• Non ci sono risultati.

Molecular tools for the characterization of Aspergillus flavus strains

A. flavus populations and their mycovirome

1. Background

1.3. Detection of Mycoviruses

To identificate mycoviruses, their genomes must be fully sequenced and annotated. This information is crucial for assessing the diversity of the virome in Aspergillus species, since the electrophoretic profiles of the dsRNA elements on agarose gels cannot be reliably used to infer evolutionary relationships with other viruses. Nerva et al in their work of 2015 reported how detection techniques evolved over time, from electrophoretic gel to NGS techonolgy. The classic method for the detection of mycoviruses consists of the purification of dsRNA using CF11 cellulose;

this simple and cheap technique is able to detect the most of viruses with dsRNA genomes (and, with some extent, also dsRNA replication intermediates from ssRNA genome viruses), and this is probably the reason why the majority of the so far described mycoviruses have a dsRNA genome (Nerva et al. 2015). Another common way of detection is through virus particle’s purification using

151

differential centrifugation protocols combined with observation by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). This approach allows the detection of viruses with different kind of genomes, but requires a traditional virological expertise and expensive equipment, which are not always available in the most common laboratories working on fungal and molecular biology; in addition, this technique is unsuitable for “naked” viruses, a fairly common feature for mycoviruses. The identification of new mycovirus taxonomic groups therefore strongly requires new approaches of diagnosis and detection. In this sense, a new impulse to this research field came from the even more diffused availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) dedicated protocols; in fact, as reported in a wide number of publications, NGS techniques proved di be able to detect the presence of viral sequences in samples with very low viral titer. For example, Al Rwahnih et al.,(2011) and Espach, (2013) analyzed the total RNA extract from plant using NGS techniques, reaching not only to detect the plant viruses, but also to characterize at the same time the whole virome of the fungal endophytes. If applied to total RNA extract, NGS allows the detection of all the different viral taxa because, independently from the DNA or RNA genome, all of them must produce mRNA during their replication cycle. NGS can be applied also to small RNA (sRNA) libraries: Kreuze et al. (2009) showed the possibility to assemble new and unknown viral sequences from RNA libraries obtained from plants. To our knowledge, this approach has been used very recently for de novo assembly of viral genomes from fungi (Vainio et al., 2015). Nerva et al (2015) reported a complete method of RNAseq.

152

2. Definition of the mycovirome inside A. flavus population from Italy and Madagascar A selection of 62 A. flavus strains, isolated from maize grains collected in the Po valley (35 strains from Emilia-Romagna, 9 from Friuli-Venezia Giulia, 6 from Piemonte, 6 from Veneto, 3 from Lombardia and 3 from Trentino Alto-Adige), and 36 A. flavus strains and 5 strains of A. tamarii from maize grains collected in the Lokobe nature reserve in Madagascar, was subjected to the analysis of the mycovirome (Figure 91).

Figure 91: Complete list of Italian and Madagascar strains.

Strains were grown in YES 5% medium in multi-well plates; the total RNA was extracted from single mycelia before conidiation, then put together at the same concentration (1ng) for each sample. RNA mix was subjected to RNAseq analysis. As results of sequence alignment in specific databases, viral dsRNAs have been identified. The presence of strain-specific viruses was assessed in each single

153

strain subjecting the relevant RNA to reverse transcription and then to Real Time PCR analysis.

Tables 11 and 12 report the complete list of A. flavus strains with the relevant mycoviruses.

MADAGASCAR

STRAIN MYCOVIRUS STRAIN MYCOVIRUS

LOK 16 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 62 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 18 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 64 -

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 21 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 66 -

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 38 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 69 -

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 44 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 71 -

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 47 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 30 +

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 50 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 49 +

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 56 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 65 +

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2

LOK 57 - Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1

Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 68 + Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 LOK 6 Aspergillus flavus RNA virus 1

LOK 7 Aspergillus flavus RNA virus 1 LOK 19 Aspergillus flavus RNA virus 1

ITALY

STRAIN MYCOVIRUS STRAIN MYCOVIRUS

CR 1 - Aspergillus flavus polymycovirus 1 OZ 7 - Aspergillus flavus flexivirus 1 Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 1 Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 2 CR 5 - Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 2 OZ 15 - Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 3

Aspergillus flavus flexivirus 1 Aspergillus flavus flexivirus 1 CR 8 - Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 2

OZ 11 - Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 2 CR 9 - Aspergillus flavus polymycovirus 1 Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 3 VEN 7 - Aspergillus flavus narnavirus 2

LOM 7 - Aspergillus flavus ourmia-like virus 2 Pie 6- Aspergillus flavus narnavirus 2 Aspergillus flavus narnavirus 1 Fri 7 - Aspergillus flavus partitivirus 2

MN 1 - Aspergillus flavus narnavirus 1 Fri 3 + Aspergillus flavus partitivirus 2 Aspergillus flavus clostero-like virus 1

Table 11: Complete list of Italian and Madagascar A. flavus strains with the relevant mycoviruses.

154

ITALIAN STRAINS VIRUS FREE

Afla+

Afla-OZ 1 + CR 6 + UD 1 + Fri 5 - OZ 14 - OZ 10 -

0Z 2 + Fri 6 + OZ 16 + UD 3 - MAM 13 - EMI 5 -

OZ 3 + CR 10 + Fri 8 + BO - OZ 17 - OZ 4 -

OZ 6 + TN µ + Pie 10 + VEN 1 - TO φ - OZ 5 -

OZ 8 + CR 16 + UD 4 + VR Ɛ - PR α - CR 7 -

EMI 4 + CR 18 + AT 1 + Pie 1 - OZ 18 - CR 14 -

OZ 19 + Fri 2 + VEN 2 + Pie 9 - GR - OZ 9 -

VEN 4 + TN δ + TN β +

VEN 8 + LOM 6 +

MADAGASCAR STRAINS VIRUS FREE

Afla+ Afla-

LOK 11 + LOK 42 + LOK 55 + LOK 22 - LOK 48 LOK 53 -

LOK 14 + LOK 43 + LOK 63+ LOK 25 - LOK 45 - LOK 60 -

LOK 26 + LOK 46 + LOK 70 + LOK 29 - LOK 51 LOK 72 -

LOK 32 + LOK 52 +

Table 12: Complete list of Italian and Madagascar A. flavus strains virus free.

As general observation, it could be commented that the 20% of Italian strains and 50% of Malagasy strains resulted infected by mycoviruses. The characterized viral population proved to be heterogeneous, but overall completely different between the two groups of isolates belonging to the two different geographical areas. While in the African group only Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 1 and Aspergillus flavus negative single-stranded RNA 2 were detected, Italian strains were found to be infected by several different viruses (polymycovirus 1 ourmia-like virus 1, 2 and 3, flexivirus 1, narnavirus 1 and 2, clostero-like virus 1, partitivirus 2, RNA virus 1, negative single-stranded RNA 1 negative single-stranded RNA 2). Aspergillus tamarii strains, included as outgroup, showed to carry only Aspergillus flavus RNA virus 1. Interestingly, data showed that A.

flavus strains infected by viruses were predominantly non-toxigenic strains: in fact, amongst the 60 isolates only one afla+ resulted infected, whereas 12 afla- were positive to mycoviruses detection.

The same also repeats for African isolates: 3 afla+ strains versus 15 afla- were infected.

155

Documenti correlati