• Non ci sono risultati.

Algoritmo terapeutico nell’adenocarcinoma del pancreas metastatico

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Algoritmo terapeutico nell’adenocarcinoma del pancreas metastatico"

Copied!
24
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Algoritmo terapeutico nell’adenocarcinoma del pancreas metastatico

Dr.ssa Chiara Alessandra Cella Istituto Europeo di Oncologia Tutor: Dr. Roberto Bordonaro

(2)

mOS (months)

6

6,24 8,5

11,1 FOLFIRINOX G-Nab G-Erlotinib GEM

GEM + 5FU GEM + pemetrexed GEM + OXA GEM + CAP GEM + CDDP

PEXG, Reni 2005

Burris, JCO 1997 Moore, JCO 2007 Conroy, NEJM 2011 Von Hoff, NEJM 2013 Wang-Gillam, Lancet 2016

BAYPAN: GEM + Sorafenib CALGB (III): GEM + beva vs GEM SWOG (III): GEM + Cetux vs GEM GEM + Erlotinib +/- Beva

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

(3)

Months 11,1 6,8

OS

GEM FOLFIRINOX

Conroy, NEJM 2011

N= 342

48 French centers

Concerns:

- Highly selected pts (ECOG 0-1) - Low number of head tumors

- >50% had normal or low CA 19-9 level - biliary stents 14.3%

(4)

mOS (months)

6

6,24 8,5

11,1 FOLFIRINOX G-Nab G-Erlotinib GEM

5 months

Burris, JCO 1997 Moore, JCO 2007 Conroy, NEJM 2011 Von Hoff, NEJM 2013 Wang-Gillam, Lancet 2016

BAYPAN: GEM + Sorafenib CALGB (III): GEM + beva vs GEM SWOG (III): GEM + Cetux vs GEM GEM + Erlotinib +/- Beva

Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

GEM + 5FU GEM + pemetrexed GEM + OXA GEM + CAP GEM + CDDP

PEXG, Reni 2005

(5)
(6)

Months 11,1 6,8

OS

GEM FOLFIRINOX

Months 8,5

6,7

OS

GEM G-Nab

Von Hoff, NEJM 2013 N= 342

PS ECOG 0-1 French study

N= 861

PS ECOG 0-2 Multicentric

Conroy, NEJM 2011

(7)

II linea GEM based ChT or

5FU based ChT 5FU based mono-ChT or BSC

III linea BSC BSC

I linea

FOLFIRINOX

GEM + Nab-Paclitaxel Gem/5FU-based ChT

Gem-Erlotinib (USA)

GEM or 5FU

Monotherapy

Fit patient Non Fit patient

(8)

Considerations regarding 1st-line treatment choice

 PS

 Age

 Comorbidity (pre-existing sensory neurophaty)

 Liver function

 Patient preference (need for central venous catheter)

Gem-Nabpaclitaxel VS FOLFIRINOX

(9)

Should nab-paclitaxel/GEM be considered in PS ECOG 2?

Von Hoff, NEJM 2013

(10)

Should nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine be considered in a patient >75 years old?

• pts ≥75 years  higher risk of serious AEs that led to treatment discontinuation

• Age ≥75 was not significantly associated with OS  MPACT study was not powered to show difference

Von Hoff, NEJM 2013

(11)

Improving tolerance of long-term use of

GEM-Nab

….learning how to manage the toxicity of these multidrug regimens

may further improve their feasibility.

(12)

Considerations regarding 1st-line treatment choice

 PS  0-1 for triplet vs 0-2 for G-Nab

 Age  range 25-76 for triplet vs 27-88 for G-Nab

 Comorbidity (pre-existing sensory neurophaty)  17% vs 9% in favor to triplet

 Liver function

 Patient preference (need for central venous catheter)

 Clinical trials

Nab-paclitaxel/GEM

FOLFIRINOX

CHT platform for current clinical practice favors GEM-based regimen rather than triplets.

(13)

Frequency of 2° line treatment in metastatic PDAC

Nagrial et al CROH 2015

(14)

CONKO Study: FF vs OFF

NAPOLI-1: MM-398 vs 5-FU/LV vs. MM-398 + 5-FU/LV

Second-line OFF significantly extended

duration of OS

compared with FF alone

MM-398 + 5-FU/LV extends survival compared to

5-FU/LV alone with a manageable safety profile

No difference in MM-398 monotherapy vs. 5-FU/LV

Wang Gillam, Lancet 2016 Pelzer, EJC 2011

(15)

2° line therapies in metastatic PDAC

After Failed GEM-Based Therapie:

- FOLFIRINOX - Cap + ruxolitinib

- Nab-paclitaxel monotherapy - FOLFIRI

After Failed FOLFIRINOX or 5FU-based Therapies:

- GEM Nab-paclitaxel (several retrospective analises show feasibility)

(16)

Evolving treatment algorythm

(17)

Combine strategies and fight it better!

Adopted from The Economist – June 2015

PEGPH20 Ibrutinib

PARP inhibitor PAK inhibitors

Tumor microenvironment

CCR2 inhibithors

(18)

Phase 2/3 Randomized Double-blind Study of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor in the first line treatment of metastatic PDAC

Ibrutinib

exerts its effect on tumoral microenvironment

:

- mast cells disruption - Antiangiogenic effect

- shift Th1/Th2 immune response  enhanced antitumor activity of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells

- Direct inhibition of ikinase of EGFR

(19)

PEGPH20 is a PEGylated version of the human recombinant PH20 hyaluronidase (rHuPH20), which removes HA from the extracellular matrix (ECM) by

depolymerizing the substrate.

(20)

Hereditary PDAC

Hereditary component in 10% of PDAC

Multiple gene panels for PDAC include : BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM, ATM, APC, STK11, PRSS1 and TP53 genes.

BRCA2 gene mut --> most frequent inherited risk factor for PDAC.

The prevalence of PALB2 among families with PDAC aggregation is estimated in a range from 3% to 4%.

(21)

The role of PARP inhibitor in BRCA mutated PDAC

Olaparib Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation

A phase I/II study of the PARP inhibitor, ABT-888 plus 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (modified FOLFOX-6) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

M. J. Pishvaian

The trial opened in January, 2011 and has accrued the first cohort.

Bella Kaufman. JCO 2017

RUCAPANC: An open-label, phase 2 trial of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC) and a known deleterious germline or somatic BRCA mutation.

S.Domchek

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, an effective radiosensitizer in lung and pancreatic cancers.

Kedar Hastak, Oncotarget 2017

(22)

Immunotheraphy in PDAC

Checkpoint inhibitors Vaccines

Monoclonal antibodies Adoptive cell transfer Viruses

Citokines

Poor antigenicity

Dense desmoplastic stroma

Immunosuppressive microenvironment BUT…

Conflicting results

(23)

Take home messages

 CHT platform for current clinical practice favors GEM-based regimen rather than triplets even in frail patients.

 Improving outcomes with 1° line treatments has increased the frequency of 2° line treatments.

 Little is known about molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance of PDAC.

 Greater attention should be paid also to hereditary cancers.

 Immunotherapy does not play a major role probably because of tumor micronenvironment immunosuppression

(24)

Adopted from The Economist – June 2015

Thank you!

Chiara A. Cella

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia

[email protected]

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati