ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Resource and Energy Economics
jo u r n a l h o m e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / r e e
Differential demand response to gasoline taxes and gasoline prices in the U.S.
Silvia Tiezzi
a,∗, Stefano F. Verde
baDepartmentofEconomicsandStatistics,UniversityofSiena(I),Italy
bFlorenceSchoolofRegulation–Climate,EuropeanUniversityInstitute,Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received23February2015
Receivedinrevisedform10February2016 Accepted14February2016
Availableonline22February2016
JELclassification:
C3 D1 H3 Q4 Keywords:
Gasolinetaxation Taxsignaleffect
Differentialdemandresponse
a b s t ra c t
This paper offers new evidence concerning the difference in consumers’ reactions to changes in gasoline taxes relative to market-inducedchangesingasolineprices.Usingmicrodatafrom the2007to2009roundsoftheU.S.ConsumerExpenditureSurvey, weestimateacompletesystemofdemandaugmentedwithinfor- mationongasolineexcisetaxes.Byrelyingonacompletesystem ofdemand,weareabletoestimateelasticitiesthattakebehavioral responsesintoaccount.Crucially,themodelallowsgasolinetaxes toaffectdemandintwodistinctways:throughrelativepricesand aslong-runpolicysignals.Differentincreasesingasolinetaxesare consideredforsimulation.A13.2¢/gallontaxincrease,correspond- ingtoa$15/tCO2carbontax,isfoundtocause,inthelongrun,a reductioningasolinedemandthatisaboutseventimesasbigasthat inducedbyanequalmarket-inducedpriceincrease.Thesamemea- sureofdifferentialdemandresponseisderivedfortaxincreases differentinsizeaswellasbyincomequintileandbyregion.We discusstheimplicationsofourfindingsforthedesignofcorrective taxationintheprivatetransportsector.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Agrowingliteraturequestionsthestandardassumptioninpublicfinancethatconsumersrespond tocommoditytaxchangesin thesamewayastheydo topricechangescausedbymarketforces (Chetty,2009;Chettyetal.,2009;Finkelstein,2009;Congdonetal.,2009;GoldinandHomonoff,2013;
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+390577233029;fax:+390577232661.
E-mailaddresses:[email protected](S.Tiezzi),[email protected](S.F.Verde).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.02.003 0928-7655/©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
DavisandKilian,2011;Lietal.,2014;RiversandSchaufele,2015).Thesestudiesvaryinthegoods considered,theapproachesused,butalsointheexplanationsgivenforsuchdifference.Behavioral economicscontributionsfocusonthevisibility,orsalience,oftaxesasadeterminantofconsumer choice.Forexample,Finkelstein(2009)showsthatthedemandcurvefordrivingismoreinelastic whentollsarechargedelectronicallyascomparedtomanualcollection.Inasimilarvein,Chettyetal.
(2009)demonstratethatmakingsalestaxesmoresalientbyincludingtheminpostedpricesincreases demandresponsiveness.1 Anotherperspectiveisthattaxpaymentsassuchmaybeperceivedasa greaterburdenthanequivalentnon-taxpayments, aphenomenoncalledtaxaversion(McCaffery andBaron,2006).2Butexplanationsmoreconsistentwithrationalbehaviorarealsoprovided.With referencetogasolinedemand,DavisandKilian(2011)andLietal.(2014)suggestthatdifferentdemand responsestochangesingasolinetaxesandtomarket-inducedchangesingasolinepricesmaybedue tothedifferenceinpersistencebetweenthetwotypesofvariations.Astaxchangesarelongerlasting, theyaremorelikelytoinfluencepriceexpectationsand,thereby,long-rundecisionsthathavean impactongasolineconsumption,suchaspurchasingamorefuel-efficientcar,changingtransport modeormovingclosertowork.Thesameauthors,however,allowthateffectsrelatedtosubjective perceptionsoftaxationmayalsoplayarole.Indeed,thesedifferentexplanationsarenotmutually exclusive.Theydescribemechanismsthatinsomemeasuremayallunderliethedifferencesobserved betweendemandresponsestotaxchangesandtomarket-inducedpricechanges.
ThepresentstudyspecificallydealswiththedifferentresponsesofU.S.consumerstochanges ingasolinetaxesandequalchangesingasolinepricescausedbymarketforces.Gasolinetaxesinthe U.S.areverylowcomparedtoothercountries,notablyEuropeanones(OECD,2013).Nonetheless,they generatemorerevenuethananyothercommoditytax,bothatStateandfederallevels.Inrecentyears, growingconcernsrelatedtodecliningfiscalrevenuesandhighCO2emissionsmeantthattheoption ofraisinggasolinetaxeshasreceivedincreasingconsiderationinthepublicpolicydebate.Raising gasolinetaxes,however,isanythingbutapopularmeasure,allthemoresoinaneconomyheavily dependentonprivatetransportation.Thus,thehypothesisthatconsumersmaybemoreresponsive togasolinetaxesthantogasolinepricesisofspecialinterest.Fromanenvironmentalstandpoint,it wouldimplythatataxincreasewouldinducelowergasolineuse–andhenceloweremissions–than standardpriceelasticities(estimatedwithoutdistinguishingbetweenthepricechangesinducedby taxationorbythemarket)wouldindicate.Ofcourse,itwouldalsomeanlessrevenuewouldberaised thanexpected.
Growingempiricalevidence showsthatindeed consumersresponddifferentlytogasolinetax changesascomparedtopricechangesunrelatedtotaxation(DavisandKilian,2011;Lietal.,2014;
RiversandSchaufele,2015).Thepresentpaperofferscorroboratingevidenceofthisphenomenon andcontributestotheliteratureinthreefundamentalrespects.First,theestimatedmodelpositsthat changesingasolinetaxesimpactongasolineconsumptionintwodistinctways.Taxesbeingaprice component,gasolinetaxchangesalterrelativepricesand,consequently,expenditureallocation.At thesametime,astaxesareafiscalpolicyinstrument,gasolinetaxchangesconstitutepolicysignals affectinglong-runconsumerdecisionswhichinturnimpactongasolineconsumption.Therefore,in thelongrun,theeffectivenessofgasolinetaxesinreducinggasolineuseisgivenbythesumofthetwo effects:thepriceeffectandthesignaleffect,respectively.Second,theanalysisiscarriedoutwithin acompletedemandsystemframework.Thismeansthatcomplementaritiesandsubstitutionrela- tionshipsamongthegoodsconsideredareaccountedfor,thusimprovingidentificationoftheeffects understudy.Third,wesimulatedifferentialdemandresponsesfordifferentmagnitudesofthetax- andpricechanges,aswellasacrossdifferentincomelevelsandU.S.regions.Notleast,weprovide newestimatesofdemandelasticitiesforabundleofenergygoods,includinggasoline.Onlyafew studiesongasolinedemandintheU.S.usemicro-foundeddemandsystemswhilealsotakingaccount ofhouseholdheterogeneity(Nicol,2003;Oladosu,2003;WestandWilliams,2004,2007).
