• Non ci sono risultati.

Refractive Lens Surgery I. H. Fine M. Packer R. S. Hoffman (Eds.)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Refractive Lens Surgery I. H. Fine M. Packer R. S. Hoffman (Eds.)"

Copied!
10
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Refractive Lens Surgery I. H. Fine

M. Packer

R. S. Hoffman (Eds.)

(2)

Editors I. Howard Fine Mark Packer

Richard S. Hoffman

With 170 Figures, Mostly in Colour, and 11 Tables

Refractive

Lens Surgery

123

(3)

Editors

I. Howard Fine, MD Mark Packer, MD, FACS Richard S. Hoffman, MD Department of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University 1550 Oak St. Suite 5

Eugene, Oregon 97401 USA

Library of Congress Control Number: 2005924302

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broad- casting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of Sep- tember 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer-Ver- lag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law.

Springer is a part of Springer Science + Business Media

springeronline.com

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005 Printed in Germany

The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Product liability: The publishers cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information about dosage and application contained in this book. In every individ- ual case the user must check such information by consulting the relevant literature.

Editor: Marion Philipp, Heidelberg Desk editor: Martina Himberger, Heidelberg Production: ProEdit GmbH, Elke Beul-Göhringer, Heidelberg

Cover design: Estudio Calamar, F. Steinen-Broo, Pau/Girona, Spain

Typesetting and reproduction of the figures:

AM-productions GmbH, Wiesloch

Printed on acid-free paper 24/3151beu-göh 5 4 3 2 1 0

ISBN-10 3-540-22716-4 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York ISBN-13 978-3-540-22716-8 Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York

(4)

The editors respectfully dedicate this book to the many pioneers of refractive surgery who had the courage to operate on healthy eyes in order to enhance the quality of life of their patients. They were right all along

and those of us who were doubters have learned that lesson and as a result have enhanced the satisfaction we derive from our own careers.

V

Dedication for Refractive Lens Surgery

(5)

The first recorded time a human lens was removed for the purpose of addressing a refractive error was by an ophthalmologist named Fukala in 1890. We do not know what type of criticism he experienced, but we know that today he is a forgotten man in ophthalmology. The introduction of this as a concept in the late 1980s by both Drs. Paul Koch and Robert Osher’s manuscripts, re- sulted in considerable disdain and some condemnation by some of their colleagues and peers. At the time, refractive surgery in the United States was limited to radial ker- atotomy. With the development of excimer lasers came a very marked change in the at- titude of eye surgeons internationally re- garding the concept of invading “healthy”

tissue for refractive purposes and within a relatively short period of time, LASIK was a firmly established procedure as were other modalities of corneal refractive surgery.

However, we have come to recognize that corneal refractive surgery, and especially LASIK, has limitations. We have also learned much in the recent past about functional vision through the use of con- trast sensitivity and an analysis of higher order optical aberrations. We have also learned that the cornea has constant spher- ical aberration but the lens has changing spherical aberrations. In the young, the hu- man lens compensates for the cornea’s pos- itive spherical aberration, but as we age the changing spherical aberration within the lens exacerbates corneal spherical aberra-

tion. Because of the changing spherical aberration in the lens, no matter what is done to the cornea as a refractive surgery modality, including the most sophisticated custom corneal shaping, functional vision is going to be degraded by changing spher- ical aberration in the lens over time.

This coupled with the fact that higher myopes and hyperopes, patients with early cataracts, and presbyopes are not necessar- ily good candidates for LASIK has resulted in a fresh look at lens-based refractive sur- gery. We have seen recent improvements in phakic IOL technology and utilization and we ourselves have been increasingly moti- vated to work with lens related refractive surgery modalities.

Our own work with power modulations, the IOL Master, and wavefront technology IOLs has convinced us that lens-related re- fractive surgery can give superior results.

