• Non ci sono risultati.

Novità sul trattamento delle neoplasie del colon-retto

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Novità sul trattamento delle neoplasie del colon-retto"

Copied!
35
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Supernovae in Oncologia

Pisa, 13 Novembre 2015

Novità sul trattamento

delle neoplasie del colon-retto

Carlotta Antoniotti Polo Oncologico

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana

Università di Pisa

(2)

Supernovae in first-line therapy

«Chemo-intensity»

Maintenance with bevacizumab

Supernovae in second- and further lines therapies

Ramucirumab TAS-102

Supernovae in molecular subgroups

HER2 BRAF MSI

My agenda

(3)

 Supernovae in first-line therapy

«Chemo-intensity»

Maintenance with bevacizumab

Supernovae in second- and further lines therapies

Ramucirumab TAS-102

Supernovae in molecular subgroups

HER2 BRAF MSI

My agenda

(4)
(5)

The concept of «chemo-intensity»

(6)

The concept of «chemo-intensity»

Courtesy of Fotios Loupakis

(7)

TRIBE trial

R

508 mCRC pts 1st line

unresectable stratified by

center

PS 0/1-2

adjuvant CT

FOLFIRI+bev

(up to 12 cycles)

FOLFOXIRI+bev

(up to 12 cycles)

5-FU/LV +Bev

5-FU/LV +Bev

PD

INDUCTION MAINTENANCE

(8)

Primary Endpoint: PFS

Loupakis et al, N Eng J Med 2014

FOLFIRI + bev, median PFS : 9.7 mos FOLFOXIRI + bev, median PFS : 12.1 mos

HR: 0.75 [0.62-0.90]

p=0.003

(9)

TRIBE: Updated OS Results

Cremolini et al, Lancet Oncol 2015 MEDIAN F-UP 48.1 mos (74% events)

FOLFIRI + bev: N = 256 / Died = 200 FOLFOXIRI + bev: N = 252 / Died = 174

FOLFIRI + bev, median OS : 25.8 mos FOLFOXIRI + bev, median OS : 29.8 mos

HR: 0.80 [0.65-0.98]

p=0.030

(10)

TRIBE: OS in molecular subgroups

Cremolini et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

Median OS (months)

N FOLFIRI + Beva

FOLFOXIRI +

Beva

HR (95% CI) P Value

for Interaction

RAS and BRAF WT 93 33.5 41.7 0.77 (0.46–1.27)

.522

RAS MT 236 23.9 27.3 0.88 (0.65–1.18)

BRAF MT 28 10.7 19.0 0.54 (0.24–1.20)

(11)

RAS and BRAF wt

RAS or BRAF mut

Cremolini et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015

(12)

Maintenance therapy

SAKK trial

Koeberle et al, Ann Oncol 2015

AIO-KRK 0207 trial

Hegewisch-Becker et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

CAIRO-3 trial

Simkens et al, Lancet 2015

(13)

Maintenance therapy: Pooled analysis

Progression-free survival

Favours active tx. Favours no tx.

Arnold et al, ASCO Ann Meeting 2014

Overall survival

(14)

Supernovae in first-line therapy

«Chemo-intensity»

Maintenance with bevacizumab

 Supernovae in second- and further lines therapies

Ramucirumab TAS-102

Supernovae in molecular subgroups

HER2 BRAF MSI

My agenda

(15)

modified from Ferrara et al, Nature 2005 Ramucirumab

Ramucirumab: mechanism of action

(16)

RAISE trial – Study design

Primary endpoint = OS

mCRC pts PD during or after bev, oxaliplatin, and

a fluoropyrimidine

Ramucirumab and FOLFIRI

every 2 weeks n = 536

Placebo and FOLFIRI every 2 weeks

n = 536 R

1:1

Tabernero et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

(17)

RAISE trial – Overall Survival

Tabernero et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

24 April 2015

(18)