1TverskyandKahneman(1974)areprecursorsofthisconceptualstrandinstressingthatconsumers,whenmakingdecisions, heavilyrelyoninformationthatisprominentorreadilyavailable.
2Experimentalevidenceoftaxaversionisgrowing(Kallbekkenetal.,2010,2011;BlaufusandMöhlmann,2014),butthere isnoempiricalevidenceofsuchaframingeffectbasedonchoice,ratherthanexperimental,data.
Therestofthepaperisorganizedasfollows.Section2illustratestheestimatedmodelandthe simulationofdemandresponsestotaxchangesandtoequalmarket-inducedpricechanges.Section 3describesthedata.Section4isdevotedtotheestimationresultsandsimulationresults.Section5 concludes.
2. Methodology
2.1. TheQAIDSmodel
ThefunctionalformchosenforourmodelistheQuadraticAlmostIdealDemandSystem(QAIDS, Banksetal.,1997),whichgeneralizesthepopularAIDS(DeatonandMuellbauer,1980a,b)byaddinga non-linearincometermtothebudgetshareequations.TheQAIDSallowsforflexibleincomeandprice responsesthatdependontheleveloftotalexpenditure,thusprovidingapracticalspecificationfor demandsacrossmanycommodities.Bycontrast,theAIDSimposesthatallgoodshaveEngelcurves varyinglinearlywiththelogoftotalexpenditure.Thismaybeareasonablespecificationfordemand systemswithfewcommodities(e.g.,WestandWilliams,2004,2007,intheliteraturerelevantto thispaper).However,empiricalstudieshaveoftenfoundnonlinearEngelcurves(Banksetal.,1997), especiallywhendealingwithratherdisaggregateddemandsystemsandbundlesofenergygoods,asin ourcase.Moreover,whenusingsurveydata,anadditionaladvantageofrank-threedemandsystems,3 suchastheQAIDS,isthattheyeasilyallowforhouseholdheterogeneity,thusenrichingthedemand modelandleavinglessspaceformisspecification(Nicol,2001;Labandeiraetal.,2006).
TheQAIDSspecificationisobtainedstartingfromthefollowingindirectutilityfunction:
lnV(p,yh)=
B(p)lnyh−lnA(p)+G(p)
−1(1)
whereyhisthetotalexpenditureofhouseholdh;pisapricevector;thetermB(p)/[lnyh−lnA(p)]
istheinverseoftheindirectutilityfunctionofaPIGLOGdemandsystem;andA,B,andGarethree functionsofprices.
Specifically,lnA(p)hasaTranslogformandislinearhomogeneous;B(p)isaCobb–Douglasprice index,homogeneousofdegreezerointhepricevectorp;andG(p)=
iilnpiishomogeneousof degreezerointhepricevectorp.ThecorrespondingsystemofMarshalliandemandfunctionsfor householdhandgoodsi=1,...,nexpressedastotalexpendituresharesisgivenby:
whi =˛i+
k
˛ikdhk+
j
cij lnpj+ˇiln
yh A(p)+ i
B(p)
ln
yh A(p)2
(2)
where˛ikarethecoefficientsofasetofdemographicvariablesenteringthemodelastranslating interceptsdh=dih,...,dhk.
Thetranslatingtechnique(PollakandWales,1992),aspecialcaseofthemodifyingfunctiontech- niqueproposedbyLewbel(1985),consistsinpositinganadditionalsetoflinear,auxiliaryrelationships betweenthe˛iintheshareequations(2)anddemographiccharacteristicsorotherconditioningvari- ables.Thedemandfunctions(2)satisfyintegrability,i.e.areconsistentwithutilitymaximization, ifthefollowingparametricrestrictionshold:
i˛i=1,
iˇi=
icij=
ii=0,
i˛ik=0∀k(adding up);
jcij=0(homogeneity);andcij=cji∀i,j(symmetry).ComparedtotheAIDS,theQAIDSaddsa quadraticterminthelogoftotalexpenditurewhichallowsfornonlinearchangesinthebudgetshares followingapriceorincomechange.Asimplewaytotestforthepresenceofsuchnonlineareffectsis totestthenullhypothesisthati=0.4
3I.e.demandmodelsdependingonthreeindependentpricefunctions.
4Weranalikelihoodratiotesttotestthehypothesisi=0.Thetestrejectedthenullhypothesis(teststatistic2(6)=713.6375, p-value=0.000),thuswechosetheQAIDSspecificationratherthantheAIDSone.
Todealwiththepresenceofzeroesinthedependentvariables,weusethetwo-stepestimator proposedbyShonkwilerandYen(1999).5Theprocedureinvolvesaprobitestimationinthefirststep andaselectivity-augmentedequationsysteminthesecondstep.6Thesystemofequations(2)isthus estimatedinthefollowingform(subscripthisomittedforeaseofnotation):
si=˚(zii)wi(p,y,)+ıi(zii)+i (3) wheresiistheobservedexpenditureshareforgoodi;ziisavectorofexogenousvariables;iisa parametervector;isavectorcontainingallparametersinthedemandsystem(˛i,˛ik,ˇi,iandcij);
i=si−E(si)is theheteroscedasticerrorterm; and˚arethestandardnormal probabilityden- sityfunction(pdf)anditscumulativedistributionfunction(cdf),respectively;andıiistheunknown coefficientofthecorrectionfactoroftheithequationinthesecondstep.
