• Non ci sono risultati.

Jadvar, “PET Physics and Instrumentation”, Clinical PET and PET/CT, London: Springer London, 2005

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Jadvar, “PET Physics and Instrumentation”, Clinical PET and PET/CT, London: Springer London, 2005"

Copied!
5
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

[1] J. Langner, PET Schema, [Online], Available:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/PET-schema.png. [2] H. Jadvar, “PET Physics and Instrumentation”, Clinical PET and PET/CT,

London: Springer London, 2005.

[3] T.B. Lynch, “PET Physics and Instrumentation”, PET/CT in Clinical Practice, London: Springer London, 2007.

[4] M.J. Martinez, S.I. Ziegler and T. Beyer, “PET and PET/CT: Basic Princi- ples and Instrumentation”, PET in Oncology,Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.

[5] J. Maus, “Annihilation”, own work part of PhD thesis, Available:

http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-23509.

[6] D.L. Bailey, “Data Acquisition and Performance Characterization in PET”

Positron Emission Tomography Basic Sciences, London, Springer London, 2005.

[7] Manticorp, “Scintillation Counter Schematic”, Own work, Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/

File:Scintillation_Counter_Schematic.jpg.

[8] G. Tomasi, F. Turkheimer and E. Aboagye, “Importance of Quantification for the Analysis of PET Data in Oncology: Review of Current Methods and Trends for the Future”, Molecular imaging and biology MIB the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-16, 2011.

[9] R.N. Gunn, S.R. Gunn and V.J. Cunningham, “Positron emission tomography compartmental models”, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : offi- cial journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 635-652, 2001.

[10] J. Logan, “Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers”, Nuclear medicine and biology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 661–670, 2000.

[11] V.J. Cunningham and T. Jones, “Spectral analysis of dynamic PET studies”, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the Interna- tional Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–23, 1993.

[12] T.E. Nichols, J. Qi and R.M. Leahy, “Continuous Time Dynamic PET Imaging Using List Mode Data”, no. Ml, pp. 98–111, 1999.

(2)

Bibliografia

[13] H.W. Atabe, Y.I. Koma, Y.K. Imura, M.N. Aganawa and M.S. Hidahara, “PET kinetic analysis — compartmental model”, Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 583-588, 2006.

[14] R. Boellaard, “Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis”, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50 Suppl 1, p. 11S–20S, 2009.

[15] C. Comtat et al.,“Fast reconstruction of 3D PET data with accurate statistical modeling”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 45,pp. 1083–89, 1998.

[16] A. Rahmim, J. Qi and V. Sossi, “Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory practice benefits and pitfalls”, Med. Phys., vol. 40, 064301, 2013.

[17] A.J. Reader and J. Verhaeghe, “4D image reconstruction for emission tomography”, Phys. Med. Biol., 59 R371, 2014.

[18] A. Reilhac et al., “Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative recon- struction methods in dynamic brain PET studies”, Neuroimage, 39 359–68, 2008.

[19] J. Verhaeghe and A.J. Reader, “AB-OSEM reconstruction for improved Pa- tlak kinetic parameter estimation: a simulation study”, Phys. Med. Biol., 55 6739–57,2010.

[20] C.S. Patlak, R.G. Blasberg and J.D. Fenstermacher, “Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data”, J. Cereb.

Blood Flow Metab., 3 1–7, 1983.

[21] G. Wang, L. Fu and J. Qi, “Maximum a posteriori reconstruction of the pa- tlak parametric image from sinograms in dynamic PET”, Phys. Med. Biol., 53 593–604,2008.

[22] C. Tsoumpas, F.E. Turkheimer and K. Thielemans, “Study of direct and in- direct parametric estimation methods of linear models in dynamic positron emission tomography”, Med. Phys., 35 1299–309, 2008

[23] J. Tang et al, “Direct 4D reconstruction of parametric images incorporating anato-functional joint entropy”, Phys. Med. Biol., 55 4261–72,2010.

[24] G.I. Angelis et al, “Convergence optimization of parametric MLEM reconstruc- tion for estimation of Patlak plot parameters”, Comput. Med. Imag. Graph., 35 407–16,2011.

[25] J.Logan, “Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers”, Nucl. Med. Biol., 27 661–70, 2000.

[26] A. Rahmim et al, “Direct 4D parametric imaging for linearized models of re- versibly binding PET tracers using generalized AB-EM reconstruction”, Phys.

Med. Biol, 57 733–55,2012.

[27] Y. Rakvongthai et al., “Direct reconstruction of cardiac PET kinetic parametric images using a preconditioned conjugate gradient approach”, Med. Phys., 40 102501, 2013.

108

(3)

[28] A. Rahmim, J. Tang and H. Mohy-ud-Din, “Direct 4D parametric imaging in dynamic myocardial perfusion PET”, Front. Biomed. Technol., 1 4–13,2014.

