• Non ci sono risultati.

Jordan Response Plan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Jordan Response Plan"

Copied!
15
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation

Jordan Response Plan 2016-2018

19 October 2015

(2)

Syria Crisis in Jordan: Key Figures

1.4 million Syrians in Jordan = 20% increase in population

630,000 Syrian registered refugees

1.27 million Syrians living in host communities, primarily in Northern Governorates

Five years into what has been called the greatest humanitarian crisis of our time, Jordan continues to uphold its moral obligations, carrying more than its fair share of the response.

(3)

Syria Crisis in Jordan: Impact

For host countries like Jordan, the magnitude and longevity of the crisis has translated into mounting costs and ever- increasing challenges to the social, economic and political fabric of the country.

Currently:

Severe vulnerability of public services (education, health, water, municipal services) in areas with high concentration of refugees

Increased competition for housing and employment;

overcrowded schools and health centres

Higher prices for consumer goods

Increasing vulnerability of Syrian refugees and vulnerable Jordanians

(4)

Jordan Response Plan 2016-2018

The Jordan Response Plan for the Syria Crisis 2016 – 2018 is a call for collective action to better support Jordan.

It represents a further step towards a comprehensive response that effectively links short-term coping solutions with longer-term initiatives aimed at strengthening local and national resilience capacities.

Multi-year vision: to guide short and medium term interventions while ensuring immediate, concrete improvements in the lives of refugees and people living in host communities.

Three-year rolling plan: to facilitate the provision and tracking of multi-year financing and the monitoring of multi-year interventions.

(5)

Jordan Response Plan 2016-2018

Stronger linkages between humanitarian and development responses: to consolidate refugee and resilience responses into one single plan for each sector.

Improved targeting of assistance based on vulnerability:

JRP projects were developed based on the results of a comprehensive vulnerability assessment.

Resilience-based approach: to enable households, communities, services and institutions initially to ‘cope’, gradually to ‘recover’, and, ultimately to strengthen and

‘sustain’ their capacities, thereby deepening their resilience to present and future shocks.

(6)

Jordan Response Plan 2016-2018

Harmonized with existing plans: the plan has been designed in alignment with two main national plans and strategies: the Executive Development Programme 2016–18, and the Governorate Development Programme 2016–18. A detailed comparison between the EDP and the JRP was carried out to review the objectives, activities, location, and budget for all projects

Tracked through a robust aid information and project management system (JORISS): to ensure that donor funding is accurately tracked and accounted for, and that interventions on the ground are coordinated and monitored.

Improved capturing and tracking of funds as a result of multi- year planning framework.

The JRP 2016-18 has been prepared based on (i) the needs defined by the Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment and (ii) implementing partners' absorption capacity.

(7)

JRP2016-2018 Objectives

Within a timeframe of three years (January 2016 – December 2018) the plan aims to:

Upscale critical capacities of the central, regional and local authorities

Foster the resilience of service delivery system and municipal services and infrastructure in areas critically affected by demographic stress

Meet the needs of (i) Syrian refugees in and out of camps; (ii) vulnerable Jordanians affected by the Syria crisis

Expand employment and livelihood opportunities

Mitigate pressures including social imbalances on Jordanian host communities

Support the government budget to cope with the additional

(8)

JRP2016-2018 Methodology

The JRP 2016 – 2018 is the result of a participatory planning process involving more than 100 institutions and organizations.

The JRP 2016-2018 was completed through an intensive series of working sessions with more than 200 representatives of national and international organizations.

The following sector responses were prepared 1. Education

2. Energy

3. Environment 4. Justice

5. Health

6. Livelihood and Food Security

7. Local Governance & Municipal Affairs 8. Shelter

9. Social Protection 10. Transport

11. WASH

(9)

Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment (CVA)

Between April and July 2015, MOPIC/HRCU and the JRPSC Secretariat coordinated the elaboration of the CVA to inform Jordan’s response to the impact of the Syria crisis on the country. Specifically, the aim of the CVA was to clarify vulnerabilities among host communities and refugees (in and out of camps) and to assess the impact of the crisis on basic services.

2 main objectives:

1. Improve targeting of assistance and use aid resources more effectively.

2. Establish a profile of vulnerability among (i) Syrian refugee households; (ii) Jordanian host communities; (iii) Public service sectors such as education, health, municipal services, and water; (iv) Other JRP sectors.

• The CVA is the primary guideline for developing JRP sector projects since it provides information for project design and prioritization.

• It was prepared using a number of studies and assessments, including the Sector Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) and the Vulnerability

(10)

JRP2016-2018 Funding Requirements

The total cost of response interventions for the JRP 2016 – 2018: US$ 8,137,444,104.

 US$ 2,450,978,299 is required for refugee interventions

 US$ 2,485,137,007 is required for resilience-strengthening, including of host communities, service delivery systems and public authorities

 US$ 3,201,328,798 is for specific budget support needs.

(11)

JRP2016-2018 Funding

Requirements

(12)

Financing Modalities

Budget Support

Pooled Funds, including

Trust Funds

Project support

(13)

Implementing partners

Line Ministries

& public entities UN agencies

National and international NGOs / CSOs

Other development partners (private sector, academia, cooperation agencies,

etc.) Implementing

partners

(14)

Next Steps

 Resource mobilization against JRP2016-2018

 Development of report on JRP implementation in 2015

 Continued strengthening of crisis response coordination structure within MOPIC and line ministries to ensure that needs are accurately identified, cost-effective strategies devised, and projects implemented and appropriately monitored.

 Capacity strengthening of TF Chairs and members to ensure that they have the capacity to engage in sector-wide multi- stakeholder planning, with greater alignment to government policies and systems.

 Ensure accurate capture of multi-year funds through JORISS

 Continued coordination with EDP committees to ensure harmonization

(15)

Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation

Thank You

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Mentre si può nominare in un fiato Büchner e Heine perché entrambi sono attivi sul fronte anti-reazionario (Heine dedicò solo due opere giovanili al teatro, Almansor e Rattcliff

• Devozione, solidarietà e assistenza a Milano nel primo Quattrocento: gli statuti della Scuola della Divinità, in "Studi di storia medioevale e diplomatica", XII-XIII

Prendendo le mosse dalle indagini archeologiche svolte alla metà degli anni ’70 nella Badia di Vaiano PO, il presente contributo, risultato di una ricerca ancora in corso,

(June 20, 2003) (unpublished report, on file with the United States Commission on Civil Rights), available at http://www.sentencingproject.org/pubs_06.cfm (follow

The delegates present at the joint World Health Organization/Russian Federation International Meeting on Prison Health and Public Health, held in Moscow on 23 and 24 October 2003,

Our study represents an effort to provide such offense-specific data, comparing ar- rest rates on a range of key charges in a cohort of state mental health service recipients with

Le seconde vittime in sanità: le fasi di recupero dopo un evento avverso

A BSTRACT : This paper investigated the potential of the Public Internet Terminal (PIT) system to promote basic health education for two rural communities in the