• Non ci sono risultati.

j our na l h o me p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / d r u g a l c d e p

Shortcommunication

High-sensitivitygamma-glutamyltransferasefractionpattern

inalcohol

addicts

andabstainers

MariaFranzinia,c,∗,IreneFornaciaria,TizianaVicob,MarcoMoncinib,ValerioCellesib,

MiloMeinib,MicheleEmdinc,AldoPaolicchic,d

aScuolaSuperioreSant’Anna,Pz.MartiridellaLibertà33,56127Pisa,Italy

bDrugAddictionDepartment,AziendaASL5,ViaFleming1,56025Pontedera(Pi),Italy

cDivisionofCardiovascularMedicine,FondazioneG.MonasterioCNRRegioneToscana,ViaGiuseppeMoruzzi1,56124Pisa,Italy dDepartmentofExperimentalPathology,UniversityofPisa,ViaRoma55,56126Pisa,Italy

a r t i c l e i n f o

Articlehistory:

Received22December2011 Receivedinrevisedform12April2012 Accepted4June2012

Available online 29 June 2012

Keywords: Alcohol Biomarker

Gamma-glutamyltransferasefractions Gelfiltrationchromatography

a b s t r a c t

Background:Fourfractionsofgamma-glutamyltransferase(GGT)withdifferentmolecularweight(b-,m-,

s-,andf-GGT)arepresentinhumanplasma.DifferentialGGTfractionpatternisfoundinnon-alcoholic

liverdisease(NAFLD)andchronicviralhepatitis,characterizedbynormalordecreasedb-GGT/s-GGT

(b/s)ratio,respectively.

Methods:ChromatographicfractionalGGTanalysiswasperformedonplasmaobtainedfrom51subjects:

27alcoholics(mean(SD),age45(9)years;23males;14positiveforviralinfection),24abstinentsfrom

atleast1month(43(12)years;20males;6positiveforviralinfection).Twenty-sevenblooddonors

matchedforageandgender(44(9)years;23males)wereselectedascontrols.

Results:Allfractionsweresignificantlyincreasedinalcoholics(P<0.001),s-GGTshowingthelargest

increase,whileonlym-GGTands-GGTwereelevatedinabstainers(P<0.01),incomparisonwithcontrols.

Theb/sratiowassignificantlylowerinbothalcoholicsandabstainersthanincontrols(median(25th–75th

perc.):0.10(0.07–0.15),0.16(0.10–0.24),0.35(0.29–0.53),respectively,P<0.001).Viralinfectiondidnot

significantlychangesabsolutevaluesofindividualGGTfractionsinalcoholics,buttheb/sratiowas

significantlylowerinviruspositivethaninvirusnegativesubjects(0.08(0.05–0.12),0.14(0.09–0.20),

respectively,P<0.01).

Conclusions:ThefractionpatternanalysismightincreasethespecificityofGGTasbiomarkerofalcohol

abuse,especiallyconcerningthedifferentialdiagnosisbetweenalcoholismandNAFLD,acommoncause

ofelevatedGGTlevelinthegeneralpopulation.

© 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Serumgamma-glutamyltransferase(GGT)isawell-recognized sensitivebiomarkerofalcoholabuse(RosalkiandRau,1972;Das etal.,2008).GGTspecificityanddiagnosticaccuracyforalcoholism arereducedbythefactthatserumGGTelevatedlevelsareencoun- teredinvariousphysiologicalandpathologicalsettingincluding awidearrayofhepatobiliarydisorders(DhanyaandVasudevan, 2008).Inparticular,acommoncauseofserumGGTincreaseisthe non-alcoholicfattyliverdisease(NAFLD),thataffectsa growing proportionofthepopulation(Bedognietal.,2005;Tahanetal.,

∗ Correspondingauthorat:ScuolaSuperioreSant’Anna,c/oFondazioneToscana G.Monasterio,ViaG.Moruzzi1,56124Pisa,Italy.Tel.:+390503153309; fax:+390503152166.

E-mailaddresses:m.franzini@sssup.it,franzinimaria@gmail.com(M.Franzini).

2008),thusthepossibilityofdiscriminatingbetweenthetwodis- easeswouldhelpthediagnosisofbothconditions.

