• Non ci sono risultati.

Spleen stiffness can be employed to assess the efficacy of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in relieving portal hypertension

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Spleen stiffness can be employed to assess the efficacy of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in relieving portal hypertension"

Copied!
3
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

AnnalsofHepatology19(2020)691–693

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Annals

of

Hepatology

j o ur na l h o me p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . e s / a n n a l s o f h e p a t o l o g y

Brief

Report

Spleen

stiffness

can

be

employed

to

assess

the

efficacy

of

spontaneous

portosystemic

shunts

in

relieving

portal

hypertension

Mauro

Giuffrè

a,b,∗

,

Giorgio

Bedogni

b

,

Cristiana

Abazia

c

,

Flora

Masutti

c

,

Claudio

Tiribelli

b

,

Lory

Saveria

Crocè

a,b,c

aDepartmentofMedical,SurgicalandHealthSciences,UniversityofTrieste,Trieste,Italy bItalianLiverFoundation,Basovizza(Trieste),Italy

cLiverClinic,AziendaSanitariaUniversitariaGiuliano-Isontina,CattinaraHospital,Trieste,Italy

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received21June2020 Accepted18July2020 Availableonline20August2020

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Introduction:Spleenstiffness(SS)hasbeenfoundtomirrordynamicchangesinportalpressureafter

tran-sjugularintrahepaticportosystemicshunt(TIPS)placement.However,thereisnodataavailableregarding

SSinpatientswithspontaneousportosystemicshunting(SPSS),especiallyinregardstopredictionof

hepaticdecompensation.

Methods:WeretrospectivelyselectedpatientswithconfirmedSPSSandesophagealvarices(EVs)at

endo-scopicexamination,andrecordedanydecompensatingevent(i.e.,varicealhemorrhage,overthepatic

encephalopathy,refractoryascites,spontaneousbacterialperitonitis,hepatorenalsyndrome)inthefirst

twelvemonthsfollowingliverandspleenelastography.

Results:Thepatientswhopresenteddecompensating eventsshowed lowerplateletcount(94.5 vs.

121.5g/L,p<0.001),higherSS(44vs.30kPa,p<0.001),higherprobabilityofEVsaccordingtoSS(77

vs.2%,p<0.001),andhigherspleendiameter(14vs.12cm,p=0.043).Theyalsoshowedahigher

preva-lenceofsplenorenalshunts(66.7vs.31.2%),andasignificantlywiderSPSSmajordiameter(14.5vs.8mm,

p<0.001).

Conclusion:SScouldpredictSPSSefficacyinrelievingportalpressure,andcouldpredictdecompensating

eventsinpatientswithSPSS.

©2020Fundaci ´onCl´ınicaM ´edicaSur,A.C.PublishedbyElsevierEspa ˜na,S.L.U.Thisisanopenaccess

articleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction

Portal Hypertension (PH), defined as a portal pressure >10−12mmHg, is a common and critical complication of liver cirrhosis,whichdefinesthetransitiontoastageofliverdisease characterizedbyasignificantreducedlifeexpectancyandqualityof life.[1]Generally,PHisassociatedwithincreasedriskofesophageal varices,(EVs)anddecompensatingevents(suchasascites,variceal haemorrhage,andhepaticencephalopathy)[2].Therefore, appro-priatePHquantificationiscrucialandspleenelastographyseems toaddressthisunmetclinicalneed.Despiteitsprovencorrelation withtheinvasivegoldstandardofhepaticvenouspressure gra-dient(HVPG)[3],spleenstiffness(SS)hasbeenfoundtomirror dynamicchangesinportalpressureaftertransjugularintrahepatic portosystemicshunt(TIPS)placement[4,5].

∗ Correspondingauthorat:DipartimentodiScienzeMediche,Chirurgicheedella Salute,UniversitàdiTrieste,StradadiFiume,447,34149Trieste(TS),Italy.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](M.Giuffrè).

ThisledustoinvestigatetheroleofSSintheparaphysiological versionofTIPS(i.e.,spontaneousportosystemicshunts,SPSS).In particular,weaimedtodetermineifSScouldhavepredictedthe efficacyofSPSSinrelievingportalpressure,especiallyconsidering thefactthatagroupofpatientswithesophagealvarices(EVs)and withoutcurrent non-selective beta-blockers(NSBB) administra-tionwerenotcorrectlyclassifiedbythespleenstiffnessprobability index,amathematicaldevicethatwehadpreviouslydevelopedin asampleof210cirrhoticpatients[6].Indetail,thisindexprovidesa givenprobabilityofhavingEVsbasedontheindividualvalueofSS, whichcouldalsobeemployedasanon-invasivesurrogateof clin-icallysignificantportalhypertension(CSPH).Surprisingly,inthis groupofpatientstheSSwaseitherloworcomparabletothoseof healthyindividuals[7,8]despitethepresenceofEVsatendoscopy. OfnoticeallpresentedSPSS.

