Sex Plant Reprod (1990) 3:23-30 Sexual Plant Reproduction
9 Springer-Verlag 1990
Sexual differentiation in Asparagus officinMis L.
II. Total and newly synthesized proteins in male and female flowers
M. Bracale 1, M.G. Galli 1, A. Falavigna 2, and C. Soave 3
1 Centro di Studio del C.N.R. per la Biologia Cellulare e Molecolare delle Piante, Dipartimento di Biologia, Sezione Botanica Generale, Via Celoria, 26, 1-20133 Milan, Italy
2 Istituto Sperimentale di Orticultura, Via Paullese, 28, 1-20075 Montanaso Lombardo (Milan), Italy 3 Istituto di Biologia Agraria, Universitfi della Basilicata, Via N. Sauro, 85, 1-85100 Potenza, Italy
Summary. Sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant Asparagus officinalis L. was examined by two-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis of both to- tal proteins and newly synthesized proteins from cladophylls ("leaves"), whole mature flowers and homologous sex organs (i.e. true female ovaries and small sterile ovaries from male flowers). Poly- peptides isolated from cladophylls of male and fe- male plants were practically indistinguishable; the flowers, however, showed a distinct set of specific proteins, some o f which differed between the two sexes. While the total protein profiles of isolated ovaries from male and female plants were very sim- ilar, the patterns were strikingly different after the tissues were pulsed with 35S-methionine: mature male ovaries showed a number of newly synthe- sized proteins, while in female ovaries only a few molecular species were actively synthesized.
Key words: Asparagus - 2-D electrophoresis - Dioecy - Flower polypeptides.
Introduction
Flowering is a complex process involving the gen- eration of the germ line and the organs for sexual reproduction. The differentiation programme, al- though responsive to several environmental influ- ences, is primarily under genetic control. In dioe- cious plants, for example, the genes required for the morphogenesis of stamens and pistils are pres- ent in both sexes, but the male and female individ- uals differ in a set of regulatory genes controlling the appearance of the respective reproductive or- gans (Westergaard 1958; Frankel and Galun 1977). The study of this sex-specific modulation
Offprint requests to: M.G, Galli
of gene expression, together with the messages re- sponsible for and accompanying floral differentia- tion, is an important step in understanding plant development. Recent publications have reported the isolation of a number of floral specific se- quences from various species (Goldberg 1989; Si- moens etal. 1988; Gasser etal. 1989; Meeks- Wagner et al. 1989).
We have chosen the process of floral differenti- ation in Asparagus officinalis as a model system for studying sex organ differentiation in plants. As- paragus is a dioecious species in which the pathway of flower development is remarkably similar in both male and female plants until a stage near meiosis. At this stage the flowers of both sexes contain primordia of both stamens and pistils.
Soon thereafter, however, the stamens degenerate and pistils develop in female plants, while in male plants, the pistils stop growing (but do not degen- erate) and the stamens continue to develop (La- zarte and Palser 1979).
In a previous paper (Galli et al. 1988) we ana- lyzed the 2-D P A G E patterns of polypeptides pro- duced in vitro by m R N A s o f young and mature flowers from female and male Asparagus plants.
Sex-specific m R N A s were observed mainly in ma-
ture flowers and their cloning is at present under
way. While relatively large masses o f tissue needed
in m R N A isolation prevented the analysis of
m R N A s from sex-specific organs (i.e. anthers and
ovaries of both sexes), this can be accomplished
by analyzing the 2-D P A G E pattern of total pro-
teins and of newly synthesized proteins (after puls-
ing the tissue with 35S-methionine), since only a
few milligrams of tissue are needed for this tech-
nique. Using this approach, we compared the poly-
peptide patterns of (I) cladophylls (leaves) from
male and female plants, (2) whole mature flowers
of both sexes and (3) homologous sexual organs
( t r u e f e m a l e o v a r i e s a n d small sterile o v a r i e s f r o m m a l e f l o w e r s ) in o r d e r t o l e a r n f o r h o w l o n g in o n t o g e n y t h e p a t t e r n o f g e n e e x p r e s s i o n is s i m i l a r in t h e h o m o l o g o u s o r g a n s o f t h e t w o sexes. H i s t o - l o g i c a l a n a l y s e s w e r e p e r f o r m e d in p a r a l l e l o n m a l e a n d f e m a l e o r g a n s .
