• Non ci sono risultati.

Shape optimization for the eigenvalues of a biharmonic Steklov problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Shape optimization for the eigenvalues of a biharmonic Steklov problem"

Copied!
64
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Shape optimization for the eigenvalues of a biharmonic

Steklov problem

Luigi Provenzano

joint work with Davide Buoso PEPworkshop 2014, Aveiro November 06, 2014

(2)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

LetΩbe a bounded domain inRNof class C1,τ >0 a fixed constant.









2u−τ∆u=0, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν− div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

2 of 26

(3)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Z

D2u:D2φ + τ∇u· ∇φdx =λ Z

∂Ω

uφdσ , ∀φ ∈H2(Ω),

where D2u:D2φ = PNi,j=1∂x2u

i∂xj

2φ

∂xi∂xj

0=λ1[Ω]<λ2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

3 of 26

(4)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Z

D2u:D2φ + τ∇u· ∇φdx =λ Z

∂Ω

uφdσ , ∀φ ∈H2(Ω),

where D2u:D2φ = PNi,j=1∂x2u

i∂xj

2φ

∂xi∂xj

0=λ1[Ω]<λ2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

3 of 26

(5)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Ω 7→λj[Ω], Ω 7→λ2[Ω]

maxλj[Ω]? minλj[Ω] ? Critical points ? among setsΩwith a fixed volume|Ω|

4 of 26

(6)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Ω 7→λj[Ω], Ω 7→λ2[Ω]

maxλj[Ω]? minλj[Ω] ? Critical points ? among setsΩwith a fixed volume|Ω|

4 of 26

(7)

Other Steklov-type problems

LetΩbe a bounded domain of class C1inRN









2u=0, in Ω , u=0, on ∂Ω ,

∆u=λ∂u∂ν, on ∂Ω ,

Bucur, Ferrero, Gazzola, “On the first eigenvalue of a fourth order Steklov problem”, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 35.

5 of 26

(8)

Other Steklov-type problems

LetΩbe a bounded domain of class C1inRN









2u=0, in Ω , u=0, on ∂Ω ,

∆u=λ∂u∂ν, on ∂Ω ,

Bucur, Ferrero, Gazzola, “On the first eigenvalue of a fourth order Steklov problem”, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 35.

5 of 26

(9)

Steklov problem for the Laplacian

Steklov problem for the Laplacian ( ∆u=0, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

0=λ1[Ω]<λ2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume (Weinstock, Brock).

6 of 26

(10)

Steklov problem for the Laplacian

Steklov problem for the Laplacian ( ∆u=0, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

0=λ1[Ω]<λ2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume (Weinstock, Brock).

6 of 26

(11)

Steklov problem for the Laplacian

Steklov problem for the Laplacian ( ∆u=0, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

0=λ1[Ω]<λ2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume (Weinstock, Brock).

6 of 26

(12)

Neumann vs Steklov, second order

( −∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω ,

where

ρε=

( ε, in Ω \ ¯ωε, Cε, in ωε, ωε=

x∈Ω : dist(x, ∂Ω) < ε andR

ρε=M for allε ∈]0, ε0[.

7 of 26

(13)

Neumann vs Steklov, second order

( −∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω , where

ρε=

( ε, in Ω \ ¯ωε, Cε, in ωε, ωε=

x∈Ω : dist(x, ∂Ω) < ε andR

ρε=M for allε ∈]0, ε0[.

7 of 26

(14)

Neumann vs Steklov, second order

( −∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

∂u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω , where

ρε=

( ε, in Ω \ ¯ωε, Cε, in ωε, ωε=

x∈Ω : dist(x, ∂Ω) < ε andR

ρε=M for allε ∈]0, ε0[.

