Pediatric Nerve Conduction Studies and EMG
Peter B. Kang
Summary
A variety of neuromuscular conditions affect children, ranging from severe, usually fatal disorders, such as spinal muscular atrophy type I (Werdnig–Hoffman syndrome) to relatively mild problems, such as benign congenital hypotonia. The evaluation of children in the EMG laboratory requires special care because of the discomfort of the tests. Moreover, other considerations, such as slower baseline nerve conduction velocities and conditions that generally do not present in adulthood, such as congenital myasthenic syndromes, can make the pediatric neurophysiological examination especially challenging.
This chapter reviews both the common pediatric neuromuscular conditions and their assessment in the EMG laboratory.
Key Words: Electromyography; Guillain–Barré syndrome; hereditary neuropathies; pediatrics; root avulsion; spinal muscular atrophy.
1. INTRODUCTION
EMG is a useful diagnostic tool in children suspected of having acquired or inherited neuromuscular disease and complements the advances in molecular genetic testing during the past decade. The technical limitations of performing EMG in children require that the electromyographer be selective in deciding how to approach the study. In evaluating for generalized processes, examination of one or two extremities is often adequate to narrow the differential diagnosis or, in some cases, suggest a specific disorder. EMG may be used to evaluate hypotonia in infants, assess the severity and localization of perinatal brachial plexus injuries, and distinguish between different possible causes of gait difficulties in older children. In children, EMG may contribute to the diagnosis of many disorders, including spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), brachial plexus injury, hereditary polyneuropathy, acquired polyneuropathy, disorders of neuromuscular transmission, myopathy, muscular dystrophy, and myotonic disorders.
2. TECHNICAL ISSUES 2.1. General Approach
Electrodiagnostic studies are highly dependent on technique in adults, but are even more dependent on technique in children. Infants and toddlers do not understand the purpose of the study, have a limited tolerance for discomfort, and often squirm and withdraw during testing.
In selected cases, sedation or general anesthesia is required to obtain adequate data. Topical anesthetic creams are used in some pediatric EMG laboratories, which can help reduce pain,
From: The Clinical Neurophysiology Primer
Edited by: A. S. Blum and S. B. Rutkove © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
369
but they require that the electromyographer either guess which sites are most likely candi- dates for needle EMG before the nerve conduction studies, or impose a stressful half-hour wait between the nerve conduction studies and needle EMG on the patient. Despite these limitations, it is usually possible to perform a successful and informative study.
As in adults, a brief history and focused physical examination is critical in directing the tests performed, especially because they may be terminated prematurely. If the child is old enough to understand the procedure, it is important to explain it to the child as well as the parent. It is sometimes possible to convince younger children that the EMG machine is a “tickling” machine for nerve conduction studies—the power of suggestion being quite effective. Infants may be more comfortable sitting in a parent’s lap on the examination table or in a chair. Pacifiers and toys are often effective in calming infants and toddlers. Even school-age children and adoles- cents may feel more comfortable if a parent sits or stands near them during the study.
2.2. Nerve Conduction Studies
The temperature of the extremity during nerve conduction studies is as important in chil- dren as in adults. An excessively cold extremity will yield falsely slow conduction velocities and increased amplitudes. Upper extremity skin temperatures, measured at first dorsal interosseous, should be at least 32°C. Lower extremity skin temperatures, measured at lower gastrocnemius, should be at least 30°C. Warming may be achieved with the use of towels dampened with hot water and wrapped around the distal extremity for approx 5 min. Care must be taken not to overheat the towels; a child’s skin is more delicate than that of an adult, and is more susceptible to scalding injury. It is also important to wring out the towel before applying to the skin and to dry the skin after warming; a wet extremity will rapidly cool.
Some electromyographers use disposable hot packs that produce heat via a chemical reaction.
If used in children, these packs should be wrapped in towels to prevent burns, for they may become very hot. The temperature should be measured again after warming to confirm that it is in the acceptable range.
Surface active and reference recording electrodes may need to be trimmed or even cut in half for infants. Full-sized ground electrodes should be used whenever possible, however, because their placement is more flexible. Pediatric stimulators with small cathodes and anodes are useful for this age group. Standard adult distal distances cannot be used in infants and young children because of the small size of the extremities involved; thus, evaluation of motor distal latencies must take the patient’s age into account (see Table 1). The initial stim- ulation should always be less than 10 mA. It can be very reassuring to a child when the first stimulation is barely perceptible.
Questions of generalized processes, such as polyneuropathies and myopathies, are common in pediatric EMG laboratories. Limited patient tolerance often makes it practical to perform only a motor and sensory study in an upper and lower extremity. In such cases, the electromyo- grapher may perform median motor and sensory studies in an upper extremity, and peroneal motor and a sural or medial plantar (depending on the age) sensory study in a lower extremity.