Thesystemofequations(3)isestimatedintwosteps:(i)MaximumLikelihood(ML)probitestimates ˆiofiareobtainedusingbinaryoutcomessi=0andsi>0;(ii)˚(ziˆi)and˚(ziˆi)arecomputedfor alli,and,ı1,ı2,...,ınareestimatedintheaugmentedsystem(3)byML.Thistwo-stepestimator isconsistent,buttheerrorterms areheteroscedastic.Theestimatedelementsof thesecond-step conventionalcovariancematrixarethereforeinefficient.For thisreason,weempiricallycalculate thestandarderrorsoftheelasticitiesusingnonparametricbootstrapping(with500replications).The dependentvariableinthefirst-stepprobitestimatesisthebinaryoutcomedefinedbytheexpenditure ineachgood.Thepredictedpdfandcdffromthesixprobitequationsareincludedinthesecondstep oftheprocedure(seeYenetal.,2003,p.464).Theexogenousvariablesusedinthefirst-stepprobit estimatesarequarterlydisposableincome(alsoavailableintheCEsurvey)andasetofdemographic andgeographicvariables,whicharedescribedinthenextsection.Asforthesecond-stepestimates,we imposehomogeneityandsymmetrythroughparametricrestrictions,whileadding-upisaccomodated bydroppingoneoftheequations.EconomictheoryalsorequiresthatthematrixofSlutzkysubstitution effectsbenegativesemi-definite,aconditionthatishereimposedusingtheCholeskydecomposition.
Furthermore,toaddressconcernsofendogeneityoftotalexpenditure,weusequarterlydisposable incomeinsteadoftotalexpenditure.
DifferentiationofEq.(3)givesdemandelasticitiesforthefirstn−1goods,whiletheelasticities forthenthgoodarerecoveredexploitingtheCournotandEngelrestrictions(DeatonandMuellbauer, 1980a,b,p.16).Thecorrespondinguncompensated(U),compensated(C)andexpenditureelasticities forgoodiare,respectively:
eUij = ij
wi −ıij (4)
eCij=eUij−eiwi (5)
ei= i
wi+1 (6)
where
ıijistheKroneckerdelta;
i=∂wi/∂lny=ˇi+B(p)2i
ln
yA(p)
;
ij=∂wi/∂lnpj=cij−i
˛i+k˛ikdk+
jcijlnpj
−ˇB(p)jiln
yA(p)
2
.
5ShonkwilerandYen(1999),Yenetal.(2003),andYenandLin(2006)provideusefulliteraturereviewsonestimation proceduresforcensoreddemandsystems.
6Adifferenttwo-stepprocedure,developedbyHeienandWessells(1990),hasoftenbeenusedinapplieddemandanalysis toaddresstheproblemofestimatingsystemsofequationswithlimiteddependentvariables.WestandWilliams(2004,2007) aretwostudiesadoptingthisprocedure.However,asstatedbyShonkwilerandYen(1999,p.972),“theHeinandWessells procedureisbuiltuponasetofequationswhichdeviatefromtheunconditionalmeanexpressionfortheconventionalcensored dependentvariablespecification”.Instead,theprocedurebyShonkwilerandYen(1999)adoptedinthisstudyprovidesa consistenttwo-stepestimator.
2.2. Incorporatinggasolinetaxesinthedemandsystem
Whiletheliterature offersa few plausibleexplanationsfor observeddifferentialresponsesto changesingasolinetaxesandmarket-inducedchangesingasolineprices,suchargumentsdonot informthemodelspecification.BothLietal.(2014)andRiversandSchaufele(2015)entergasoline taxesandtax-exclusivegasolinepricesseparatelyinsingleequationmodelsforgasolinedemand.
However,noparticularroleoftaxesinrelationtoconsumerchoicesistestedorassumed.Thesameis trueforthestudybyDavisandKilian(2011),whoidentifythetaxeffectbyinstrumentingtax-inclusive gasolinepriceswithgasolinetaxes.Wefundamentallydepartfromtheliteratureinthisrespect,as wepositspecificrolesforgasolinetaxes.
Ourapproachhingesonthepresumptionofadualeffectofchangesingasolinetaxesongasoline demand:thepriceeffectandthesignaleffect.Thefirstisthechangeingasolinedemandcausedby thechangeinrelativepricesfollowingataxchange.Thepriceeffectofataxchangeondemandis perfectlyequivalenttothatofanequalchangeinthefinalprice.Thesecondeffectistheadditional change,oradjustment,ingasolinedemandcausedbylong-runconsumerdecisions,suchasbuyinga morefuel-efficientcarorchangingtransportmode,whichgasolinetaxchangesaspolicysignalsare expectedtoinfluence.Ingeneral,anytaxchangesshouldsignalthewillofthegovernmentconcerning thegivenpolicies.Gasolinetaxchanges,inparticular,areusuallystrongpolicysignals,astheytend tobeinfrequentandalsotoreceivemediaattention(e.g.,Lietal.,2014).Theyarethuslikelytoaffect theexpectationsoffuturegasolineprices.7
Accordingly,gasolinetaxesenterourmodelintwodistinctways.First,asapricecomponent,they areembeddedinthegasolinepriceindex.Second,togetherwiththeothertranslatingintercepts(thed’s in(2)),gasolinetaxes(specifiedincentspergallon,¢/gallon)enterthemodelexplicitlyasconditioning variablesadjustinglong-runequilibriumdemands(Pollak,1969).Thesameapproachhasbeenusedin otherdemandsystemstudiestoanalysetheeffectsofnon-price,non-incomevariablessuchasquality information(Jensenetal.,1993;Chernetal.,1995),innovation(Moroetal.,1996)andadvertising (Duffy,1995;BrownandLee,1997).Suchaspecificationimpliesthattaxesasapricecomponent donothaveaspecialrole(i.e.,theyarenodifferentfromotherpricecomponents)indetermining gasolinedemand.Thatis,whenchoosingthequantityofgasolinetoconsume,consumersareassumed toconsiderthelevelofthefinalprice,notitscomposition.Evenifdriverswerewellinformedabout theleveloftaxation,orhadagoodestimationofit,8itisdifficulttoimaginetheywouldrefillthe tankdependingonthecompositionofthepricetheypayandnotjustitslevel.Conversely,itseems tousplausiblethatgasolinetaxesaspolicysignalscaninfluencelong-rundecisionswhichinturn determinegasolinedemand.
2.3. Simulatingdemandresponsestotaxincreasesandtomarket-inducedpriceincreases
Themodelin(3),inclusiveofgasolinetaxesamongtheintercepts,canbeusedtoseparatelysimulate demandresponsestochangesingasolinetaxesandtomarket-inducedchangesingasolineprices.In otherterms,definingtax-inclusivegasolineprices(pG)asthesumoftax-exclusiveprices(G)and taxes(tG),pG=G+tG,distinctdemandresponsestotGandtoG,respectively,canbesimulated.
