• Non ci sono risultati.

Attualmente risulta ancora difficile definire un modello ideale di stimolazione transcranica diretta (tDCS) per la riabilitazione motoria nei pazienti post-ictus, poiché la letteratura prodotta in merito offre ancora pochi lavori e con caratteristiche disomogenee circa le modalità di stimolazione utilizzate, il numero di sedute necessarie, la durata delle stesse, i sistemi di valutazione e le caratteristiche dei pazienti.

Dai risultati ottenuti in questo studio è stato osservato in entrambi i gruppi il miglioramento del punteggio delle scale cliniche con riduzione del livello di menomazione dell’arto superiore, seppur non statisticamente significativo per la specifica sezione del polso.

Attraverso l’analisi cinematica dei movimenti selezionati si sono evidenziati miglioramenti delle prestazioni motorie in entrambi i gruppi, definite dall’aumento del ROM (Range of Motion) articolare, seppur non statisticamente significativi, ed un aumento della velocità di esecuzione dei movimenti con significatività statistica solo per l’abduzione nel gruppo Sham.

Dal confronto fra il miglioramento clinico ottenuto nei valori FM/UE e MI in entrambi i gruppi non è emersa una predominanza nel gruppo tDCS rispetto al gruppo Sham così da ritenere che la tDCS non abbia fornito un valore aggiuntivo al trattamento riabilitativo, fermo restando il campione limitato analizzato.

L’utilizzo del sistema robotico risulta fondamentale per l’analisi qualitativa del movimento e lo studio dei processi di recupero motorio. I risultati preliminari presentati in questo studio dovranno essere confermati mediante (i) l’incremento del numero dei casi studiati e (ii) la rivalutazione degli effetti a lungo termine sui pazienti.

Ulteriori osservazioni che tengono conto di un consenso generale in materia di tDCS riguardano l’applicazione della metodica in associazione alle terapie convenzionali per incentivare gli input afferenti corticali e la ripetizione di più sedute consecutive per rafforzare l’efficacia e la stabilizzazione degli effetti. Una strategia futura utile a nuovi studi potrebbe essere quella di effettuare una maggior selezione delle caratteristiche dei pazienti in termini di etiologia della

lesione (ischemica o emorragica), sede di lesione (emisfero destro o sinistro) ed estensione (corticale o sottocorticale) con rivalutazione a lungo termine degli effetti.

Bibliografia

Sacco, S., Carolei, A. (2012). Stroke: clinica. In G. Sandrini e R. Dattola, Compendio di

Neuroriabilitazione (pp. 249-250). Roma: Verducci.

 Barreca, S., Wolf, S.L., Fasoli, S., & Bohannon, R. (2003). Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 17, 4, 220-6.

 Roger, V.L., Go, A.S., Lloyd-Jones, D.M., Benjamin, E.J., Berry, J.D., Borden, W.B., Bravata, D.M., Dai, S., Ford, E.S., Fox, C.S., Fullerton, H.J., Gillespie, C., Hailpern, S.M., Heit, J.A., Howard, V.J., Kissela, B.M., Kittner, S.J., Lackland, D.T., Lichtman, J.H., Lisabeth, L.D., Makuc, D.M., Marcus, G.M., Marelli, A., Matchar, D.B., Moy, C.S., Mozaffarian, D., Mussolino, M.E., Nichol, G., Paynter, N.P., Soliman, E.Z., Sorlie, P.D., Sotoodehnia, N., Turan, T.N., Virani, S.S., Wong, N.D., Woo, D., & Turner, M.B. (2012). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 125,

1, 2-220.

Paolucci, S., Morelli, D. (2012). Stroke: riabilitazione. In G. Sandrini e R. Dattola, Compendio

di Neuroriabilitazione (pp. 267-269, pp.273-275). Roma: Verducci.

Ernst, E. (1990). A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Stroke, 21, 7,1081-5.

 Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L.B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377-401.

 Schjetnan, A.G.P., Faraji, J., Metz, G.A., Tatsuno, M., & Luczak, A. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a review of recent advancements. Stroke

Research and Treatment, vol. 2013, Article ID 170256, 14 pages. doi:10.1155/2013/170256.  Stagg, C.J., Johansen-Berg, H. (2013). Studying the effects of transcranial direct-current

stimulation in stroke recovery using magnetic resonance imaging. Frontiers in Human

Neuroscience, 7, 857.

 Kandel, M., Beis, J.M., Le Chapelain, L., Guesdon, H., & Paysant, J. (2012). Non-invasive cerebral stimulation for the upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review. Annals of Physical

and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55, 657-80.

 Priori, A., Berardelli, A., Rona, S., Accornero, N., & Manfredi, M. (1998). Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport, 9, 10, 2257-60.

 Priori, A. (2003). Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non- invasive modulation of brain excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 4, 589-95.

 Nitsche, M.A., Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 15, 527, 3, 633-9.

