Multi-Criteria
Decision
Analysis
to
prioritize
hospital
admission
of
patients
affected
by
COVID-19
in
low-resource
settings
with
hospital-bed
shortage
Pasquale
De
Nardo
a,*
,1,
Elisa
Gentilotti
a,1,
Fulvia
Mazzaferri
d,
Eleonora
Cremonini
a,
Paul
Hansen
b,
Herman
Goossens
c,
Evelina
Tacconelli
a,
the
members
of
the
COVID-19MCDA
Group
2a
DivisionofInfectiousDiseases,DepartmentofDiagnosticsandPublicHealth,UniversityofVerona,Italy
b
DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofOtago,Dunedin,NewZealand
cLaboratoryofMedicalMicrobiology,VaccineandInfectiousDiseasesInstitute,UniversityofAntwerp,Antwerp,Belgium d
DivisionofInfectiousDiseases,DepartmentofMedicine,VeronaUniversityHospital,Verona,Italy
ARTICLE INFO Articlehistory: Received13May2020
Receivedinrevisedform22June2020 Accepted24June2020
Keywords: SARSCoV-2 COVID-19
Multi-CriteriaDecisionAnalysis Pandemic
ABSTRACT
Objective:TouseMulti-CriteriaDecisionAnalysis(MCDA)todetermineweightsforelevencriteriain ordertoprioritizeCOVID-19non-criticalpatientsforadmissiontohospitalinhealthcaresettingswith limitedresources.
Methods:TheMCDAwasappliedintwomainsteps:specificationofcriteriaforprioritizingCOVID-19 patients(and levelswithineachcriterion);and determinationofweightsforthecriteriabasedon experts’knowledgeandexperienceinmanagingCOVID-19patients,viaanonlinesurvey.Criteriawere selectedbasedonavailable COVID-19evidencewithafocuson low-andmiddle-incomecountries (LMICs).
Results:Themostimportantcriteria(meanweights,summingto100%)are:PaO2(16.3%);peripheralO2
saturation(15.9%);chestX-ray(14.1%);ModifiedEarlyWarningScore-MEWS(11.4%);respiratoryrate (9.5%);comorbidities(6.5%);livingwithvulnerablepeople(6.4%);bodymassindex(5.6%);durationof symptomsbeforehospitalevaluation(5.4%);CRP(5.1%);andage(3.8%).
Conclusions:Atthebeginningofanewpandemic,whenevidencefordiseasepredictorsislimitedor unavailableandeffectivenationalcontingencyplansaredifficulttoestablish,theMCDAprioritization modelcouldplayapivotalroleinimprovingtheresponseofhealthsystems.
©2020TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofInternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases. ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Background
Asof13thMay2020,therehavebeen4,170,424confirmedcases and287,399confirmeddeathsfromSARSCoV-2worldwide(World HealthOrganization.COVID-19diseasepandemic,2020).Sincethe firstcaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019(COVID-19)wasrecorded
inItalyon21stFebruary,2,735,628nasopharyngealswabshave been processed. The number of cases and deaths has reached 222,104 and 31,106 respectively, with Italy having one of the highest nationalratesof localtransmission.The Italian govern-mentimposedaggressivemeasurestocontainthespreadofthe disease.Nevertheless,thedailyincidenceofnewCOVID-19cases anddeathsreachedalarmingrates(MinisterodellaSalute. COVID-19SituazioneinItalia,2020).SARSCoV-2appearedinItalyinthe middleoffluseason,contributingtotheover-crowdingofprimary care,outpatientclinicsandemergencydepartments. Duetothe COVID-19 pandemic emergency, the Italian National Health System (NHS), which is regionally based and offers universal accesstohealthcare,hasbeenclosetocollapse(Armocidaetal., 2020).Theshortageofavailablehospitalbedsandthelackofbeds inintensivecareunits(ICUs)forcriticallyillpatientshavebeen amongthemajorchallengesfaced.
*Corresponding author at: Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of DiagnosticsandPublicHealth,UniversityofVerona,PiazzaleL.A.Scuro,37134 Verona,Italy.