7 of 26

(15)

Neumann vs Steklov, second order

For all j∈ N,λj(ε) → λjasε →0

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

0 10 20 30 40

Figure: N=2, M=π

8 of 26

(16)

Neumann vs Steklov, second order

For all j∈ N,λj(ε) → λjasε →0

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

0 10 20 30 40

Figure: N=2, M=π

8 of 26

(17)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Strategy:

Biharmonic Neumann problem with mass densityρε









2u−τ∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν− div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω ,

Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume, whenρε≡ const(Chasman 2011).

Write the HamiltonianH of a plate with its mass concentrated at the boundary and recover equations of motion









2u−τ∆u=0, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν − div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

9 of 26

(18)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Strategy:

Biharmonic Neumann problem with mass densityρε









2u−τ∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν− div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω , Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume, whenρε≡ const(Chasman 2011).

Write the HamiltonianH of a plate with its mass concentrated at the boundary and recover equations of motion









2u−τ∆u=0, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν − div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

9 of 26

(19)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Strategy:

Biharmonic Neumann problem with mass densityρε









2u−τ∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν− div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω , Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume, whenρε≡ const(Chasman 2011).

Write the HamiltonianH of a plate with its mass concentrated at the boundary and recover equations of motion









2u−τ∆u=0, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν − div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

9 of 26

(20)

The biharmonic Steklov problem

Strategy:

Biharmonic Neumann problem with mass densityρε









2u−τ∆u=λ(ε)ρεu, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν− div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =0, on ∂Ω , Theballis a maximizer forλ2[Ω]amongΩwith a fixed volume, whenρε≡ const(Chasman 2011).

Write the HamiltonianH of a plate with its mass concentrated at the boundary and recover equations of motion









2u−τ∆u=0, in Ω ,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω ,

τ∂u∂ν − div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω ,

9 of 26

(21)

Symmetric functions of the eigenvalues

LetΩa bounded domain inRN. Set Φ(Ω) =

φ ∈

C2(Ω)N

, injective : inf

|detDφ| >0



Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a bounded domain ofRNof class C1. Let F be a finite non-empty subset ofN \ {0}. Let

A[F] =nφ ∈ Φ(Ω) : λl[φ] <nλj[φ] :j∈Fo

∀l ∈ N \ (F ∪ {0})o

Then the setAis open inΦ(Ω)and the mapΛF,sfromAtoR defined by

ΛF,s[φ] = X

j1<···<js∈F

λj1[φ] · · · λjs[φ] for s∈ {1, ..., |F|}is real analytic.

10 of 26

(22)

Symmetric functions of the eigenvalues

LetΩa bounded domain inRN. Set Φ(Ω) =

φ ∈

C2(Ω)N

, injective : inf

|detDφ| >0



Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a bounded domain ofRN of class C1. Let F be a finite non-empty subset ofN \ {0}. Let

A[F] =nφ ∈ Φ(Ω) : λl[φ] <nλj[φ] :j ∈Fo

∀l ∈ N \ (F ∪ {0})o

Then the setA is open inΦ(Ω)and the mapΛF,sfromAtoR defined by

ΛF,s[φ] = X

j1<···<js∈F

λj1[φ] · · · λjs[φ]

for s∈ {1, ..., |F|}is real analytic.

10 of 26

(23)

Isovolumetric perturbations

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a bounded domain inRN. Let F a finite non-empty subset ofN \ {0}. Letφ ∈ A˜ [F]be such that all the eigenvalues with indexes in F have a commond valueλF and moreover that

∂˜φ(Ω) ∈C4. Let v1, ...,v|F|be a hortonormal basis of the eigenspace associated with the eigenvalueλF[˜φ]. Then

d|φ=˜φF,s)[ψ] = −λsF[˜φ] |F| −1 s−1

! |F|

X

l=1

Z

∂˜φ(Ω)

FKvl2

F∂(vl2)

∂ν −τ|∇vl|2− |D2vl|2

µ · νdσ, (1.3)

for allψ ∈ (C2(Ω))N, whereµ = ψ ◦ φ(−1), and K denotes the mean curvature on∂˜φ(Ω).