Bersani, F.S., Biondi, M. (2011). Corsi e ricorsi in psichiatria: le terapie somatiche. Rivista di

psichiatria, 46,4.

 Brunoni, A.R., Valiengo, L., Baccaro, A., Zanão, T.A., de Oliveira, J.F., Goulart, A., Boggio, P.S., Lotufo, P.A., Benseñor, I.M., & Fregni, F. (2013). The sertraline vs electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. Jama Psychiatry, 70, 4, 383-391.

 Agarwal, S.M., Shivakumar, V., Bose, A., Subramaniam, A., Nawani, H., Chhabra, H., Kalmady, S.V., Narayanaswamy, J.C., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, 11, 3, 118-125.

 Fregni, F., Gimenes, R., Valle, A.C., Ferreira, M.J.L., Rocha, R.R., Natalle, L., Bravo, R., Rigonatti, S.P., Freedman, S.D., Nitsche, M.A., Pascual-Leone, A. & Boggio, P.S. (2006). A randomized, sham controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 54, 12, 3988– 3998.

 Fregni, F., Boggio, P.S., Lima, M.C., Ferreira, M.J., Wagner, T., Rigonatti, S.P., Castro, A.W., Souza, D.R., Riberto, M., Freedman, S.D., Nitsche, M.A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain, 122, 1-2, 197-209.

 Boggio, P.S., Khoury, L.P., Martins, D.C., Martins, O.E., de Macedo, E.C., & Fregni, F. (2009). Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgical and Psychiatry, 80, 4, 444-7.

 Pereira, J.B., Junqué, C., Bartrés-Faz, D., Martí, M.J., Sala-Llonch, R., Compta, Y., Falcón, C., Vendrell, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Valls-Solé, J., & Tolosa, E. (2013). Modulation of verbal fluency networks by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in Parkinson's disease.

Brain Stimulation, 6, 1, 16-24.

 Marangolo, P., Fiori, V., Calpagnano, M.A., Campana, S., Razzano, C., Caltagirone, C. & Marini, A. (2013). tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 539.

 Shah, P.P., Szaflarski, J.P., Allendorfer, J. & Hamilton, R.H. (2013). Induction of neuroplasticity and recovery in post-stroke aphasia by non-invasive brain stimulation. Review Article. Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 888.

 Baker, J., Rorden, C., & Fridriksson, J. (2010). Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to treat stroke patients with aphasia. Stroke, 41, 6, 1229–1236.

 Fridriksson, J., Richardson, J.D., Baker, J.M., & Rorden, C. (2011). Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Naming Reaction Time in Fluent Aphasia A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study. Stroke, 42, 819-821.

 Marquez, J., van Vliet, P., Elduff, P., Lagopoulos, J., & Parsons, M. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.

International Journal of Stroke, DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12169

 Nitsche, M.A., Cohen, L.G., Wassermann, E.M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P.S., Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1, 3, 206-23.

 Miranda, P.C., Lomarev, M., & Hallett, M. (2006). Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 7, 1623–1629.

 Roche, N., Lackmy, A., Achache, V., Bussel, B., & Katz, R. (2009). Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 1, 587, 23, 5653-64.

 Bolzoni, F., Pettersson, L.G., & Jankowska, E. (2013). Evidence for long-lasting subcortical facilitation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the cat. The Journal of Physiology, 1, 591, 3381-99.

 Bolzoni, F., Bączyk, M., & Jankowska, E. (2013). Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat. The Journal of Physiology, 15, 591, 4027-42.

 Thickbroom, G.W. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models. Experimental Brain Research,180, 4, 583-93.

 Krause, B., Márquez-Ruiz, J., & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2013). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance? Mini review article.

Frontiers in Human Neurosciences, 7, 602.

 Hess, G., Aizenman, C.D., & Donoghue, J.P. (1996). Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. Journal of

Neurophysiololgy, 75, 5, 1765-78.

 Clarkson, A.N., Huang, B.S., Macisaac, S.E., Mody, I., & Carmichael, S.T. (2010). Reducing excessive GABA-mediated tonic inhibition promotes functional recovery after stroke. Nature, 468, 7321, 305-9.

 Fritsch, B., Reis, J., Martinowich, K., Schambra, H.M., Ji, Y, Cohen, L.G., & Lu, B. (2010). Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron, 66, 2, 198-204.

 Cheeran, B., Talelli, P., Mori, F., Koch, G., Suppa, A., Edwards, M., Houlden, H., Bhatia, K., Greenwood, R., & Rothwell, J.C. (2008). A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. The Journal of Physiology, 586, 23, 5717-25.

 Holdefer, R.N., Sadleir, R. & Russell, M.J. (2006). Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 17, 1388–97.

 Nitsche, M.A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Tergau, F., & Paulus, W. (2003). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114,11, 2220-2.

 Nitsche, M.A., Liebetanz, D., Antal, A., Lang, N., Tergau, F. & Paulus, W. (2003). Chapter 27 Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation – technical, safety and functional aspects. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology, 56, 255-76.