E-mailaddresses:pasquale.denardo@univr.it(P.DeNardo),
elisa.gentilotti@univr.it(E.Gentilotti),fulvia.mazzaferri@univr.it(F.Mazzaferri),
eleonora.cremonini@univr.it(E.Cremonini),paul.hansen@otago.ac.nz(P.Hansen),
herman.goossens@uza.be(H.Goossens),evelina.tacconelli@univr.it(E.Tacconelli).
1
Contributedequally.
2
ThemembersoftheCOVID-19MCDAGrouparelistedinAppendixA.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.082
1201-9712/©2020TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofInternationalSocietyforInfectiousDiseases.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
International
Journal
of
Infectious
Diseases
Becauseevencountrieswithrobusthealth caresystemsand strongeconomiescanberapidlyoverwhelmedbythisemergency, attentionstartstobefocusedonlessadvantagedareasoftheworld (Hopman et al., 2020). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where over-crowdingrenders social distancing almost impossible,shortagesofhandsanitizersandcleanwaterarethe normandpreventionmeasuresaredifficulttoestablish,thespread ofthepandemiccouldhavecatastrophicconsequences.Healthcare facilities,alreadycongestedandlackingpersonnelandsupplies, are likely tobe rapidly overwhelmed and not able to provide potentially life-savingservices – such as caesarean sectionsor basicsurgery–anymore(Bongetal.,2020).AnAfricantaskforce for coronavirus preparedness and response (AFTCOR) has been established, focusing on: laboratory diagnosis and subtyping, surveillance, infection prevention and control in health care facilities,clinicaltreatmentofpeoplewithsevereCOVID-19,risk communication,and supplychain management(Nkengasonget Mankoula, 2020). Nonetheless, prioritizing access to care in settings at extremely high risk of collapse appears to be unavoidable.
UnliketriageforprioritizingadmissionstoICUs– whichhas beendebated worldwide (Emanuel et al., 2020; White and Lo, 2020;TheHastingsCenter,2020)–noexplicitrecommendations have been developed to identify which COVID-19patients are prioritizedforhospitaladmissioninsettingswithanunsolvable shortageofbedsandinLMICs.Thequalityofsuchprioritization decision-making when multiple criteria need to be considered together can be improved by using structured and explicit methods. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is useful in suchacontext.FundamentaltoMCDAisspecifyingthecriteriathat arerelevantforthedecisionathandanddeterminingtheirrelative importance(usuallyrepresentedintermsofweights).Widelyused in many sectors, MCDA is increasingly employed in healthcare applications to increase the consistency, transparency, and legitimacyofdecisions(Thokalaetal.,2016;Marshetal.,2014).
TheobjectiveofthisstudywastouseMCDAtoidentify non-critical COVID-19 patientswho should be admitted tohospital becauseoftheirriskofrapidclinicaldeterioration.
Methods
MCDAandthePAPRIKAmethod
TheMCDAwasappliedintwomain steps:1.specificationof criteriaforprioritizingCOVID-19patientsforhospitalizationand thelevelswithineachcriterion,and2.determinationofweights for the criteria (and their levels), representing their relative importance,basedonexperts’knowledgeandpreferences.Atthe firststep,evidencefromthescientificliteratureonpredictorsof outcomesinpatientsaffectedbyCOVID-19was reviewedupto March15.Atthesecondstep,alargegroupofItalianexpertswere invitedtocompleteanonlinesurveytodeterminetheweightsfor the criteria. The experts were selected according to their experience in dealing with COVID-19 patients, and included physiciansbasedinemergency,infectiousdiseases,pneumology, andinternal medicinedepartmentsand workinginavarietyof institutions(i.e.universityhospitals,institutesfor researchand treatment,andcommunityhospitals).Attentionwaspaidtothe prevalenceofCOVID-19casesintheexperts’region:moreexperts based in northern Italian regions wereinvited than experts in southernregionswherethediseaseislessprevalent.
