

(17)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Maturazione (giorni)

M od ul o el as tic o [M Pa ]

Preparazione standard Preparazione 150kN - 5' Collegamento 80/100: 3500 MPa

Collegamento 60/70: 4160 MPa

Curing time, t (days)

E la st ic m od ul us , E ( M P a)

Binder course mix 80/100: 3500 MPa Binder course mix 60/70: 4160 MPa

Standard preparation 150 kN – 5 min

• Elastic stiffness testing (RLIT)

(18)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Indirect tensile strength (ITS) testing (static)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

0 1 2 3 4

Displacement (mm)

Lo a d ( k N )

(19)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

y = 1371.5x-0.2153 R2 = 0.8657

10 100 1000

1000 10000 100000 1000000

Num ero di cicli a rottura Nf

Deformazione iniziale [strain]

Precondizionamento standard Precondizionamento a 60°C Precondizionamento a 40°C Usura ANAS (v = 3,0%) Usura aperta (v = 5,4%) Collegamento ANAS (v = 7,4%)

N

f

(number of loadings to failure)

In iti al s tr ai n (m icr os tr ai n)

• Fatigue testing

(20)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

1 10 100 1000

Curing time (days)

El a st ic s tif fn e ss a t 20 °C ( M Pa )

E = E

1

+ klog

10

(days)

Short term

Long term

(21)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Elastic stiffness parameters (E 1 and k) extremely sensitive to variations of:

– Size distribution – Emulsion type – Compaction

1999 2000 2001

E

1

1429 569 1256

k

E

1388 921 1591

E

60

3897 2206 4084

Lower binder content, coarser RAP, higher air voids

(22)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20

1 10 100

Curing time, t (days) IT S ( N /m m

2

)

101.6 mm specimens 150 mm specimens ITS = 0.467 + 0.281 log t

ITS = 0.238 + 0.290 log t

(23)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• ITS parameters (RTI 1 and k RTI ) extremely sensitive to variations of:

– Size distribution – Emulsion type – Compaction

Lower binder content, coarser RAP, higher air voids

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Day of monitoring ITS (N/mm2 )

101.6 mm specimens Value at 60 days (2001) = 0.967 N/mm2

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Day of monitoring ITS (N/mm2 )

150 mm specimens Value at 60 days (2001) = 0.752 N/mm2

(24)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1400 2400 3400 4400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Curing time, t (days)

E la st ic s ti ff ne ss , E [ M P a]

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8

W at er c on te nt ( % )

0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Curing time, t (days) IT S [ N /m m 2 ]

4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5 7,0 7,5 8,0

W at er lo ss ( % )

• Evolution of water content

(25)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1400 2400 3400 4400

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Curing time, t (days)

E la st ic s ti ff ne ss , E [ M P a]

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8

W at er c on te nt ( % )

0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1,0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Curing time, t (days) IT S [ N /m m 2 ]

4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5 6,0 6,5 7,0 7,5 8,0

W at er lo ss ( % )

• Evolution of water content

(26)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Ma tura zi one (giorni)

Modulo elastico [MPa]

Maturazione a 20°C

Maturazione preliminare a 60°C Dopo la maturazione preliminare

Collegamento 80/100: 3500 MPa Collegamento 60/70: 4160 MPa

• Effect of curing temperature

(27)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Effect of emulsion type and quantity

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 min 30 min 60 min In situ

Modalità di compattazione

In t ( E )

ESSO 2.5%

COLAS 2.5%

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 min 30 min 60 min In situ

Modalità di compattazione

In t ( E )

ESSO 4.5%

COLAS 4.5%

(28)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Effect of filler type (cement vs quicklime)

E

quicklime

= 53,615 x (days) + 530,51 0

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Curing time (days)

Ela st ic s tif fn e ss a t 20° C ( M Pa )

Filler: 2%

Emulsion: 4%

Water: 1%

(29)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Compaction properties (from gyratory equipment)

70 75 80 85 90 95 100

1 10 100 1000

N g (log)

% M V es s

Dati sperimentali

Modellazione (eq. 1)

(30)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Compaction properties (from gyratory equipment)

C1

g

= -2,16 K

g

+ 98,1 R

2

= 0,82

C1

g

= -2,37 K

g

+ 100,8 R

2

= 0,93

77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84

7,0 7,5 8,0 8,5 9,0 9,5 10,0

K g

C 1 g ( % )

Politecnico

Autostrade

(31)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Mix design

2,120 2,130 2,140 2,150 2,160 2,170 2,180 2,190

3,75 4,00 4,25 4,50 4,75 5,00 5,25

Water content, %w (%)

D ry d en si ty , G

dry

( g/ cm

3

)

(32)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Mix design

7,00 7,20 7,40 7,60 7,80 8,00 8,20 8,40 8,60 8,80

3,75 4,00 4,25 4,50 4,75 5,00 5,25

Water content, %w (%)

W or k ab ili ty , k

(33)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Mix design

%FF optimum = %w added + (a+Kb) ⋅ %E

0,150 0,175 0,200 0,225 0,250 0,275 0,300 0,325 0,350

2,150 2,175 2,200 2,225 2,250 2,275 2,300

Dry density, G

dry

(g/cm

3

) In di re ct t en si le s tr en gt h, I T S (N /m m

2

)

K = 0

K = 0.25

K = 0.5

K = 0.75

K = 1

(34)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Short term characterization

– UNBOUND?

• Resilient modulus M R

• Failure (p-q) criteria

(35)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Short term characterization

– UNBOUND?

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

0,00 100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00 600,00 700,00 800,00

Θ [kPa]

Mr [Mpa]

Mr (Modello)

(36)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Short term characterization

– UNBOUND?

0,0 100,0 200,0 300,0 400,0 500,0 600,0 700,0

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

p [kPa]

t [k P a]

(37)

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Critical issues derived from research experience

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• Characterization of the emulsion-filler system

Interconnected binding matrix High modulus, high strength

Porous binding matrix

Low modulus, low strength

(38)

• Can production plants be improved?

• Can compaction techniques be improved?

• Should RAP be separated in fractions to control gradation?

• Are rejuvenators needed?

• Are modified emulsions needed?

• What can of filler should be used?

• How much stiffness is needed?

• Options to mix design?

• Options to performance testing?

• Coring?

• Field testing?

Cold recycling of bituminous mixtures

Closure - Questions

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(39)

Thanks for your attention

[email protected]

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

First of all, privatization is not always translated into economic efficiency. As a matter of fact, neoliberals stand for privatizing any kind of company without making

If this results in a higher aggregate wealth-to-output ratio, steady-state equi- librium is restored by a decline of the rate of return on savings along a neoclassical factor

14 Particularly relevant is the substrate selectivity displayed by the system developed by Monflier 15 where six CD derivatives were evaluated in the palladium

L’artiste qui s’est mariée hors du Liban avec un Libanais mais qui n’a pas passé plus d’un an à l’étranger doit être préalablement autorisée à entrer au Liban par

Tra tutti i portafogli possibili che si possono costruire con un determinato numero di titoli, tale frontiera comprende quelli per cui, dato un certo rendimento

For this campaign, Figure 2a indicates that the main line of conflict is a kind of transformed left-right dimension with Syriza as the main party on the left (close to welfare

Simple simulations focus on transferable skills, such as the ability to prevail in a distributive zero-sum negotiating setting, whereas complex simulations are best placed to

En todo caso, creo que una vez que hayamos aceptado el concepto de derecho corno "institución", que he intentado presentar muy brevemente en la primera