 Nathan, S.S., Sinha, S.R., Gordon, B., Lesser, R.P., & Thakor, N.V. (1993). Determination of current density distributions generated by electrical stimulation of the human cerebral cortex.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysioogyl. 86, 183–192.

 Liebetanz, D., Koch, R., Mayenfels, S., König, F., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M.A. (2009). Safety limits of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rats. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 6, 1161-7.

 Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal. A., & Paulus, W. (2007) Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull, 72, 208-14.

 Palm, U., Keeser, D., Schiller, C., Fintescu, Z., Nitsche, M., Reisinger, E., & Padberg, F. (2008). Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain

Stimulation, 1, 4, 386-7.

 Kim, D.Y., Ohn, S.H., Yang, E.J., Park, C.I., & Jung, K.J. (2009). Enhancing motor performance by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke patients.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 88, 10, 829-36.

 Kim, D.Y., Lim, J.Y., Kang, E.K., You, D.S., Oh, M.K., Oh, B.M., & Paik, N.J. (2010). Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89, 11, 879-86.

 Wu, D., Qian, L., Zorowitz, R.D., Zhang, L., Qu, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2013). Effects on Decreasing Upper-Limb Poststroke Muscle Tone Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1, 1–8.

 Bradnam, L.V., Stinear, C.M., Barber, P.A., & Byblow, W.D. (2012). Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 11, 2662-71.

 Stagg, C.J., Bachtiar, V., O'Shea, J., Allman, C., Bosnell, R.A., Kischka, U., Matthews, P.M., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic stroke. Brain, 135, 1, 276-84.

 Butler, A., Shuster, M., O'Hara, E., Hurley, K., Middlebrooks, D., & Guilkey, K. (2013). A meta- analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26, 2,162-171.

 Serrao, M., Bartolo, M., Ranavolo, A., & Pierelli, F. (2012). Analisi quantitativa del cammino e nuove tecnologie in riabilitzione neurologica. In G. Sandrini e R. Dattola, Compendio di

Neuroriabilitazione (pp. 629-30). Roma: Verducci.

Nudo, R.J., Friel, K.M. (1999). Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation.

Revue Neurologique (Paris), 155, 9, 713-7.

 Fasoli, S.E., Krebs, H.I., Stein, J., Frontera, W.R., & Hogan, N. (2003). Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine

and Rehabilitation, 84, 4, 477-82.

 Straudi, S., Benedetti, M.G., & Bonato, P. (2011). Neuroplasticità e motor learning: nuove strategie nella riabilitazione dell'arto superiore nel paziente con ictus cerebrale. Scienza Riabilitativa, 13, 1, 5-11.

 Prange, G.B., Jannink, M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., Hermens, H.J., & Ijzerman, M.J. (2006). Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43, 2, 171-84.

 Takahashi, C.D., Reinkensmeyer, D.J. (2003). Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 2, 131-40.

 Dipietro, L., Krebs, H.I., Fasoli, S.E., Volpe, B.T., Stein, J., Bever, C., & Hogan, N. (2007). Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 2, 757-68.

 Mazzoleni, S., Crecchi, R., Posteraro, F., & Carrozza, M.C. (2012). Effects of robot-assisted wrist therapy in chronic stroke patients: a kinematic approach”, in Proc. 4th IEEE RAS/EMBS Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, June 24-27, Rome, pp. 1978- 1982.

 Takahashi, CD., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R.R., & Cramer, S.C. (2008). Robot- based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain, 131, 2, 425-37.

Dobkin, B.H. (2004). Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurology, 3, 9, 528-36.

 Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 5, 2, 3208-24.

 Gallotta, E., Mancuso, N., Listrani, A., Magrone, G., Romanelli, A., Zollo, L., Guglielmelli, E., & Sterzi. (2008). L’utilizzo della tecnologia robotica nella disabilità motoria cronica dell’arto superiore da stroke. Europa Medicophysica, 44, 1, 3.

 Hesse, S., Waldner, A., Mehrholz, J., Tomelleri, C., Pohl, M. & Werner C. (2011). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke

patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25, 9, 838-46.

 S. Mazzoleni, S. Bigazzi, F. Posteraro, M. C. Carrozza, “Robotic wrist rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients”, in Atti Congresso Nazionale di Bioingegneria 2012, Rome, 26-29 giugno 2012, ISBN:978 88 555 3182-5.

 Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Archambault, P.S., & Fung, J. (2012). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 49, 4.

 Charles, S.K., Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Lynch, D., & Neville Hogan. Wrist rehabilitation following stroke: initial clinical results, in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics June 28 - July 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, USA

 Fregni, F., Boggio, P.S., Mansur, C.G., Wagner, T., Ferreira, M.J., Lima M.C., Rigonatti, S.P., Marcolin, M.A., Freedman, S.D., Nitsche, M.A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport, 28, 16, 14, 1551-5.

Documenti correlati