• Non ci sono risultati.

RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI"

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

RIFERIMENTI BIBLIOGRAFICI

Aghion P., Bolton P. (1987), “Contracts as barriers to entry”, Amer. Econom. Rev. 77: 388 - 401

Allen R. C. (1983), “Collective invention”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 4: 1 - 24

Arundel A. (1997), “Why Innovation Measurement Matters”, Innovation Measurement and Policies

(Arundel A., Garrelfs R.): 94 - 197

Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. (2001), “Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities”, Information Systems Journal 11: 305 - 320

Besen S. M., Raskind L. J. (1991), “An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property”, Journal of Econimic Perspectives 5: 3 - 27

Blind K., Edler J., Friedewald M. (2004), Software Patents – An Empirical Analysis from an

Economic Perspective

Bonaccorsi A., Giannangeli S., Rossi C. (2006), “Entry Strategies Under Competitive Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry”, Management Science 52: 1085 - 1098

Bonaccorsi A, Rossi C. (2006), “Motivations to take part in the open source movement”,

Knowledge, Technology & Policy – Winter 2006, Vol. 18, N. 4: 40 - 64

Chesbrough H. (2003), Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from

technology

Coombs R., Narandren P., Richards A. (1996), “A literature-based innovation output indicator”,

Research Policy 25: 403 – 413

Dahlander L. (2005), “Appropriation and appropriability in open source software”, International

(2)

Dahlander L. (2005), Commercializing free and open source software: The emergence of for-profit

interests in a “free” world

Dahlander L. (2006), Managing Beyond Firm Boundaries: Leveraging User Innovation Networks

Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. (2005), “Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms”, Research Policy 34: 481 - 493

Dahlander L., McKelvey M. (2005), “Who is not developing open source software? Non-users, users, and developers”, Econ. Innov. New Techn. 14: 617 - 635

Dahlander L., Wallin M. W. (2006), A man on the inside: unlocking communities as complementary

assets

Dahlin K. B., Behrens D. M. (2005), “When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness”, Research Policy 34: 717 - 737

Edwards K. L., Gordon T. J. (1984), Characterisation of innovations introduced on the US market

since 1982

Farrell J. (1989), “Standardization and Intellectual Property”, Jurimetrics Journal: 35 - 50

Fleiss J. L., Statistical Methods for rates and proportions (II ed., cap. 13): 212 - 236

Foster R. N. (1986), Innovation, the attacker’s advantage

Freeman C. (1982), The Economics of Industrial Innovation

Freeman C. (1991), “Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues”, Research Policy 20: 499 - 514

Garcia R., Calantone R. (2002), “A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management

(3)

Gomes-Casseres B. (1997), The Alliance Revolution. The New Shape of Business Rivalry

Granstrand O. (2004), “Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights”, The Oxford Handbook of

Innovation (Fagerberg J., Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R.: cap. 10): 266 – 290

Hars A., Ou S. (2002), “Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Project”,

International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6: 25 - 39

Hawkins R. E. (2004), “The economics of the open source software for a competitive firm. Why give it away for free?”, Netnomics 6: 103 - 117

Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. (2003), “Motivation of Software Developers in Open Soruce Projects: An Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel”, Research Policy 32: 1159 - 1177

Himanen P. (2001), The Hacker Ethic and the Spirit of the Information Age

Hipp C., Grupp H. (2005), “Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies”, Research Policy 34: 517 – 535

Hopkins M. M., Nightingale P. (2006), “Strategic risk management using complementary assets: Organizational capabilities and the commercialization of human genetic testing in the UK”,

Research Policy 35: 355 - 374

Jaffe A. B. (1999), “The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process”, National Bureau of Economic Research

Jordan G., Segelod E. (2002), Software Innovativeness: Knowledge Acquisition, External Linkages

and Firm Developmental Processes

Kash D. E., Kingston W. (2001), “Patents in a World of Complex Technologies”, Science and

Public Policy February 28: 11 - 22

(4)

Kleinschmidt E. J., Cooper R. G. (1991), “The impact of product innovativeness on performaance”,

Journal of Product Innovation Management 8: 240 – 251

Klincewicz K. (2005), Innovativeness of open source software projects

Kline S., Rosengerg N. (1986), “An overview of innovation”, The positive sum strategy: harnessing

technology for economic growth: 275 - 306

Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. (2003), “How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance”, Research Policy 32: 923 - 943