Total GGT activity corresponds to several distinct GGT- containingmolecularcomplexes,withdifferentphysico-chemical properties(Huseby,1982),pathophysiologicalandclinicalcorre- lations(NemesanszkyandLott,1985).Recently,ahighsensitivity clinicallaboratorymethodhasbecomeavailable,thatallows,in humanplasma,thesimultaneousdetectionoffourdifferentfrac- tionsof GGT, namelyb-GGT,m-GGT,s-GGT, and f-GGT,having molecularweight rangingfrom 2000to70kDa (Franzini etal., 2008a).Whilef-GGTisthemostabundantGGTfractioninhealthy individuals(Franzinietal.,2008b),theotherfractionsareresponsi- bleforGGTincreaseindiseasedones.Recently,wefounddifferent GGTfractionpatternscharacterizingeitherNAFLD,orchronicviral hepatitisC(CHC):theformerwascharacterizedbyanincreasein allfractionswithoutchangingintheb-GGT/s-GGT(b/s)ratio,and thelaterbyaprominentincreaseins-GGTtogetherwithamodest

Controls(n=27) Alcoholics(n=27) Abstainers(n=24) P Controlsvs. alcoholics P Controlsvs. abstainers P Alcoholicsvs. abstainers Males,n 23 23 20 Age,years 44.0(35.0–48.0) 44.0(36.0–48.0) 39.0(35.5–53.0) n.s. n.s. n.s. BMI,kg/m2 24.8(22.9–27.0) 23.5(21.6–27.3) 24.3(22.0–26.1) n.s. n.s. n.s. AST,U/L 20.0(17.0–23.0) 58.0(31.0–96.0) 22.5(18.0–33.0) <0.001 n.s. <0.001 ALT,U/L 24.0(15.0–26.0) 57.0(25.0–95.0) 29.0(15.0–41.5) <0.01 n.s. <0.05 MCV,fL 85.9(83.3–87.5) 95.1(89.2–102.3) 93.1(91.0–95.3) <0.001 <0.001 n.s. Bilirubin,mg/dL 0.80(0.60–0.90) 0.76(0.45–1.11) 0.44(0.32–0.81) n.s. n.s. n.s. TotalGGT,U/La 23.9(15.1–32.0) 133.0(50.1–287.0) 37.5(19.4–84.8) <0.001 <0.05 <0.001 b-GGT,U/La 2.4(1.4–4.5) 7.5(3.2–21.0) 2.8(1.3–7.6) <0.001 n.s. <0.01 m-GGT,U/La 1.0(0.5–1.5) 5.2(2.8–19.0) 2.1(0.8–4.5) <0.001 <0.01 <0.001 s-GGT,U/La 7.3(3.6–12.4) 95.7(30.1–207.8) 15.3(8.1–58.5) <0.001 <0.01 <0.001 f-GGT,U/L 13.7(9.9–16.9) 22.7(15.4–26.7) 14.4(9.0–18.8) <0.001 n.s. <0.001 b/sratioa 0.35(0.29–0.53) 0.10(0.07–0.15) 0.16(0.10–0.24) <0.001 <0.001 <0.05

Dataarepresentedasmedian(25th–75thpercentile).BMI:bodymassindex;AST:aspartate-aminotransferase;ALT:alanineaminotransferase;MCV:meancorpuscular volume;GGT:gamma-glutamyltransferase.Statisticalanalysis:1-wayANOVAfollowedbyTukey’smultiplecomparisontest.n.s.:notsignificant.

aStatisticalanalysisperformedonln-transformeddata.

increaseinotherfractionsanddecreaseoftheb/sratio(Franzini etal.,2011).

Sincesteatosisisamainfeatureofhepatocellulardamageoccur- ringearlyinthecourseofalcoholicliverdisease(ALD;Basraand Anand,2011),weaimedtocheckwhethertheGGTfractionpattern associatedwithALDcouldmimicthosefoundinNAFLD(Franzini etal.,2011),inapreliminaryseriesofalcoholaddicts.Thiswould permittodesignlarge-scalestudiesconcerningthediagnosticvalue ofGGTfractionanalysisinthesettingofalcoholabuse.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

Fastingbloodsampleswereobtainedfrom51subjectswithpositivehistoryof alcoholdependenceaccordingtotheICD-9-CMDiagnosisCode303.9(mean(SD; range):age43.6(10.6;26–69)years;45malesand6females;abuseduration4.6 (range1.3–20)years).AllthesesubjectswereenrolledinthestudyattheAlcoholism CenteroftheDrugAddictionDepartmentoftheLocalHealthService(Pisa,Italy).

Alcoholdependenceandconsumptionwereestimatedbyphysiciansofthe AlcoholismCenter baseduponthe informationcollected from thepatientas well asfrom his/her relatives during the interview.The alcohol content of onestandarddrinkinItaly is assumedto be12g ofpurealcohol (website:

http://icap.org/PolicyIssues/DrinkingGuidelines).AccordingtoWHOrecommenda- tionswesetthelimitofhazardousalcoholconsumptionto>45g/dayformenand >30g/dayforwomen(Schellenbergetal.,2005).

