• Non ci sono risultati.

Nitrogen recovery from digestate with ammonia stripping: results of 27 tests

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Nitrogen recovery from digestate with ammonia stripping: results of 27 tests"

Copied!
15
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Sergio Piccinini

Giuseppe Moscatelli Claudio Fabbri

CRPA – Research Centre on Animal Production - Reggio E. - Italy

Nitrogen recovery from digestate with ammonia stripping : results of 27 tests

ManuREsource 2013 Manure management 

and valorization

December 5‐6, 2013  Bruges, Belgium International conference 

(2)

Layout of the stripping treatment in an anaerobic digestion scheme

Slurry and biomass Anaerobic Digestion

S/L Separation

Stripping

Ammonium sulfate Liquid fraction

Composting Drying

(optional)

Agronomic use

Liquid fraction with low ammonia

Solid fraction Fertilizer

Industry Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

Digestate

(3)

Layout and characteristics of the stripping pilot plant.

•Recirculation of air

•SemiBatch

•Acid Scrubber

•Temp: 60°C

•HRT: 6 ore

•Capacity reactor: 1 m3 of slurry

•Air flow rate=100-250 m3/h.m3 of slurry

(4)

Pilot plant stripping reactor

Air insuffator

Anti foam

Heat exchanger

(5)

Pilot plant stripping reactor

(6)

Hot (60°C) stripping of

ammonia, without the chemical

raising of pH, on several tests with 9 types of clarified digestate (9 types x 3

repetitions)

Experimental programme carried out

A.D. Plant Power S / L separator

A.D. plant 1 330 kWel Screw press Cattle manure and slurry (100%)

A.D. plant 2 999 kWel Screw press

Cattle slurry (25%) Energy crops (60%) Agoindustrial by-product (15%)

Pig slurry (90%)

Corn flour and molasses (4%) Cattle slurry (6%) A.D. plant 3 999 kWel Screw press Energy crops (100%)

A.D. plant 4 630 kWel Sieve drum press

Pig slurry (70%) Energy crops (15%)

Cattle slurry (15%)

999 kWel Sieve drum press Cattle slurry and manure (70%) Energy crops (30%) A.D. plant 5 999 kWel Screw press Energy crops (100%)

A.D. plant 6 250 kWel Centrifuge

A.D. plant 9 250 kWel Screw press

Pig slurry (30%) Energy crops (30%)

Cattle slurry (40%)

Input Substrate to Anaerobic Digestion

A.D. plant 7 60 kWel Screw press Cattle slurry (100%) A.D. plant 8

(7)

Characterisation of clarified digestate before and after stripping tests

pH TS TKN pH TS TKN

[-] [g/kg] [mg/kg] [mg/kg] [%TKN] [-] [g/kg] [mg/kg] [mg/kg] [%TKN]

Average 8,09 48,3 3339 1944,7 58,2% 8,59 49,5 2481 1049,7 42,3%

S.D. 0,05 0,6 33 4,7 0,5% 0,06 1,4 44 52,9 1,9%

Average 8,11 54,6 4324 2594,3 60,0% 8,70 58,2 3326 1503,7 45,2%

S.D. 0,05 0,4 31 1,2 0,4% 0,01 1,3 39 15,0 0,3%

Average 7,98 69,0 4341 2131,3 49,1% 8,67 71,9 3621 1251,7 34,6%

S.D. 0,11 1,5 56 60,9 0,8% 0,15 0,8 74 15,9 0,5%

Average 7,92 53,7 5476 3769,7 68,9% 8,63 53,9 4135 2171,7 52,5%

S.D. 0,26 5,7 92 64,8 2,2% 0,09 9,3 34 147,9 3,7%

Average 7,81 65,5 4672 2223,3 47,7% 8,46 71,1 3786 1296,7 34,2%

S.D. 0,07 3,3 420 95,6 2,7% 0,06 2,6 215 91,9 0,9%

Average 7,88 15,6 2110 1602,0 76,0% 8,43 15,2 1460 792,7 54,3%

S.D. 0,09 2,5 73 33,3 1,1% 0,06 2,0 33 21,1 1,2%

Average 7,73 36,8 2391 1366,0 57,1% 8,48 34,7 1890 933,0 49,4%

S.D. 0,07 1,3 18 46,4 1,5% 0,03 2,4 15 11,4 1,0%

Average 7,91 43,5 3514 1928,3 54,9% 8,54 48,3 2892 1315,7 45,5%

S.D. 0,11 2,6 138 44,8 1,4% 0,02 1,1 119 87,8 2,6%

Average 7,75 13,9 1747 1361,0 78,1% 8,74 14,2 1276 761,7 60,1%

S.D. 0,08 0,6 83 57,2 5,9% 0,10 0,8 151 30,7 4,8%

A.D. plant 7

A.D. plant 8 A.D. plant

1

A.D. plant 2

A.D. plant 3

A.D. plant 4

A.D. plant 5

A.D. plant 6

Thesis NH4

+ -N

A.D. plant 9

Clarified Digestate POST-Stripping NH4

+ -N Clarified Digestate PRE-Stripping

(8)