The survey was run using 1000minds MCDA software (www.1000minds.com)which implementsthePAPRIKA (Poten-tiallyAllPairwiseRanKingsofallpossibleAlternatives)method (HansenandOmbler,2008).Previousapplicationsofthesoftware andmethodincludeprioritizingpatientsforelectivesurgeryand
creatingtheWorldHealthOrganization’sprioritylistof antibiotic-resistantbacteria tosupportresearchand development ofnew drugs(Hansenetal.,2012;Tacconellietal.,2018).ThePAPRIKA methodinvolvedeachparticipantbeingshownaseriesofpairsof combinations of levels on two criteria at a time (in effect, representingapairofimaginarypatients)andaskedforeachpair: “Whichoneofthesecombinationsofcriteriaismorerelevantforthe hospitalization of aCOVID-19 patient during a health emergency, consideringashortageofhospitalbeds?”.Eachpairofcombinations involved a trade-off between thetwo criteria, suchthat when participantsansweredthequestion–bychoosingoneofthetwo combinationsor indicatingtheyareequal –theyrevealedtheir opinion abouttherelativeimportance ofthetwo criteria.Such questions(alwaysinvolvingatrade-offbetweenthecriteria,twoat atime)wererepeatedwithdifferentcombinationsofthecriteria until enough information was collected to determine each participant’ssetofweightsfor thecriteria(usingmathematical methods based on linear programming) (Hansen and Ombler, 2008).Thecriteriawerenot disclosedtotheexperts beforethe surveyinordernottoinfluencetheiranswers.Twoquestionswere repeatedattheendofthesurveyasaninternalconsistencycheck. Thesoftwarerecordedthenumberofquestionsansweredandthe timetakentoanswereachquestion.Attheendofthesurvey,the expertswerealsoaskedfortheiropinionabouttheusefulnessof lung ultrasound (US) compared to chest X-ray for diagnosing COVID-19pneumonia.
Participants’weightswereaveragedtoproducemeanweights (andstandarddeviations,SD)forthegroupofexpertsasawhole. Significant differences in the mean weights for the criteria (p<0,05)wereassessedthroughaone-wayanalysisofvariance fornormallydistributedvariables,andtheKruskal-Wallisranktest whenthenormalityassumptionwasnotmet.
Roleofthefundingsource
The fundersof thestudyhadnorole instudydesign,data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the article, or the decision to submit forpublication. All authors were responsible for the decision to submit the article for publication.
Results
A board of five Infectious Diseases (ID) physicians with experiencein treatingCOVID-19patientsselected11 criteriato prioritizehospitaladmission,basedonthecurrentevidenceand theavailabilityand feasibilityof criteriainLMICs(Zhanget al., 2020;Chenetal.,2020;Wangetal.,2020;Guanetal.,2020;Mo etal.,2020).Thecriteria(levelsinparentheses)were:1.age(18– 50,50–70,and>70);2.bodymassindex(BMI:<30,30–40,and >40); 3. Co morbidities (diabetes, pre-existing respiratory/ cardiovascular diseases, and onco-hematological diseases); 4. respiratory rate (<20 breaths/min and >20 breaths/min); 5. PaO2 (>80mmHg, 70–80mmHg,and <70mmHg); 6.peripheral
oxygen(O2)saturation(>96%,92–96%,and<92%);7.findingsat
chestX-ray(normal,consolidation,andbilateralinterstitiallung abnormalities); 8. ModifiedEarly WarningScore-MEWS (Subbe et al., 2001), a clinical scoring system including pulse rate, respiratory rate,systolicblood pressure,body temperature,and neurological symptoms (score: 0–2 and 3–4); 9. duration of symptomsbeforehospitalevaluation(<3days,4–7days,and>7 days);10.C-reactiveprotein(CRP:normal/highbylocalcutoff); and11.livingwithvulnerablepeople(i.e.peoplewith comorbid-ities,pregnantwomen,orimmunosuppressedpatients).CRPwas selected considering itspotential availabilityas a point-of-care (POC)testworldwide(Drainetal.,2014).
Launchedon23rdMarch2020,theonlinesurveytodetermine thecriteria weightsranfor 15daysand wascompletedby103 experts.Ofthem,96(93%)answeredthetworepeatedquestions consistently and were therefore included in the final analysis. These96expertswerefrom11Italianregions,withthemajority (70%)fromLombardy,PiedmontandVeneto,thethreeregionsin northernItalywiththehighestburdenofcases.Fifty-threepercent oftheexpertswereworkingatinstitutionsdealingwithmorethan
500COVID-19patientssincethebeginningofthepandemic;32% were based at university hospitals and 20% at institutes for researchandtreatment;77%wereIDphysicians;and 53%were female. The mean number of questions answered by each participantwas36(IQR12),takingmostparticipants10–15min intotal.
