Introduction
Knowledge of the normal mediastinal anatomy and its variants is indispensable for proper interpretation of chest radiology. Mediastinal masses may be found inci- dentally in asymptomatic individuals, but they can also be symptomatic, depending on their size and location.
Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an important role in the nonsurgical evaluation of mediasti- nal lesions.
In this article, we review the anatomy and normal vari- ants of mediastinal structures as well as the radiographic, CT, and MR appearances of some of the most common mediastinal diseases, with emphasis on those features that permit a focused differential diagnosis and help di- rect management.
Imaging Strategies in Mediastinal Diseases Conventional Chest Radiography
Many mediastinal masses are incidentally discovered on routine chest examinations obtained for other reasons.
Chest radiography is the first imaging modality used in those asymptomatic patients or when a mediastinal mass is suspected. The key to the chest radiograph is to deter- mine whether the lesion is actually within the medi- astinum or lung and to make an educated guess as to where the lesion is within the mediastinum. A lesion con- fined to the posterior mediastinum (paravertebral region) may be better evaluated by MR.
Computed Tomography
Computed tomography is currently the gold standard for the detection of mediastinal pathology. Initial nonen- hanced contiguous slices should be obtained to demon- strate calcifications and hemorrhage. The injection of in- travenous contrast will define the enhancement patterns of the lesions as well as their relationship with adjacent vascular and mediastinal structures.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance has a complementary role in the evaluation of mediastinal masses. It is mainly used: (a) to solve unanswered questions after CT scan, (b) to assess mediastinal masses in patients allergic to iodinated con- trast material, and (c) to better assess the relationship of the mediastinal mass with adjacent structures, e.g., the pericardium, heart cavities, spinal canal, and vessels. For this last reason, MR is usually preferred to CT for the as- sessment of masses of suspected neurogenic origin.
Another indication for mediastinal MR is if the mediasti- nal mass is suspected to be a cyst (thymic, pericardial, foregut duplication, neuroenteric) and this suspicion can- not be confirmed by CT. With MR subtraction imaging (post contrast image minus pre-contrast image) only en- hanced structures are shown. Cysts should be invisible on these images.
Anatomic and Normal Variants Mimicking Mediastinal Pathology
Thymus
The thymus has a wide variation in appearances on cross- sectional imaging and its size and morphology are di- rectly related with age [1]. Whereas relatively large in the neonate and young infant, after puberty, there is a grad- ual reduction of the thymus size due to a progressive re- placement of the atrophied thymic follicles by adipose tissue. However, there is a broad variation in this involu- tion and significant residual thymic tissue may be present in individuals over the age of 30.
Superior Pericardial Recess
The superior pericardial recess is a semicircular space sur- rounding the ascending aorta. The most superior extent of this recess is at the level of the innominate artery. On rare occasions, pericardial effusion within the superior peri- cardial recess can simulate a cystic mediastinal mass [2].
IDKD 2007
Plain-Film and CT Evaluation of the Adult Mediastinum and Hilum:
Pitfalls vs. Disease
S. Bhalla
1, J. Cáceres
21
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
2