• Non ci sono risultati.

A look at the complex issues of science communication: the Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology


Academic year: 2021

Condividi "A look at the complex issues of science communication: the Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology"

Mostra di più ( pagine)

Testo completo


J COM A look at the complex issues of science communication:

the Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology



, M.




, B.


. (2021).

Reviewed Book











. 3


. L


, U.K.: R


Andrea Rubin

Reviewed by

In the year of the PCST Conference that brings together scholars and experts in public communication of science, Routledge published the new edition of the Handbook of Public Communication of Science and

Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench. The book, in its third edition, seeks to update and define the field of study and

application of science communication from both a theoretical and empirical point of view mostly in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic which

undoubtedly represents an event of historical significance that cannot fail to question scholars on the medium and long-term effects.


Popularization of science and technology; Science communication in the developing world; Science communication: theory and models




Submitted: 25th May 2021 Accepted: 26th May 2021 Published: 23rd August 2021

How to improve the public communication of science is going to be an important issue for most societies and cultures, especially after the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic that evidenced the social role of public communication of science and its multiple ways of developing around the world.

The third edition of the Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, offers several

theoretical analysis on science communication’s models and provides an open and broad perspective of science communication.

Compared to previous editions, the book has been extensively renewed and contributions from new authors have been added, taking advantage of the opportunity offered by the recent pandemic to investigate, in particular, the new

Review Journal of Science Communication 20(05)(2021)R02 1


balances that have formed between expertise and public. The book represents a collaboration of authors and scholars united by the international PCST network which past 24–27 May held its biennial own conference, animating and enriching the debate on public communication of science and promoting a fruitful

collaboration between networks of scholars and world institutions. The aim is to highlight, in its 17 chapters, the different intersections present in the science communication practices and the main debates on the future challenges in science communication.

The book, indeed, investigates in a multidisciplinary perspective the multiple spaces and themes in which public communication of science is applied: from the theme of the environment to the relationship between art and science, from risk communication to trends in museums. and science center. Each reader will be able to find useful and updated reflections on the new challenges of science journalism in the digital age or indications on the concepts and tools useful for evaluating public engagement activities or, again, a very precious collection of empirical research on public opinion of science in worldwide. The Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology provides an updated review of the literature and a privileged point of view on the most recent results of national and international research activities which makes it a rich guide for teachers, students, researchers and practicioners in this field.

The book is also a valuable tool for public communication scholars and students of public communication of science and technology. Both will find important insights on the main topics concerning this important discipline

Considering the particular period in which the book is published, characterized by the Covid-19 pandemic and by the “unprecedented public exposure of scientific experts” as Bucchi and Trench recall in the introduction, the contribution on the media visibility of the scientists who acquire visibility in the public sphere and became “stars”, intercepting a particularly relevant trend, a social character that characterizes modernity. Furthermore, the growing professionalization of public communication of science and technology has become a factor in mobilizing scientists in the public arena which requires a progressive increase in

communication skills. This poses new challenges for researchers, scientific institutions and scientists’ educational pathways.

The book, however, overlooks — perhaps inevitably — some aspects that are characterizing the public communication of science such as the political, moral, and legal implications and renounces to explore models of science communication that takes into account the political contexts in which science communication takes place. A reader interested in a global perspective could also perceive the absence of the important and established initiatives and perspectives that come from countries not sufficiently considered in the contributions present in the Handbook.

Furthermore, the contributions do not seem to fully respond to the challenges posed to science communication by the Covid-19 crisis “around long-standing questions about communicating science with policy-makers, and the claims of the latter to be ‘following science’, or to questions as “what will be the long-term impact of such an unprecedented public exposure of scientific experts on the public images of perception of science and scientists?”.

https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20050702 JCOM 20(05)(2021)R02 2


Despite this, the Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology remains an essential tool for anyone who intends to deepen or begin to approach studies on the public communication of science and the relationships between science and society.


Eyal, G. (2019). The crisis of expertise. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.

Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science? Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.: Princeton University Press.


Andrea Rubin, Ph.D., teaches Social Science Theory at the University of Bergamo.

In the area of science and technology studies, his main research interests are public perception and public communication of science and public engagement.

He co-edited (with Giuseppe Pellegrini) the Yearbook on Science in Society 2020.



Rubin, A. (2021). ‘A look at the complex issues of science communication: the

How to cite

Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology’.

JCOM 20 (05), R02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20050702.

c The Author(s). This article is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution — NonCommercial — NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 License.

ISSN 1824-2049. Published by SISSA Medialab. jcom.sissa.it

https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20050702 JCOM 20(05)(2021)R02 3


Documenti correlati

Here a  is the parameter responsible for the Feynman scaling violation, whereas D and a are additional parameters obtained from the fit to data — all are energy dependent (cf. [1]

Breaking News, Videos, Top Headlines across Asia, South-East Asia, South Asia, East Asia.. Asia for Educators (AFE) is designed to serve faculty and students in world history,

Catala, PLATO: detailed design of the telescope optical units, in: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. Catala,

More than 260 scholars discussed the spirit and culture of science, science communication during the COVID-19 crisis, the public understanding of science, and the ethical aspects

Based on research that surveyed different aspects of European science communication, including science journalism, teaching and training in science communication, social media

Science communication studies include philosophically distinct tendencies to emphasise audience analysis through social research methods, or to emphasise understanding

1 https://buildscicomm.eventcreate.com... publics and sciences — has begun to languish in recent years in Japan. Since the launch of a series of science communicator training

Once communicators understand and tap into this aspect of storytelling, stories can become versatile tools to help people make sense of the world around them, including issues

Trained as a historian of science, he works across the field of public communication of science and technology, including informal science education, citizen science, and.

Following this approach, the study of science comics could benefit from research in the field of education, cognitive psychology, information design and literary studies, which

Is science communication a child of science, a child of journalism, a child of communication, or is it time it enters adulthood when it comes to its ethics.. As it turns out,

Finally, Jessica Norberto Rocha and Martha Marandino explore the development process for mobile science museums and centers in international contexts and discuss, especially in

It is a selective list and omits for reasons of space other events and organisations: the two Science Academies; the Royal Institute of Australia, Australia’s national science

In 2006, for instance, the Rio de Janeiro state government, MCT, BNDES and the Vitae Foundation financed the creation of the mobile science centre, Caravan of Science, by

This study of the science communication views and practices of African researchers — academics at the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) in Zimbabwe — reveals a

Accordingly, under PIT one would predict that as members of opposing cultural groups become more science literate and more adept at analytical reasoning — and thus less dependent

From a point of view of the contents, I hope only that this line of research continues to have a strong role in the topics covered by JCOM because actually the convergence

Quite interestingly, the contribution to the construction of a global public opinion is twofold: it is implemented through explicit and rigorous forms of science communication

È di grande interesse notare come questo contributo alla costruzione di un’opinione pubblica mondiale avvenga sia attraverso forme di comunicazione della scienza esplicita e

Results clearly point out that scientific journalists and research institutions press officers are increasingly eager for rapid access to researchers capable of

Even in their diversity, these approaches stand out from the norm in that they do not limit their field of study to external social aspects that have an impact on science

Con l’espressione comunicazione trans-epistemica 23 ci si riferisce a quella componente della comunicazione scientifica che vede coinvolti soggetti provenienti da

Ma se la comunicazione pubblica della scienza è diventata un bisogno sociale diffuso, allora anche il grande pubblico dei non esperti ha dei doveri.. Un diritto