• Non ci sono risultati.

Living in the EU : circular economy

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Living in the EU : circular economy"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

1.4 0 % 17 % 0.6 0.2 1 Value added (% of GDP) No patent declared 3.1 1 2.4 1.7 Emplo ymen t (%) EL BE RO SK PT NL FI SE EU-27 Patents / m inh.: 0.6 Value added: 0.96 % Employment: 1.72 % EU-27 Patents / m inh.: 0.6 Value added: 0.96 % Employment: 1.72 % FR HU DE CY ES IT LV PL AT LT BG HR SI KR (16.0) CN (4.7) JA (4.1) EU-27 (0.6) USA (0.5) CA, RU, AU (0.4)

Number of patents per million inhabitants

Non-EU partners EU partners

Exports

extra EU TR44 % Importsextra EU UK 35 % CH 17 % IN 11 % ID 5 % 12 %NO US 10 % RU 6 % CN 5 % EG 4 % Other 32 % Other 20 % 9 (million tonnes) Imports extra EU 25 Exports extra EU 48

Imports intra EU DE NL BE IT ES Other Member States

1.5 % 11.9 % 8.3 % 2.1 3.7 5.3 13.4 28.5 % 2019 2004 EU-27

AT A GLANCE

Infographic

EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service EUI | European University Institute Authors: Giulio Sabbati, Members' Research Service, EPRS; Igor Tkalec, GlobalStat, EUI

Graphics: Samy Chahri, Members' Research Service PE 659.391 – March 2021

Living in the EU: Circular economy

Circular economy is a production and consumption model that involves reusing, repairing, refurbishing and recycling existing materials and products to keep materials within the economy. It implies that waste becomes a resource, consequently minimising the actual amount of waste. The circular model is generally the antithesis of a traditional, linear economic model, which is based on a 'take-make-consume-throw away' pattern. This paper looks at the job creation potential and added value produced by the circular economy and illustrates the generation and treatment of waste in the EU.

Jobs, value added and patents related to circular economy sectors

(% of total employment and % of GDP, 2017; patents per million inhabitants, 2016)

The scatter-plot below presents three indicators used to monitor progress towards a circular economy on the 'competitiveness and innovation' dimension. The x axis represents the value added as % of GDP, while the y axis shows the employment as % of total employment. The size of the bubbles represents the number of technology patents related to recycling and secondary raw materials (per million inhabitants). The added value of circular economy accounts for 0.96 % of GDP (€126 billion); it employs almost 4 million people representing 1.72 % of the total employment. There are 270 patents in the EU, three quarters of which are distributed between five Member States (DE, ES, FR, NL and PL). Five countries report no patents (BG, CY, LT, PT and SI). No data are available for CZ, DK, EE, IE, LU and MT. The chart below shows the number of patents for selected economies worldwide.

Trade in recyclable raw materials

(Million tonnes and %, 2019)

The indicator measures the trade of materials that are recycled and re-injected into the economy as secondary raw materials, including used pneumatic; scrap plastic; old or unsold newspapers and magazines; gold melted down into unworked blocks; shredded iron or aluminium scrap (categorisation according to a JRC classification of relevant products). The bar chart below shows trade of secondary raw materials within Member States (imports intra EU), and with non-EU countries (exports and imports extra EU). It is expressed in million tonnes and the top five Member States refers to the three categories. The pie charts represent the top non-EU partners. Turkey is the EU's biggest export partner (€2.6 billion; 44 % of exports). The UK is the EU's biggest import partner (€2.1 billion; 35 % of imports).

Circular material use rate

(%, 2019)

The circularity rate is an indicator developed by Eurostat to monitor the circular economy. It is the share of material recovered and fed back into the economy in overall material use. A higher circularity rate means that primary raw materials are replaced by secondary materials to a greater extent. The EU-27's circularity rate is 11.9 % and varies between Member States; in the Netherlands, 285 kilograms of secondary materials are needed for one tonne of primary materials; in Romania 15 kg for one tonne. There are six Member State above the EU average.

(2)

Disposal Recovery

Treatment

Generation of waste 5 190 2 610 2 203

Share of total collection

4 814 Share of total collection

Incineration (1 %) Landfill (45 %) Recycling (38 %) Backfilling (10%) Energy (6 %) kg/cap Households Water and waste Manufacturing Mining and quarrying Construction 36 % 26.2 % 9.9 % 8.2 % Other 9.1 % 10.6 % RO HR BG EL LV PT LT SK CY ES HU IE CZ IT EU-27 SE DK PL FR AT MT FI DE BE SI NL EE LU DisposalDisposal Rec ov er y 13 061 6 456 4 202 3 840 3 794 3 793 3 763 3 721 3 481 3 480 3 037 2 970 2 926 2 610 2 074 1 852 1 832 1 299 1 168 936 935 714 658 641 591 576 532 462 0 5 000 10 000 15 000 20 000 (kg/cap) 20 000 (kg/cap) Recovery Disposal Waste generation Recycling rate

Recycling rates EU targets Municipal waste (492 kg collected/inhabitant) Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)

