bando “climate action,

La partecipazione italiana nel bando “climate action,

environment, resource efficiency and raw materials” 2014-15

Carlo Barbante,

Rappresentante nazionale per Climate Action, Environment, Resource Efficiency and Raw Materials

IDPA-CNR e Università Ca’ Foscari - Venezia

Utbildningsdepartementet

MINISTRO

DUAR

Cons.

Dipl.

EPR

D1 D

2 D

3 D

13 D

14 AS

RPUE

Segr.

Tecnica

STRATEGY

COORDINATION ACTIONS

National Representatives

Capo Gabinetto

UNI

APRE ESP

ad hoc

REG IMP

NCP14 APRE

ESP14a ESP14b ESP14c ESP1a

ESP1b ESP1c NCP1 APRE

The Team

How many applications have been received?

Number of eligible applications to H2020 per EU Member State

First 100 calls

Applications received in SC5

Number of eligible applications to SC5 per EU Member State

~2/3 of EU MS participations

Applications per country compared with FP7

Horizon 2020 compared with FP7

What is the rate of applications by country?

Number of eligible applications to Horizon 2020 per capita

Percentage of proposals received funding?

Success rate of eligible full proposals to Horizon 2020

Success rates of the different Member States?

Success rates for applications to Horizon 2020 per EU Member State

avg

Member State’s success rate compared with FP7

Success rate as percentage of eligible applications: H2020 vsFP7

Avg FP7

Avg H2020

Which types of organisations applied to H2020?

Number of applications to Horizon 2020 per type of organisation

Origin of project coordinators in SC5

– 53 organisations from 3 EU countries are

coordinating 52% of the 102 selected projects – Organisations from 17

countries are

coordinating 102 projects – 1 project is coordinated

by an organisation from an Associated Country

Share of H2020 funding received

Share of EU financial contribution to participants in signed grant agreements:

Horizon 2020 compared with FP7

How did different types of organisations fare in terms of grant agreements?

Share of participations in signed grant agreements per type of organisation:

H2020 vs FP7

Share of EU financial contribution in signed grant agreements per type of organisation: H2020 vs FP7

How did SMEs fare in terms of grant agreements?

Share of SMEs participations in signed grant agreements:

H2020 vs FP7

Share of EU financial contribution to SMEs in signed grant

agreements: H2020 vs FP7

Country breakdown for the SME instrument?

Applications to the Horizon 2020 SME instrument per EU Member State

Country’s success rate under the SME instrument

Success rate in applications to the Horizon 2020 SME instrument per EU MS

Call 2014 SC5

SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014

No. topics Budget

Mill. EUR Proposte presentate Proposte finanziate Tasso di successo

29 306 276 57 25%

No.

Partecipanti italiani in proposte presentate

No.

Partecipanti italiani finanziati

Tasso di successo partecipanti Italiani

313 (47)

64 (12)

20,4%

(18.7%)

No.

Proposte presentate a coordiname nto italiano

No.

Coordiname nti italiani finanziati

Tasso di successo coordinatori Italiani

22 (10)

4 (1)

18,2%

(10%) Partecipazione

Coordinamento

Contributo finanziario per l’Italia

17,895,389 € (9,366,197 €)

(x ) Dati parziali 2015 – Call 1 stage

20

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Success Rate Call 2014 SC5

SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014

21

31 60

4 3 5 9 17

5 19

65 106

20 8 4 64

2 3 1 2

79

13 37

11 5 13 105

33 90 109

196

19 14 32 29 65 12

100 235

397

122 54

27 313

9 8 7 11 258

66 114

58

22 37 457

122 365

Numero Partecipazioni

Beneficiari Finanziati Beneficiari Proposte

Call 2014 SC5

SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014

22

Austria 4%

Belgium 5%

Bulgaria

0% Croatia 0%

Cyprus 0%

Czech Republic Denmark 0%

2%

Estonia 0%

Finland France 2%

8%

Germany 17%

Greece 2% Hungary Ireland 0%

0%

Italy 6%

Latvia 0%

Lithuania 0%

Luxembourg 0%

Malta 0%

Netherlands 13%

Poland Portugal 1%

3%

Romania 1%

Slovakia 0%

Slovenia 1%

Spain 12%

Sweden 5%

United Kingdom 17%

Budget Member States (%)

Call 2014 SC5

SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014

23

0 € 5.000.000 € 10.000.000 € 15.000.000 € 20.000.000 € 25.000.000 € 30.000.000 € 35.000.000 € 40.000.000 € 45.000.000 € 50.000.000 €

Call 2014 SC5

SC5, WASTE & WATER Calls 2014

Budget Member

States (€)

24

Call 2014 SC5

EU funding rate vs. population rate per EU Member State

Percentage of financial contrib.

Percentage of population

• POOR:

– EXCELLENCE - IMPACT - IMPLEMENTATION

• Not clear objectives output and quantification of impacts

• Poor stakeholder involvement:

 Two-ways interaction/involvement of end-users

 Interaction at beginning/interim/final product

• Poor integration of work among different institutions

• Poor plan of exploitation, transferability and sustainability of the activities

• Not sound/credible mechanism for monitoring performances

Common aspects of a NON-successful proposals 1/2

• Low technology readiness level for IA

• Not faire/adequate sub-division of resources

• Non-adequate number and involvement of partners and credible management structure

• Non-adequate number of tasks / deliverables and limited number milestones

• For stage-1, poorly focused on the idea and credible approach rather than WP structure or management

Common aspects of a NON-successful proposals 2/2

Expert Distribution in H2020

Expert'%'in'SC5.H2020'

Call for experts

http://ec.europa.eu/easme/en/call-experts-climate-action-environment-resources-management