Stephen Klyce, MD, the developer of corneal topography has demonstrated, using topographical and wavefront analysis methods, that IOL intraocular optics are far superior to the optics of the most so- phisticated, customized wavefront treated cornea. We have also seen the development of new lens technologies including im- proved multifocal IOLs, improved accom- modative IOLs, light adjustable IOLs, in- jectable IOLs, and a variety of other investigational IOL technologies that sug- gest unimaginable possibilities. Our own results with the Array and Crystalens have

VII

Preface

(6)

been very encouraging as has our work with bimanual micro-incision phacoemul- sification, which I believe has allowed us to develop a refractive lens exchange tech- nique that sets a new standard for safety and efficacy. It is our belief that refractive lens exchange is indeed not only the future of refractive surgery, but in many ways the procedure that will become a mainstay of ophthalmology within the coming decades.

A major task for any editor is delegation, and this book represents the ultimate in

delegation. My reliance on my two partners is evident throughout the book in the au- thorship of the chapters we have produced.

It is my belief that just as refractive lens exchange represents the future of refractive surgery that my partners, Drs. Richard S.

Hoffman and Mark Packer, represent the new generation of leadership in anterior segment ophthalmic surgery.

I. Howard Fine

VIII Preface

(7)

Chapter 1

The Crystalline Lens as a Target

for Refractive Surgery . . . 1 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 2

Refractive Lens Exchange

as a Refractive Surgery Modality . . . 3 Richard S. Hoffman, I. Howard Fine, Mark Packer

Chapter 3

Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery. . 11 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 4

Intraocular Lens Power Calculations:

Correction of Defocus . . . 21 Jack T. Holladay

Chapter 5

IOL Calculations Following

Keratorefractive Surgery. . . 39 Douglas D. Koch, Li Wang

Chapter 6

Correction of Keratometric Astigmatism:

Incisional Surgery . . . 49 Louis D. Nichamin

Chapter 7

STAAR Toric IOL . . . 59 Stephen Bylsma

Chapter 8

Correction of Keratometric Astigmatism:

AcrySof Toric IOL . . . 71 Stephen S. Lane

Chapter 9

Wavefront Technology

of Spherical Aberration . . . 79 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 10

The Eyeonics Crystalens . . . 87 Steven J. Dell

Chapter 11

Presbyopia – Cataract Surgery with Implantation of the Accommodative Posterior

Chamber Lens 1CU. . . 99 Nhung X. Nguyen,

Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, M. Küchle Chapter 12

Synchrony IOL. . . 113 H. Burkhard Dick, Mana Tehrani, Luis G. Vargas, Stephen D. McLeod Chapter 13

Sarfarazi Elliptical Accommodative Intraocular Lens . . . 123 Faezeh Mona Sarfarazi

IX

Contents

(8)

Chapter 14 AcrySof ReSTOR

Pseudo-accommodative IOL . . . 137 Alireza Mirshahi, Evdoxia Terzi, Thomas Kohnen

Chapter 15

The Tecnis Multifocal IOL . . . 145 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 16

Blue-Light–Filtering Intraocular

Lenses . . . 151 Robert J. Cionni

Chapter 17

The Light–Adjustable Lens. . . 161 Richard S. Hoffman, I. Howard Fine, Mark Packer

Chapter 18

Injectable Polymer . . . 173 Sverker Norrby

Chapter 19

The Vision Membrane . . . 187 Lee Nordan, Mike Morris

Chapter 20

Bimanual Ultrasound

Phacoemulsification . . . 193 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 21

Low Ultrasound Microincision

Cataract Surgery . . . 199 Jorge L. Alio, Ahmed Galal,

Jose-Luis Rodriguez Prats, Mohamed Ramzy

Chapter 22

The Infiniti Vision System . . . 209 Mark Packer, Richard S. Hoffman, I. Howard Fine

Chapter 23

The Millennium . . . 213 Rosa Braga-Mele, Terrence Devine, Mark Packer

Chapter 24

The Staar Sonic Wave . . . 221 Richard S. Hoffman, I. Howard Fine, Mark Packer

Chapter 25 AMO Sovereign

with WhiteStar Technology . . . 227 Richard S. Hoffman, I. Howard Fine, Mark Packer

Chapter 26

Refractive Lens Exchange in High Myopia:

Weighing the Risks . . . 233 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman Chapter 27

Conclusion: The Future

of Refractive Lens Surgery . . . 237 Mark Packer, I. Howard Fine,

Richard S. Hoffman

Subject Index . . . 239

X Contents

(9)

Jorge L. Alio, MD,PhD Inst Oftalmologico de Alicante Avda Denia 111

Alicante 03015, Spain

Rosa Braga-Mele, MD, FRCSC 200-245 Danforth Ave.

