Il Primo Presidente al “The Judicial Conference of the Supreme Courts of the G20”

statutes already in force at the height of the War on Drugs’ incarcerative zeal. 419 The diversionary justification of drug court thus depends upon arguing that differences on

Myriad’s patents would, if valid, give it the exclusive right to isolate an individual’s BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (or any strand of 15 or more nucleotides within the genes) by

Paul Blokker is associate professor in political sociology at the Department of Sociology and Business Law, University of Bologna, Italy, and research coordinator at the

"with common sense", bearing in mind that it is in the interest of the parties, the national courts as well as the Court of Justice to avoid burdening the preliminary

10.00- 17.15 Colloquium of the Network of the Presidents of the Supreme Judicial Courts of the European Union : “The Motivation of Supreme Court Decisions”.. 10.15 - 10.45 Chair

Si le temps de l’apogée médiéval n’est sans doute pas le temps de la primauté vénitienne, il n’empêche que les premières décennies du XIV e siècle

For example, a search policy in a cold climate that applied to all jackets would be effectively unavoidable, even if a person theoretically could commute to

In this case, it is abundantly clear that our precedents do not clearly establish the categorical rule on which the Court of Appeals relied, i.e., that the questioning of a