11 of 26

(24)

Isovolumetric perturbations

V(φ) = Z

φ(Ω)

dy = Z

|detDφ|dx FixV0 ∈]0, +∞[

V(V0) =φ ∈ Φ(Ω) : V(φ) = V0

The functionφ˜is a critical point forΛF,sif and only if

|F|

X

l=1





λF[˜φ]





Kv

2 l +∂vl2

∂ν





−τ|∇vl|2− |D2vl|2





=c, a.e. on ∂˜φ(Ω).

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a domain ofRN. Letφ ∈ Φ(Ω)˜ be such thatφ(Ω)˜ is a ball. Letλ˜be an eigenvalue of the problem inφ(Ω)˜ , and let F be the set of j∈ N \ {0}such thatλj[˜φ] = ˜λ. ThenΛF,s has a critical point atφ˜ on V(V(˜φ)), for all s =1, . . . , |F|.

12 of 26

(25)

Isovolumetric perturbations

V(φ) = Z

φ(Ω)

dy = Z

|detDφ|dx FixV0 ∈]0, +∞[

V(V0) =φ ∈ Φ(Ω) : V(φ) = V0 The functionφ˜is a critical point forΛF,sif and only if

|F|

X

l=1





λF[˜φ]





Kv

2 l +∂vl2

∂ν





−τ|∇vl|2− |D2vl|2





=c, a.e. on ∂˜φ(Ω).

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a domain ofRN. Letφ ∈ Φ(Ω)˜ be such thatφ(Ω)˜ is a ball. Letλ˜be an eigenvalue of the problem inφ(Ω)˜ , and let F be the set of j∈ N \ {0}such thatλj[˜φ] = ˜λ. ThenΛF,s has a critical point atφ˜ on V(V(˜φ)), for all s =1, . . . , |F|.

12 of 26

(26)

Isovolumetric perturbations

V(φ) = Z

φ(Ω)

dy = Z

|detDφ|dx FixV0 ∈]0, +∞[

V(V0) =φ ∈ Φ(Ω) : V(φ) = V0 The functionφ˜is a critical point forΛF,sif and only if

|F|

X

l=1





λF[˜φ]





Kv

2 l +∂vl2

∂ν





−τ|∇vl|2− |D2vl|2





=c, a.e. on ∂˜φ(Ω).

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

LetΩbe a domain ofRN. Letφ ∈ Φ(Ω)˜ be such thatφ(Ω)˜ is a ball.

Letλ˜be an eigenvalue of the problem inφ(Ω)˜ , and let F be the set of j∈ N \ {0}such thatλj[˜φ] = ˜λ. ThenΛF,s has a critical point atφ˜ on V(V(˜φ)), for all s =1, . . . , |F|.

12 of 26

(27)

The fundamental tone

Balls are critical for the symmetric functions of the eigenvalues under isovolumetric perturbations

Could we say more on the fundamental toneλ2?

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded domains of class C1 with fixed volume, the ball maximizes the first non-negative eigenvalue, that isλ2[Ω] ≤λ2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume asΩ.

13 of 26

(28)

The fundamental tone

Balls are critical for the symmetric functions of the eigenvalues under isovolumetric perturbations

Could we say more on the fundamental toneλ2?

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded domains of class C1 with fixed volume, the ball maximizes the first non-negative eigenvalue, that isλ2[Ω] ≤λ2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume asΩ.

13 of 26

(29)

The fundamental tone

Balls are critical for the symmetric functions of the eigenvalues under isovolumetric perturbations

Could we say more on the fundamental toneλ2?

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded domains of class C1 with fixed volume, the ball maximizes the first non-negative eigenvalue, that isλ2[Ω] ≤λ2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume asΩ.

13 of 26

(30)

The fundamental tone

ConsiderB =B(0,1)⊂ RN.