2. Methods

Spleen and Liver Stiffness as well as the laboratory tests reportedin Table 1were performed,as perthe standard clini-https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2020.07.004

(2)

692 M.Giuffrèetal./AnnalsofHepatology19(2020)691–693

Table1

Patientswerestratifiedintwogroupsaccordingtothedevelopmentofdecompensatingeventsintwogroups.Variablearepresentedasabsolutenumber(relativepercentage) ormedian(Quartile1;Quartile3).IntergroupdifferenceswereassessedtroughMann-WhitneyUtestfornumericalvariablesandChi-SquareTestforordinalvariable.SPSS: spontaneousportosystemicshunt;AST(aspartateaminotransferase);ALT(alanineaminotransferase);ALP(alkalinephosphatase);LS(liverstiffness);SS(spleenstiffness); EVs(esophagealvarices).

Total n=52 Patientswithout DecompensatingEvents n=22 Patientswith Decompensating Events N=30 Significance Gender,Male (%) 30(57.7) 14(63.6) 16(53.3) NS Age,years 65(62;68) 65.5(63;69) 64.5(62;67) NS Etiology,N (%) Alcohol Abuse Viral Hepatitis 29(55.8)23(44.2) 15(68.2)7(31.8) 14(46.7) 16(53.3) TypeofSPSS, N(%) Paraumbilical Splenorenal 25(48.1)27(51.9) 15(68.2)7(31.2) 10(33.3) 20(66.7) P=0.013 Cramer’sPhi =0.345 AST(IU/L) 27(23;29.5) 28.5(24.25;31.75) 26(23;28.75) NS ALT(IU/L) 22(20;24) 21.5(19.25;23.5) 22(20;30.75) NS GGT(IU/L) 27(26;39) 27(23.75;36.75) 27.5(26;39) NS ALP(IU/L) 82(80;91) 81.5(80;90) 82(80;97.75) NS TotalBilirubin (mg/dL) 2(1.75;2.20) 1.95(1.60;2.20) 2.04(1.70;2.32) NS Albumin (g/dL) 3.2(2.9;3.4) 3.4(3;3.6) 3.3(2.9;3.6) NS Platelet(g/L) 110(92.75;121) 121.5(115.75;123.75) 94.5(78.25;100) P<0.001 LS(kPa) 42(40;46) 40.5(32.5;43) 45(40.25;47.75) p=0.003 Probabilityof EVsaccording toLS(%) 74(73;75) 73(69;74) 75(74;77) P=0.006 SS(kPa) 39.5(30;45) 30(26.5;32.75) 44(41.25;55) p<0.001 Probabilityof EVsaccording toSS(%) 56(4;81) 2(0.5;11) 77(66;94) p<0.001 SPSS Diameter (mm) 8(11;16) 8(7;10) 14.5(10.25;19) p<0.001 Spleen Diameter(cm) 13(12;15) 12(12;14) 14(12;16) p=0.043

calpractice,onpatientswhowereevaluatedbytheLiverClinic

between January 2018 and December 2018. The methodology

behindelastographymeasurementwasalreadyexplainedindetail

elsewhere[6,8,9].

WeretrospectivelyselectedpatientswithconfirmedSPSSand EVsatendoscopicexamination,andrecordedany decompensat-ingevent(i.e.,varicealhemorrhage,overthepaticencephalopathy, refractoryascites,spontaneousbacterialperitonitis,hepatorenal syndrome)inthefirsttwelvemonthsfollowingelastography exam-ination.

3. Results

Patientswerestratifiedintwogroupsbasedonthedevelopment of decompensatingevents; theircharacteristicsare reported in Table1.Patientswerepredominantlymale(57.5%),withamedian ageof65(62;68)years.Theetiologyofliverdiseasewasalcohol abusein55.8%ofpatientsandvirus-relatedin44.2%ofpatients. Thepatientswhopresenteddecompensatingeventsshowedlower plateletcount(94.5vs.121.5g/L,p<0.001),higherSS(44vs.30kPa, p<0.001), higherprobability ofEVs accordingtoSS (77vs. 2%, p<0.001),and higher spleen diameter(14 vs.12cm, p=0.043). Theyalsoshowedahigherprevalenceofsplenorenalshunts(66.7 vs.31.2%),andasignificantlywiderSPSSmajordiameter(14.5vs. 8mm,p<0.001).

4. Discussion

TheimportanceofthesefindingsresidesinthefactthatSPSS canbeinterpretedasaphysiologicalattemptofthehumanbodyto decompresstheportalvenoussystem.Unfortunately,SPSSoften doesnotallowadequatereductionofportalpressure,whichcan presentelevatedvaluedespitethepresenceofmassiveSPSS[10]. Whatifwecouldemployasimpleand non-invasivemethodto checkifSPSSareeffectivelyaccomplishingtheirpurposeof reduc-ingtheportalpressure?Theanswertothisquestionyieldshigh relevance(giventhefactthatSPSSarerelativelycommoninliver cirrhosis and that theclinical evolution of cirrhoticpatients is extremelyvariable)andcouldfindapossibleanswerinSS, espe-cially because SS hasalready been reportedto predict hepatic decompensation[11].