Fromtheexperts’answerstothesurvey,themostimportant criterion [meanweights,summing to100%]was revealedtobe
Figure1.Meanweightsforthecriteria
Theboldedvaluesrepresenttherelativeweightsofthecriteriaoverall(i.e.theboldedvaluessumto100%).
Abbreviations:MEWSmodifiedearlywarningscore;“comorbidities”criterionincludes:diabetespre-existingrespiratory/cardiovasculardiseases,andonco-hematological diseases;“livingwithvulnerablepeople”criterionincludes:peoplewithcomorbiditiesand/orpregnantwomen,and/orimmunosuppressedpatients.
PaO2[16.3%],followedbyperipheralO2saturation[15.9%],chest
X-ray[14.1%],MEWS[11.4%],respiratoryrate[9.5%],comorbidities [6.5%],livingwithvulnerablepeople[6.4%],BMI[5.6%],durationof symptomsbeforehospitalevaluation[5.4%],CRP[5.1%],andage [3.8%].Thecriteriaandtheirlevelsandmeanweightsarereported inFigure1.Thevaluesforeachcriterion’shighestlevel(boldedin thefigure)sumacrossthecriteriatoone(100%),andthuseachof thesevaluesiseasilyinterpretableastheattribute’srelativeweight overall. The value assigned to any middle levels of a criterion representsthecombinedeffectofthelevel’srelativepositionon theparticularcriterionaswellasthecriterion’sweight;andeach criterion’slowestlevelhasavalueofzero.Foranypairofcriteria, the ratio of their overall weights measures their relative importance; for example, MEWS (Subbe et al., 2001) was 1.2 times (e.g. 11.4%/9.5%) more important than tachypnoea alone (respiratoryrate >20breaths/min) and approximately twiceas importantasdurationofsymptoms,C-reactiveproteinandBMI respectively(Figure2).Themajorityofexperts(70%)indicatedthat theythinklung-USismorevaluablethanchestX-rayasanimaging tool for evaluating COVID-19 patients. The table presents an exampleofapplyingthemeanweights to10randomlyselected COVID-19patientsattendingtheemergencydepartmentfrom1st March2020 at the Verona University Hospital.More in detail,
patientswithatotalscore<33%werenotadmittedtoinpatient COVID-19unit.Atfollow-uptheyhadnoadverseoutcomeinterms ofneedofhospitalization,and/orneedofoxygentherapyand/or death.Patientsranked47%werealladmitted(datanotshownin the table). These patientsneeded high-flow oxygen therapy or non-invasiveventilationduringinpatientstay(Table1).
Discussion
The criteria included in the MCDA prioritization model developedhereweredeliberatelyselectedinordertobeableto beapplied‘anywhereandbyanyone’,includingbyunskilledhealth personnel and in low-resource settings. This approach was intendedtomeettheneedsofLMICswhere,duetoverylimited resources, effective national contingency plans are difficult to establish.
Atearlystage,mildhypoxemiaduetoanimpairedgasexchange canbe easilyidentifiedusingan arterialblood gastest (ABGT). Accordingly,PaO2wasthemostimportantcriterionidentifiedby
theexperts.Thesecondmostimportantcriterion,withasimilar weight,wasperipheralO2saturation–suggestingthatinsettings
whereABGTisunavailable,suchasLMICsorevenduringdomestic self-isolation,pulseoximetrymaybeausefulalternativetomore
Figure2.Relativeimportanceofthecriteria
Basedonthemeanweights,eachnumberinthefigureisaratiocorrespondingtotheimportanceofthecriterionontheleftrelativetothecriterionatthetop(weights reportedtoo,faded).Theratiosareobtainedbydividingtheleftweightsbythetopweights(i.e.:MEWSscoreis2timesmoreimportantthandurationofsymptoms;duration ofsymptomsis1.5timesmoreimportantthanage,etc.).Abbreviations:MEWS,modifiedearlywarningscore;BMI,bodymassindex;CRP,C-reactiveprotein;“comorbidities” criterionincludes:diabetes,pre-existingrespiratory/cardiovasculardiseases,andonco-hematologicaldiseases;“livingwithvulnerablepeople”criterionincludes:people withcomorbidities,and/orpregnantwomen,and/orimmunosuppressedpatients.
