• Non ci sono risultati.

ABO polymorphism and SARS-CoV-2 infection - a meta-analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "ABO polymorphism and SARS-CoV-2 infection - a meta-analysis"

Copied!
7
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

ABO polymorphism and SARS-CoV-2 infection - a meta-analysis

1.Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

Population: The unit of analysis of this review is studies published in health-related journals with original data or results.

Interventions/exposures: We included studies that describe the distribution of AB0 blood groups in SARS-CoV-2 positive.

Comparator: ABO blood group distribution among either the general healthy or COVID- 19 negative population of the related geographic area.

Outcome measures: To be included, studies had to report or allow to calculate Odds Ratios (ORs) for the association of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and having a specific blood group (A, B, AB, or O).

Study design: Experimental studies (e.g. nonrandomized studies or cohort studies), observational studies, case series, and case studies.

Publication type: We included original research papers, including scientific meeting abstracts or research letters, if they contained sufficient information to fill the extraction forms.

2.Search strategy

(search date: July 16, 2020)

Search strategy Output

(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2) AND (โ€œblood groupโ€ OR โ€œABOโ€) MEDLINE (n= 42)

โ€COVID-19โ€ OR โ€œSARS-CoV-2โ€ AND โ€œblood groupโ€ OR โ€œABOโ€ LITCOVID (n=13)

TOTAL n=55

3.Content

Table S1. Quality of studies assessment: Newcastle Ottawa Scale

(2)

Li 1

Zietz 2

Gรถker 3

Wu 4

Ellinghaus 5a,5b

Leaf 6a,6b,

6c,6d Dzik

7 Selection

1) Is the case definition adequate?

a) yes, with independent validation *

b) yes, eg record linkage or based on self reports c) no description

b b b b b b b

2) Representativeness of the cases

a) consecutive or obviously representative series of cases * b) potential for selection biases or not stated

b b b b b b b

3) Selection of Controls a) community controls * b) hospital controls c) no description

a a a b a a b

4) Definition of Controls

a) no history of disease (endpoint) * b) no description of source

a a a a a a a

Comparability

1) Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis

a) study controls for_______ (Select the most important factor.) * b) study controls for any additional factor * (This criteria could be modified to indicate specific control for a second important factor.)

a a a a a a a

Exposure

1) Ascertainment of exposure a) secure record (eg surgical records) *

b) structured interview where blind to case/control status * c) interview not blinded to case/control status

d) written self report or medical record only e) no description

a a a a a a a

2) Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls a) yes *

b) no

a a a a a a a

3) Non-Response rate a) same rate for both groups * b) non respondents described c) rate different and no designation

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

TOTAL (OUT OF 8) 5 5 5 4 5 5 4

SCORE % 62.5 62.5 62.5 50.0 62.5 62.5 50.0

(3)

4.Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-out approach)

Table S2. Results from sensitivity analysis leave-one-out method: pooled OR and 95%

confidence interval calculated omitting each study in turn

A vs ABยทBยท0 B vs AยทABยท0 AB vs AยทBยท0 0 vs AยทBยทAB

Study omitted pooled OR 95%CI pooled OR 95%CI pooled OR 95%CI pooled OR 95%CI 1a (Li) 1ยท232 1ยท067 - 1ยท423 1ยท042 0ยท935 - 1ยท161 1ยท079 0ยท904 - 1ยท287 0ยท779 0ยท676 - 0ยท897

1b (Li) 1ยท226 1ยท074 - 1ยท398 1ยท060 0ยท965 - 1ยท164 1ยท065 0ยท915 - 1ยท239 0ยท776 0ยท677 - 0ยท890

1c (Li) 1ยท225 1ยท071 - 1ยท400 1ยท052 0ยท953 - 1ยท162 1ยท085 0ยท923 - 1ยท275 0ยท777 0ยท676 - 0ยท893

2 (Zietz) 1ยท253 1ยท091 - 1ยท439 1ยท037 0ยท938 - 1ยท146 1ยท124 0ยท975 - 1ยท296 0ยท755 0ยท653 - 0ยท874

3 (Gรถker) 1ยท185 1ยท054 - 1ยท332 1ยท068 0ยท979 - 1ยท166 1ยท110 0ยท956 - 1ยท288 0ยท786 0ยท687 - 0ยท900

4 (Wu) 1ยท215 1ยท066 - 1ยท385 1ยท049 0ยท951 - 1ยท158 1ยท110 0ยท957 - 1ยท288 0ยท777 0ยท677 - 0ยท892

5a (Ellinghaus) 1ยท207 1ยท061 - 1ยท372 1ยท078 0ยท987 - 1ยท176 1ยท067 0ยท911 - 1ยท250 0ยท779 0ยท676 - 0ยท897

5b (Ellinghaus) 1ยท228 1ยท071 - 1ยท408 1ยท038 0ยท947 - 1ยท138 1ยท055 0ยท917 - 1ยท214 0ยท783 0ยท682 - 0ยท899

6a (Leaf) 1ยท234 1ยท073 - 1ยท419 1ยท049 0ยท949 - 1ยท160 1ยท055 0ยท904 - 1ยท230 0ยท771 0ยท667 - 0ยท891

6b (Leaf) 1ยท252 1ยท091 - 1ยท437 1ยท039 0ยท938 - 1ยท152 1ยท121 0ยท968 - 1ยท297 0ยท755 0ยท653 - 0ยท873

6c (Leaf) 1ยท247 1ยท093 - 1ยท422 1ยท039 0ยท949 - 1ยท139 1ยท072 0ยท919 - 1ยท251 0ยท777 0ยท677 - 0ยท891

6d (Leaf) 1ยท265 1ยท110 - 1ยท441 1ยท080 0ยท999 - 1ยท168 1ยท090 0ยท932 - 1ยท275 0ยท741 0ยท654 - 0ยท840

7 (Dzik) 1ยท277 1ยท143 - 1ยท426 1ยท039 0ยท938 - 1ยท150 1ยท084 0ยท919 - 1ยท279 0ยท746 0ยท658 - 0ยท846

None 1ยท234 1ยท087 - 1ยท400 1ยท052 0ยท960 - 1ยท153 1ยท086 0ยท936 - 1ยท259 0ยท769 0ยท674 - 0ยท879

(4)

5.Subgroup analysis

Figure S1. Forest plot from random effects analysis: OR of being blood group A in SARS-

CoV-2+ group versus control group, by type of Control population.

(5)

Figure S2. Forest plot from random effects analysis: OR of being blood group A in SARS-

CoV-2+ group versus control group, by Country.

(6)

Figure S3. Forest plot from random effects analysis: OR of being blood group 0 in SARS-CoV-

2+ group versus control group, by type of control population.

(7)

Figure S4. Forest plot from random effects analysis: OR of being blood group 0 in SARS-CoV-

2+ group versus control group, by Country.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic and stainless steel than on copper and cardboard, and viable virus was detected up to 72 hours after ap- plication to these surfaces (Fig..

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Secondary attack rate for SARS-CoV-2, disaggregated by covariates (ie, household or family contact, index case symptom status, adult or child

Compelling data now demonstrate that com- munity mask wearing is an effective nonpharmacologic interven- tion to reduce the spread of this infection, especially as source con- trol

Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have developed mRNA-based vaccines that demonstrate more than 90% efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 clinical disease in clinical trials.. This high

definibili a contatto stretto (esposizione ad alto rischio) di un caso probabile o confermato (4) , asintomatico, resta fermo lโ€™obbligo del soggetto in questione

In a retrospective study by Liu et al., among 140 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, the proportion of patients with increased C-reactive protein, IL-6, and procalcitonin was

2 Assuming no population immunity and that all individuals are equally susceptible and equally infectious, the herd immunity threshold for SARS-CoV-2 would be expected to range

All articles with a report of pregnant women with con- firmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavi- rus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)