• Non ci sono risultati.

The
Middle
East
in
the
1970s

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "The
Middle
East
in
the
1970s"

Copied!
17
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

The
Middle
East
in
the
1970s


6.11.2009


Elena
Vezzadini


elenavezz@gmail.com



(2)

The
two
models
of
state
in
the
Middle
 East
and
North
Africa:


•  One
party
military
 regimes:


– Egypt
1952,
 – Syria
1948,

 – Algeria
1962,
 – Tunisia
1957,
 – Libya
1969,



 – Iraq
1958,



– Yemen
aQer
1962


•  Family
based
 governments


– Morocco
from
1956,
 – 
Jordan
from
1921,
 – Saudi
Arabia


(expanding
in
the


Arabic
Peninsula
from
 1902
to
1927),



– and
the
various
states
 of
the
Arabic
Peninsula,
 except
Yemen



(3)
(4)

Anwar
Sadat
1970‐81


•  Infitah
–
the
opening
up


•  Failed
a[empts
to
reduce
 the
welfare
state


•  Strengthening
of
Islamist
 movements,
in
par\cular
 aQer
the
peace
treaty


with
Israel,
following
the
 Camp
David
nego\a\ons
 in
1978


(5)

Hafiz
al‐Asad,
Syrian
president,


1970‐2000


(6)

Lebanon…


•  Lebanon
aQer
the
WW2:
the
Switzerland
of
 the
Middle
East,
and
Beirut
the
most


glamorous
city


•  The
za’im
system


•  First
manifesta\ons
of
sectarian
conflict:
The
 presidency
of
Camille
Chamoun
(1952‐58)


•  The
one
who
saves
the
situa\on:
president
 Fuad
Shihab,
1958‐1964


(7)

Fouad
Shihab
1902‐1973


Camille
Chamoun
 1900‐1987


(8)

Lebanese
civil
war


•  First
phase:
1975‐76:
figh\ng
among
the



Pales\nian
guerrilla
(PLO),
the
Maronite
Phalange
 lead
by
Pierre
Gemayel,
the
Lebanese
Na\onal


Movement
lead
by
Kamal
Jumbla[,
and
Syria


•  Second
Phase:
Israeli
invasion,
1982,
opera\on
 Peace
for
Galilee
=>
The
massacre
of
Shaba
and
 Sha\la


•  Birth
of
the
Hezbollah
movement,
end
of
the
 1980s


(9)

A
map
of
the
Lebanese
civil
war


(10)

Islamic
revival


•  Fight
to
Western
cultural
hegemony


•  Return
‘to
the
origins’


•  Emphasis
on
the
unity
and
totality
of
Islam:


Islam
is
both
religion
and
government


•  Call
for
the
reintegra\on
of
the
Islamic
law


(11)

Iran


•  1921:
coup
of
Reza
Khan
(later
Reza
Shah)
against
the
Qajar
 dynasty
and
its
Bri\sh
supporters


•  Ataturk
modeled
reforms


•  Pillars
of
power:


–  Centraliza\on


–  Control
of
the
army


–  Expanding
body
of
civil
servants
 –  Court
patronage


•  During
the
WW2,
Reza
Khan
sympathies
go
to
Nazi
Europe,
 but
Iran
is
neutral



•  The
country
is
occupied,
Reza
Khan
abdicates
for
his
son
 Muhammad
Reza



(12)

The
tall
Reza
Khan
(1878‐1944)


(13)

Iran
aQer
WW2


•  Parliamentary
a[empt
of
1953
fails;


Muhammad
Reza
start
to
rule
as
an
autocrat


•  No
poli\cal
freedom
between
1953‐79


•  Iran
enters
the
Baghdad
pact
in
1955‐
the
 regime
is
strongly
filo‐US


•  The
regime
is
very
repressive:
the
SAVAK


(14)

Muhammad
Reza
Shah
(1919‐1980)


(15)

Iran
in
the
1960s‐70s


•  “Nasserist”
tendencies
of
the
regime:
the
White
 Revolu\on


– In
1970s,
Iran
was
the
5th
largest
army
in
the
world
 – Land
reforms


– Broadening
of
the
welfare
 – Large
scale
industrializa\on


– BUT
the
White
revolu\on
did
not
make
people
loyal
to
 the
regime


•  =>
Development
of
an
urban
guerrilla
in
1970s
=>


increased
repression


•  The
Islamic
revolu\on
of
1978


(16)

AQer
1978…


•  Large
an\‐shah
coali\on
‐>
emergence
of
 Khomeini


•  ‘Islamiza\on’
of
the
state
structures
‐>
Council
 of
the
Islamic
Republic,
forma\on
of
the


Revolu\onary
Guards,
the
Islamic
Republican
 Party


•  Khomeini
himself
is
vilayat‐I
faqih:
the


supreme
jurist,
who
acts
on
behalf
of
the
 Hidden
Imam


(17)

Map
of
Iran


Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

More precisely, the general layout adopted is made up of two parts mutually interactive: the vehicle model (multibody model and wheel-rail global contact model) and a wear model

At least in theory, the United States is thus currently committed to two forms of nation- building in the Greater Middle East: the comprehensive rebuilding of Afghanistan and

Regional actors have augmented their military capacity since the war on the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) started in 2014 and have reverted to old geopolitical rivalries

Any credible attempt of “stabilising” the Middle East cannot but pass through the deconstruction of these dynamics and a simultaneous process of getting back into history, that

However, others look at the broader context and spectrum of movements and struggles on the ground, and find that international institutions such as the UN, and the world order

To support Iraq through its transition from crisis, a policy that shifts its focus from emergency response to longer-term planning for refugees and IDPs, through national

In April 2018, Prime Minister Saad Hariri represented Lebanon at the international donor conferences CEDRE 3 and Brussels II, declaring to the international community that

The key regional powers are Turkey, Iran, Israel, Qatar, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia and Hezbollah; local actors include the Syrian state, assorted militant or