Twenty-foursubjectswereabstinentforatleast1month(age43.3(12.1;26–69) years;20men;abstinencetime:2.7(3.4)months):thesesubjectswillbereferredas “abstainers”.SixabstainerswereeitherhepatitisCvirus(HCV)orhepatitisBvirus (HBV)antibodiespositive.Abnormalitiesinbothalanine(ALT)andaspartate-amino transferase(AST)havebeendetectedin3abstainers.Theother3abstainersshowed ALTand/orASTelevation.

Twenty-sevensubjectswerecurrentlyalcoholdependent(age44.9(9.2;30–65) years;23men;alcoholconsumption:209(192;100–810)g/day).Fourteensubjects (age40.1(6.5;30–50)years;12men;alcoholconsumption162(78;80–290)g/day) wereHCVorHBVantibodiespositivewithbothASTandALTelevatedlevels,10 amongthemwereprovedpositiveforHCV-RNAtestorHBVsurfaceantigen(HBsAg). Theremaining13subjects(age48.0(10.1;33–65)years;11men;alcoholconsump- tion250(254;100–810)g/day)showednegativevirologyanalysis,amongthem,7 showedASTandALTelevation.

Twenty-sevenblooddonorsmatchedforageandgenderhavebeenselectedas controls(age43.7(9.3;27–64)years;23men;alcoholconsumption≤20g/day).

TheInstitutionalEthicsCommitteeapprovedthestudyandallsubjectsgave informedconsent.

2.2. Laboratoryanalyses

Fastingbloodsamples,collectedinethylenediamine-tetra-aceticacid(EDTA), wereobtainedfromallsubjects.AST,ALT,meancorpuscularvolume(MCV),total bilirubin,serumglucose,totalcholesterol,HDLcholesterol,LDLcholesterol,triglyc- eridesandcreatinineclearance(eGFR)wereassayedwithin3haccordingtothe standardclinicallaboratoryproceduresbyautomatedanalyzers(BeckmanSynchron CX9-PROanalyzer,AbbottCell-DynSaphireforbloodcellcount).LDLcholesterol

andeGFRwerecalculatedusingtheFriedewaldandtheCockcroft-Gaultformula, respectively.

2.3. FractionalGGTanalysis

AliquotsofplasmaEDTAsampleswerestoredat−20◦Candusedwithinthree

monthsforfractionalGGTanalysis.AnalysisoftotalandfractionalGGTwasper- formed,aspreviouslydescribed(Franzinietal.,2008a,b),usingafastprotein liquidchromatographysystem(AKTApurifier;GEHealthcareEurope,Milan,Italy) equippedwithagel-filtrationcolumn(Superose6HR10/300GL;GEHealthcare Europe)andafluorescencedetector(JascoFP-2020;JascoEurope,Lecco,Italy). Theenzymaticactivitywasquantifiedbypost-columninjectionofthefluores- centsubstrateforGGT,gamma-glutamyl-7-amido-4-methylcoumarin(gGluAMC). Enzymaticreaction,inthepresenceofgGluAMC0.030mmol/Landglycylglycine 4.5mmol/L,proceededfor4.5mininareactioncoil(PFA,2.6mL)keptatthe37◦C

inawaterbath.Thefluorescencedetectoroperatingatexcitation/emissionwave- lengthsof380/440nmdetectedtheAMCsignal.Areaundercurvechromatogram curveisproportionaltoGGTactivity,whichwasquantifiedaspreviouslydescribed (Franzinietal.,2008b).

2.4. Statisticalanalysis

Statisticalanalysiswasconductedbyone-wayANOVAanalysisfollowedby Tukey’smultiplecomparisontestorStudent’sttest.Total,b-,m-ands-GGT,aswell asb/sratioandtriglyceridevalueswereln-transformedtoreducethedistribution skewness.

3. Results

As expected, significant elevation of aspartate-amino trans- ferase(AST, P<0.001),alanine-amino transferase(ALT,P<0.01), andmean corpuscularvolume(MCV,P<0.001)wasdetectedin alcohol addicts ascompared to controls.Abstainers showedan increaseinMCVvaluesonly(P<0.001;Table1).

