• Non ci sono risultati.

The WISSH Quasars Project: BLR vs galaxy scale WINDS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "The WISSH Quasars Project: BLR vs galaxy scale WINDS"

Copied!
14
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

2017

Publication Year

2020-10-19T10:02:30Z

Acceptance in OA@INAF

The WISSH Quasars Project: BLR vs galaxy scale WINDS

Title

VIETRI, GIUSTINA; FIORE, Fabrizio; PICONCELLI, Enrico; BONGIORNO, ANGELA; Bischetti, M.; et al.

Authors

10.5281/zenodo.580572

DOI

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12386/27883

(2)

The WISSH Quasars Project:

BLR vs galaxy scale WINDS

!

GIUSTINA VIETRI

INAF-OAR University of Rome “La Sapienza”

The WISSH quasars project

F.Fiore,E.Piconcelli,A. Bongiorno, M. Bischetti,F. Duras,S. Martocchia,A. Travascio,L. Zappacosta INAF OAR

M. Brusa, C. Vignali UNIBO - INAF OABO

A. Marconi, G. Cresci INAF Arcetri

… and many others

(3)

The WISSH Quasars survey

WISSH Quasars

86 WISE/SDSS Selected Hyper-luminous

broad-line Quasars with

L

Bol

> 2 x 10

47

erg s

-1

The most luminous quasars are the best targets

to hunt for powerful AGN-driven outflows

Theory

&

Observations

Goal: Observing AGN feedback at its best

XMM & Chandra

X-rays

X-shooter

Hβ + CIV + MgII


SINFONI

IFU Spec Hβ + [OIII] + Hα

LBT/LUCI - TNG

Hβ + [OIII]

ALMA

CO

+

CII + FIR continuum


+

Herschel - WISE - 2MASS - SDSS

public data

Panchromatic view of

Hyper-Lum QSOs

(4)

Targeting WISSH Quasars

NIR spectroscopy-Optical rest-frame

!

(I) SMBH mass (Hbeta)

(II) NLR winds ([OIII])

(III) BLR winds (CIV)

This talk:

Kpc

NLR

Hβ gravitationally

bounded clouds

BLR

<0.1pc

Accretion Disk

<0.01pc

[OIII]

outflows

Torus

1pc-10pc

Systematic study of

nuclear and galaxy scale winds

in luminous quasars

High ionization emission

lines winds (i.e. CIV)

(5)

(I) SMBH mass from Hβ emission line

PG QSO

SDSS contours

LBol from multi-component

broad-band (MID-IR to UV) SED fitting

(Duras et al. in prep)

FWHM(Hβ)

3,000-8,000 km/s

!

Hβ-based SMBH masses

from ~ 2 × 10

9

M⊙

up to ∼ 2 × 10

10

M⊙

!

High accretion rates

0.4 < λEdd < 3

Opportunity of

collecting high-mass, highly accreting

SMBHs

at the peak of the quasar number density

(6)

SDSS J1326-0005 z=3.303

lack of

[OIII]

70 %

SDSS J1201-0116 z=3.247

70% weak/lack [OIII] emission

30% prominent broad [OIII] emission

Very complex spectra

Narrow [OIII] emission weak or absent in all of them

!

If present, [OIII] shows broad blue-shifted profiles (in 6/18 quasars)

indicative of outflows

!

Strong, complex FeII emission

(7)

Very broad blue-shifted [OIII] lines

FWHM

[OIII]

~ 1200 -2200 km s

-1

v(

max)

~ 1400 -3000 km s

-1

SDSS J0745+4734 z=3.225

SDSS J0900+4215 z=3.294

SDSS J1201+1206 z=3.512

SDSS J1326-0005 z=3.303

SDSS J1549+4215 z=2.365

30% broad

prominent

[OIII] emission

(II) NLR winds via [OIII] emission line

(8)

Powerful kpc-scale ionized winds:

M up to 7700 M⊙ yr

-1

E

kin

up to 10

46

erg s

-1

.

.

L

broad[OIII]

M

ion

M

.

3 M

ion

v

max

R

Mv

max

2

.

2

E

kin

=

.

Broa

d [OIII] FWHM

[k

m/

s]

Log (L

TOT

[OIII]/erg s

-1

)

(II) NLR winds via [OIII] emission line

Highest [OIII]

luminosities

observed so far

(9)

.

Bischetti, Piconcelli, Vietri + 2017, A&A, 598, A122

Powerful kpc-scale ionized winds:

M up to 7700 M⊙ yr

-1

E

kin

up to 10

46

erg s

-1

.

L

broad[OIII]

M

ion

M

.

3 M

ion

v

max

R

Mv

max

2

.

2

E

kin

=

.

Broa

d [OIII] FWHM

[k

m/

s]

Log (L

TOT

[OIII]/erg s

-1

)

(II) NLR winds via [OIII] emission line

SDSS J1326-0005 z=3.303

SDSS J0900+4215 z=3.294

SDSS J1326-0005 z=3.303

Ek

in

[

er

g/

s]

.

Log (Lbol/erg s

-1

)

E

kin

up to 10

46

erg s

-1

E

.

kin

~ 1-3 % L

Bol

.

Highest [OIII]

luminosities

observed so far

.

(10)

1 10 (µm) 1 ( L ), normalized at 15 µ m EW[OIII]= 117 Å ([OIII]) EW[OIII]= 3 Å (Weak [OIII])

Risaliti+11

Bisogni+16

Weak [OIII]

sample intrinsic distribution

[OIII]

sample high inclination

(partial view of the inner, hotter dust?)

(II) NLR winds via [OIII] emission line

Γ~3.5

Torus

λ(µm)

EW[OIII],obs

= EW[OIII]/cosθ

WISSH: θ~30-70°

Weak [OIII] quasars <EW[OIII]>=3A

[OIII] quasars <EW[OIII]>=117A

Weak [OIII]

quasars --> "bluer" SEDs

(11)

(III) BLR winds via CIV emission line

(Vietri et al. in prep)

Contours: SDSS DR7 Shen11

Weak [OIII]

[OIII]

Weak Line

Quasars

BLR winds traced by CIV(SDSS)-Hbeta(LBT) velocity shift

WISSH QSOs also very effective in

collecting the strongest CIV winds

Corbin & Boroson

1996

Richards et al.

2002a

Gaskell 1982

Marziani+1996

Richards+2011

Shifts comparable with

Weak Line Quasars

Strong CIV shift

(12)

−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Log Edd ratio

0 1 2 3 4

Log (CIV velocity shift/(km/s))

WISSH Weak [OIII] WISSH [OIII] WISSH BAL PG+HST QSOs (Tang+12,Baskin+04) Shen+16 Coatman+16 WLQ (Plotkin+15) 44 45 46 47 48

Log Lbol (erg/s) 0

1 2 3 4

Log (CIV velocity shift/(km/s))

WISSH Weak [OIII] WISSH [OIII] WISSH BAL WLQ (Plotkin+15) PG+HST QSOs (Tang+12,Baskin+04) Coatman+16 Shen+16

Sample of 183 QSOs with Hbeta SMBH mass

Log Edd ratio

Log (Lbol/erg s

-1)

Lo

g

CIV velo

city shif

t (km/s)

Lo

g

CIV velo

city shif

t (km/s)

(Vietri et al. in prep)

As expected for radiatively driven winds

Log Vout ∝0.25 Log L

Bol

What is the Driver of BLR winds?

(13)

−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 Log Edd ratio

0 1 2 3 4

Log (CIV velocity shift/(km/s))

WISSH Weak [OIII] WISSH [OIII] WISSH BAL PG+HST QSOs (Tang+12,Baskin+04) Shen+16 Coatman+16 WLQ (Plotkin+15) 44 45 46 47 48

Log Lbol (erg/s) 0

1 2 3 4

Log (CIV velocity shift/(km/s))

WISSH Weak [OIII] WISSH [OIII] WISSH BAL WLQ (Plotkin+15) PG+HST QSOs (Tang+12,Baskin+04) Coatman+16 Shen+16

Log Edd ratio

Log (Lbol/erg s

-1)

Lo

g

CIV velo

city shif

t (km/s)

What is the Driver of BLR winds?

slope=0.24±0.05

What is the Driver of BLR winds?

(c)

r=0.1 P=0.3

−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 shift (fct Lbol) −4 −2 0 2 4 edd (fct lbol)

(d)

r=0.3 P=2E( 4)

−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 shift (fct edd) −4 −2 0 2 4 lbol (fct edd)

Δ

Ed

d

(fc

t

Lb

ol

)

Δ

Lbo

l (f

ct edd)

Δshift (fct Lbol)

Δshift (fct Edd)

r=0.1 P=0.3

r=0.3 P=2E(-4)

Correlations between residuals:

Hypothesis Fundamental correlation with

Lbol

(Vietri et al. in prep)

As expected for radiatively driven winds

(14)

…..MANY WISSH PAPERS ARE FORTHCOMING

STAY TUNED!!!!!

Conclusions

Lbol

as primary driven of BLR winds

(II) Powerful massive Kpc scale ionized winds

(I) Ultramassive (up to

2 × 10

10

M⊙)

- Highly Accreting SMBH at z∼3

WISSH: Revealing widespread presence of outflows in the most luminous quasars

(III) High-velocity (3000-8000 km/s) BLR winds

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

A detector which, strictly speaking, reproduces the structure of the ionization chamber discussed so far, would work as long as the material employed in the sensitive region is

[r]

Esistono tabelle che riportano i limiti di accettazione corretti da utilizzare nel caso in cui si stimino i parametri dalle osservazioni: il problema è che però

Abbiamo già visto in una lezione precedente che il passo 1) si esegue con complessità non superiore alla polinomiale, con un test che verifica se n è potenza di opportuna base

È stato dimostrato un aumento nel siero di pazienti affetti da CLL dei livelli di CD44 solubile ed una sua maggiore espressione sulla superficie cellulare dei

— We discuss pair production of light CP -even Higgs bosons in the framework of the two-Higgs doublet model in the limit sin(β − α) = 1, where this Higgs resembles very much

In preparation for that, physics and detector studies are assessing the physics potential of a multi-TeV collider with the CLIC parameters for a broad variety of scenarios, de-

In the case of slow chemistry, after a short initial transient on the elastic scale, dis- tributions have approached a local mechanical equilibrium, and, in the hypothesis of