Inthefirstcase,theoveralllong-runimpactondemandisgivenbythesumofthepriceeffectand thesignaleffect,aspreviouslydefined.Inthesecond,onlythepriceeffectisinplay.Inparticular,we areinterestedincomparingtheresponsesingasolinedemandtotGandtoGwhenthesetwo variationsarepositiveandequalinmagnitude.Insuchacase,theratioofthetwopredicteddemand variations,,measuresthelong-runeffectivenessofthetaxincreaseinreducinggasolinedemand relativetothatofanequalpriceincreasecausedbymarketforces.IftheestimatedcoefficientoftGin
7Andersonetal.(2013)seemnottosupportthisparticularhypothesis,astheyfindthatconsumers’expectationsofgasoline pricesarerathersimplistic.However,arguablytheirtestwarrantsfurtherinvestigation.Itisnotinconceivablethattherespon- dentstothesurveyusedbytheauthorsexpressedtheirexpectationsongasolinepricesfiveyearsintothefutureconsidering onlymarketforcesandnottaxation.Thismaybethecasesincefuturetaxchangeswithinafive-yearhorizonarevirtually impossibletopredict.
8Postedpricesonbigsignsatgasolinestationsaretax-inclusive.
thegasolineequationisnegative(andstatisticallysignificant),thesignaleffectaddstothepriceeffect (alsonegative)and,ifso,tGturnsouttobemoreeffectivethanGinreducinggasolinedemand.
Thefirststepforthesimulationofthetax-increasescenarioisderivingthenewgasolinepricepGB resultingfromtG.Atagivenpoint0,
pGB,0=pGA,0
1+tG PGA,0
(7)
wherepGA,0istheinitialpriceindexandpGA,0istheinitial(tax-inclusive)priceinlevels.
Similarly,thenewlevelofthegasolinetaxiscomputedbyaddingtGtotheinitialtax,
tGB,0=tA,0G +tG (8)
Feedingboththenewpriceandthenewtaxtotheestimatedmodel,thenewpredictedbudgetshares areobtained,includingtheoneforgasoline, ˆwGB,0.Finally,holdingtotalexpenditureyA,0asfixed,the percentagechangeingasolinedemandisderivedas
ˆqG0 ˆqG0 =
wˆB,0G yA,0
pGB,0− ˆwA,0G yA,0
pGA,0
/ ˆwA,0G yA,0
pGA,0 (9)
Thesameprocedureappliesforthesimulationofthemarket-inducedprice-increasescenario,with thefollowingtwodifferences:(a)tGisreplacedbyGin(7)(althoughpGB,0isunchangedsincetG andG areequalinsize),and(b)tG=0in(8),asnopolicysignalisactive.Theaboveisthen computedbycomparingtheresultingpercentagechangeingasolinedemandwiththatobtainedfor thetax-increasescenario,
0= ˆqG0/ˆqG0(tG)
ˆqG0/ˆqG0(G) (10)
Aresult0=nindicatesthat,inthelongrun,atthegivenpoint0,anincreaseingasolinetaxesis n-timesaseffectiveinreducinggasolinedemandasanequal-in-sizemarket-inducedpriceincrease.
3. Data
3.1. Householdbudgetshares,totalexpenditureanddemographics
TheU.S.ConsumerExpenditureSurvey(CEX)producedbytheBureauofLabourStatistics(BLS) isthemaindatasourceforourapplication.Weusemicrodataof thequarterlyInterviewSurvey (IS)fromthe2007,2008and2009roundsoftheCEX.9EachCEXroundhasfiveIScross-sections:
onepercalendarquarter,includingthefirstofthefollowingyear.10Wedrawon15cross-sections and about90,000observations, as each cross-section hasapproximately6000 observations.The model,however,isestimatedonasubsetof43,457observations,thoseforwhichinformationon theMetropolitanStatisticalArea(MSA)isgiven.Weusesuchasubsetbecausemorepricevariation isobtainedwithpriceindicesthatvarybyMSAthanwithState-levelindices.Theresultingsam- plespans39months,fromJanuary2007toMarch2010,and20MSA(seeTablesA1andA2,inthe Appendix).
In the IS, each household’s expenditures, which refer to thethree monthsbefore the inter- view, are classified into 60 consumption categories. Our system of demand only considers current expenditures (durables and occasional purchases are ignored), corresponding to 40 of the60 categories. Specifically, themodel is estimated for the following shares of total current expenditure:
9SeeChapter16oftheBLSHandbookofMethodsforadescriptionoftheCEX.
10TheISisapanelrotationsurvey.Eachpanelisinterviewedforfiveconsecutivequartersandthendroppedfromthesurvey andreplacedwithanewone.
Table1
Summarystatisticsoftotalcurrentexpenditureshares.
Variable Observations Mean Standarddeviation Coeff.ofvariation Min Maxa Zeros
Foodathome 43,457 22.8% 13.7% 0.60 0.0% 100.0%(15) 0.9%
Electricity 43,457 5.8% 5.3% 0.92 0.0% 100.0%(3) 8.5%
Naturalgas 43,457 2.9% 4.3% 1.50 0.0% 63.4% 38.5%
Otherhomefuels 43,457 0.7% 3.1% 4.59 0.0% 72.8% 91.2%
Motorfuels 43,457 9.1% 7.7% 0.84 0.0% 100.0%(2) 12.9%
Publictransport 43,457 2.0% 5.4% 2.63 0.0% 81.4% 73.4%
Allotherexpend. 43,457 56.7% 17.5% 0.31 0.0% 100.0%(128) 0.1%
aInbracketsisthenumberofobservationswith100%budgetshare.
Table2
Summarystatisticsofdemographicsandtotalcurrentexpenditure.
Variable Obs.(#) Mean Standarddeviation Min Max
Single 43,457 0.28 0.45 0 1
H&W 43,457 0.19 0.40 0 1
H&W,child(ren)<6 43,457 0.05 0.21 0 1
H&W,child(ren)<18 43,457 0.14 0.34 0 1
H&W,child(ren)>17 43,457 0.08 0.27 0 1
Otherhouseholds 43,457 0.26 0.44 0 1
Northeast 43,457 0.31 0.46 0 1
Midwest 43,457 0.20 0.40 0 1
South 43,457 0.24 0.43 0 1
West 43,457 0.26 0.44 0 1
Compositionincomeearners 43,457 0.23 0.42 0 1
Educationreferencepersona 43,457 5.44 1.82 1 9
Numberofcars 43,457 0.91 0.89 0 15
Totalcurrentexpenditure,$ 43,457 7178 7298 35 321,316
a1“Neverattendedschool”,2“1stthrough8thgrade”,3“9ththrough12thgrade”,4“Highschoolgraduate”,5“Somecollege, lessthancollegegraduate”,6“Associate’sdegree”,7“Bachelor’sdegree”,8“Master’sdegree”,9“Professional/Doctoratedegree”.