All the eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem are of the form

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =Rl(r)Yl1, ..., θN−1) where

Rl(r) =αlrllil(√ τr).

The corresponding eigenvalues are given by an explicit formula (rather long)

λ =g(l,N, τ), for l∈ N.

Example: g(0,N, τ) =0, g(1,N, τ) = τ. Which l∈ Ngives the fundamental tone?

14 of 26

(31)

The fundamental tone

ConsiderB =B(0,1)⊂ RN. All the eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem are of the form

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =Rl(r)Yl1, ..., θN−1) where

Rl(r) =αlrllil(√ τr).

The corresponding eigenvalues are given by an explicit formula (rather long)

λ =g(l,N, τ), for l∈ N.

Example: g(0,N, τ) =0, g(1,N, τ) = τ. Which l∈ Ngives the fundamental tone?

14 of 26

(32)

The fundamental tone

ConsiderB =B(0,1)⊂ RN. All the eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem are of the form

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =Rl(r)Yl1, ..., θN−1) where

Rl(r) =αlrllil(√ τr).

The corresponding eigenvalues are given by an explicit formula (rather long)

λ =g(l,N, τ), for l∈ N.

Example: g(0,N, τ) =0, g(1,N, τ) = τ. Which l∈ Ngives the fundamental tone?

14 of 26

(33)

The fundamental tone

ConsiderB =B(0,1)⊂ RN. All the eigenfunctions of the Steklov problem are of the form

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =Rl(r)Yl1, ..., θN−1) where

Rl(r) =αlrllil(√ τr).

The corresponding eigenvalues are given by an explicit formula (rather long)

λ =g(l,N, τ), for l∈ N.

Example: g(0,N, τ) =0, g(1,N, τ) = τ. Which l∈ Ngives the fundamental tone?

14 of 26

(34)

The fundamental tone

λ2[B]=g(1,N, τ) =τ

λ2[B]has multiplicity N and the eigenfunctions are{x1, ...,xN}

Strategy: use the eigenfunctions of the unit ball as test functions in a variational characterization ofλ2[Ω]

15 of 26

(35)

The fundamental tone

λ2[B]=g(1,N, τ) =τ

λ2[B]has multiplicity N and the eigenfunctions are{x1, ...,xN}

Strategy: use the eigenfunctions of the unit ball as test functions in a variational characterization ofλ2[Ω]

15 of 26

(36)

The fundamental tone

λ2[B]=g(1,N, τ) =τ

λ2[B]has multiplicity N and the eigenfunctions are{x1, ...,xN}

Strategy: use the eigenfunctions of the unit ball as test functions in a variational characterization ofλ2[Ω]

15 of 26

(37)

The fundamental tone

Lemma (Hile-Xu 1993)

LetΩbe a bounded domain of class C1inRN. Then

N+1

X

l=2

1

λl(Ω) =max





N+1

X

l=2

Z

∂Ωvl2





 ,

where{vl}N+1l=2 is a family in H2(Ω)satisfying R

D2vi:D2vj+τ∇vi· ∇vjdx =δij andR

∂Ωvldσ =0 for all l=2, ...,N+1.

16 of 26

(38)

The fundamental tone

Lemma (Betta-Brock-Mercaldo-Posteraro 1999)

LetΩbe an open set inRN and f be a continuous, non-negative, non-decreasing function defined on[0, +∞). Let us assume that the function

t 7→

f(t1/N) −f(0) t1−(1/N) is convex. Then

Z

∂Ωf(|x|)dσ ≥ Z

∂Ωf(|x|)dσ,

whereΩis the ball centered at zero with the same volume asΩ.

17 of 26

(39)

The fundamental tone

TakeΩof class C1with|Ω| = |B|.

