• Non ci sono risultati.

Appendix B. In this appendix we report the detailed graphs of the high frequency simulations for each mode. B.1. Schematic simulation results B.1.1. Mode 00 : 1.8 GHz HG

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Appendix B. In this appendix we report the detailed graphs of the high frequency simulations for each mode. B.1. Schematic simulation results B.1.1. Mode 00 : 1.8 GHz HG"

Copied!
11
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Appendix B.

In this appendix we report the detailed graphs of the high frequency simulations for each mode.

B.1. Schematic simulation results

B.1.1. Mode 00 : 1.8 GHz HG

AC Gain (dB) - Mode 1.8 GHz 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G s11 (dB) - Mode 1.8 GHz -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G NF (dB) - Mode 1.8 GHz 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G KF - Mode 1.8 GHz 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G

(2)

IIP3 1.8 GHz High Gain -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) 1st order 3rd order 1 dB/dBm 3 dB/dBm CP1 1.8 GHz High Gain -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) Vout (dBV) 1 dB/dBm

Figure B.2 IIP3

, CP

1

in 1.8 GHz HG mode

B.1.2. Mode 01 : 1.9 GHz HG

AC Gain(dB) - Mode 1.9 GHz 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G s11 - Mode 1.9 GHz -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G NF Mode - 1.9 GHz 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G KF - Mode 1.9 GHz 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G

(3)

IIP3 1.9 GHz High Gain -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) 1st order 3rd order 1 dB/dBm 3 dB/dBm CP1 1.9 GHz High Gain -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) Vout (dBV) 1 dB/dBm

Figure B.4 IIP3

, CP

1

in 1.9 GHz HG mode

B.1.3. Mode 10 : 2.1 GHz HG

AC Gain(dB) - Mode 2.1 GHz HG 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G s11 - Mode 2.1 GHz HG -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G NF Mode - 2.1 GHz HG 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G KF - Mode 2.1 GHz HG 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G

(4)

IIP3 2.1 GHz High Gain -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) 1st order 3rd order 1 dB/dBm 3 dB/dBm CP1 2.1 GHz High Gain -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) Vout (dBV) 1 dB/dBm

Figure B.6 IIP3

, CP

1

in 2.1 GHz HG mode

B.1.4. Mode 11 : 2.1 GHz LG

AC Gain(dB) - Mode 2.1 GHz LG -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G s11 - Mode 2.1 GHz LG -20 -18 -16 -14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G NF Mode - 2.1 GHz LG 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G KF - Mode 2.1 GHz LG 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5 1.6G 1.7G 1.8G 1.9G 2G 2.1G 2.2G 2.3G 2.4G

(5)

IIP3 2.1 GHz Low Gain -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) 1st order 3rd order 1 dB/dBm 3 dB/dBm CP1 2.1 GHz Low Gain -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 Input (dBm) Output (dB) Vout (dBV) 1 dB/dBm

Figure B.8 IIP

3

, CP

1

in 2.1 GHz LG mode

B.2. Post-layout simulation results

B.2.1. Mode 00 : 1.8 GHz HG

AC18

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

(6)

S11_18

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.10 S11

in 1.8 GHz HG mode

NF18

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

1,4

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

(7)

B.2.2. Mode 01 : 1.9 GHz HG

AC19

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.12 AC voltage gain in 1.9 GHz HG mode

S11 19

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.13 S

11

in 1.9 GHz HG mode

(8)

NF 19

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

1,4

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.14 Noise Figure in 1.9 GHz HG mode

B.2.3. Mode 11 : 2.1 GHz HG

AC 21 HG

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

(9)

S11 21 HG

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.16 S11

in 2.1 GHz HG mode

NF 21 HG

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

1,4

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

(10)

B.2.4. Mode 10 : 2.1 GHz LG

AC 21 LG

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.18 AC voltage gain in 2.1 GHz LG mode

S11 21 LG

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figure B.19 S

11

in 2.1 GHz LG mode

(11)

NF 21 LG

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

1,4

1,6

1,8

2

1.6G

1.76G

1.92G

2.08G

2.24G

2.4G

Figura

Figure B.1 AC Voltage Gain, S11 , Noise Figure, K f  stability factor in 1.8 GHz HG mode
Figure B.3 AC Voltage Gain, S11 , Noise Figure, K f  stability factor in 1.9 GHz HG mode
Figure B.5 AC Voltage Gain, S11 , Noise Figure, K f  stability factor in 2.1 GHz HG mode
Figure B.7 AC Voltage Gain, S11 , Noise Figure, K f  stability factor in 2.1 GHz LG mode
+7

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

All these groups are taken from the Appendix A of [3- 2] except for a group that we modify because it has the same value of the previous group.. Really those group are not the

OT Anterior tip of zygomatic process to rear edge of squamosal below mastoid foramen 181 P Length of parietals, frontoparietal suture to rear of external occipital protuberance

Numerous scientific research worldwide has shown the same positive effects, both physical and mental, of a corporeal education based on meditation and psychophysical relaxation, in

Reimers, ISH Heft 94, Bundesgesundheitsamt, Berlin Mallol J, Bonino C (1997) Comparison of radiochemical purity control methods for technetium radiopharmaceuticals used in

Descriptive data for 42 attempted Black Skimmer Rhynchops niger infanticides observed in Pinellas County, Florida, USA,

Residuals as a function of linear predictor for Westland Petrel burrow density estimates... Residuals of Westland Petrel burrow

van den Hoff: Factors affecting Giant Petrel breeding

position: NE of Velo island Wiley & Ottenwalder 1990, cited Goetz et al.. (position from website).. position) notes R van Halewijn