AlthoughtotalGGTvaluesweresignificantlyincreasedinalco- holaddictsandabstainersascomparedtocontrols(P<0.001and <0.05, respectively), while all GGT fractions were significantly higherinalcoholics(P<0.001),onlym-GGTands-GGTremained significantlyelevatedin abstainers(P<0.01;Table1).In alcohol addicts,a13.1-foldincreasevalueins-GGTwasdetected,together withasignificantbutmoremodestelevationinallotherfractions (f-GGT:1.7-fold;b-GGT:3.1-fold;m-GGT:5.2-fold).Inabstainers, asstated above,thevalues ofboth m-GGTand s-GGTfractions remainedsignificantlyhigherthanincontrols,butatamuchlower extent(2.1-foldfor both).Thustheb/s ratioremainedlowerin bothgroups(P<0.001),thanincontrols,withahigherb/sratio inabstainersthaninaddicts(P<0.05;Table1).

Amongaddicts,nosignificantdifferencesasconcernseachGGT fractionwere found between theHCV/HBV positive or (n=14) or negative (n=13) subjects, except for the b/s ratio,that was

Alcoholics HCV/HBVnegative(n=13) HCV/HBVpositive(n=14) P TotalGGTa 168.0(45.7–695.4) 129.0(73.2–274.5) n.s. b-GGTa 9.0(3.0–60.0) 5.6(3.4–14.4) n.s. m-GGTa 8.4(2.5–32.2) 4.5(2.9–15.3) n.s. s-GGTa 112.9(24.6–502.1) 95.6(48.8–205.3) n.s. f-GGT 22.7(14.0–55.3) 22.7(18.0–25.5) n.s. b/sratioa 0.14(0.09–0.20) 0.08(0.05–0.12) 0.0045

Abstainers HCV/HBVnegative(n=18) HCV/HBVpositive(n=6) P

TotalGGTa 37.5(18.0–261.8) 47.1(25.0–130.3) n.s. b-GGTa 2.7(1.1–25.6) 3.0(1.5–6.9) n.s. m-GGTa 2.0(0.7–4.6) 2.1(1.1–6.7) n.s. s-GGTa 15.3(7.1–56.7) 30.1(9.2–94.8) n.s. f-GGT 14.2(8.2–19.0) 14.4(10.9–21.1) n.s. b/sratioa 0.17(0.11–0.25) 0.11(0.05–0.25) n.s.

Dataarereportedasmedian(25th–75thpercentile).

aStudent’sttesthasbeenperformedonln-transformeddata.

significantlyhigherinthelattergroup(P<0.01;Table2), butin bothcasessignificantlylowerthanincontrols(P<0.001forboth comparisons).Withinabstainersnodifferenceswerefoundinb/s ratio,betweenHCV/HBVpositiveornegativesubjects(Table2).

4. Discussion

InthepresentstudyweshowthattheelevationoftotalGGTin alcoholaddictsisassociatedwithaprominents-GGTincrease,and alesserincreaseofallthreeotherfractions.Forthisreason,theb/s ratioresultedsignificantlylowerthanincontrols.

ThisGGTfractionpatterncorrespondstothatfoundinsubjects withchronicviralhepatitisC(CHC),butnotinsubjectswithnon- alcoholicfattyliverdisease(NAFLD)whoarecharacterizedbyb/s ratiovaluescomparabletothoseofhealthysubjects(Franzinietal., 2011).Interestingly,despitesimilarabsolutevaluesoftotalGGT anditsfractions, thedecreaseinb/sratio wasmore markedin alcoholaddictsprovedtobepositiveforviralinfection,suggesting thatb/sratioisadistinctandpotentiallyquantitativebiomarkerof hepatocellulardamageinalcoholism,eveninthepresenceofviral infection.

AbstinencefromalcoholresultedinloweringoftotalGGTval- ues:b-GGTandf-GGTfractionsreturnedtonormalvalues,while m-GGTands-GGTlevelsremainedpersistentlyhigh,inadditionto alowerb/sratiothanincontrols.Thisfindingconfirmsb/sratioasa sensitivebiomarkerofpersistentliverdamage,independentlyfrom totalGGTlevel.Inaddition,thedifferentialdecreaseintheGGT fractionsinalcoholabstainerssuggeststhatGGTfractionanalysis mightperformbetterthantotalGGT,asformonitoringabstinence. Concerningtheinterferencebetweenviralhepatitisandalcohol addiction,theb/sratioshowedasignificantdifferencebetween HCV/HBV positive and negativealcohol addicts,but not among HCV/HBVpositiveandnegativeabstainers;anywayitislikelytobe duetothemodestsamplesize(6positivevs.18negativeabstain- ers);largerstudiesareneededtofullyexplorethediagnosticvalue oftheb/sratiointhisfield.

