RenzoLRicca andXinLiu fi erfortopologicalcascadesofvortexknots HOMFLYPTpolynomialisthebestquanti

knots

Renzo L Ricca

^1,2,4

and Xin Liu

³

1

Department of Mathematics and Applications, U. Milano-Bicocca, Via Cozzi 55, I-20125 Milano, Italy

2

BDIC, Beijing U. Technology, 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, Peopleʼs Republic of China

3

BDIC & Inst. Theoretical Physics, Beijing U. Technology, 100 Pingleyuan, Beijing 100124, Peopleʼs Republic of China

E-mail: renzo.ricca@unimib.it and xin.liu@bjut.edu.cn Received 17 January 2017

Accepted for publication 13 March 2017 Published 22 November 2017

Communicated by Philip Boyland Abstract

In this paper we derive and compare numerical sequences obtained by adapted polynomials such as HOMFLYPT, Jones and Alexander-Conway for the topo- logical cascade of vortex torus knots and links that progressively untie by a single reconnection event at a time. Two cases are considered: the alternate sequence of knots and co-oriented links (with positive crossings) and the sequence of two- component links with oppositely oriented components (negative crossings). New recurrence equations are derived and sequences of numerical values are com- puted. In all cases the adapted HOMFLYPT polynomial proves to be the best quanti fier for the topological cascade of torus knots and links.

Keywords: vortex knots and links, torus knots, helicity, HOMFLYPT, structural complexity

(Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal)

1. Adapted knot polynomials for vortex knots

In recent years the present authors have shown that adapted knot polynomials can be usefully employed to study and quantify topological complexity of fluid knots (vortex or magnetic)

4 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

(Liu and Ricca 2012, 2015 ). These adapted polynomials are function of knot type and fluid conserved quantities (such as vortex strength), and represent new powerful invariants of ideal fluid mechanics (Ricca and Liu 2014 ). In 2016, stimulated by the laboratory experiments of Kleckner and Irvine ( 2013 ) on the production and decay of vortex knots in water, and by the work of Shimokawa et al ( 2013 ) on recombinant DNA plasmid reactions, we have applied the adapted the HOMFLYPT polynomial to study the alternate sequence of torus knots

+

( )

T 2, 2 n 1 and torus links T ( 2, 2 n ) (n positive integer) of co-oriented components, when they progressively untie under the assumption of decreasing topological complexity, due to a single reconnection event at a time (see figure 1 ). We found that under certain simplifying assumptions the alternate cascade from T ( 2, 2 n + 1 to ) T ( 2, 2 n ) (as  n 0) can be detected by a unique, monotonically decreasing sequence of HOMFLYPT numerical values (Liu and Ricca 2016 ).

The derivation of the HOMFLYPT polynomial for fluid knots has allowed the inter- pretation of the two standard variables of this polynomial in terms of the average values of writhe and twist, and it has also helped to understand the physical implications of the analytical constraints that reduce the two HOMFLYPT variables to a single variable of other knot polynomials, such as Jones and Alexander-Conway. The scope of this paper is to re- examine the numerical sequence obtained by HOMFLYPT and compare it with the numerical sequences obtained by Jones and Alexander-Conway polynomials. In doing so we shall also consider the case of a cascade of torus links T

o

( 2, 2 n ) , whose components are oppositely oriented and compare the results. This will give us useful indications as to which polynomial is best suited to detect and quantify topological cascade processes. The material is arranged as follows. In section 2 we brie fly recall the results obtained by HOMFLYPT for the sequence of figure 1. In section 3 we derive the expressions of Jones and Alexander-Conway polynomial for the sequence above and compute the numerical values. We then apply HOMFLYPT to the case of links with oppositely-oriented components (section 4 ), compute the results and compare these to the results obtained by deriving Jones and Alexander-Conway polynomials from HOMFLYPT (section 5 ). Conclusions are drawn in the final section.

2. HOMFLYPT polynomial for the alternate sequence of knots and co-oriented links

In (Liu and Ricca 2016 ) we considered the topological cascade sequence of torus knots and links shown in figure 1 under the following assumptions:

Figure 1.

Top: topological cascade of torus knots and co-oriented links by single

reconnection events. Bottom: monotonically decreasing sequence of corresponding

HOMFLYPT numerical values.

By applying the standard HOMFLYPT skein relations, given by

ð1Þ

ð2Þ in the independent variables a and z, we can compute the polynomial P

_K

for any given knot K.

Explicit computations of some basic examples are given in (Liu and Ricca 2015 ). By applying equations ( 1 )–( 2 ) to the ordered set { ( T 2, n )} one can prove the following general result (Liu and Ricca 2016 ).

Theorem (Liu and Ricca 2016). Let us consider the ordered set { ( T 2, n )} (n integer,

 )

n 2 of torus knots and links. The HOMFLYPT polynomial P

_T(2,n)

of T ( 2, n ) ( n  4 is ) given by

= - -

+ + - -

+

- - -

- -

- - -

- -

( )

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

P k k

a k k P k k

a k k P , 3

T n

n n

n T

n n

n T

2,

2 2

3 1 2,3

3 3

2 1 2,2

where P

T 2,3( )

= 2 a

^-2

+ a z

^-2 2

- a

^-4

and P

T 2,2( )

= a z

^-1

+ ( a

^-1

- a

^-3

) z

^-1

.

Initial values are given by the HOMFLYPT computation of the 2-component unlink unknot T 2, 0 ( ) , unknot T 2, 1 ( ) , Hopf link T 2, 2 ( ) and trefoil knot T 2, 3 ( ) . In general, for any physical knot /link K of writhe Wr, twist Tw and unit strength (flux of vorticity), we have (Liu and Ricca 2015 )

=

^lt

=

^lw

( )

a e

^Tw

, k e

^{2 Wr}

, 4

with z = - k k

^-1

and uncertainty (probability) factors l l Î {

w

,

t

} ( 0, 1 . Consistently with ) the above assumptions, let l

_w

= l

_t

= 1 2 (equivalent to an equi-distribution of uncertainty of writhe and twist values ) and Wr = Tw = + 1 2 (admissible values of writhe and twist of standardly embedded positive torus knots (Oberti and Ricca 2016 ). Hence, the sequence of numerical values shown in figure 1 and reproduced in the table of figure 3 is obtained by taking

= = ( )

a e

^{1 4}

, k e

^{1 2}

. 5

Note that a different choice of l

_w

and l

_t

values would simply produce a vertical shift of the

numerical sequence in the plot.

3. Jones and Alexander-Conway polynomials for the alternate sequence of knots and co-oriented links

3.1. Jones polynomial V

T ð2;nÞ

The HOMFLYPT polynomial P

_K

degenerates to the Jones polynomial V

_K

when we take

t t t

=

^-

= -

^-

= -

^-

( )

a

¹

, z k k

^{1 12 12}

, 6

where τ is the new polynomial variable. The standard Jones polynomial is indeed a single- variable polynomial obtained by combining the two HOMFLYPT variables according to

=

ak

²

1 , i.e. a = k

^-2

. For physical knots this amounts to a framing prescription on the admissible values of writhe (through z) and twist (through a), given by

l l l l

=  = - ( =

w t

) ( )

ak

²

1 Tw 4 Wr . 7

If we take l = 1 ^{, then} Tw = - 4 Wr , that for Wr = 1 2 we have Tw = - 2 , that represents a rather peculiar constraint for fluid systems. In any case, by taking( 6 ) the skein relations of the Jones polynomial reduce to

ð8Þ

ð9Þ Explicit computations of some basic examples are given in (Liu and Ricca 2012 ). By substituting the positions ( 6 ) into ( 3 ), and after some straightforward algebra, we obtain the Jones polynomial V

_T(2,n)

for the ordered set { ( T 2, n )} ( n  4 : )

t t

t t

t t

t t

= + -

+ + + -

+

- - -

-

- - -

-

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

V 1 V 1 V

, 10

T n

n n n

T

n n n

2, T

4 1 2

2,3

3 7 2 1

2,2

3 2

1 2 1

2 1 2

1 2

1 2 1

2 1 2

with V

_{T 2,3( )}

= + t t

³

- t

⁴

and V

T 2,2( )

= - t - t

1

2 5

2

. 3.2. Numerical values for the sequence of V

T ð2;nÞ

According to Ricca and Liu ( 2014 ) (section 6, equation ( 16 )) it is reasonable to take

t = e .