Lakhani K. R., Wolf R. G. (2003), “Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects”, MIT Sloan School of Management: 4425 - 03

Landenna G., Marasini D., Ferrari P. (1998), La verifica di ipotesi statistiche

Lee G. K., Cole R. E. (2003), “From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development”, Organization Science 14: 633 - 649

Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002), “Some simple economics of open source”, J. Indust. Econom. 50: 197 - 234

Levy S. (1984), Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution

Lin Y. (2006), “Collaboration between the FLOSS community and corporations”, Knowledge,

Technology & Policy – Winter 2006, Vol. 18, N. 4: 86 - 100

Lundval B. A. (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and

Interactive Learning

Malerba F. (2003), Economia dell’innovazione

Mazzoleni R., Nelson (1998), “The Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protections: a Contribution to the Current Debate”, Research Policy 27: 273 - 284

(5)

Miles I. (1995), Services Innovation: Statistical and Conceptual Issues

Murillo G. (1998), “Institutional Development in the Software Industry: Intellectual Property Protection”, UMI Dissertation Abstract

Nalley E. T. (2000), “Intellectual Property in the Computer Programs”, Business Horizons 43: 43 - 51

Nordhaus W. D. (1969), Invention, Growth and Welfare

OECD (Parigi, 1992), The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system,

technology and producticity – the challenge for economic policy: 303 - 314

OECD (Frascati, 2002), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed

Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development

O’Mahony S. (2003), “Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work”, Research Policy 32: 1179 - 1198

Pavitt K. (1984), “Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”,

Research Policy 13: 343 - 373

Preissl B. (1998), “Innovation im Dienstleistungssektor”, DIW Wochenbericht 65: 519 - 526

Raymond E. (2000), The Cathedral and the Bazaar

Rothwell R., Gardiner P. (1988), “Reinnovation and robust designs: producer and user benefits”,

Journal of Marketing Management 3: 372 - 387

Sheskin D. (2004), Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures

(6)

Smith K. (2004), “Measuring Innovation”, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Fagerberg J.,

Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R.: cap. 6): 148 – 177

Soete L., Miozzo M. (1989), Trade and Development in Services: A Technological Perspective

Sundbo J. (1997), “Management of innovation in services”, The Service Industry Journal 17: 432 - 455

Tuomi I. (2005), “The Future of Open Source”, How Open is the Future? (Wynants M., Cornelis

J.): 429 - 459

Utterback J. M. (1996), “Mastering the dynamics of innovation”, Harvard Business School Press

Utterback J. M., Abernathy W. J. (1975), A dynamic model of process and product innovation: 639 - 656

Verganti R., Calderini M., Garrone P., Calmieri S. (2004), “L’impresa dell’innovazione”, Gestione

d’impresa e innovazione (Il Sole 24 ORE)

Von Hippel E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation

von Hippel E., von Krogh G. (2003), “Open source software and the ‘private-collective’ innovation model: Issues for organization science”, Organization Science 14: 209 - 223

Weber S. (2004), The Success of Open Source

Wenger E., Snyder W. M. (2000), “Communities of practice: The organizational frontier”, Harvard

Business Review 78: 139 - 145

Wichmann T. (2002), “Firms’ open source activities: Motivations and policy implications”, Final

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

La maggior parte delle regioni russe sono sussidiate dal governo federale e non ritengono vantaggioso un approccio pratico a lungo termine, riguardo allo

La terza ed ultima parte evidenzia, attraverso una serie di esempi e relativa analisi, come alcuni noti costumisti in epoca contemporanea abbiano ripreso e rivisitato

all’idea che il corpo “addormentato” del leader possa essere risvegliato in futuro per tornare a guidare il Paese in caso di bisogno, elevandolo a figura mitica. Nel caso

The relationship between public support for mitigation policies under the Paris Agreement and a country’s NDC ambition level is not strengthened by controlling for the effects of

A change in eciency does not change the post-tax factor income distribution under pro-capital or income egalitarian policies and shifts relatively more post-tax factor income to

È in questo contesto in cui era forte il tentativo di uniformare e di emancipare la società del nascente Regno d’Italia, che venne emanato il Codice Pisanelli del 1865 che come

Schlag Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50016 San Domenico di Fiesole FI Italy

Utilizzando indici più approfonditi, vertendo sull’importanza dell’innovazione per la crescita economica e la competitività regionale, la tesi analizzerà i diversi