FOLFIRI + Placebo N = 528

FOLFIRI + Ramucirumab N = 529

All grades,

%

Grade 3/4,

%

All grades,

%

Grade 3/4,

%

Diarrhea 51.3

9.7

59.7

10.8

Stomatitis 20.8

2.3

30.8

3.8

Fatigue 52.1

7.8

57.7

11.5

Neutropenia 45.6

23.3

58.8

38.4

Thrombocytopenia 13.6

0.8

28.4

3.0

Hypertension 8.5

2.8

25.7

10.8

Febrile neutropenia 2.7

-

3.6

-

RAISE trial - Safety profile

Tabernero et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

(19)

Angiogenesis inhibition in 2 nd line

Bevacizumab Ziv-aflibercept Ramucirumab

Study TML BEBYP VELOUR RAISE

CT+

BEV CT CT +

BEV CT FOLFIRI

+ AFL FOLFIRI FOLFIRI

+ RAM FOLFIRI

N pts 409 410 92 92 612 614 536 536

mOS 11.2 9.8 14.1 15.5 13.5 12.1 13.3 11.7

HR 0.81* 0.77 0.82* 0.84*

mPFS 5.7 4.1 6.8 5.0 6.9 4.7 5.7 4.5

HR 0.68* 0.70* 0.76* 0.79*

RR (%) 5.4 3.9 21 17 19.8* 11.1 13.4 12.5

100% prior Beva 100% prior Beva 30% prior Beva 100% prior Beva

* p<0.05

Bennouna et al, Lancet Oncol 2012; Masi et al, Ann Oncol 2015 Van Cutsem et al, J Clin Oncol 2012; Tabernero et al, Lancet Oncol 2015

(20)

TAS-102: mechanism of action

F

3

TMP

(inactive form)

TPI

FTY

TPase

F

3

TDP FTD + TPI

FTD incorporation into DNA

F

3

TTP

FTD

TAS-102

DNA dysfunction Inhibition of

tumor growth

FTD: Trifluridine TPI: Tipiracil-HCl

(21)

N= 800

Primary end-point: OS

RECOURSE trial – Study design

N= 534 N= 266

(about 20% rego-pretreated)

Mayer et al, N Eng J Med 2015

R 1:2

Placebo + BSC

TAS-102 + BSC

mCRC pts

treated with

≥2 tx lines

refractory to

all standard tx

(22)

RECOURSE trial – Overall Survival

Mayer et al, N Eng J Med 2015

22 September 2015

TAS-102: mOS 7.1 mos Placebo: mOS 5.3 mos

(23)

RECOURSE trial Safety profile

Lab abnormalities, %

TAS-102 (n=533)

Placebo (n=265)

All Gr Gr ≥3

All Gr Gr ≥3

Leukopenia

77 21 5 0

Anemia

77

18

33 3

Neutropenia

67

38

<1 0

Thrombocytopenia

42 5 8 <1

Adverse events, %

TAS-102 (n=533)

Placebo (n=265)

All Gr Gr≥ 3

All Gr Gr ≥3

Febrile neutropenia

4

4

0 0

Adapted from Mayer et al, N Eng J Med 2015

(24)

Refractory mCRC patients

TAS-102 REGORAFENIB

CORRECT trial RECOURSE trial

Mayer et al, N Eng J Med 2015 Grothey et al, Lancet 2013

(25)

Supernovae in first-line therapy

«Chemo-intensity»

Maintenance with bevacizumab

Supernovae in second- and further lines therapies

Ramucirumab TAS-102

 Supernovae in molecular subgroups

HER2 BRAF MSI

My agenda

(26)

HER2: HERACLES trial

mCRC pts

HER2+

KRAS exon 2 wt

refractory to all standard tx*, resistant to anti-

EGFR

*prior bevacizumab, aflibercept or regorafenib allowed but not mandatory

Cohort A

Trastuzumab+Lapatinib

Cohort B

Trastuzumab+Pertuzumab

Siena et al, ASCO Ann Meeting 2015

Primary end-point: ORR

(27)

849 patients with mCRC KRAS exon 2 WT

803 HER2-negative

22 not eligible because PS ≥2 or tumor-related comorbidities

24 enrolled

23 evaluable for response

1 too early for safety & efficacy assessment

46 HER2+ (5.4%)

HER2: HERACLES trial

Best Response

RECIST 1.1 by centralized revision

N %

Responses (PR+CR) 8

34.7

Complete Response 1 4.3 Partial Response 7 30.4 Stable Disease >4 mos 7

30.4

Stable Disease <4 mos 3

13.0

Progressive Disease 5 21.7

Total 23 100

78%

DCR

Siena et al, ASCO Ann Meeting 2015

(28)