Perform the translation xi =yi−ti

ti = 1

|∂Ω| Z

∂Ωyi

Use test functionsvl =(τ|Ω|)12xlin the variational formula and use the isoperimetric inequality

N+1X

l=2

1

λl[Ω] ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂Ω|x|2dσ ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂B|x|2dσ = N τ =

N+1X

l=2

1 λl[B].

Remark: for general values of|Ω|just observe λ[τ, Ω] =s4λ[s−2τ,sΩ]

18 of 26

(40)

The fundamental tone

TakeΩof class C1with|Ω| = |B|. Perform the translation xi =yi−ti

ti = 1

|∂Ω|

Z

∂Ωyi

Use test functionsvl =(τ|Ω|)12xlin the variational formula and use the isoperimetric inequality

N+1X

l=2

1

λl[Ω] ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂Ω|x|2dσ ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂B|x|2dσ = N τ =

N+1X

l=2

1 λl[B].

Remark: for general values of|Ω|just observe λ[τ, Ω] =s4λ[s−2τ,sΩ]

18 of 26

(41)

The fundamental tone

TakeΩof class C1with|Ω| = |B|. Perform the translation xi =yi−ti

ti = 1

|∂Ω|

Z

∂Ωyi

Use test functionsvl =(τ|Ω|)12xlin the variational formula and use the isoperimetric inequality

N+1X

l=2

1

λl[Ω] ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂Ω|x|2dσ ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂B|x|2dσ = N τ =

N+1X

l=2

1 λl[B].

Remark: for general values of|Ω|just observe λ[τ, Ω] =s4λ[s−2τ,sΩ]

18 of 26

(42)

The fundamental tone

TakeΩof class C1with|Ω| = |B|. Perform the translation xi =yi−ti

ti = 1

|∂Ω|

Z

∂Ωyi

Use test functionsvl =(τ|Ω|)12xlin the variational formula and use the isoperimetric inequality

N+1X

l=2

1

λl[Ω] ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂Ω|x|2dσ ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂B|x|2dσ = N τ =

N+1X

l=2

1 λl[B].

Remark: for general values of|Ω|just observe λ[τ, Ω] =s4λ[s−2τ,sΩ]

18 of 26

(43)

The fundamental tone

TakeΩof class C1with|Ω| = |B|. Perform the translation xi =yi−ti

ti = 1

|∂Ω|

Z

∂Ωyi

Use test functionsvl =(τ|Ω|)12xlin the variational formula and use the isoperimetric inequality

N+1X

l=2

1

λl[Ω] ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂Ω|x|2dσ ≥ 1 τ|Ω|

Z

∂B|x|2dσ = N τ =

N+1X

l=2

1 λl[B].

Remark: for general values of|Ω|just observe λ[τ, Ω] =s4λ[s−2τ,sΩ]

18 of 26

(44)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

Letτ =0 andΩbe a bounded domain of class C1









2u=0, in Ω,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω,

−div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω,

0=λ1[Ω] =λ2[Ω] = · · · =λN+1[Ω]<λN+2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

The kernel is{1,x1,...,xN}

19 of 26

(45)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

Letτ =0 andΩbe a bounded domain of class C1









2u=0, in Ω,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω,

−div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω,

0=λ1[Ω] =λ2[Ω] = · · · =λN+1[Ω]<λN+2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

The kernel is{1,x1,...,xN}

19 of 26

(46)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

Letτ =0 andΩbe a bounded domain of class C1









2u=0, in Ω,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω,

−div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂∆u∂ν =λu, on ∂Ω,

0=λ1[Ω] =λ2[Ω] = · · · =λN+1[Ω]<λN+2[Ω]≤ · · · ≤λj[Ω] ≤ · · ·

The kernel is{1,x1,...,xN}

19 of 26

(47)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we can do:

identify the fundamental tone of the unit ball λN+2[B]=2 N+8

5

!

identify the corresponding eigenfunctions

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =(6r2−r4)Y21, ..., θN−1)

construct trial functions of the formR(r)Y21, ...θN+1)

