Health Informatics (

(1)

Health Informatics

( formerly Computers in Health Care)

Kathryn J. Hannah Marion J. Ball

Series Editors

(2)

Charles P. Friedman Jeremy C. Wyatt

Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics

Second Edition

Foreword by Edward H. Shortliffe

With contributions by Joan S. Ash, Allen C. Smith III, P. Zoë Stavri, and Mark S. Roberts

With 49 Illustrations

(3)

Charles P. Friedman, PhD Jeremy C. Wyatt, MD

Professor, Center for Biomedical Informatics Professor of Health Informatics University of Pittsburgh University of Dundee

Pitttsburgh, PA 15260 Dundee, Scotland DD1 4NH

and and

Senior Scholar and Program Ofﬁcer Director, Health Informatics Centre National Library of Medicine Ninewells Hospital

Division of Extramural Programs Dundee

Bethesda, MD 20894 Scotland DD1 9SY

USA UK

Series Editors:

Kathryn J. Hannah, PhD, RN Marion J. Ball, EdD

Adjunct Professor, Department of Vice President, Clinical Informatics Community Health Sciences Strategies Healthlink, Inc.

Faculty of Medicine Baltimore, MD 21210

University of Calgary and

Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1 Adjunct Professor

Canada The Johns Hopkins University School of

Nursing

Baltimore, MD 21205 USA

Library of Congress Control Number: 2005925510 ISBN 10: 0-387-25889-2

ISBN 13: 987-0387-25889-8 Printed on acid-free paper.

All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written per- mission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden.

The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identiﬁed as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.

Printed in the United States of America. (BS/MVY) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

springeronline.com

(4)

Foreword

v As the director of training programs in biomedical informatics, ﬁrst at Stan- ford and now at Columbia, I have found that one of the most frequent inquiries from graduate students is, “Although I am happy with my research focus and the work I have done, how can I design and carry out a practical evaluation that proves the value of my contribution?” Informatics is a mul- tifaceted interdisciplinary ﬁeld with research that ranges from theoretical developments to projects that are highly applied and intended for near-term use in clinical settings. The implications of “proving” a research claim accordingly vary greatly depending on the details of an individual student’s goals and thesis statement. Furthermore, the dissertation work leading up to an evaluation plan is often so time consuming and arduous that attempt- ing the “perfect” evaluation is frequently seen as impractical or as divert- ing students from central programming or implementation issues that are their primary areas of interest. They often ask what compromises are possible so they can provide persuasive data in support of their claims without adding two to three years to their graduate-student life.

Our students at Stanford clearly needed help in dealing more effectively with such dilemmas, and it was therefore fortuitous when, in the autumn of 1991, we welcomed two superb visiting professors to our laboratory. We had known both Chuck Friedman and Jeremy Wyatt from earlier visits and professional encounters, but it was coincidence that offered them sabbatical breaks in our laboratory during the same academic year. Knowing that each had strong interests and skills in the areas of evaluation and clinical trial design, I hoped they would enjoy getting to know one another and would ﬁnd that their scholarly pursuits were both complementary and synergistic.

To help stir the pot, we even assigned them to a shared ofﬁce that we try to set aside for visitors, and within a few weeks, they were putting their heads together as they learned about the evaluation issues that were rampant in our laboratory.

The on-site contributions by Drs. Friedman and Wyatt during that year were marvelous, and I know that they continue to have ripple effects at Stanford to this day. They served as local consultants as we devised evalu-

(5)

ation plans for existing projects, new proposals, and student research. By the Spring, they had identified the topics and themes that needed to be understood better by those in our laboratory, and they offered a well- received seminar course on evaluation methods for medical information systems. It was out of the class notes formulated for that course that the present volume evolved. Its availability since publication of the first edition allowed the Stanford program to rejuvenate and refine the laboratory’s knowledge and skills in the area of evaluating medical information systems.

It has had a similar impact in diverse biomedical informatics training environments both in the U.S. and abroad, so the publication of this revised second edition has been eagerly awaited.

This book ﬁlls an important niche that is not effectively covered by other biomedical informatics textbooks or by the standard volumes on evaluation and clinical trial design. I know of no other writers who have the requisite knowledge of statistics and cognition, coupled with intensive study of biomedical informatics and an involvement with creation of applied systems as well. Drs. Friedman and Wyatt are scholars and educators, but they are also practical in their understanding of the world of clinical medicine and the realities of system implementation and validation in settings that defy formal controlled trials. Thus, the book is not only of value to students of biomedical informatics, but will continue to be a key reference for all individuals involved in the implementation and evaluation of basic and applied systems in biomedical informatics.

Edward H. Shortliffe, MD, PhD FACMI, MACP Department of Biomedical Informatics College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University in the City of New York February 2005 vi Foreword

(6)

Series Preface

vii This series is directed to healthcare professionals who are leading the trans- formation of health care by using information and knowledge. Launched in 1988 as Computers in Health Care, the series offers a broad range of titles:

some addressed to speciﬁc professions such as nursing, medicine, and health administration; others to special areas of practice such as trauma and radi- ology. Still other books in the series focus on interdisciplinary issues, such as the computer-based patient record, electronic health records, and net- worked healthcare systems.

Renamed Health Informatics in 1998 to reflect the rapid evolution in the discipline now known as health informatics, the series will continue to add titles that contribute to the evolution of the field. In the series, eminent experts, serving as editors or authors, offer their accounts of innovations in health informatics. Increasingly, these accounts go beyond hardware and software to address the role of information in influencing the transforma- tion of healthcare delivery systems around the world. The series also will increasingly focus on “peopleware” and organizational, behavioral, and societal changes that accompany the diffusion of information technology in health services environments.

These changes will shape health services in the new millennium. By making full and creative use of the technology to tame data and to trans- form information, health informatics will foster the development of the knowledge age in health care. As coeditors, we pledge to support our professional colleagues and the series readers as they share advances in the emerging and exciting ﬁeld of health informatics.

Kathryn J. Hannah, PhD, RN Marion J. Ball, EdD

(7)

Preface:

Still Counting the Steps on Box Hill

ix The brief anecdote that began the preface to the ﬁrst edition of this volume seems just as pertinent today. We therefore include it here again, and then introduce the pedagogical goals and target audience for this textbook. The preface concludes with a summary of changes incorporated into this second edition.

In February 1995, during a visit by the American coauthor of this volume to the home of the Wyatt family in the United Kingdom, one afternoon’s activity involved a walk on Box Hill in Surrey. In addition to the coauthors of this volume, Jeremy’s wife Sylvia and the two Wyatt children were present. We walked down a steep hill. As we began ascending the hill, the group decided to count the number of earthen steps cut into the path to make the climbing easier. When we arrived at the top, each of us had gen- erated a different number.

There ensued a lively discussion of the reasons the numbers differed.

Clearly, one or more of us may have lost attention and simply mis- counted, but there emerged on analysis three more subtle reasons for the discrepancies.

• First, not all of the steps on our return trip went upward. Do the down- ward steps count at all toward the total; and if so, do they add or subtract from the count? We realized that we had not agreed to all of the rules for counting because we did not know in advance all of the issues that needed to be taken into account.

• Second, the path was so eroded by heavy rain that it was not always easy to distinguish a step from an irregularity. What counts as a step? In a few instances along the way, we had discussions about whether a particular irregularity was a step, and apparently we had disagreed. It is not clear if there is any veriﬁably right answer to this question unless there existed plans for the construction of the steps. Even then, should a step now eroded almost beyond recognition still count as a step?

• Third and ﬁnally, one of the children, having decided in advance that there were 108 steps, simply stopped counting once she had reached this

(8)

number. She wanted there to be no more steps and made it so in her own mind. Beliefs, no matter how they develop, are real for the belief holders and must be taken seriously.

Even an apparently simple counting task led to disagreements about the results. Each of us thought himself or herself perfectly correct, and we realized there was no way to resolve our differences without one person exert- ing power over the others by dictating the rules or arbitrating the results of our disagreements.

It struck us in 1995 that this pleasant walk in the country had raised several key dilemmas confronting anyone designing, conducting, or inter- preting an evaluation. These dilemmas seemed no less pertinent in 2005 as we completed the second edition of this volume. Themes of anticipation, communication, measurement, and belief raised in this anecdote distinguish evaluation, and what should be covered in a textbook on evaluation, from what might be addressed in works addressing empirical research methods more generally. So this anecdote and the issues it raises remain a point of departure for this book and direct much of its organization and content. We continue to trust that anyone who has performed a rigorous data-driven evaluation can see the pertinence of the Box Hill counting dilemma. We hope that anyone reading this volume will in the end possess both a frame- work for thinking about these issues and a set of methods for addressing them.

More speciﬁcally, we have attempted to address in this book the major questions relating to evaluation in informatics.