In a child who is uncooperative or anxious, it may be best to perform the sensory studies first, because those require less stimulation intensity and are, thus, better tolerated.
The median motor study is performed as in an adult, with the E1 recording electrode
placed over the abductor pollicis brevis and stimulation occurring at the wrist and cubital
Table 1
Motor Nerve Conduction Studies, Suggested Values
Age A (mV) CV (m/s) DL (ms)
Median nerve
Preterm (33–39 wk) — ≥18 —
0–1 mo ≥2.5 ≥20 ≤3.5
1–6 mo ≥3.5 ≥25 ≤3.0
7–12 mo ≥2.5 ≥30 ≤3.0
1–2 yr ≥3.5 ≥35 ≤2.5
2–3 yr — ≥40 ≤2.5
3–4 yr — ≥45 ≤2.5
4 + yr — ≥50 ≤3.0
Adult ≥4.0 ≥50 ≤4.0
Ulnar nerve
Preterm (33–39 wk) — ≥18 ≤3.3
0–1 mo ≥1.5 ≥20 ≤3.0
1–6 mo ≥2.5 ≥25 ≤3.3
7–12 mo ≥3.0 ≥35 ≤2.5
1–2 yr ≥2.5 ≥40 ≤2.5
2–3 yr — ≥40 —
3–4 yr — ≥45 —
4 + yr — ≥50 —
Adult ≥6.0 ≥50 ≤3.3
Peroneal nerve
0–1 mo ≥1.5 ≥20 ≤3.0
1–6 mo ≥1.5 ≥25 ≤2.5
7–12 mo ≥2.0 ≥30 ≤3.5
1–2 yr ≥1.5 ≥35 ≤3.5
2–3 yr — ≥40 —
3–4 yr — ≥40 —
4 + yr — ≥40 —
Adult ≥2.0 ≥40 ≤6.5
Tibial nerve
Preterm (33–36 wk) — ≥14 —
Preterm (37–39 wk) — ≥18 —
0–1 mo — ≥20 ≤4.5
1–6 mo — ≥20 ≤4.0
7–12 mo — ≥25 ≤3.5
1–2 yr — ≥30 ≤3.0
2–3 yr — ≥35 ≤4.0
3–4 yr — ≥40 ≤4.0
4–6 yr — ≥40 ≤4.5
6 + yr — ≥40 ≤5.0
Adult ≥4.0 ≥40 ≤5.8
A, suggested amplitude; CV, suggested conduction velocity; DL, suggested distal latency; —, data not available.
a
Adapted from refs. 1, 2, 4–6, 23–25.
fossa. The peroneal motor study is performed as in an adult, with the E1 recording electrode placed over the extensor digitorum brevis and stimulation occurring at the ankle, fibular head, and popliteal fossa. Recording of tibialis anterior may be used when no response or a very small response is obtained from extensor digitorum brevis. One of the proximal stimulation sites may be omitted in children, unless, of course, there is a question of a peroneal neuropa- thy at the fibular head, such neuropathy being quite rare in children.
In infants, the most difficult aspect of the median antidromic sensory study involves the placement of the active and reference electrodes. The active electrode may be placed on the second digit and the reference on the third, or the electrodes can be cut in half and both placed on the second or third digit. If this is unsuccessful, ring electrodes may be used instead. The stimulation site is, as usual, at the wrist. In neonates and some infants, surface recordings of sural nerve sensory action potentials are often obscured by artifact caused by high skin impedance and short interelectrode distances. In this age group, the most technically reliable sensory study to obtain in the lower extremity is the orthodromic medial plantar study, recording the tibial nerve at the ankle and stimulating the medial plantar region of the sole.
Full-term newborns typically have nerve conduction velocities that are approximately half those expected in an adult. Nerve conduction velocities increase steadily during the first 3 to 5 yr of life, because of growth in axon diameter and thickening of myelin. Thus, adult nerve conduction values cannot be reliably expected until 3 to 5 yr of age, although some children’s responses reach those values earlier. Normal amplitudes are also diminished in children com- pared with adults, especially in the first year of life. In a child younger than 3 to 5 yr, it is important to consult age-matched reference values in interpreting the results of nerve conduc- tion studies. Tables 1 and 2 list suggested normal values adapted and summarized from pub- lished data on surface recordings, and also include adult normal values for comparison. Most studies seeking to establish normal values in children focus on motor nerve conduction studies, thus, Table 1 is more comprehensive than Table 2.