Material and methods
Plant material
Asparagus officinalis L. male and female plants (line UC) having very similar genetical backgrounds were used. The plants were grown in open fields. Leaves were collected at a comparable stage of development from male and female plants, and flowers were collected at maturity: male flowers with completely devel- oped but still unopened anthers; female flowers with enlarged but unfertilized pistils (still closed corollas). Female ovaries and rudimentary male ovaries as well as male anthers were removed under a stereo microscope. Leaves, whole flowers or specific sex organs were immediately used for fixing and histological analysis or for pulsing with 35S-methionine and protein extrac- tion.
Histological procedures and "pulsing"
with labelled methionine
Male and female anthers and male and female ovaries were fixed in 3 % glutaraldehyde for 3 h, washed in phosphate buffer, dehydrated, embedded in Epon-Araldite (Mollenhouer 1964) and sectioned (1-gm thick sections) by a Reichert ultramicro- tome. In some experiments samples were treated, before fixa- tion, with 3H-methionine (specific activity: 5 Ci/mmol) at a concentration of 30 gCi/ml in a final volume of 0.5 ml/ten ovar- ies (approximately). Slides with sections were then autoradio- graphed using NTB2 emulsion (Galli 1984).
To clear the tissues to show vascular elements, male and female flowers stripped of sterile parts were stained in fuchsin according to the procedure of Fuchs (1963).
35S_Methionine (specific activity > 800 Ci/mmol) for label- ling newly synthesized proteins was applied for 4 h at room temperature at a concentration of 120 gCi/ml in a final volume of 3 ml water/100 mg tissue. After a thorough washing with water, the samples were used for protein extraction. In some experiments proteins were also extracted from untreated sam- ples.
Polypeptide extraction and electrophoresis procedure
Samples (100 mg) were ground in liquid nitrogen in a chilled mortar and extracted in 800 lal 0.5 M TRIS-HC1, ph 7.5, 0.1 M KC1, 0.05 M EDTA, 0.7 M sucrose and 2% (v/v) mercaptoeth- anol. An equal volume of water-saturated phenol was added, and samples were shaken for 10 rain at room temperature. The phases were separated by centrifugation: the phenol phase was recovered, and the aqueous phase re-extracted with an equal volume of water-saturated phenol. Proteins were precipitated from the phenol phase by adding 5 volumes of cold 0.1 M NH4acetate dissolved in methanol and storing samples at - 2 0 ~ C overnight. The precipitate was pelleted by centrifuga- tion at 11,000 g for 10 min at 4~ and then washed twice with 0.1 M NH4acetate in methanol and once with cold acetone
(Hurkman and Tanaka 1986). The pellet was dried and dis- solved in 100 gl lysis buffer (O'Farrell 1975). Before being loaded on a gel, the samples were clarified by centrifugation.
Electrophoresis in the first and second dimension were carried out as described by Galli et al. (1988). After electrophoresis, the gels were stained by combined Coomassie blue G-250 and silver stain procedure (De Moreno et al. 1985). After staining and photographing, the gels were fixed in 30% methanol-10%
acetic acid for 30 min, soaked three times in DMSO for 30 min, once in DMSO + PPO for 3 h and washed in water for 30 min.
Gels were then dried and exposed for at least 20 days.
At least three gels, corresponding to independent protein extracts, were examined for every sample type; patterns were highly reproducible. Moreover, stained protein patterns were unchanged, irrespective of a previous treatment with labelled precursor or not.