Ammonia-N and TKN Removal efficiency observed in the 27 tests (average value and standard deviation -in brackets - of the 3 repetitions of each 9 types of clarified digestates treated)

NH4

‐ N   TKN

Power [dm3] [dm3] [%] [%]

A.D. plant 1

(330 kWel) 310 (11) 263 (6) 603 (19) 276 (12) 54.3 (1.5) 31.6 (1.1)

A.D. plant 2

(999 kWel) 301 (2) 289 (4) 780 (4) 435 (3) 44.3 (0.7) 26.6 (0.6)

A.D. plant 3

(999 kWel) 301 (2) 262 (11) 641 (21) 328 (12) 48.8 (0.8) 24 (0.6)

A.D. plant 4

(630 kWel) 301 (2) 276 (24) 1135 (11) 600 (87) 47.1 (8.2) 32.5 (6.5)

A.D. plant 5

(999 kWel) 303 (8) 245 (8) 674 (42) 317 (32) 52.9 (2.5) 25.2 (1)

A.D. plant 6

(250 kWel) 316 (14) 205 (53) 506 (19) 162 (44) 68.1 (7.8) 51.7 (5.4)

A.D. plant 7

(60 kWel) 339 (5) 273 (4) 463 (14) 254 (6) 45 (0.6) 25.7 (0.9)

A.D. plant 8

(999 kWel) 320 (9) 275 (22) 617 (3) 362 (53) 41.3 (8.3) 22.7 (5)

A.D. plant 9

(250 kWel) 318 (7) 211 (19) 433 (24) 160 (7) 63 (0.5) 49.2 (3.7)

NH4+

 ‐ N  initial 

NH4 + ‐ N  final

N removal efficiency

[g]

Types of clarified  digestates from 9 

A.D. plants

Clarified digestate to stripping

Effluent after  stripping

(9)

Average trend of the ammonia concentration and removal during the experiments at 60 °C

(10)

Relationship between removal efficiency of ammonia and total solids content in the influent

The removal efficiency of nitrogen is strongly influenced

by the content of total solids present in the clarified digestate

(11)

Relationship between content of ammonia in the influent and removal efficiency of ammonia

The greater the ammonia content in the digestate, higher the stripping efficiency

(12)

Results: characteristics of ammonium sulphate solution extracted from scrubber

pH: 4.29

TS: 36.4 %

TKN: 73.27 g/kg (20.1 % TS),

about 90% as ammonia

(13)

Results: some problems

• Foam formation (but controlled by the slurry mixing system designed to reduce this

problem);

• Ammoniun sulphate dilution in the scrubber’s tank, for condensation of the water vapor from air stripping flow;

• Accumulation of organic matter on the reactor

walls and bottom.

(14)

• The results of experiments show feasible the stripping of clarified digestate by air insufflation and heating, without chemical raise of the pH; efficiencies, however, are not very high;

• The lower the solids content in the digestate, the greater the efficiency of stripping;

• The greater the nitrogen content and the percentage of ammonia in the digestate, higher the stripping efficiency;

• The ammonia stripping after anaerobic digestion therefore has three advantages: the anaerobic digestion converts most of the organic nitrogen into ammonia, reduces organic acids (less foam) and makes available waste heat from CHP unit.

Conclusion

(15)

Thank for your attention

www.crpa.it

www.lifemanev.eu

s.piccinini@crpa.it

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Secondo il disegno dei Trattati istitutivi la creazione del mercato comune avveniva in termini di concorrenza e libertà di circolazione senza che le scelte ad esso

Conclusion: Because the molecular asset of EGFR may change during the metastatic progression of NSCLC to brain (but not to adrenal), the selection of patients with brain metastasis

nell’opera di Primo Levi, in E. La visione del mondo di Primo Levi, Angeli, Milano 2000, pp.. vie», commenta Semprún, «ou plutôt: le rêve de la mort, seule réa- lité d’une vie

55,62,63,71 The difference between Scheme 1 and previously proposed reaction schemes does not lie in the individual reaction steps or reaction intermediates, but in the description

Rispettivamente, il Regno Unito gli investimenti in ricerca ed il trasferimento tecnologico, il Cile il sostegno all’im- prenditorialità, Israele la valorizzazione

Co-digestion of agricultural wastes with animal manures plays significant role to control the carbon and ratio of substrate for anaerobic digestion and this process offers not only

The use of this tannery by-product as main substrate to feed anaerobic digestion is limited because of the high concentrations of ammonia formed during fermentation, in a way

Two investigators (C.L., A.N.) independently conducted a literature search in PubMed and SCOPUS with no language restrictions, from the inception of the databases up until 30