^-1

( 11 )

Hence, by ( 10 ) and the position above we have

= + -

+ + + -

+

- + - - +

-

- - - - -

-

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

V e e

e e V e e

e e V

1 1

, 12

T n

n n n

T

n n n

2, T

4 1 2

2,3

3 7 2 1

2,2

3 2

1 2 1

2 1 2

1 2

1 2 1

2 1 2

with

=

^-

+

^-

-

^-

= -

^-

-

^-

( )

( ) ( )

V

T 2,3

e

1

e

3

e

4

, V

T

e e , 13

2,2

1 2

5 2

and (Ricca and Liu ( 2014 ), section 6, equation ( 17 ))

= - ( +

^-

) ( )

( )

V

T 2,0

e

¹₂

1 e

1

. 14

The numerical values of V

T₍2,10₎

, ¼ , V

T₍2,0₎

are shown in the table of figure 3. As we see, the

Jones sequence is, in absolute values, a monotonically growing sequence as n  0. In terms

of signed numbers we actually have two distinct sequences, one of positive values for knots

and one of negative values for two-component links, both growing with decreasing values

of n.

ð16Þ

ð17Þ As above, by substituting the positions ( 15 ) into ( 3 ), and after some straightforward algebra, we obtain the Alexander-Conway polynomial D

T₍2,n₎

for the ordered set { ( T 2, n )} ( n  4 : )

D = + -

+ D + + -

+ D

- - -

- - -

- - - -

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

t t

t t

t t

t t

1 1

, 18

T n

n

T

n 2, T

1

2,3

2

2,2

n 2 n n n

2 2

2 1

2 1 2

3

2 3

2 1

2 1 2

where D

T 2,3_{( )}

= t + t

^-1

- 1 and D

_{T 2,2( )}

= t

¹²

- t

^-12

. 3.4. Numerical values for the sequence of Δ

T ð2;nÞ

We take

=

^-

( )

t e .

¹

19

Hence, by ( 18 ) and the position above, we have

D = + -

+ D + + -

+ D

- -

-

- -

-

- - - -

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

e e

e e

e e

e e

1 1

, 20

T n

n

T

n 2, T

1

2,3

2

2,2

n 2 n n n

2 2

2 1

2 1

2

3

2 3

2 1

2 1

2

with

D

T₍2,3₎

= e

^-1

+ - e 1, D

T_{( )}

= e

^-

- e , D

T_{( )}

= 0. ( 21 )

2,2 2,0

1

2 1

2

The numerical values of D

T₍2,10₎

, ¼ D ,

T₍2,0₎

are shown in the table of figure 3. As we see the Alexander-Conway sequence is, in absolute values, a monotonically decreasing sequence as



n 0. Similarly to Jones, in terms of signed numbers we actually have two distinct sequences, one of positive values for knots and one of negative values for two-component links, both decreasing with decreasing values of n.

4. HOMFLYPT polynomial for the sequence of links with oppositely oriented components

In the case of torus links with oppositely oriented components the family { ( T 2, n )} reduces to the ordered set { ( T

o

2, 2 n )} . By direct application of the HOMFLYPT skein relations ( 1 )–( 2 ) we can see (figure 2 ) that at every reduction step we have the production of a torus link of lower topological complexity, and of an unknot. Hence, we can prove the following result in full generality.