Results
Histological data
T h e a p p e a r a n c e o f m a l e a n d f e m a l e o v a r i e s a n d a n t h e r s at a m a t u r e s t a g e o f d e v e l o p m e n t is s h o w n in Fig. 1. F e m a l e a n t h e r s (Fig. 1 C) w e r e s h r u n k e n a n d c o l l a p s e d , while m a l e o v a r i e s (Fig. 1 D ) , e x c e p t f o r their small size a n d a b o r t e d ovules, w e r e c h a r - a c t e r i z e d b y a p p a r e n t l y h e a l t h y tissues a n d t h e i r r e s e m b l e n c e t o f e m a l e o v a r i e s . D i f f e r e n t p a t t e r n s o f v a s c u l a r i z a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i z e d t h e sex o r g a n s : in f e m a l e f l o w e r s t h e v a s c u l a r b u n d l e s w e r e well-de- v e l o p e d u p t o t h e style (Fig. 1 E), w h i l e in m a l e f l o w e r s t h e y e x t e n d e d o n l y t o t h e p r o x i m a l p a r t o f t h e r u d i m e n t a r y o v a r y (Fig. l F). W i t h r e s p e c t to s t a m e n v a s c u l a r i z a t i o n t h e o p p o s i t e s i t u a t i o n a p p e a r e d : f e m a l e s t a m e n b u n d l e s w e r e v e r y small a n d l a c k e d m a t u r e x y l e m e l e m e n t s .
Comparison of two-dimensional protein patterns Totalproteins. F i g u r e 2 s h o w s t h e p a t t e r n s o f t o t a l p r o t e i n s f r o m c l a d o p h y l l s a n d w h o l e f l o w e r s o f m a l e a n d f e m a l e p l a n t s c o l l e c t e d at t h e s a m e s t a g e o f d e v e l o p m e n t . C l a d o p h y l l p a t t e r n s (A, B) w e r e a l m o s t i d e n t i c a l b e t w e e n sexes b u t d i f f e r e d f r o m t h o s e o f w h o l e f l o w e r s (C, D ) : several s p o t s w h i c h w e r e p r e s e n t in leaves w e r e a b s e n t in f l o w e r s , a n d vice versa. I n a d d i t i o n , m a l e a n d f e m a l e f l o w e r s d i f f e r e d f r o m e a c h o t h e r q u i t e e x t e n s i v e l y ( a r r o w s i n d i c a t e m a j o r s p o t s p r e s e n t in o n e sex a n d a b s e n t , o r d r a s t i c a l l y r e d u c e d in i n t e n s i t y , in t h e o t h e r ) .
O n e o f t h e p u r p o s e s o f o u r s t u d y w a s t o c o m - p a r e t h e p r o t e i n p a t t e r n s o f sex-specific o r g a n s (i.e.
a n t h e r s a n d o v a r i e s ) f r o m m a l e a n d f e m a l e flowers.
I n m a t u r e f e m a l e f l o w e r s t h e o v a r y w a s fully devel-
o p e d , while in m a l e f l o w e r s this o r g a n w a s r u d i -
m e n t a r y a n d s t r o n g l y r e d u c e d in size (Fig. 1 B, D ) ;
t h e h o m o l o g o u s p a t t e r n o f t o t a l p r o t e i n s , h o w e v e r ,
w a s r e m a r k a b l y similar b e t w e e n t h e o r g a n s f r o m
Fig. 1 A-F. Appearance of anthers and ovaries from mature flowers: A, D anthers and ovaries, respectively, from male flow- er; B, C from female flower. E, F Whole ovaries from female (E) flower and whole anthers from male (F) flower treated to visualize the differential development of the vascular elements
the two sexes, with only few differences, and these mainly quantitative (Fig. 3 A, B). Some of the ov- ary proteins were recognizable in the patterns from the whole female flower and from the leaves. How- ever, both male and female whole flowers exhibited spots not present in the ovaries or stamens (likely tepal-specific proteins).
The profile of the male anthers is shown in
pH7.8 IEF ~ p H 4 . 2
- 9 2 - 6 9 - 4 2
- 3 0
03 a 03
- 1 4
- 9 2
-