1. Why should information resources be studied? Why is it a challenging process?

2. What are all the options for conducting such studies? How do I decide what to study?

3. How do I design, carry out, and interpret a study using a particular set of techniques: for objectivist (quantitative) studies as well as subjectivist (qualitative) studies?

4. How do economic factors play into evaluations?

5. How do I communicate study designs and study results?

When drafting the ﬁrst edition, we set out to create a volume useful to several audiences: those training for careers in informatics who as part of their curricula must learn to perform evaluation studies; those actively conducting evaluation studies who might derive from these pages ways to improve their methods; and those responsible for information systems in biomedical or health settings who may wish to understand how well their services are working and how to improve them. These audiences remain the primary audiences for the second edition as well. As such, this book can alert investigators to evaluation questions they might ask, the answers they might expect, and how to obtain and understand them.

x Preface: Still Counting the Steps on Box Hill

(9)

This volume is intended to be germane to all biomedical professions and professionals. The ﬁrst edition employed the word “medical” in the title, and we slightly modiﬁed the title of the second edition, using instead the word

“biomedical” to emphasize this intended breadth. The ﬁrst edition’s dual emphasis on both quantitative (what we call “objectivist”) methods and qualitative (“subjectivist”) methods remains in the second edition. A reader may not choose to become proﬁcient in both of these Grand Approaches to evaluation, but we continue to see an appreciation of both as essential.

Subjectivist approaches have continued to gain traction in the world of informatics evaluation since the ﬁrst edition was published.

This volume is designed to serve as a textbook for a graduate level course, although we hope and intend that the work will also prove useful as a general reference. The subject matter of this volume has been the basis of graduate courses offered by us at the University of North Carolina 1993–1996, the University of Pittsburgh since 1997, and University College London from 1998 onward. Someone reading the book straight through should experience a logical development of the subject, as it addresses most of the important concepts, and develops several key methodological skill areas. To this end, “self-test” exercises with answers and “food for thought”

questions have been added to many chapters. With this goal of continuity in mind, we wrote 10 of the 12 chapters of this volume ourselves and then collaborated with expert contributing authors in crafting the two chapters that stretched our own knowledge a bit too thinly.

In our view, evaluation is different from an exercise in applied statistics.

This work is therefore intended to complement, not replace, basic statistics courses offered at most institutions. (We assume our readers to have only a basic knowledge of statistics.) The reader will find in this book material derived from varying methodological traditions including psychometrics, statistics and research design, ethnography, clinical epidemiology, health economics, organizational behavior, and health services research–as well as the literature of informatics itself. We have found it necessary to borrow terminology, in addition to methods, from all of these fields. Because these different fields tend to employ different labels for similar concepts, we have deliberately chosen one specific term to represent each important concept in this volume and have tried to employ our choice consistently through- out. But as a result, some readers may find the book using an unfamiliar term to describe what, for them, is a familiar idea.

Several chapters also develop in some detail examples taken from the informatics literature or from unpublished studies. The example studies were chosen because they illustrate key issues and because they are works with which we are familiar through present or past collaboration. This prox- imity gave us access to the raw data and other materials from these studies, which allowed us to generate pedagogic examples often differing in emphasis from the published literature about them. Information resources forming the basis of these examples include the Hypercritic system developed at Preface: Still Counting the Steps on Box Hill xi

(10)

Erasmus University in the Netherlands, the TraumAID system developed at the Medical College of Pennsylvania and the University of Pennsylva- nia, and the T-HELPER system developed at Stanford University. We have retained these examples in the second edition. Even though these information resources have aged technologically, the evaluation challenges raised by their development and deployment are no less salient.

We consciously did not write this book for software developers or engi- neers who are primarily interested in formal methods of software verification. In the classic distinction between validation and verification, this book is more directed at validation, but also goes beyond validation in the sense that software engineers use this term. Nor did we write this book for professional methodologists who might expect to read about contemporary advances in the methodological areas from which much of this book’s content derives. Nonetheless, we hope that this book will prove useful to individuals from a broad range of professional backgrounds—and especially those interested in applying well-established evaluation techniques specifically to problems in biomedical informatics.

The second edition of this volume entails both major and minor changes.