1)Foodathome 2)Electricity 3)Naturalgas 4)Otherhomefuels 5)Motorfuels(gasoline) 6)Publictransport 7)Allotherexpenditures
whereFoodathomeisthetotalexpendituresforfoodatgrocerystores(orotherfoodstores)and foodpreparedbytheconsumerunitontrips;Otherhomefuelsisthesumofexpendituresonfueloil, non-pipedgasandotherfuels(heatingfuels);Publictransportisthesumoffarespaidforallformsof publictransport,includingbuses,taxis,coaches,trains,ferriesandairlines.
Table1showsthesummarystatisticsoftheseexpendituresharesastheyappearinthesample.
Onaverage,expenditureonfoodconsumedorpreparedathomeaccountsfor22.8%oftotalcurrent expenditure,followedbymotorfuelsandelectricity,whichrepresent9.1%and5.8%,respectively;the residualcategory,Allotherexpenditures,represents56.7%oftotalcurrentexpenditure.Thecoefficients ofvariationindicatethatvariabilityisgreatestforOtherhomefuels,PublictransportandNaturalgas,in thatorder.Largeproportionsofhouseholdsreportedzeroexpenditurefortheseexpenditureaggre- gates(seethesharesinthelastcolumnofTable1).Consumptionoftherespectivegoodsorservices isindeedconditionaloncertainprerequisites,suchasthepossessionofspecificappliancesandhigh substitutabilitybetweenprivateandpublictransport,whichmaynotholdformanyhouseholds.
DifferenttypesofdemographiccharacteristicsarealsoextractedfromtheISdataset.Descriptive statisticsofthoseandoftotalcurrentexpenditurearereportedinTable2.Thehouseholdprofileis categorizedthroughsixdummyvariablesidentifyingthefollowingtypes:(a)Single;(b)Husband
3540455055
2007 2008 2009 2010
year
GA FL
DC
ME MD MN
NY WA WV
c$/gallon
Federal- plus state gasoline excise taxes
Fig.1. Gasolinetaxesinstates(insample)whererateschangedatleastonce.
andwife;(c)Husbandandwife,witholdestchildunder6;(d)Husbandandwife,witholdestchild under18;(e)Husbandandwife,witholdestchildover17;(f)Otherhouseholds.Geographiclocation isrenderedthroughfourdummyvariables,oneforeachoftheCensus-definedregions:Northeast, Midwest,SouthandWest.Adummyvariablebringsininformationonthecompositionofearnersin thehousehold:ittakesthevalue1ifboththereferencepersonandthespouseareincomeearners;0, otherwise.Acategoricalvariableclassifiestheeducationlevelofthereferencepersoninninelevels.
Moreover,themodelcontrolsforthenumberofcarsownedbythehousehold.
3.2. Priceindicesandgasolinetaxes
Insufficientpricevariationisacommonproblemwhenestimatingdemandmodelswithcross- sectionaldataandpriceindices.WeavoidthisissuebyusingmonthlyindicesvaryingbyMSA,which exhibitsufficienttimeandspatialvariation.11Anotherpotentialproblemissomedegreeofinaccuracy inthecorrespondencebetweendemandandpricedata.Inourapplication,thisissuedoesnotarise becausepriceindices,alsoproducedbytheBLS,followthesameclassificationashouseholdexpen- diture.TheBLSusestheCEXtoperiodicallyrevisetheexpenditureweightsoftheConsumerPrice Index(CPI).Thereis,therefore,perfectcorrespondencebetweenISandCPIstatisticswithrespectto theexpenditureaggregates.IntheAppendix,TableA3showsthesummarystatisticsofpriceindices;
also,Fig.A1showstheevolutionovertimeofpriceindicesaveragedbyregion.
IntheU.S.,threelayersoftaxesapplytotheconsumptionofgasolineandautodiesel,namely, federaltaxes,Statetaxesandlocaltaxes.Thefederaltaxrateongasolineiscurrently18.4¢/gallonand hasnotchangedsince2006.12Bycontrast,StatetaxescandiffersignificantlyfromoneStatetoanother andtheyareoccasionallysubjecttorevisions.ThedatausedonthemonthlyratesofStatetaxesare publishedbytheFederationofTaxAdministrators(FTA).13Localtaxesarenotconsideredduetoa lackofinformation.InourestimatesgasolinetaxesareadjustedforinflationusingthenationalCPI.14
11Only,aspriceindicesbyMSAarenotavailableforOtherhomefuelsnorforPublictransport,nationallevelindicesareused inthesecases.
12Source:U.S.EnergyInformationAdministration.
13Tworatesareaddedup:“Statemotorgasolinetaxes”and“OtherStatetaxes”.
14Estimatesobtainedusingtaxesunadjustedforinflationwereverysimilar.
-30-20-1001020304050
2007 2008 2009 2010
year
Taxes Price index
Maine (ME)
-30-20-1001020304050
2007 2008 2009 2010
year
Taxes Price index
Washington (WA)
%
Volatility of gasoline taxes and gasoline prices: distance from mean
Fig.2.Gasolinetaxesandpriceswithinstates:MaineandWashington.
Fig.1showsthesumoffederalandStategasolinetaxesintheStateswherethetaxratechangedat leastonce(9Statesoutof23inthesample)overthemonthscoveredbythesample.Itisapparent thatchangesingasolinetaxesarerelativelyrareeventsandthatvariationbetweenStatesismuch greaterthanvariationwithinStates.Fig.2focusesonthetwoStateswheregasolinetaxesvariedmost intheyearsconsidered,namelyMaine(MA)andWashington(WA).15Inbothcases,taxesremain withinadistanceof5%fromthemeanoftheperiod,withoneexceptionforWashington,inearly 2007.Bycontrast,pricesroseashighasalmost50%abovethemeanoftheperiodandthenfellto aslowas30%belowthemean.Ingeneral,priceandtaxchangesveryclearlydifferbothinsizeand persistence.