20 of 26

(48)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we can do:

identify the fundamental tone of the unit ball λN+2[B]=2 N+8

5

!

identify the corresponding eigenfunctions

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =(6r2−r4)Y21, ..., θN−1)

construct trial functions of the formR(r)Y21, ...θN+1)

20 of 26

(49)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we can do:

identify the fundamental tone of the unit ball λN+2[B]=2 N+8

5

!

identify the corresponding eigenfunctions

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =(6r2−r4)Y21, ..., θN−1)

construct trial functions of the formR(r)Y21, ...θN+1)

20 of 26

(50)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we can do:

identify the fundamental tone of the unit ball λN+2[B]=2 N+8

5

!

identify the corresponding eigenfunctions

u(r, θ1, ..., θN−1) =(6r2−r4)Y21, ..., θN−1)

construct trial functions of the formR(r)Y21, ...θN+1)

20 of 26

(51)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we (still) cannot do:

test these trial functions onanyΩof class C1

find good estimates for the sum of the reciprocals in the case the test is possible

Trial functions work withradial domains. For small dimensions we haveisoperimetric inequality

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded radial domainsΩwith a fixed volume inRN, N≤4, the ball maximizes the first non-zero eigenvalue, that is

λN+2[Ω] ≤λN+2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume ofΩ.

21 of 26

(52)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we (still) cannot do:

test these trial functions onanyΩof class C1

find good estimates for the sum of the reciprocals in the case the test is possible

Trial functions work withradial domains. For small dimensions we haveisoperimetric inequality

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded radial domainsΩwith a fixed volume inRN, N≤4, the ball maximizes the first non-zero eigenvalue, that is

λN+2[Ω] ≤λN+2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume ofΩ.

21 of 26

(53)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we (still) cannot do:

test these trial functions onanyΩof class C1

find good estimates for the sum of the reciprocals in the case the test is possible

Trial functions work withradial domains. For small dimensions we haveisoperimetric inequality

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded radial domainsΩwith a fixed volume inRN, N≤4, the ball maximizes the first non-zero eigenvalue, that is

λN+2[Ω] ≤λN+2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume ofΩ.

21 of 26

(54)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

What we (still) cannot do:

test these trial functions onanyΩof class C1

find good estimates for the sum of the reciprocals in the case the test is possible

Trial functions work withradial domains. For small dimensions we haveisoperimetric inequality

Theorem (Buoso-P. 2014)

Among all bounded radial domainsΩwith a fixed volume inRN, N≤4, the ball maximizes the first non-zero eigenvalue, that is

λN+2[Ω] ≤λN+2[Ω], whereΩis the ball with the same volume ofΩ.

21 of 26

(55)

Further directions: the case τ = 0

N=2 N=3 N=4 N=5

0.5 1 1.5 R

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 36 5 46 5 56 5 66 5 Λ2,1HRL

Figure:N=2,3,4,5

22 of 26

(56)

Further directions: Neumann problem, Poly-harmonic operators,...

Neumann problem for the biharmonic operator









2u=λu, in Ω,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω,

−div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂(∆u)∂ν =0, on ∂Ω.

Λ0,1 Λ1,1 Λ2,1

10 20 30 40 50 60 Λ

50 100 150 200

Figure:N=2

23 of 26

(57)

Further directions: Neumann problem, Poly-harmonic operators,...

Neumann problem for the biharmonic operator









2u=λu, in Ω,

2u

∂ν2 =0, on ∂Ω,

−div∂Ω D2u.ν

∂(∆u)∂ν =0, on ∂Ω.

Λ0,1 Λ1,1 Λ2,1

10 20 30 40 50 60 Λ

50 100 150 200

Figure:N=2

23 of 26

(58)

Further directions: Neumann problem, Poly-harmonic operators,...