Lemma. Let us consider the ordered set of oppositely oriented torus links { ( T

o

2, 2 n )} (n

integer, n  ) 1 . The HOMFLYPT polynomial P

T_o(2,2n)

is given by

= -

+ -

- ( )

( )

P a

az a a

a az

1 1

1 . 22

T n n

n 2,2

2

2 2

2

o

Proof. Let us apply the skein relations ( 1 )–( 2 ) to the top diagram of figure 2. We have

-

^- +

= ( )

( ) ( )

aP

T 2,2n

a P

1 T n

z, 23

2,2 2

o o

that is

= -

+

( )

( ) ( )

P

T 2,2n 2

a P

2 T n

az. 24

o o2,2

By applying the same relation recursively, we have

=

_-

- ( )

( ) ( ( ))

a P

2 T n

a P

T n

a z, 25

2,2 4

2,2 1 3

o o

= -

- -

 ( )

( ( )) ( ( ))

a P a P a z,

26

T n T n

4 2,2 1 6

2,2 2 5

o o

= -

- + - + - +

( )

( )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

a

ⁿ

P

T

a

n

P a z. 27

T n

2 1 2

2,2 2 1 4

2,0 2 1 3

o o

By substituting the l.h.s. term of equation ( 25 ) into the r.h.s. of ( 24 ) and by doing the same for the subsequent terms in the equations above, we obtain



= - + + + +

= - -

-

+ - +

+ +

(  )

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

P a P az a a a

a P az a

a n

1 1

1 1 . 28

T n n

T n

n T

n

2,2 2 2 1 4

2,0 2 4 2

2 2 2,0

2 1

2

o o

o

( )

P

_{T 2,0o}

denotes the polynomial of a disjoint union of two unknots given by Liu and Ricca ( 2015 ) section 4.1, equation (4.2):

d

= -

-

=

( )

( )

P a a

z . 29

T 2,0

1

o

Figure 2.

Application of the skein relation (2) to a portion of torus knot/link diagram.

The over-crossing (top diagram, encircled region) is converted to the under-crossing

(left diagrams) and the non-crossing (right diagrams). Double arrows denote

topological equivalence.

Thus, we have

d d

= + -

( )

( )

P a 1 a

, 30

T n n

n

2,2 2 2

o

or, equivalently

= -

+ -

( )

-

P a

az a a

a az

1 1

1 ,

T n n

n 2,2

2

2 2

2

o

that proves the Lemma. +

4.1. Numerical values for the sequence of P

Toð2;nÞ

Without loss of generality we can take l

_w

= l

_t

= 1 2 and Wr = Tw = - 1 2 (admissible values of writhe and twist of standardly embedded negative torus links (Oberti and Ricca 2016 ). Hence, we have

=

^-

=

^-

( )

k e

^{1 2}

, a e

^{1 4}

, 31

and according to ( 28 ), we have numerically:

d

= = = - = -

^-

= ( )

a k z a a

0.78, 0.61, 1.04, z 0.48. 32

1

Hence, for HOMFLYPT we have

d d

= + -

= ´ + -

( )

( )

P a 1 a

0.78 0.48 1 0.78

0.48 . 33

T n n

n

n

n

2,2 2 2

2 2

o

The numerical values of P

T_o(2,10)

, ¼ , P

T_o(2,0)

are shown in the table of figure 3. For oppositely oriented components (negative crossings) the sequence decreases with decreasing values of n.

Figure 3.

Numerical values of HOMFLYPT, Jones and Alexander-Conway adapted

polynomials for the sequence T ( 2, 10 ) - T ( 2, 0 and ) T

o

( 2, 10 ) - T

o

( 2, 0 ) . Note that

Wr = 1 2 for co-oriented link components (with positive crossings) and Wr = - 1 2

for oppositely oriented link components (with negative crossings).

This behavior is consistent with that obtained for the alternate sequence of torus knots and co- oriented links.