4. Results
In this section, we first discuss estimation results concerning the demand system and its derived parameters (elasticities). We then focus on the simulation results of gasoline demand responsestothegivenincreasesingasolinetaxesandtoequalmarket-inducedincreasesingasoline prices.
4.1. Estimationresults:QAIDScoefficientsandelasticities
Theestimatedcoefficientsofthefirst-stepprobitmodelsunderShonkwilerandYen’sprocedure arereportedinTableA4,intheAppendix.Incomeissignificantinallprobitequationsandtakeson theexpectedpositivesign.Focusingontheequationforgasoline,comparedtolivingintheMidwest (thereferencelocation),livingintheNortheasthasanegativeimpactontheprobabilityofpurchasing gasoline,whereaslivingintheSouthorintheWesthasapositiveimpactontheprobabilityofbuying gasoline.Havingchildrenhasapositiveimpactontheprobabilityofbuyinggasolinecomparedtoa
15ThegraphsfortheotherStates,whicharesimilar,arenotshownforspacereasons.Theyareavailablefromtheauthors uponrequest.
Table3
EstimatedQAIDScoefficients.
Coefficient i=1 i=2 i=3 i=4 i=5 i=6
Food Electricity Naturalgas Otherfuels Gasoline Pub.transp.
˛i 0.197 0.043 0.046 0.049 0.108 0.090
0.002 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.001 0.010
ˇi −0.038 −0.004 −0.007 −0.008 −0.008 −0.006
0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002
i −0.004 −0.001 −0.001 −0.002 −0.001 −0.001
0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
˛i,NE 0.030 −0.000 −0.006 0.045 0.008 −0.003
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.004
˛i,SO 0.020 0.034 −0.023 −0.005 0.015 0.005
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.009 0.001 0.004
˛i,WE 0.043 −0.008 −0.039 −0.009 0.019 0.019
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.004
˛i,NCAR −0.017 −0.001 0.001 0.009 0.009 −0.008
0.001 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001
˛i,TWOE −0.004 −0.000 −0.000 0.015 0.010 0.003
0.001 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.003
˛i,N1 −0.039 −0.012 0.008 0.048 0.018 −0.011
0.003 0.002 0.001 0.005 0.002 0.004
˛i,N3 0.032 −0.004 −0.003 0.016 0.013 −0.015
0.003 0.001 0.002 0.006 0.001 0.005
˛i,N4 0.043 0.006 −0.002 −0.007 0.012 −0.009
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.004
˛i,N5 0.039 0.008 −0.004 −0.008 0.014 −0.014
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.005 0.001 0.004
˛i,N6 0.033 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.020 −0.015
0.002 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.001 0.003
˛i,EDUC −0.009 −0.003 −0.002 −0.004 −0.008 0.005
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001
˛i,TAX −0.053 0.013 −0.013 0.176 −0.062 0.035
0.006 0.003 0.003 0.010 0.004 0.008
Loglikelihood 337.700
R2 0.19 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.12 0.03
Nobs 43,308
Note:Standarderrorsbelowcoefficients.BoldentriesindicaterejectionofH0:e=0atthe5%significancelevelforatwo-tailed test.
childlesscouple(thereferencehouseholdtype).Beingsinglehasinsteadanegativeimpactonthe probabilityofconsuminggasolinerelativetoachildlesscouple.
Table3reportstheresultsofsomeofthesecond-stepQAIDSparameters.16Heretoowefocus onthecoefficientsofthegasolinebudgetshareequation.Allgeographicdummyvariables(˛NE,˛SO,
˛WE)arestatisticallysignificant.Theirvalues indicatethat,relativetotheMidwest(thereference category),livingintheWesthasapositiveimpactongasolineconsumption,followedbytheSouthand theNortheast(indescendingorder).Asexpected,thenumberofcarsownedbyahousehold(˛NCAR) hasapositiveimpactongasolineconsumption.Thesameistrueforthepresenceoftwoincome earnersinthehousehold(˛TWOE),possiblyduetocumulativelylongerdistancesbetweenhomeand therespectiveworkplaces.Thedummyvariablesforhouseholddemographics(˛N1,˛N3,˛N4,˛N5,
˛N6)areallstatisticallysignificant.Thesizeofthecoefficients,whosevaluesarerelativetothatofthe
“Householdandwife”basecategory,seemstoreflectthenumberofhouseholdmembersoldenough toholdadrivinglicense.17Ahighereducationleveloftheheadofhousehold(˛EDUC)turnsouttohave anegativeimpactongasolineconsumption.Importantlyforouranalysis,thesameistrueforhigher gasolinetaxes(˛TAX),asonewouldexpect.
16Forspacereasons,pricecoefficientsandcdfcoefficientsarenotreported.Theseparametersareavailablefromtheauthors uponrequest.
17IntheU.S.,theminimumageforobtainingadrivinglicenseis16yearsold.
Table4
Estimatedbudgetshares,income-andcompensatedpriceelasticities.
j=1 j=2 j=3 j=4 j=5 j=6 j=7
Food Electricity Naturalgas Otherfuels Gasoline Pub.transp. Othergoods
wj 0.223 0.057 0.028 0.007 0.090 0.021 0.576
ej 0.860 0.942 0.855 0.919 0.938 0.929 1.080
0.004 0.007 0.009 0.023 0.006 0.021 0.002
eC1j −0.445 −0.139 0.076 −0.100 0.081 −0.008 0.535
0.037 0.012 0.009 0.022 0.015 0.027 0.050
eC2j −0.443 −0.876 0.058 −0.013 −0.359 −0.500 2.129
0.041 0.026 0.015 0.032 0.027 0.049 0.061
eC3j 0.504 0.089 −0.160 0.115 −0.296 −0.167 −0.086
0.045 0.022 0.037 0.034 0.031 0.041 0.072
eC4j −0.131 0.028 0.075 −0.477 0.207 0.118 0.180
0.055 0.025 0.019 0.165 0.040 0.038 0.123
eC5j 0.214 −0.220 −0.142 0.107 −0.435 −0.447 0.923
0.033 0.016 0.013 0.030 0.027 0.037 0.058
eC6j 0.003 −0.382 −0.113 0.087 −0.563 −0.385 1.353
0.080 0.041 0.023 0.038 0.051 0.145 0.134
eC7j 0.160 0.183 −0.002 0.021 0.104 0.142 −0.607
0.020 0.007 0.005 0.011 0.010 0.015 0.030
Note:Standarderrorsbelowcoefficients.BoldentriesindicaterejectionofH0:e=0atthe5%significancelevelforatwo-tailed test.