Elicitation of late responses may produce significant discomfort in a child, and should not be performed unless they can help answer a specific question, for example, when Guillain–
Barré syndrome is a possible diagnosis. If a number of late response studies are necessary, sedation or anesthesia should be considered. Despite incomplete myelination, short stature results in F-response latencies that are shorter in children than in adults. Age-matched normal values, such as the ones listed in Table 3 should be used. H-reflexes may be obtained in the upper as well as the lower extremities in the first year of life, but are rarely necessary in the pediatric population.
2.3. Needle EMG
For the needle examination, a 30-gauge, 25-mm disposable concentric needle (the small- est commercially available) is almost always the best choice. School-age children often ask if “it will hurt.” One can reply that it will “pinch” or say that it will be like a blood draw, while avoiding the term “needle.” The needle itself can be described as a “microphone.” Older chil- dren and adolescents may often be examined as thoroughly as adults, but it is still advisable to examine the fewest muscles necessary to answer the question at hand. These patients sometimes reach a limit of tolerance unexpectedly during the needle examination and become upset with little warning.
Except in cases of neonatal brachial plexus injury or trauma, extensive root screens are
rarely required in children. In many cases, the question revolves around a generalized process,
therefore, a limited needle examination often yields the necessary data. In infants and tod- dlers, poor cooperation often makes it impossible to evaluate both insertional activity and vol- untary activity in the same muscle. In the upper extremities, insertional activity is most easily observed in triceps and first dorsal interosseous, whereas motor unit activity is better assessed in biceps and flexor carpi radialis. In the lower extremities, medial gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis are better for insertional activity, whereas tibialis anterior and iliopsoas are preferred for motor unit potential (MUP) analysis.
As in adults, if there is a question of a polyneuropathy, it is important to examine distal muscles, although it is rarely necessary to study intrinsic foot muscles in young children.
Children with possible myopathy should have several proximal muscles evaluated, but one extremity (preferably lower) should be spared so that histological examination of a muscle biopsy performed at a later time will be free of potential artifacts from needle injury.
Table 2
Sensory Nerve Action Potentials, Suggested Values
Age A (mV) CV (m/s)
Median nerve (antidromic)
0–1 mo ≥5 ≥25
1–6 mo ≥10 ≥35
7–12 mo ≥15 ≥30
1–2 yr ≥15 ≥40
2–3 yr — —
3–4 yr — —
4 + yr — —
Adult ≥20 ≥50
Sural nerve (antidromic)
0–1 mo ≥6 ≥20
1–6 mo ≥6 ≥20
7–12 mo ≥6 ≥25
1–2 yr ≥6 ≥30
2–3 yr ≥6 ≥35
3–4 yr ≥6 ≥40
4 + yr ≥6 ≥40
Adult ≥6 ≥40
Medial plantar nerve orthodromic in children
0–1 mo ≥10 —
1–6 mo ≥15 ≥35
7–12 mo ≥15 ≥35
1–2 yr ≥15 ≥35
2–4 yr — —
4 + yr — —
Adult (antidromic) ≥2 ≥35
A, suggested amplitude; CV, suggested conduction velocity; —, data not available. Sural sensory responses may be obscured by subcutaneous tissue in neonates and infants; medial plantar studies may be more accurate in this age group.
a
Adapted from refs. 1–3, 6, 25.
3. COMMON REFERRALS TO THE PEDIATRIC EMG LABORATORY
Deciding whether to request or perform an EMG in a particular case is sometimes diffi- cult, because the number of available diagnostic modalities has increased dramatically in recent years. Genetic testing is available for many neuropathies and muscular dystrophies, and may make EMG unnecessary in certain patients. However, there are many children with
Table 3
F-Wave Responses, Suggested Values
Age Latency (ms)
Median nerve
0–1 mo ≤20
1–6 mo ≤20
7–12 mo ≤21
1–2 yr ≤21
2–4 yr ≤21
4–6 yr ≤23
6–14 yr ≤29
Adult ≤31
Ulnar nerve
0–1 mo —
1–6 mo ≤17
7–12 mo ≤17
1–2 yr ≤17
2–4 yr —
4–6 yr —
6–14 yr —
Adult ≤32
Peroneal nerve
0–1 mo ≤26
1–6 mo ≤27
7–12 mo ≤29
1–2 yr ≤30
2–4 yr ≤34
4–6 yr ≤36
6–14 yr ≤43
Adult ≤56
Tibial nerve
0–1 mo —
1–6 mo —
7–12 mo ≤24
1–2 yr ≤26
2–4 yr —
4–6 yr —
6–14 yr —
Adult ≤56
—, data not available.
a