5. Jones and Alexander-Conway polynomials for the sequence of links with oppositely-oriented components

5.1. Jones polynomial V

Toð2;nÞ

As mentioned in section 3.1 HOMFLYPT degenerates to Jones by taking equations ( 6 ). Thus, equation ( 22 ) reduces to



t t t t t t

= - + - - - t

-

- - - - -

( ) ( )

-

( ) ( )

( )

V 1 n

1 1 . 34

T n n

n

2,2 2 2

2

o

1

2 1

2 1

2 3

2

5.2. Numerical values for the sequence of V

Toð2;nÞ

As above, we can take the same uncertainty value for Jones and the average writhe

= -

Wr 1 2 for standardly embedded negative torus links; then, we have t = e . By sub- stituting this value into ( 34 ), we have



= - + - - -

-

- - - - -

( ) ( )

-

( ) ( )

( )

V e e e e e e

e n

1

1 1 , 35

T n n n

2,2 2 2

2

o

1 2

1 2

1 2

3 2

with (Ricca and Liu ( 2014 ), equation (6))

= -

^-

- ( )

( )

V

T 2,0o

e e . 36

1

2 1

2

The numerical values of V

T_o(2,10)

, ¼ , V

T_o(2,0)

are shown in the table of figure 3. The Jones sequence is given by negative numbers that decrease with decreasing values of n.

5.3. Alexander-Conway polynomial Δ

Toð2;nÞ

As in section 3.3 HOMFLYPT degenerates to Alexander-Conway by the positions ( 15 ).

Thus, equation ( 28 ) degenerates to



D

To₍2,2n₎

= 0 " n 1. ( 37 )

Hence, in this case we have no useful information from D

_To(2,n)

.

6. Concluding remarks

In this paper we have derived and compared the numerical sequences obtained by HOM-

FLYPT, Jones and Alexander-Conway adapted polynomials for the topological cascade of

torus knots and links that progressively untie by a single reconnection event at a time. For this

we considered two cases: the first case is given by the alternate sequence of knots and co-

oriented links (with positive crossings) considered in (Liu and Ricca 2016 ), the second case is

given by the sequence of two-component links with oppositely oriented components (nega-

tive crossings ). In the first case contrary to HOMFLYPT, that provides a monotonically

decreasing sequence of numerical values for decreasing complexity, both Jones and Alex-

ander-Conway give distinct sequences of positive and negative numbers —respectively for

knots and links. In absolute values both sequences show uniform, monotonic behavior, that is

increasing for Jones and decreasing for Alexander-Conway. It is also interesting to compare

derived a new, general recurrence equation for HOMFLYPT and examined the numerical sequences of all polynomials. In this case too the HOMFLYPT sequence has been found to be uniformly monotonically decreasing with decreasing complexity over the whole cascade.

Jones gives a decreasing sequence, whereas Alexander-Conway does not provide any useful information. In summary, HOMFLYPT provides a consistent, reliable and robust numerical information, proving to be the best quanti fier to detect and quantify topological complexity for cascades of vortex torus knots and links. We hope to be able to extend this approach to more complex families of knots and links relevant to physical processes characterized by topological transitions. Work is in progress to apply this approach to analyze data from numerical simulations of super fluid vortex tangles.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), Grant No.

11572005, is kindly acknowledged. XL wishes to express his gratitude to the Haiju Project Fellowship (Beijing).

ORCID iDs

Renzo L Ricca https: //orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-4042

References

Kleckner D and Irvine W T M 2013 Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices Nat. Phys. 9 253–8 Laing C E, Ricca R L and Sumners D W L 2015 Conservation of writhe helicity under anti-parallel

reconnection Sci. Rep. 5 9224

Liu X and Ricca R L 2012 The Jones polynomial for fluid knots from helicity J. Phys. A: Math. &

Theor. 45 205501

Liu X and Ricca R L 2015 On the derivation of the HOMFLYPT polynomial invariant for fluid knots J. Fluid Mech. 773 34–48

Liu X and Ricca R L 2016 Knots cascade detected by a monotonically decreasing sequence of values Sci. Rep. 6 24118

Oberti C and Ricca R L 2016 On torus knots and unknots J. Knot Theory & Its Ramif 25 1650036 Ricca R L and Liu X 2014 The Jones polynomial as a new invariant of topological fluid dynamics Fluid

Dyn. Res. 46 061412

Shimokawa K, Isihara K, Grainge I, Sherratt D J and Vazquez M 2013 FtsK-dependent XerCD-dif

recombination unlinks replication catenanes in a stepwise manner PNAS USA 110 20906–11