• Non ci sono risultati.

un caso clinico

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "un caso clinico"

Copied!
25
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Dott. ssa Pamela Guglielmini Dott.ssa Elena Traverso

SC Oncologia Medica

Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale “SS. Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo” Alessandria

Eventi metabolici:

un caso clinico

(2)

- Ipertensione arteriosa in terapia medica (amlodipina 5 mg/die)

- Obesità (BMI =32)

- Ex fumatrice (10 sigarette/die) - PS = ECOG 0

ANAMNESI

Donna, 76 anni, A.A.

Caso Clinico

(3)

Esordio 4/2016:

Tru cut della mammella sinistra Diagnosi istopatologica: CDI G3 TNM: cT4 cN1 Mx

Fattori Prognostici: ER 99% PgR neg Ki67 41% HER 2 2+

FISH non amplificata

Stadiazione

TC-TB con m.d.c.: lesioni secondarie polmonari bilaterali e linfonodali mediastiniche.

Caso Clinico

(4)

Linfonodi mediastinici paratracheale Sottocarenale e noduli polmonari:

STADIO IV

(5)

Dal Maggio al Luglio 2016: 1° LINEA TAXOLO (1-8-15 q28) x 12 cicli ben tollerata

Agosto 2016 - Giugno 2017  Mantenimento: LETROZOLO 2,5 mg/die continuativamente

Giugno 2017: TAC rivalutazione: PD EPATICA e PLEURICA

Comparsa di nodulazioni secondarie pleuriche dx e 2 localizzazioni secondarie epatiche.

Luglio 2017: 2° LINEA: EVEROLIMUS 10 MG/DIE + EXEMESTANE 25 MG/DIE

Caso Clinico

(6)
(7)

ESAMI BASALI GLICEMIA: 110 mg/dL

COLESTEROLO TOT.: 210 mg/dL

Dopo 1 mese di trattamento

8/2017

GLICEMIA A DIGIUNO: 165 mg/dL

(G2 secondo CTCAE 4.0)

La paziente continua Everolimus

Consulenza diabetologica: modifica l’alimentazione (dieta ipoglucidica)  monitoraggio più frequente della glicemia

Caso Clinico

(8)
(9)

Dopo 2 settimane

GLICEMIA A DIGIUNO: 260 mg/dL

HBA1C: 6%

(G3 secondo CTCAE 4.0) !!!

Caso Clinico

(10)
(11)

La paziente ha temporaneamente sospeso Everolimus

Consulenza diabetologica: iniziare terapia antidiabetica orale (Metformina 500 mg x 3/die) e proseguire dieta ipoglucidica.

GLICEMIA A DIGIUNO: 130 mg/dL

Dopo 1 mese GLICEMIA A DIGIUNO: 105 mg/dL HBA1C: 4.5%

La paziente riprende Everolimus a dosi ridotte ( 5 mg/die)

Dopo 2 settimane

Caso Clinico

(12)

EVE 10 mg + EXE PBO + EXE

Number of patients still at risk

HR = 0.38 (95% CI: 0.31-0.48) Log-rank P value: < .0001

Kaplan-Meier medians EVE 10 mg +

EXE: 11.0 months

PBO + EXE: 4.1 months

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108

485 239

427 179

359 114

292 76

239 56

211 39

166 31

140 27

108 16

77 13

62 9

48 6

32 4

21 1

18 0

11 0

10 0

5 0

0 0 Censoring times

EVE 10 mg + EXE (n/N = 188/485) PBO + EXE (n/N = 132/239)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Pr oba bi lit y (%) of Ev en t

Time (week)

PFS Based on Central Review at 18-mo Follow-up in BOLERO-2 Confirms Earlier Reports and Local Assessment

12

Yardley D, et al. Adv Ther 2013

(13)

BOLERO-2 (18-mo f/up): PFS Benefits Were Comparable In Patients With (A) Visceral Metastases, (B) Without Visceral Metastases, and (C) With Bone-Only Metastases

0 20 40 60

Probability of Event, % Probability of Event, %

80 100

Time, wk Time, wk

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114

EVE+EXE PBO+EXE

Patients at risk

271 240 192 157 128 107 88 72 52 38 25 22 16 12 11 7 5 4 1 0 135 108 66 44 32 23 18 14 11 8 4 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 20 40 60 80 100

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120

EVE+EXE PBO+EXE

Patients at risk

214 196 174 147 129 114 97 86 72 53 41 28 19 12 11 6 5 4 1 1 0 104 82 66 52 35 27 21 16 10 7 6 4 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

A B C

HR=0.47 (95% CI, 0.37-0.60) Kaplan-Meier medians EVE+EXE: 6.83 mo PBO+EXE: 2.76 mo

HR=0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.55) Kaplan-Meier medians EVE+EXE: 9.86 mo PBO+EXE: 4.21 mo

Censoring times EVE+EXE (n/N=122/214) PBO+EXE (n/N=84/104) Censoring times

EVE+EXE (n/N=188/271)

PBO+EXE (n/N=116/135) 0

20 40 60 80 100

Time, wk

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108

EVE+EXE PBO+EXE

Patients at risk

105 95 88 75 72 65 53 47 41 30 20 13 7 6 5 3 2 1 0 46 35 30 24 19 14 12 10 5 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

EVE+EXE (n/N=48/105) PBO+EXE (n/N=33/46) Censoring Times

EVE+EXE: 12.88 mo Kaplan-Meier medians PBO+EXE: 5.29 mo HR=0.33 (95% CI, 0.21-0.53)

Progression-Free Survival, %

13

Yardley D, et al. Adv Ther 2013

(14)

BOLERO-2 (18-mo follow-up):

PFS Benefits Were Comparable in Elderly vs Younger Patients

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EVE, everolimus; EXE, exemestane; HR, hazard ratio; PBO, placebo; PFS, progression-free survival.

Pritchard KI, et al. ASCO 2012; abstract 551 (poster).

0 20 40 60 80

Progression-Free Survival, %

100

Time, wk

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96102108114120

Progression-Free Survival, %

0 20 40 60 80 100

Time, wk

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120

< 65 years old ≥ 65 years old

EVE + EXE PBO + EXE

8.31 months

Median PFS

2.92 months

EVE + EXE PBO + EXE

HR = 0.38 (95% CI = 0.30, 0.47) HR = 0.59 (95% CI = 0.43, 0.80) 6.83 months

Median PFS

4.01 months

(15)

BOLERO-2 (18 mo f/up): Common Adverse Events Were Consistent With the Established Safety Profile of Everolimus

Everolimus + Exemestane (N=482), %

Grade

All 1 2 3 4 All 1 2 3 4

Total 100 7 40 44 9 91 26 36 23 5

Stomatitis 59 29 22 8 0 12 9 2 <1 0

Rash 39 29 9 1 0 7 5 2 0 0

Fatigue 37 18 14 4 <1 27 16 10 1 0

Diarrhea 34 26 6 2 <1 19 14 4 <1 0

Nausea 31 21 9 <1 <1 29 21 7 1 0

Appetite decreased

31 19 10 1 0 13 8 4 1 0

Non-infectious pneumonitis*

16 7 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Hyperglycemia* 14 4 5 5 <1 2 1 1 <1 0

15

Yardley D, et al. Adv Ther 2013

(16)

BOLERO-2 (18 mo f/up): Adding Everolimus to Exemestane Maintained QOL*

16

Log-rank P value = .0084

EVE + EXE: 8.3 months PBO + EXE: 5.8 months

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96

485 239 EVE + EXE

PBO + EXE

427 201

305 116

245 83

198 62

176 49

145 36

119 27

99 19

71 16

52 7

43 6

29 3

18 1

13 0

9 0

8 0 Patients still at risk n

Pr oba bi lit y of Ev en t, %

Censoring times EVE + EXE (n = 485) PBO + EXE (n = 239)

Time to Deterioration in QoL, mo

Campone M et al. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013

(17)

Study Design (BALLET)

Patient population

•Postmenopausal women

•HR+, HER2– unresectable locally advanced or metastatic BC

•Recurrence or progression after NSAI

•No limitation in terms of prior chemotherapy lines

TREATMENT PHASE

Everolimus (RAD001) 10 mg/day + Exemestane 25 mg/day

Treatment continues until:

•Disease progression

•Unacceptable toxicity

•Death

•Discontinuation from the study

•for any other reason

•Drug locally reimbursed or LPLV

Primary objective

•To evaluate the safety of everolimus (RAD001) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor- positive locally advanced

•or metastatic breast cancer after recurrence or progression following NSAIs treatment

Secondary objective

•To evaluate adverse events grade 3 and 4 in the routine practice

BC, breast cancer; HR+, hormone receptor; HER2‒, human epidermal growth factor receptor;

LPLV, last patient/last visit; NSAI, non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

(18)

Discontinued Patients and Reasons for Discontinuation

• Reasons include: natural end, subject’s condition no longer requires study drug, loss to follow up, abnormal laboratory values,

• unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, administrative problems, abnormal test procedure result, among others.

1. Yardley DA, et al. Adv Ther 2013;30:870–884.

(19)

Most Frequent AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation

Data are based on the Safety analysis set (SAS); N = 2064. Discontinuation of everolimus refers to discontinuation of either everolimus alone or everolimus + exemestane.

* Pneumonitis includes radiotherapy-induced and non-infective pneumonitis. EVE, everolimus.

1. Rugo HS, et al. Ann Oncol 2014;25:808–815.

(20)

Rugo H S et al. Ann Oncol 2014

(21)

Hyperglycemia Management

• Monitorare i livelli di glucosio a digiuno prima di iniziare la terapia con everolimus e

• periodicamente durante il trattamento

• Consigliare ai pazienti di segnalare sete eccessiva o aumento della minzione

• Evitare zuccheri a rapido assorbimento

Gestione dell’ Iperglicemia in riferimento alle linee guida:

• Registrare e mantenere un valore glicemico nella norma (HbA

1c

<7%)

• In caso di Iperglicemia modificare lo stile di vita e/o somministrare Metformina

• Intervenire subito farmacologicamente o cambiare classe di farmaci nel caso in cui il trattamento

• non risulti efficace.

• Somministrare Insulina in quei pazienti che non raggiungono il beneficio sperato con altre terapie;

• utilizzare Insulina a rapida azione solo nel caso in cui si somministrano STEROIDI

(22)

Hyperglycemia: Suggested Treatment Approach 1,2

Grade Symptoms Management Everolimus

Dose Modification

1 HG: >ULN-160 mg/dL None No change

2 HG: >160-250 mg/dL Treat HG according to American Diabetes Association and

European Association for the Study of

Diabetes standard guidelines

Maintain dose if patients is able to tolerate

If patient is unable to tolerate, hold dose until recovery to grade ≤1, then restart at same dose

3 HG: >250-500 mg/dL

4 HG: >500 mg/dL

HG, hyperglycemia; ULN, upper limit of normal.

1.Porta C et al. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1287-1298

2.Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):193-203.

(23)

Raccomandazioni in RCP

(24)

 Il provvedimento terapeutico adottato per la gestione dell’evento metabolico è corretto o potrebbero esserci ulteriori accorgimenti specifici da prendere in

considerazione?

 Ogni quanto sarebbe consigliabile effettuare un follow-up per il monitoraggio corretto di questo tipo di AE e con

quali esami?

Discussione

(25)

 È possibile stilare delle linee guida ideali da seguire (follow up, esami, ecc ecc) per poter ottimizzare il trattamento? O un PDTA ottimale?

 Prevenzione?

Discussione

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The combination could be considered as a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent hormone-receptor- positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that has progressed

Among premenopausal women with either hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative breast can- cer, concurrent administration of triptorelin and chemo- therapy, compared

As a control population, we analyzed data from patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative (ER positive/HER2 negative) metastatic breast cancer treated

According to the results of our network meta- analysis, if patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer are treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in

Phase II study of eribulin in combination with gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (ERIGE trial).. Clinical

Strom et al., “Predictors of locoregional recurrence in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, mastectomy, and radiotherapy,”

Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone- receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that pro- gressed on

First results of a randomized phase III trial comparing exemestane versus tamoxifen as first-line hormone therapy (HT) for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)