Raf

MEK

Erk Tumor cell

proliferation and survival

EGF Tumor cell

P P

Ras

P P

Study

Reference N RR DCR PFS

Dabrafenib + Trametinib + Panitumumab

Atreya, ASCO Ann Meet ‘15 35 26% 60% 4.1

Encorafenib + Alpelisib + Cetuximab

Elez, WCGIC ‘15 28 32% 94% 4.3

BRAF mut V600E: BRAFi + EGFRi + MEKi

(29)

New CRC molecular subgroups

Guinney et al, Nature Med 2015

(30)

Pembrolizumab in MSI mCRC

Modified from Le et al, N Eng J Med 2015

Type of response MSI

(n=10)

MSS (n=18)

Complete Response

0% 0%

Partial Response

40% 0%

Objective Response Rate

40% 0%

Disease Control Rate 90% 11%

(31)

Pembrolizumab in MSI mCRC

Le et al, N Eng J Med 2015

(32)

Response assessment: Every 9 weeks Primary endpoint: ORR per RECIST v1.1

Secondary endpoints: Duration of response, disease control rate, PFS, OS, safety

No Patients

•Locally advanced

unresectable or metastatic (Stage IV) MSI high CRC

•≥2 prior treatments with standard therapya

•Provision of tumor and blood sample for evaluation and

confirmation of MSI status

•≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1

•ECOG PS 0 or 1

Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W

Complete Response

Partial Response or Stable Disease

Confirmed Progressive

Diseaseb

Discontinuation Permittedc

Treat for 35 cycles or until progression

or intolerable toxicity

Discontinue Confirmation of

MSI-high status at a central

laboratory

Not enrolled

Yes

Future perspective: KEYNOTE-164

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/

(33)

Take home messages

The chemo-intensity should be modulated according to patients characteristics.

Maintenance with bevacizumab (+/- fluoropyrimidines) is an

effective part of 1st-line therapy and should be considered after an

induction with chemo plus bevacizumab.

(34)

Ramucirumab and TAS-102 have recently widened the therapeutical scenario in mCRC, for second-line and heavily pretreated patients, respectively.

The molecular landscape of mCRC is increasingly complex.

Up today precision medicine has provided interesting results but molecular markers able to allow a positive selection of patients are not yet ready for prime time (maybe in the future HER-2, BRAF V600E mutation).

The immunotherapy will be a new planet to be deeply discovered in mCRC too.

Take home messages

(35)

carlottantoniotti@gmail.com

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

JCO 2017; Presented at the European Society Medical Oncology Congress, Madrid, September 8-12, 2017. NEUROENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS:

Primary tumor location may become a driver in our therapeutic decision-making, but results from randomized studies in well selected pts are awaited. Available data from

NIVOLUMAB ± IPILIMUMAB IN TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER WITH AND WITHOUT HIGH MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY: &lt;BR /&gt;CHECKMATE 142 INTERIM RESULTS.

The tipping point for combination therapy: cancer vaccines with radiation, chemotherapy, or targeted small molecule inhibitors. Copyright 2012, with permission

Comitato Scientifico: Francesco Badessi, Nuoro • Felice Borghi, Cuneo • Ferdinando Cafiero, Genova Paolo De Paolis, Torino • Carlo de Werra, Napoli • Mauro Salizzoni, Torino..

 Se due tumori della stessa sottosede del colon sono sincroni si utilizza il codice di sede della sede con stadio più avanzato ( es:. cieco T2 e flessura splenica T3 

La terapia può essere effettuata prima dell’intervento chirurgico (neoadiuvante), con l’obiettivo di ridurre le dimensioni della neoplasia.. Dopo la rimozione del cancro

La natura da sola non è capace, però, di superare le fasi più critiche e le malattie più tenaci: diventa indispensabile l’arte del medico... We