Theseresults,albeitinteresting,mustbetakenwithcautiondue totherelativelylownumerosityofthesamplesizeandthepossible limitationsrelatedtoselectionbias.Whilewaitingfortheessential externalvalidation,westronglybelievethatSSmaybevaluablein theeverydayclinicalevaluationofcirrhoticpatients.

Authors’contributions

(3)

M.Giuffrèetal./AnnalsofHepatology19(2020)691–693 693

F.M.,C.T.andL.S.C.wereinvolvedinthewritingtheoriginaldraft andapprovingthefinalversionofthemanuscript.

Fundingstatement

Theauthorsreceivednospecificfundingforthiswork.

Conflictofinterest

Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.

References

[1]D’AmicoG,Garcia-TsaoG,PagliaroL.Naturalhistoryandprognostic indica-torsofsurvivalincirrhosis:asystematicreviewof118studies.JHepatol 2006;44:217–31,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013.

[2]NorthItalianEndoscopicClubfortheStudyandTreatmentofEsophageal Varices.Predictionofthefirstvaricealhemorrhageinpatientswith cirrho-sisoftheliverandesophagealvarices.NEnglJMed1988;319:983–9,http:// dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198810133191505.

[3]RavaioliF,ColecchiaA,DajtiE,MarascoG,AlemanniLV,TamèM,etal.Spleen stiffnessmirrorschangesinportalhypertensionaftersuccessfulinterferon-free therapyinchronic-hepatitisCviruspatients.WorldJHepatol2018;27:731–42,

http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v10.i10.731.

[4]BuechterM,MankaP,TheysohnJM,ReinboldtM,CanbayA,KahramanA.Spleen stiffnessispositivelycorrelatedwithHVPGanddecreasessignificantlyafter TIPSimplantation.DigLiverDis2018;50:54–60,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dld.2017.09.138.

[5]RanH-T,YeX-P,ZhengY-Y,ZhangD-Z,WangZ-G,ChenJ,etal.Spleenstiffness andsplenoportalvenousflow:assessmentbeforeandaftertransjugular intra-hepaticportosystemicshuntplacement.JUltrasoundMed2013;32(2):221–8,

http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.2013.32.2.221.PublishedOnlineFirst. [6]GiuffrèM,MacorD,MasuttiF,AbaziaC,TinèF, BedogniG,etal. Spleen

StiffnessProbabilityIndex(SSPI):asimpleandaccuratemethodtodetect esophagealvaricesinpatientswithcompensatedlivercirrhosis.AnnHepatol 2020;19:53–61,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2019.09.004.

[7]GiuffrèM,MacorD,MasuttiF,AbaziaC,TinèF,PattiR,etal.Evaluationof spleenstiffnessinhealthyvolunteersusingpointshearwaveelastography. AnnHepatol2019;18:736–41,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aohep.2019.03.004. [8]GiuffrèM,FourakiS,CampigottoM,ColomboA,VisintinA,BuonocoreMR,etal. Alanineaminotransferaseandspleno-portaldynamicsaffectspleenstiffness measuredbypointshear-waveelastographyinpatientswithchronichepatitis Cintheabsenceofsignificantliverfibrosis.JUltrasound2020,http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s40477-020-00456-9.PublishedOnlineFirst.

[9]GiuffrèM,FourakiS,ComarM,MasuttiF,CrocèLS.Theimportanceof transam-inasesflareinliverelastography:characterizationoftheprobabilityofliver fibrosisoverestimationbyhepatitisCvirus-inducedcytolysis.Microorganisms 2020;8,http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030348.

[10]HsiehJS,WangJY,HuangCJ,ChenF-M,HuangT-J.Effectofspontaneous por-tosystemicshuntsonhemorrhagefromesophagogastricvarices.WorldJSurg 2004;28:23–8,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7068-7.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Two algorithms were developed, aiming at matching an input string or a list of taxa to the reference database, either returning the closest match (in the case of the

Distribution data (taken from the checklists, and expressed as presence-absence) are given for each of the 20 administrative regions of Italy (two enclave-countries Republic of

fragilis sono state 3, pari al 20.0%; va però precisato che mentre nei 5 campioni di soggetti non a contatto diretto con i suini il risultato è sempre stato negativo (anche per

There- fore an important development of the present work would be represented by the implementation of the developed algorithms on GPU-base hardware, which would allow the

(2004): “Effect of breed on anatomy of portosystemic shunts resulting from congenital diseases in dogs and cats: a review of 242 cases” Australian veterinary journal, volume 82,

I dati raccolti in tale progetto di ricerca consentono di evidenziare alcune tendenze nei comportamenti delle imprese tedesche che hanno rivisto le strategie di

To evaluate the correlation between spleen stiffness and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with chronic liver diseases.. To determine optimal cut-off points of

FIGURE 1 The venous shunting pathway of the patient is shown in the figure panels obtained through volume rendering 3D reconstruction: (A) A dilated portal vein (arrowhead)