invasive procedures. Chest X-ray was ranked lower than PaO2,
probablybecauseoftheloweraccuracyespeciallyatanearlyphase of the disease. Indeed, a ‘normal’ chest radiograph should not excludethepossibilitythataninterstitialdisorderispresentinthe appropriateclinicalcontext(Ryuetal.,2007).Theuseoflung-US forevaluatingCOVID-19patientshasseveraladvantages–suchas lowerriskofexposuretohealthcareworkers,repeatabilityduring follow-up and lower costsand easier application, especially in LMICs(Soldatietal.,2020a).Moreover,lung-UScanbeappliedin outpatientsettings,asatriageforsymptomaticpatientsathomeas wellasintheprehospitalphase(Soldatietal.,2020b).
MEWS isa scorethat usesreadily availableand inexpensive clinicalparametersto identifypatientsatincreasedrisk of ICU admissionordeath(Subbeetal.,2001).Withrespecttothecriteria’ ranking,MEWSscorewasconsiderablylessimportantthanPaO2
and O2 saturation. Moreover, MEWS was only 1.2 times more
importantthantachypnoeaalone,corroboratingtheimportanceof parametersrelatedtotherespiratorysystem (O2saturationand
respiratoryrate)outlinedbythisanalysis.MEWScanbeobtained quicklybyphysicalexaminationandalsobyunskilledhealthcare workers,andithastheadvantageofcombiningbothrespiratory and non-respiratory parameters to assess a possible rapid worsening of clinical conditions – making it the fourth most importantcriterion.
Although it is well known that age negatively affects the outcomeinCOVID-19patients(Lietal.,2020),agewasfoundtobe theleast-importantcriterion.Remarkably,bothBMIandCRPwere 1.5 and 1.3 times more important than age, respectively. As recentlypublishedbyZhangetal.(2020),CRPtestingcouldbeused atthepointofcareinordertodirectpatientsfurtheralongthe treatmentpath. Finally,living withvulnerable peoplewas also deemed to be a relevant criterion to consider when deciding whetherto admita COVID-19patient, even though it is not a clinicalparameter.
Accordingtoexperts’evaluationofCOVID-19patients,allages arepotentiallyatriskofrapidclinicaldeterioration.AlthoughPaO2
–oralternativelyO2saturation–areessentialparameters,both
MEWSandBMIshouldbeconsideredtopredictnegativeclinical outcomeandnotdeferrableneedofhospitalization.Finally,incase ofalargevolumeofpatientsenteringhealthcarefacilities,POCCRP
testing can be adopted as a useful criterion in the proposed prioritizationmodel.
Tothebestoftheauthors’knowledge,thisisthefirsttimethat MCDAhasbeenusedinapandemiceventforrankingnon-critical patients for hospitalization. Since most of the criteria can be collected also by patients themselves, a “simplified domestic model” for patients self-isolated would be easily adapted by excludingsomecriteria(e.g.chestX-rayandABGT)andincluding otherslikeperipheralO2saturation.Thisapproachrepresentsan
innovativewayofcoordinatingeffortsduringapandemiccaused byanovelvirus.Determiningcriteriaandweightsforprioritizing patientsisevenmorerelevantinconditionsofcriticalimbalance betweenneedand availableresources.Furthermore,thismodel (criteria and weights)can be adapted todifferent settingsand stagesofthepandemicinresponsetoemergingevidence.Inthe demonstrative case series shown in the table, for example, a threshold above33% maybe proposed for theidentificationof patientstobehospitalized,asallthepatientsrankedbelowthis cut-offdidnot needhospitalizationand hadanoverall positive outcome. The most adequate method to validate a threshold definitionwould be that of applyingMCDA resultstoa cohort study.Atthebeginningofanewpandemic,itmaybefeasibleto prospectively gather patients’ information based on the MCDA prioritizationmodel (possibly withamulticentricapproach).In thisway,athresholdtosupportclinicaldecisionscouldbequickly available. Future research could include the validation of the patients’scoresalsothroughmachinelearning.Theresultsofthis studysuggestthat,whenevidenceislimited,usingMCDAtocodify experts’knowledgeisarapidandeffectiveapproachforcreating toolstosupportdifficultdecision-making.