Toronto, Ontario M4K 1N2, Canada Stephen S. Bylsma, MD

Shepherd Eye Center 1414 E Main Street

Santa Maria, CA 93454, USA Robert J. Cionni, MD Cincinnati Eye Institute 10494 Montgomery Rd Cincinnati, OH 45242, USA Steven J. Dell, MD 1700 S Mopac

Austin, TX 78746-7572, USA H. Burkhard Dick, MD,PhD Department of Ophthalmology Johannes Gutenberg-University Langenbeckstraße 1

55131 Mainz, Germany I. Howard Fine, MD

Department of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University 1550 Oak St. Suite 5

Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA

Richard S. Hoffman, MD Department of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University 1550 Oak St. Suite 5

Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA Jack Holladay, MD 5108 Braeburn Drive

Bellaire, TX 77401-4902, USA John Hunkeler, MD Hunkeler Eye Institute, P.A.

4321 Washington, Suite 6000 Kansas City, MO 64111-5905, USA Douglas Koch, MD

Cullen Eye Institute 6565 Fannin, Suite NC205 Houston, TX 77030, USA Thomas Kohnen, MD

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Department of Ophthalmology Theodor-Stern Kai 7

60590 Frankfurt, Germany Stephen S. Lane, MD Associated Eye Care, Ltd.

232 North Main Street Stillwater, MN 55082, USA Richard L. Lindstrom, MD Minnesota Eye Consultants, P.A.

710 E. 24th Street, Suite 106 Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA

Contributors

XI

(10)

Alireza Mirshahi, MD Recklinghausen Eye Center Erlbruch 34-36

45657 Recklinghausen, Germany Mike Morris, MD

Ocala Eye Surgeons

1500 S Magnolia Ext Ste 106 Ocala, FL 34471, USA Nhung X. Nguyen, MD University Eye Hospital University Erlangen-Nürnberg Schwabachanlage 6

91054 Erlangen, Germany Louis D. Nichamin, MD Laurel Eye Clinic

50 Waterford Pike

Brookeville, PA 15825, USA Lee Nordan, MD

6183 Paseo Del Norte, Ste. 200 Carlsbad, CA 92009, USA

Sverker Norrby, MD Van Swietenlaan 5 9728 NX Groningen The Netherlands

Mark Packer, MD, FACS Department of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University 1550 Oak St. Suite 5

Eugene, Oregon 97401, USA

Faezeh Mona Sarfarazi, MD, FICS President, Shenasa Medical LLC 7461 Mermaid Lane

Carlsbad, CA 92009, USA Evdoxia Terzi, MD

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Department of Ophthalmology Theodor-Stern Kai 7

60590 Frankfurt, Germany

XII Contributors

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

A recent survey of members of the Ameri- can Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery has revealed that 40% of respondents performed at least one refractive lens ex- change (RLE)

RLE with multifocal or accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs) in combination with corneal astigmatic procedures could theoretically address all refractive errors in-

That same year, Ruhswurm used only the +2.0-D toric power STIOL in 37 eyes with a mean preoperative refractive cylinder of 2.7 D and found 48% to achieve UCVA of 20/40 or better, with

However, the results of our studies obtained by different examination methods (near visual acuity with best corrected distance refraction, subjective near point, defocusing and

More circumstantial evidence of the effect of lens extraction on the eye’s internal structures is offered by Grand [13], who studied the risk of a new retinal break or

The IntraLase was set for a 120-µm flap thickness, 8.8-mm diameter, and superior hinge to match the mean flap dimensions produced by the Hansatome with a 160-µm plate and a 9.5-

The phaco chop technique was initially intro- duced by Nagahara, who used the natural fault lines in the lens nucleus to create cracks without creating prior grooves (as presented by

∑ If the pupil is large and the effective optical zone of the cornea is small, then the poten- tial for aberrant rays to reduce the quality of vision exists.. ∑ Similarly if