0 20 40 60 80 100 (%) 90 100 110 120 130 2018 2016 2014 2012 2010 SE FR FI LV SK IE HU ES CZ PL BG HR PT EE EL CY RO MT EU-27 LU LT IT DK BE NL AT SI DE Disposal Rec ov er y Construction Packaging 66.3 % Municipal 47.3 % Plastic packaging 41.5 % e-waste 38.9 %

All waste 56 % Collected 8.90 (kg/cap)

Treatment 8.75 Recovery 7.98 Recycling/reuse 7.27 Incineration (27 %) Landfill (24 %) Material recycling (31 %) 2011 = 100 Composting (17 %)

9.6 % of total EU waste 0.2 % of total EU waste

Placed on the market 19.53

8.9 % Municipal WEEE 66.7 % 88 % 70 % 70 % 60 % 55 % 55/70/80 % Note: 2030 targets, except construction (2020) and e-waste (2018 onwards) with different targets depending on the category.

EPRS

Living in the EU: Circular economy

This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. © European Union & GlobalStat, 2021.

eprs@ep.europa.eu (mail) http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) http://epthinktank.eu (blog)

globalstat@eui.eu(mail) http://www.globalstat.eu (internet)

Generation and tre atment of waste by economy and category

(all economic activities and households, kg per capita and %, 2018)

In 2018, the EU-27 generated 2.3 billion tonnes (5 190 kg per capita) of waste. Member States' waste generation ranges from 23 253 kg per capita in Finland to 920 kg in Latvia. Four countries (DE, FR, RO, PL) account for 50 % of total EU waste. Twelve Member States account for 91 %. In terms of economic activities, construction, for instance, represents more than one third of total waste generation, with 0.8 billion tonnes (36 %). In 2018, roughly 2.1 billion tonnes of waste were treated in the EU-27 (4 814 kg per capita). While this does not include exported waste, it does include treatment of waste imported into the EU-27. The reported amounts are therefore not directly comparable with those on waste generation. More than half of the waste was treated in recovery operations (54 %). The bar chart on the right shows recovery and disposal of waste per Member State.

Waste streams

(2018)

The recycling rate measures the share of recycled waste in total waste generation. Recycled waste consists of waste treated in recovery operation in domestic plants, plus the waste exported for recycling, minus the imported waste. It therefore reflects the treatment of national waste and excludes the waste that is imported from non-EU countries. The recycling rate for construction refers to material recovery, while the index of e-waste is weighted with the number of products put on the market – the higher the value, the higher the quantity of recycled material. Product and process design are improved; investment in tangible goods for the recycling, repair and reuse sector is increasing, as well as administrative capacity and infrastructure. The recycling rates targeted generally increase. Following this target, the recycling rate for e-waste increased by 40 % in the 2010-2018 period. The line chart shows the historical evolution of the waste streams with 2011 as reference, which is the first year when all data are available. Two waste streams are of particular interest: e-waste (one of the fastest growing streams in the EU) and municipal waste (mainly includes waste from households).

Notes

GlobalStat is a project developed by the European University Institute's Global Governance Programme (Italy).

Data sources: Eurostat. Online data code: Jobs and value added (CEI_CIE010); Patents (CEI_CIE020); Trade in recyclable raw materials (CEI_SRM020); Circular material use rate (CEI_SRM030); Generation of waste by economy and category (ENV_WASGEN); Waste streams (CEI_WM010, ENV_WASPACR, CEI_WM011, CEI_WM050, CEI_WM040, ENV_WASPAC, ENV_WASELEE, ENV_WASMUN). Extraction date: January and February 2021.

Country codes EU: Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Czechia (CZ), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Estonia (EE), Ireland (IE), Greece (EL), Spain (ES), France (FR), Croatia (HR), Italy (IT), Cyprus (CY), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT),

Luxembourg (LU), Hungary (HU), Malta (MT), Netherlands (NL), Austria (AT), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Slovenia (SI), Slovakia (SK), Finland (FI), Sweden (SE). Non-EU: China (CN), Egypt (EG), India (IN), Indonesia (ID), Norway (NO), Russia (RU), South Korea (KR), Switzerland (CH), Turkey (TR), United Kingdom (UK), United States (USA). Kg per capita (kg/cap). Per million inhabitants (m inh.).

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Relevant contributions attempt an integration of the internal and external perspectives under the banner of the R-BV (e.g., Barney, 1991; Wernerfelt, 1984), but

Our analysis contributes to the literature on waste management in two main respects. Firstly, we highlight a substantial impact of curbside collection programs on waste reduction.

When urban village serviced by the pipe waste water service means the area included in the recommendations priority off-site system, while areas have not passed by a pipe

In this intention, we were able to contribute to the elastic characterization of a virgin material of animal origins by cutting of the test specimens depending on

The article is an analysis of the feasibility of the implementation of the idea of the circular economy in the area of copper ore mining, and more precisely, in the area of

As part of the above undertaking, auxiliary systems have also been developed to manage all municipal waste streams generated in the central part of the Region of Warmia

Foto di Scena La figlia dell’aria – Teatro Stabile di Palermo, 1996 (La figlia dell’aria di P. Calderón de la Barca. Silvia, produzione Teatro Biondo Stabile di Palermo.

Pantelleritic, latitic, HK basaltic and trachybasaltic compositions have been analysed over a range of water contents up to 5.3 wt%.For each investigated melt composition the