Contributors
PDNandEGconceivedthestudyandwrotethefirstdraftofthe manuscript.FMandECreviewedtheliterature.PHworkedonthe statisticalanalysisandrevisedthemanuscript.HGandETcritically revised the manuscript. Each member of the COVID-19 MCDA Groupwasinvolvedinthesurveyandcontributedsignificantlyto thework.Allauthorshaveseenandapprovedthefinalmanuscript andcontributedsignificantlytothework.
Table1
Applicationoftheweightsto10COVID-19randomlyselectedpatientsattendingtheemergencyroomfromthe1stMarch2020atVeronaUniversityHospital,Italy.Total scoresarecalculatedbysummingtheweightsforeachpatientaccordingtothepatient’sratingonthelevelsforthecriteria.
Rank Age range Comorbidities BMIa Durationof symptoms (days) Respiratoryrate (breath/min) SpO2b (%) CRPc
ChestX-ray Livingwith vulnerablepeople MEWSd PaO2 (mmHg) Totalscore (%) 1 >70 Yes <30 >7 >20 <92 Ne interstitiallung abnormalities No 0–2 65–70 69 2 18–50 Yes >40 <3 >20 92–96 N N No 3–4 65–70 54 3 18–50 No 31– 40 >7 >20 92–96 Hf pulmonary consolidation No 3–4 71–80 54 4 51–70 No <30 4–7 >20 92-96 H N No 3–4 71–80 50 5 51–70 No <30 4–7 <20 92–96 H N Yes 3–4 71–80 47 6 51–70 No <30 4–7 <20 >96 N interstitiallung abnormalities No 0–2 71–80 32 7 18–50 No <30 <3 >20 >96 N N Yes 3–4 >80 25 8 18–50 Yes >40 >7 <20 >96 N pulmonary consolidation No 0–2 >80 23 9 >70 No <30 4–7 <20 >96 N N No 3–4 >80 22 10 >70 Yes <30 >7 <20 >96 N N No 0–2 >80 15 a
BodyMassIndex;
b
peripheraloxygensaturation;
c
C-reactiveprotein;
d Modified
EarlyWarningscore;
eNormal; f
Funding
The Value-Dx project was supported by the Innovative MedicinesInitiative 2JointUndertakingundergrant agreement No 820755. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the EuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchandinnovationprogram and EFPIA and bioMérieux SA, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Accelerate Diagnostics S.L., Abbott, Bio-Rad Laboratories, BD SwitzerlandSàrl,andTheWellcomeTrustLimited.
Ethicalapproval
Approvalwasnotrequired. Declarationofinterests
Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterests. Acknowledgments
Wewouldliketothankallthecolleagueswhoparticipatedin thesurvey. Sincerethanksalsoto1000minds LtdbasedinNew Zealandformaking1000mindssoftwareavailableforfree.
Theauthorsdedicatethisworktoallhealthcareworkerswho losttheirlivesinthefightagainstCOVID-19pandemic.
AppendixA.
MembersoftheCOVID-19MCDAGroupinclude:
E.DuranteMangoni,L.L.Florio,R.Zampino,F.Mele(Internal Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” and AORN OspedalideiColli–MonaldiHospital,Naples,Italy);I.Gentile,B. Pinchera(DepartmentofClinicalMedicineandSurgery–Sectionof Infectious Diseases – University of Naples Federico II”, Naples, Italy);N.Coppola,M.Pisaturo(UniversityofCampania,Infectious Diseases Unit, AORN Sant’Anna e San Sebastiano di Caserta, Caserta, Italy); R. Luzzati (Dept. Haematology, Oncology & Infectious Diseases, University of Trieste Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy); N. Petrosillo, E. Nicastri, A. Corpolongo, M. A. Cataldo,A.D’Abramo,G.Maffongelli,L.Scorzolini,C.Palazzolo,E. Boumis(ClinicalandResearchDepartment,NationalInstitutefor Infectious Diseases “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, Rome, Italy); A. Pan (Infectious Diseases Unit, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy); A. D’ArminioMonforte, F.Bai (Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases,DepartmentofHealthSciences,ASSTSantiPaoloeCarlo, UniversityofMilan, Italy); S.Antinori(III