Neumann problem for(−∆)m

( (−∆)mu=λu, in Ω,

N1u=N2u= · · · =Nmu=0, on ∂Ω,

Niu are the m natural boundary conditions, ordered according their order: N1 is an operator of order m, N2 is of order m+1,..., Nm is of order 2m−1.

Steklov problem for(−∆)m









mu=0, in Ω,

N1u=N2u= · · · =Nm−1u=0, on ∂Ω,

Nmu=λu, on ∂Ω,

with the same Ni

24 of 26

(59)

Further directions: Neumann problem, Poly-harmonic operators,...

Neumann problem for(−∆)m

( (−∆)mu=λu, in Ω,

N1u=N2u= · · · =Nmu=0, on ∂Ω,

Niu are the m natural boundary conditions, ordered according their order: N1 is an operator of order m, N2 is of order m+1,..., Nm is of order 2m−1.

Steklov problem for(−∆)m









mu=0, in Ω,

N1u=N2u= · · · =Nm−1u=0, on ∂Ω,

Nmu=λu, on ∂Ω,

with the same Ni

24 of 26

(60)

References

C. Bandle,

Isoperimetric inequalities and applications,

Pitman advanced publishing program, monographs and studies in mathematics, vol. 7, 1980.

D. Bucur, A. Ferrero, F. Gazzola,

On the first eigenvalue of a fourth order Steklov problem,

Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 35 , 103-131, 2009.

D. Buoso, L. Provenzano,

An isoperimetric inequality for the first non-zero eigenvalue of a biharmonic Steklov problem.

preprint, 2014.

D. Gomez, M. Lobo, E. Perez,

On the vibrations of a plate with a concentrated mass and very small thickness, Math. Method. Appl. Sci. 26, no.2, 27-65, 2003.

D. Gomez, M. Lobo, S.A. Nazarov, E. Perez,

Spectral stiff problems in domains surrounded by thin bands: Asymptotic and uniform estimates for eigenvalues, J. Math. Pures Appl. 85, no.4, 598-632, 2006.

L.M. Chasman,

An isoperimetric inequality for fundamental tones of free plates, Comm. Math. Phys. 303, no. 2, 421-449, 2011.

P.D. Lamberti, L. Provenzano,

Viewing the Steklov eigenvalues of the Laplace operator as critical Neumann eigenvalues, to appear on the 9th Isaac Congress proceedings.

25 of 26

(61)

THANK YOU

26 of 26

(62)

Further directions: mass concentration

Behavior ofλj(ε)for mass concentration problem for the biharmonic operator

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

0 20 40 60 80 100

Figure:N=2, M=π, τ = 5

On the ball? On arbitraryΩ(also in the second order case)?

26 of 26

(63)

Further directions: mass concentration

Behavior ofλj(ε)for mass concentration problem for the biharmonic operator

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

0 20 40 60 80 100

Figure:N=2, M=π, τ = 5

On the ball? On arbitraryΩ(also in the second order case)?

26 of 26

(64)

Further directions: mass concentration

Behavior ofλj(ε)for mass concentration problem for the biharmonic operator

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

0 20 40 60 80 100

Figure:N=2, M=π, τ = 5

On the ball? On arbitraryΩ(also in the second order case)?

26 of 26

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

A detailed analysis in dimension 2 has been performed in [14], where Gadyl’shin investigated the case in which the perturbing set is a segment of length  → 0 + contained in

Comparing the above asymptotic expansion for the spectral fractional Laplacian with the ex- pansion derived in Theorem 1.7, we note that only in the case of the restricted

Furthermore, the new method also exhibited some advantages over the principal component regression which uses less of information contained in the sample since the number

[r]

Since algebraic and geometric multiplicities differ and hence there is no basis of R 4 consisting of eigenvectors of A, the matrix A cannot be

Solution: The eigenvalues of A are the zeros of the cubic polynomial det(λI − A).. Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is

Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is not possible1. Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is

Explain why your result is in full agreement with the values of Tr(A)