The major changes include a complete revision of the chapter on subjectivist methods. This is Chapter 10 in the numbering system of the second edition, corresponding to Chapter 9 in the first edition. The new numbering system resulted from another change: the division of the first edition’s Chapter 7 into two revised chapters on design and analysis of quantitative studies. The second edition also includes a completely new Chapter (11) on economic aspects of evaluation. This new chapter addresses what we saw as a major content deficiency of the first edition. Chapter 3 underwent a major facelift to establish more clearly how the general methods of evaluation apply to the world of informatics, and to assist readers more directly in the formulation of evaluation studies. In the numbering scheme of the second edition, chapters 1, 2, 4–6, 9, and 12 were significantly revised based on our own further thinking as well as thoughts shared with us by many readers of the first edition. We elected to delete the chapter on organizational issues in evaluation (Chapter 11 in the first edition) from this revised volume. We took this action in large part because the new Chapter 10 contained many of the methodological points of the earlier chapter.

We intend to make some of the material from the deleted chapter, as well as new material about evaluation as we accumulate it, available on the Web site that will accompany the book. This resource can be found at http://springeronline.com/0-387-25889-2.

The evaluation methods presented in this volume are generic and should apply to all informatics domains including biological research as well as health care and education. We have also made some changes in this edition to reﬂect the emergence of bioinformatics, but the examples in the volume remain weighted toward clinical information resources and health care. We expect to develop and make available in the future more examples addressing bioinformatics via the book’s Web site.

xii Preface: Still Counting the Steps on Box Hill

(11)

In conclusion, we would like to acknowledge the many colleagues and collaborators whose contributions have made this work possible. They include contributing chapter authors Joan Ash, Mark Roberts, Allen Smith and Zoë Stavri. We continue to be indebted to Ted Shortliffe and the members of the Section on Medical Informatics at Stanford University for their support and ideas during our sabbatical leaves there in 1991–1992, when the original ideas for this book took shape. We also continue to be grateful to colleagues Johan van der Lei, Mark Musen, John Clarke, and Bonnie Webber for the volume’s speciﬁc examples that derive from their own research. George Hripcsak provided comprehensive feedback that was very helpful in guiding the creation of the second edition.

Chuck speciﬁcally thanks his students at Pitt, UNC, Duke, NIH, and Woods Hole for challenging him repeatedly both in and out of class. Chuck also thanks Stuart Bondurant, Dean of the UNC School of Medicine from 1979 to 1994, for his unfailing support, which made this volume possible.

He thanks Thomas Detre and Arthur Levine, Senior Vice Chancellors at the University of Pittsburgh, for their mentorship and counsel from 1996 to the present day. And he thanks Milton Corn of the National Library of Medicine for being a wonderful source of advice and support during his recent tenure there. Three MIT physicists Chuck has been very fortunate to know and work with—the late Nathaniel Frank, the late Jerrold Zacharias, and Edwin Taylor—taught him the importance of meeting the needs of students who are the future of any ﬁeld. Chuck’s son Nathaniel, the best writer Chuck knows, is an inspiration to be both interesting and clear; son Andrew helped Chuck appreciate the importance of bioinformatics. Finally, Chuck wishes to thank his special friend and colleague, Patti Abbott, for putting sunshine into every day, including those many days that were largely devoted to this second edition.

Jeremy acknowledges the useful insights gained from many coworkers during collaborative evaluation projects, especially from Doug Altman (CRUK Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford) and David Spiegelhal- ter (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge). The UK Medical Research Council funded the traveling fellowship that enabled Jeremy to spend a year at Stanford in 1991–1992. Students on masters courses and others at University College London, City University and the Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam have also helped him clarify many of the ideas expressed in this book. Finally, Jeremy thanks his family, Sylvia, David, and Jessica and his parents Moira and Selwyn for their patience and support during the long gestation of this book and its second edition.

Charles P. Friedman, PhD Pittsburgh, PA, and Bethesda, MD, USA Jeremy C. Wyatt, MD Dundee, UK Preface: Still Counting the Steps on Box Hill xiii

(12)

Contributors

xvii Joan S. Ash, PhD

Associate Professor, Division of Medical Informatics and Outcomes Research, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR 97201, USA

Mark S. Roberts, MD, MPP

Associate Professor of Medicine, Health Policy and Management, Indus- trial Engineering; Chief of the Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, Division of General Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA

Allen C. Smith III, PhD

Associate Dean for Student and Academic Affairs, Northeastern Ohio Uni- versities College of Medicine, Rootstown, OH 44272, USA

P. Zoë Stavri, PhD, MLS

Assistant Professor, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97201; Visiting Assistant Professor, Health Sciences Informatics, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Health Informatics (