Divisionof Infectious Diseases,LuigiSaccoHospital,ASSTFatebenefratelliSacco,Milan, Italy);F.G.DeRosa,S.Corcione,T.Lupia,S.M.Pinna,S.Scabini,F. Canta, S. Belloro (Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious DiseasesatAmedeodiSavoiaHospital,UniversityofTurin,Turin, Italy);Z.Bisoffi,A.Angheben,F.Gobbi,E.Turcato,N.Ronzoni,L. Moro,S.Calabria,P.Rodari,G.Bertoli,G.Marasca(Departmentof Infectious-TropicalDiseasesand Microbiology,IRCCSOspedale SacroCuoreDonCalabria,NegrardiValpolicella,Italy);M.Puoti (InfectiousDiseasesUnit,AOOspedaleNiguardaCa’Granda,Milan, Italy);A.Gori,A.Bandera,D.Mangioni(InfectiousDiseasesUnit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico. CentreforMultidisciplinaryResearchinHealthScience(MACH), UniversityofMilan);M.Rizzi(InfectiousDiseasesUnit,ASSTPapa GiovanniXXIII,Bergamo,Italy);F.Castelli(UniversityDepartment ofInfectiousandTropicalDiseases,UniversityofBresciaandASST SpedalicivilidiBrescia,Brescia,Italy);A.Montineri,C.A.Coco,M. Maresca,M.Frasca(UnitofInfectious DiseasesandHepatology, Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, University Hospital Complex (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria ‘Policlinico-Vittorio Ema-nuele’),UniversityofCatania,Catania,Italy);D.Aquilini(Infectious
DiseasesUnit,NuovoOspedaleS.Stefano,Prato,Italy);M.Vincenzi (InfectiousDiseasesUnit,MaterSalutisHospital,Legnago,Italy);L. Lambertenghi,M.E.DeRui,E.Razzaboni,P.Cattaneo,A.Visentin,A. Erbogasto,I.DallaVecchia,I.Coledan,M.Vecchi,G.Be,L.Motta,A. Zaffagnini, N. Auerbach, P. Del Bravo, A. M. Azzini,E. Righi, E. Carrara,A.Savoldi,M.Sibani,E.Lattuada,G.Carolo,M.Cordioli,F. Soldani, M. D. Pezzani, S. Avallone (Infectious Diseases Unit, DepartmentofDiagnosticsandPublicHealth,VeronaUniversity Hospital,Verona,Italy);R.Bruno,A.Ricciardi(InfectiousDiseases Unit, IRCCS “San Matteo”, Pavia, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Science,University of Pavia, Pavia,Italy);M.P.SaggeseEmergencyDepartment,“SantoSpirito” Hospital, ASLRoma 1, Rome, Italy); G.Malerba(Department of InternalMedicine,IvreaHospital,Turin,Italy).
References
ArmocidaB,FormentiB,UssaiS,PalestraF,MissoniE.TheItalianhealthsystemand theCOVID-19challenge.LancetPublicHealth2020; S2468-2667(20)30074-30078.
BongCL,BrasherC,ChikumbaE,McDougallR,Mellin-OlsenJ,EnrightA.The COVID-19pandemic:effectsonlowandmiddle-incomeCountries[publishedonline aheadofprint,2020Apr1].AnesthAnalg2020;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ ANE.0000000000004846.
ChenN,ZhouM,DongX,QuJ,GongF,HanY,etal.Epidemiologicalandclinical characteristicsof99casesof2019novelcoronaviruspneumoniainWuhan, China:adescriptivestudy.Lancet2020;395(10223):507–13.
DrainPK,HyleEP,NoubaryF,FreedbergKA,WilsonD,BishaiWR,etal.Diagnostic point-of-care tests inresource-limited settings. LancetInfect Dis2014;14 (3):239–49.
EmanuelEJ,PersadG,UpshurR,ThomeB,ParkerM,GlickmanA,etal.Fairallocation ofscarcemedicalresourcesinthetimeofCovid-19[Epubaheadofprint].NEngl JMed2020;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2005114.
GuanWJ,NiZY,HuY,LiangWH,OuCQ,HeJX,etal.Clinicalcharacteristicsof coronavirusdisease2019inChina,Chinamedicaltreatmentexpertgroupfor covid-19[Epubaheadofprint].NEnglJMed 2020;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
HansenP,HendryA,NadenR,OmblerF,StewartR.Anewprocessforcreatingpoints systemsforprioritisingpatientsforelectivehealthservices.ClinGovernance: IntJ2012;17:200–9.