Concerningtheelasticities,compensatedown-andcross-priceelasticities(ecij),alongwithincome elasticities(ei)andthepredictedbudgetshares( ˆwi),areshowninTable4.Alloftheseareevaluated atthesamplemeansofexogenousvariables.Onaverage,18.2%oftotalcurrentoutlayisspenton energyrelatedproducts(thesumofthebudgetsharesofElectricity,Naturalgas,Otherhomefuels andGasoline),withGasolineonitsownmakingup9.0%oftotalcurrentexpenditure.Withregardto incomeelasticities,allthecommoditiesbutOthergoodsturnouttobenecessities.Ingeneral,allown- priceelasticitiesseemplausible,rangingbetween−0.876and−0.160,thesebeingtheelasticitiesfor ElectricityandNaturalgas,respectively.18ForGasoline,wefindanown-priceelasticityof−0.435,which isinlinewiththeU.S.literatureestimatingcompletesystemsofdemand(e.g.,WestandWilliams, 2004,2007;Nicol,2003;Oladosu,2003).Table5showssomerecentestimatesofown-priceelasticities ofU.S.householddemandforgasoline,distinguishingbetweendemandsystemsandsingleequation models.Singleequationstudiestendtofindlowerpriceelasticities.Thisisprobablyduetosystemsof demandaccountingforbehavioralresponsesafterapricechange,i.e.forhowhouseholdsreallocate theirbudgetafterachangeinoneoftheprices.Thenatureofthedatausedmayalsoplayarole, inasmuchastime-seriesdatatendtoyieldshort-runresponsesandcross-sectionstendtoyieldlong- runresponses,especiallyinthecaseofenergydemand(BaltagiandGriffin,1984;PesaranandSmith, 1995).
Cross-priceelasticitiesmeasurethedegreeofsubstitutionorcomplementaritybetweenthegoods considered.EachentryofTable4shows thepercentage changeinthequantitydemandedofthe goodslistedintherowsfollowinga1%changeinthepriceofthegoodslistedinthecolumns.For Gasoline,relationshipsofcomplementarityarisewithNaturalgas,ElectricityandPublicTransport.Inall thesecases,therelationshipissymmetric,meaningecijandeCjihavethesamesign(eC35=−0.295and eC53=−0.142;eC25=−0.359andeC52=−0.220;eC65=−0.563andeC56=−0.447).Apossibleinterpre- tationofthesefindingsisthatsuchcomplementaritiesmaybetheconsequenceofabudgetconstraint tighteningfollowinganincreaseinthepriceofanecessity(gasoline).Thecomplementaritybetween
18Alberinietal.(2011)estimatethepriceandincomeelasticitiesofU.S.householddemandbothforelectricityandgas.For electricity,own-priceelasticitiesrangebetween−0.860and−0.667;forgas,between−0.693and−0.566.
Table5
RecentestimatesofpriceelasticitiesofU.S.householdgasolinedemand.
Study Ownpriceelasticityofgasolinedemand Datatype
Systemofdemandmodels
WestandWilliams(2007) −0.75(largest);−0.27(smallest) Pooledcross-section
WestandWilliams(2004) −0.46 Pooledcross-section
Nicol(2003) −0.59(largest);−0.02(smallest) Pooledcross-section
Oladosu(2003) −0.70(largest);−0.36(smallest) Pooledcross-section
Singleequationmodels
Lietal.(2014) −0.10 Panel
Sentenac-Chemin(2012) −0.30 Time-series
Su(2011) −0.39 Cross-section
DavisandKilian(2011) −0.46(largest);−0.19(smallest) Panel
ManzanandZerom(2010) −0.35 Pooledcross-section
Hughesetal.(2008) −0.07 Time-series
SmallandVanDender(2007) −0.43 Pooledcross-section
GasolineandPublictransport(eC65=−0.563)isperhapsevenmoresurprising.Onetentativeexplana- tionisthatanincreaseinthepriceofGasolinemakesPublictransportmoreexpensivetoo.19Wefind insteadsubstitutionbetweenOther(home)fuelsandGasoline(e45=0.207).Noimmediateexplanation presentsitselfforthisresult,butthemeanbudgetshareforOther(home)fuelsisverysmall,0.7%, whichmakessuchsubstitutionnotacriticalfinding.Finally,wefindweaksubstitutionbetweenElec- tricityandNaturalgas(eC23=0.058).However,theelasticityisactuallyverysmall,implyingthata1%
increaseinthepriceofNaturalGaswouldcauseElectricitydemandtoincreaseby0.058%.
4.2. Simulationresults:demandresponsetotaxchangesandtomarket-inducedpriceschanges
Theestimationresultspresentedintheprevioussectionarehereusedtoquantifyandcompare responsesingasoline demandtogiven increasesin gasoline taxesand toequal market-induced increasesingasolineprices.Pairsoftax-andpriceincreasescenariosarethussimulatedintheway describedinSection2.3.Thecomparisonsoftherespectivepredictedvariationsingasolinedemand provideuswithasmanyvaluesfortheparameterdefinedin(10).Specifically,wederivefordiffer- enttaxincreasesandatdifferentpointsinoursample.Withaviewtoevaluatingthepotentialimpact ofcorrectivetaxation,gasolinetaxincreasesofdifferentmagnitudesareconsideredinrelationto differentlevelsofcarbontaxation.Forexample,a$15/tCO2carbontaxtranslatesintoa13.2¢/gallon gasolinetax.20SuchalevelofcarbontaxisinlinewiththeratesindicatedinrecentU.S.legislative proposalstoreducenationalCO2emissions.21Patternsofarethenderived,foragiven13.2¢/gallon taxincrease,bothacrossincomelevelsandacrossregions.
4.2.1. Differentialdemandresponsebysizeofthetaxincrease
Ourinvestigationofdifferentialdemandresponsesbeginswithexamininghowchangeswiththe sizeofthetaxincrease.Fivetaxincreasesareconsidered,namely5,13.2,25,35,and40¢/gallon,which correspondtocarbontaxlevelsrangingfrom5.7to45.5$/tCO2,approximately.Inallthescenarios, demandresponsesaresimulatedatthesamplemeanvaluesofthemodel’sindependentvariables.
TheresultsobtainedareillustratedthroughthefourgraphsinFig.3.
19TheaggregatePublicTransportisthesumofbothintra-cityexpenditureitemsandinter-cityexpenditureitemsassupplied intheCEXsurvey.Specifically,intra-cityexpenditureitemsinclude:intra-citymasstransitfares;taxifaresandlimousine services;schoolbus.Inter-cityexpenditureitemsincludedinouraggregateare:airlinefares;intercitybusfares;localtransport ontrips;taxifaresontrips;intercitytrainfares;shipfares.
20GivenaCO2emissionfactorforgasolineof19.44lbs/gallon.
21Forexample,the2009CongressbillRaiseWages,CutCarbonAct(H.R.2380,111thCongress)setaninitialrateof$15/tCO2, in2010.The2013ClimateProtectionAct(S.332,113thCongress)setaninitialrateof$20/tCO2.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Price increase, %
Tax increase, cents per gallon
Increase of sample mean gasoline price by tax increase
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
0 10 20 30 40 50
Gasoline budget share, %
Tax increase, cents per gallon
Predicted gasoline budget shares by scenario and tax increase
tax-incr.
price-incr.
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
0 10 20 30 40 50
Demand change, %
Tax increase, cents per gallon
Gasoline demand change by scenario and tax increase
tax-incr.
price-incr.
0 2 4 6 8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
θ
Tax increase, cents per gallon
Differential demand response (θ) by tax increase
Fig.3.Simulationresults:priceincreases,budgetshares,demandchanges,anddifferentialdemandresponses().
ThecurveinthetopgraphofFig.3showsthepercentageincreaseinthesamplemeangasolineprice, whichis$2.7/gallon,asafunctionoftheconsideredgasolinetaxincrease:a13.2¢/gallontaxincrease correspondstoanincreaseinthesamplemeangasolinepriceof4.9%;a25¢taxincreasecorresponds toa9.3%priceincrease;etc.Thefivepairsofgasolinebudgetsharespredictedbythemodel,under thetaxincreasescenarioandunderthepriceincreasescenario,arepicturedinthesecondgraph.Asit canbeseen,thedifferencebetweenthetwobudgetsharesgetslargerwiththesizeofthetaxincrease.
Thecorrespondingvariationsingasolinedemand,derivedasper(9),areshowninthenextgraph.A market-inducedpriceincreaseof13.2¢/gallonisfoundtoreducegasolinedemandby2.5%.However, thesamepriceincreasebroughtinthroughtaxationreducesdemandby18%.Similarly,a25¢/gallon market-inducedpriceincreasereducesgasolinedemandby4.7%,whileanequal-in-sizetaxincrease reducesdemandbyasmuchas30%.Theratiosofeachpairofthesefiguresarethecorresponding, whosevaluesarereportedinthebottomgraphofFig.3.Anegativerelationshipisobservedbetween andthesizeofthetaxincrease.Thismeansthatthesignaleffect,whilestillbeinga(−1)multiple ofthepriceeffect,declinesinrelativetermswithincreasinglylargetaxhikes.Indeed,thisiswhatone wouldexpectassumingsufficientlylargepriceincreasemayalsoaffectlong-runconsumerdecisions suchasinvestmentinmoreefficientcars.Takingthebiggestandthesmallestofthetax-andprice increasesconsidered,isequalto7.3fora5¢/gallonincreaseanditisequalto5.7fora40¢/gallon increase.
Themagnitudeoftheseresultsislargerthanthatoftheresultsfoundintheliterature,which areobtainedusingdifferentdataandeconometricapproaches.Forexample,RiversandSchaufele (2015)findthattheBritishColumbiacarbontaxreducedgasolinedemandbyanamount4.1times greaterthanthatwhichanequalmarket-inducedpriceincreasewouldhavecaused.Thederived byDavisandKilian(2011)rangesbetween2.4and4.6,whileLietal.(2014)find isequalto3, bothinapplicationstoU.S.data.Thereasonforthisdiscrepancybetweenourresultsandthoseof theliteratureliesinthedifferenthorizonofthesimulateddemandresponses:itisthelongrunin ouranalysis,whileitistheshortrunintheotherstudies.Inthiscontext,thedifferencebetween thelong run and the shortrun consists in whetherthe dataand model specification allowfor effectsofgasolinetaxesonrelevantlong-runconsumerchoices,suchasbuyingamorefuel-efficient car,changingtransportmodeormovingclosertowork.Themodelcapturessuchlong-runeffects throughgasoline taxesasconditioningvariablesadjustinglong-runequilibrium demands(Pollak, 1969).
Aformalinvestigationofthemechanismsunderlyingdifferentialresponsestotaxchangesand market-induced price changes is beyond the scope of this study. However, it should be noted that our approach and interpretation are consistent with the findings of Li et al. (2014), who toourknowledgearetheonlyonesdirectlyaddressingthis question.Using U.S.household-level dataon vehicles purchased and miles travelled,the authorsconclude that (a) vehiclepurchase decisions,as reflected in miles per gallon, respond more strongly to tax changes than to price changes,and(b)nodifferentialeffectwithrespecttomilestravelledisfound.Theseresultssup- portourpresumptionthatspecificeffectsofgasolinetaxesunfoldmostly,ifnotentirely,inthelong run.
4.2.2. Differentialdemandresponsebyincomelevel
Incomelevelisalsoexpectedtoaffecthouseholds’demandresponsivenesstochangesingasoline taxes,especiallyinthelongrun.Thus,forthesametwoscenariosof13.2¢/gallontax-andmarket- inducedpriceincreases,wemeasureacrossfiveincomelevelscorrespondingtothequintilesofthe sampleincomedistribution.Toidentifyeffectsthatcanbeattributedonlytoincomedifferences,all independentvariablesotherthanincomeareheldatsamplemeanvalues.Theresultsobtainedare illustratedthroughthegraphsinFig.4.
Theuppergraphcontraststheestimatedelasticitiesofgasolinedemandwithrespecttothetax signal22andtotheownprice(Eq.(4)),atmeanvaluesofthesampleincomequintiles.Thedifferences betweentheseelasticitiesunderlietheresultsobtainedinthesimulations.Withtheexceptionof
22eit=∂wi/∂lntw−1i where∂wi/∂lnt=˛it−ˇi
j˛jtlnpj+2i/B(p){ln[y/A(p)]}.