[29] K.H. Su, T.C. Yen and Y.H. Fang, “A novel approach for direct reconstruction of parametric images for myocardial blood flow from PET imaging”, Med. Phys., 40 102505,2013.

[30] M.E. Kamasak et al, “Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 24 636–50, 2005.

[31] G. Wang and J. Qi, “Generalized algorithms for direct reconstruction of parametric images from dynamic PET data”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 28 1717–26,2009.

[32] P. Gravel and A.J. Reader, “Direct 4D PET MLEM reconstruction of para- metric images using the simplified reference tissue model with the basis func- tion method”, IEEE and Medical Imaging Conf. Nuclear Science Symp., pp 1–7 (NSS/MIC),2013

[33] A.J. Reader et al., “EM algorithm system modeling by image-space techniques for PET reconstruction”, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 50 1392–97, 2003.

[34] G. Wang and J. Qi, “An optimization transfer algorithm for nonlinear parame- tric image reconstruction from dynamic PET data”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 31 1977–88, 2012.

[35] G. Wang and J. Qi, “Direct estimation of kinetic parametric images for dynamic PET”, Theranostics, 3 802–15,2013.

[36] G. Wang and J. Qi, “Acceleration of the direct reconstruction of linear parametric images using nested algorithms”, Phys. Med. Biol., 55 1505–17,2010.

[37] J.C. Matthews et al., “The direct calculation of parametric images from dyna- mic PET data using maximum-likelihood iterative reconstruction”, Phys. Med.

Biol., 42 1155–73,1997.

[38] I. Hong I and A.J. Reader, “Ultrafast 4D PET image reconstruction with user-definable temporal basis functions”, Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Record, pp 5475–8,2008.

[39] J. Qi and R.M. Leahy, “Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography”, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51 (15):R541-578, 2006.

[40] R.E. Carson and K. Lange, “A statistical model for positron emission tomogra- phy—the EM parametric image reconstruction algorithm—comment”, J. Am.

Stat. Assoc., 80 20–2, 1985.

[41] C. Tsoumpas et al, “The effect of regularization in motion compensated PET image reconstruction: a realistic numerical 4D simulation study”, Phys. Med.

Biol., 58 1759–73, 2013.

[42] J.C. Matthews et al, “Direct reconstruction of parametric images using any spatiotemporal 4D image based model and maximum likelihood expectation ma- ximisation”, IEEE Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Record (NSS/MIC), 2435–41,

(4)

Bibliografia

2010.

[43] A. Reader, J. Matthews, F. Sureau et al., “Iterative kinetic parameter estima- tion within fully 4D PET image reconstruction”, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Syp. & Med.

Im. Conf, 3): 1752-56, 2006.

[44] K. Lange, D.R. Hunter, I. Yang, “Optimization transfer using surrogate objec- tive functions”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9(1):1–20, 2000.

[45] A.R. De Pierro, “A modified expectation maximization algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation in emission tomography”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 14(1):132–137, 1995.

[46] D.W. Marquardt, “An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters”, Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2):431–441, 1963.

[47] K. Madsen, H.B. Nielsen and O. Tingleff, “Methods for non-linear least squares problems”, Tech rep, Technical University of Denmark, 2004.

[48] A.M. Spence, M. Muzi, M.M. Graham et al., “ Glucose metabolism in hu- man malignant gliomas measured quantitatively with PET, 1-[C-11]glucose and FDG: analysis of the FDG lumped constant”, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 39(3):440–448,1998.

[49] J.A. Fessler, “Image Reconstruction Toolbox”, [Online], Available:

http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~fessler/code/index.html.

[50] D.G. Feng, K.P. Wong, C.M. Wu and W.C. Siu, “A technique for extracting physiological parameters and the required input function simultaneously from PET image measurements: Theory and simulation study”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol 1, no. 4, pp. 243-254, 1997.

110

(5)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The development of the first PET/CT prototype was initi- ated in 1992 with the objectives to integrate CT and PET within the same device, to use the CT images for the atten- uation

2[F]-Fluoro-2- deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a sensitive tool for the detection of occult primary cancer (carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome) with head and

1. The role of Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluating the results of therapy of lymphoma patients. Kostakoglu L, Leonard JP, Kuji I, et al. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose

Clinical as- sessment of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence in colorectal cancer.. Kim CK, Gupta NC, Chandramouli B,

(13) studied 35 patients with esophageal cancer and demonstrated that FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 88% (7/8) and specificity of 93% (25/27) for detection of distant metastatic

addition of FDG-PET imaging to CT altered the surgical management in 41% of the patients, 27% by detecting CT- occult pancreatic carcinoma and 14% by identifying un- suspected

A prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography scanning, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and standard axillary dis- section for axillary staging in patients with early

These problems with conventional imaging have led to evaluation of FDG-PET as an alterative for the staging of cervical carcinoma and for the evaluation of lymph nodes in