Hansen P,OmblerF.Anewmethodforscoringadditivemulti-attributevalue modelsusingpairwiserankingsofalternatives.JMulti-CriteriaDecAnalysis 2008;15:87–107.
HopmanJ,AllegranziB,MehtarS.ManagingCOVID-19inLow-andMiddle-Income Countries[Publishedonline,2020March16].JAMA2020;,doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1001/jama.2020.4169.
LiX,XuS,YuM,etal.RiskfactorsforseverityandmortalityinadultCOVID-19 inpatientsinWuhan[publishedonlineaheadofprint,2020Apr12].JAllergy Clin Immunol2020;, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.006 S0091-6749(20)30495-4.
MarshK,LanitisT,NeashamD,OrfanosP,CaroJ.Assessingthevalueofhealthcare interventionsusingmulti-criteriadecisionanalysis:areviewoftheliterature. PharmacoEconomics2014;32(4):345–65.
MinisterodellaSalute.COVID-19SituazioneinItalia.COVID-19SituazioneinItalia. [cited2020May13].Availablefrom:.2020.http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/ nuovocoronavirus/dettaglioContenutiNuovoCoronavirus.jsp?area=nuovoCoro-navirus&id=5351&lingua=italiano&menu=vuoto.
MoP,XingY,XiaoY,DengL,ZhaoQ,WangH,etal.Clinicalcharacteristicsof refractoryCOVID-19pneumoniainWuhan,China[Epubaheadofprint].Clin InfectDis2020;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa270pii:ciaa270.
NkengasongJN,MankoulaW.LoomingthreatofCOVID-19infectioninAfrica:act collectively,andfast.Lancet2020;395(10227):841–2.
RyuJH,DanielsCE,HartmanTE,YiES.Diagnosisofinterstitiallungdiseases.Mayo ClinProc2007;82:976–86.
SoldatiG,SmargiassiA,InchingoloR,BuonsensoD,PerroneT,BrigantiDF,etal. Proposalforinternationalstandardizationoftheuseoflungultrasoundfor patients with COVID-19: a simple, quantitative, reproducible method. J UltrasoundMed2020a;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.15285.
SoldatiG,SmargiassiA,InchingoloR,BuonsensoD,PerroneT,BrigantiDF,etal.Is therearoleforlungultrasoundduringtheCOVID-19pandemic?.JUltrasound Med2020b;,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.15284.
SubbeCP,KrugerM,RutherfordP,GemmelL.Validationofamodifiedearlywarning scoreinmedicaladmissions.QJM2001;94(10):521–6.
TacconelliE,CarraraE,SavoldiA,HarbarthS,MendelsonM,MonnetDL,etal. Discovery,research,anddevelopmentofnewantibiotics:theWHOprioritylist of antibiotic-resistantbacteria andtuberculosis. LancetInfect Dis2018;18 (3):318–27.
TheHastingsCenter.WhyISupportAge-RelatedRationingofVentilatorsfor Covid-19 Patients [cited 2020 May 13]. Available from:. 2020. https://www. thehastingscenter.org/why-i-support-age-related-rationing-of-ventilators-for-covid-19-patients/.
ThokalaP,DevlinN,MarshK,BaltussenR,BoysenM,KaloZ,etal.Multiplecriteria decisionsnalysisforhealthcaredecisionmaking–anintroduction:report1ofthe ISPORMCDAemerginggoodpracticestaskforce.ValueHealth2016;19(1):1–13.
WangZ,YangB,LiQ,WenL,ZhangR.Clinicalfeaturesof69caseswithcoronavirus disease2019inWuhan,China[Epubaheadofprint].ClinInfectDis2020;,doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa272pii:ciaa272.
WhiteDB,LoB.Aframeworkforrationingventilatorsandcriticalcarebedsduring theCOVID-19pandemic[PublishedonlineMarch27].JAMA2020;,doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
WorldHealthOrganization.Coronavirusdisease(COVID-19)pandemic.Coronavirus disease(COVID-19)pandemic–situationreport.[cited2020May13].Available from:.Geneva:WHO;2020. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/nov-el-coronavirus-2019.
ZhangJ,ZhouL,YangY,PengW,WangW,ChenX.Therapeuticandtriagestrategies for2019novelcoronavirusdiseaseinfeverclinics.LancetRespirMed2020;8(3): e11–2.