Ina previousstudy,weshowedthat fractionalGGTanalysis showedhigherspecificityand sensitivityfor thedirectand dif- ferentialdiagnosisofNAFLDandCHCincomparisontototalGGT activity(Franzinietal.,2011).WhenconsideringthatamongNAFLD subjects,highserumGGTlevelshavebeenalreadyidentifiedaspre- dictorsofliverfibrosisrisk(Tahanetal.,2008),furtherandlarger prospectivestudiesareneededtoestablishthepotentialvalueof theindividualGGTfractionsandoftheb/sratio,eitherinthescreen- ingofalcohol abuse,oraspredictorsofchronicliverdamagein

Roleoffundingsource

ThisworkwassupportedbyInstitutionalfunding(G.Monas- terio Foundation CNR-Regione Toscana, Scuola Sant’Anna and UniversityofPisa,Italy).Allfundingbodieshadnofurtherrolein studydesign;inthecollection,analysisandinterpretationofdata; inthewritingofthereport;orinthedecisiontosubmitthepaper forpublication.

Contributors

AuthorsAP,MEandMMdesignedthestudyandwrotethepro- tocol.AuthorTV,MMandVCselectedparticipantstothestudyand providedplasmasamples.AuthorIFperformedfractionalGGTanal- ysis.AuthorMFundertookthestatisticalanalysiswithsignificant scientificinputfromMEandAP.AuthorMFwrotethefirstdraft ofthemanuscriptandauthorsAP,MEandMMcontributedtothe maincontentandprovidedcriticalcommentsonthefinaldraft.All authorsapprovedthefinalmanuscript.

Conflictofinterest

Noconflictdeclared.

Acknowledgements

Theauthorsthankthestudyparticipantsfortheircontribution totheresearch.

References

Basra,S.,Anand,B.S.,2011.Definition,epidemiologyandmagnitudeofalcoholic hepatitis.WorldJ.Hepatol.3,108–113.

Bedogni,G.,Miglioli,L.,Masutti,F.,Tiribelli,C.,Marchesini,G.,Bellentani,S.,2005. Prevalenceofandriskfactorsfornonalcoholicfattyliverdisease:theDionysos nutritionandliverstudy.Hepatology42,44–52.

Das,S.K.,Dhanya,L.,Vasudevan,D.M.,2008.Biomarkersofalcoholism:anupdated review.Scand.J.Clin.Lab.Invest.68,81–92.

Franzini,M.,Bramanti,E.,Ottaviano,V.,Ghiri,E.,Scatena,F.,Barsacchi,R.,Pompella, A.,Donato,L.,Emdin,M.,Paolicchi,A.,2008a.Ahighperformancegelfiltra- tionchromatographymethodforgamma-glutamyltransferasefractionanalysis. Anal.Biochem.374,1–6.

Franzini,M.,Fornaciari,I.,Fierabracci,V.,Elawadi,H.A.,Bolognesi,V.,Maltinti,S.,Ric- chiuti,A.,DeBortoli,N.,Marchi,S.,Pompella,A.,Passino,C.,Emdin,M.,Paolicchi, A.,2011.Accuracyofb-GGTfractionforthediagnosisofnon-alcoholicfattyliver disease.LiverInt.32,629–634.

Franzini, M., Ottaviano, V., Fierabracci, V., Bramanti, E., Zyw, L., Barsacchi, R., Scatena, F., Boni, C., Mammini, C., Passino, C., Pompella, A., Emdin, M., Paolicchi, A., 2008b. Fractions of plasma gamma-glutamyltransferase

Association of the enzyme with lipoproteins. Clin. Chim. Acta 124, 103–112.

Nemesanszky,E.,Lott,J.A.,1985.Gamma-glutamyltransferaseanditsisoenzymes: progressandproblems.Clin.Chem.31,797–803.

Rosalki,S.B.,Rau,D.,1972.Serum-glutamyltranspeptidaseactivityinalcoholism. Clin.Chim.Acta39,41–47.

2005.Dose–effectrelationbetweendailyethanolintakeintherange0–70grams and%CDTvalue:validationofacut-offvalue.AlcoholAlcohol.40,531–534. Tahan,V.,Canbakan,B.,Balci,H.,Dane,F.,Akin,H.,Can,G.,Hatemi,I.,Olgac,

V., Sonsuz,A., Ozbay,G., Yurdakul, I.,Senturk, H., 2008. Serum gamma- glutamyltranspeptidasedistinguishesnon-alcoholicfattyliverdiseaseathigh risk.Hepatogastroenterology55,1433–1438.

C

HAPTER

5

C

IRCULATING GAMMA

-

GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE

FRACTIONS IN LIVER CIRRHOSIS

C I R R H O S I S A N D L I V E R F A I L U R E

Documenti correlati