Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Physics
Letters
B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Search
for
a
W
boson
decaying
to
a
τ
lepton
and
a
neutrino
in
proton-proton
collisions
at
√
s
=
13
TeV
.
The
CMS
Collaboration
CERN, Switzerland
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Article history:Received30July2018
Receivedinrevisedform30January2019 Accepted31January2019
Availableonline15March2019 Editor:M.Doser Keywords: CMS Physics Tau MET
A search for a new high-mass resonance decaying to a
τ
lepton and a neutrino is reported. The analysisusesproton-protoncollisiondata collectedbytheCMSexperimentattheLHCat√s=13TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.9 fb−1. The search utilizes hadronically decayingτ
leptons. No excess in the event yield is observed at high transverse masses of the
τ
and missing transverse momentum.Aninterpretation ofresultswithinthe sequentialstandard modelexcludesW boson massesbelow 4.0 TeV at 95% confidencelevel. Existinglimits are also improvedonmodels in whichthe W bosondecays preferentiallytofermions ofthethird generation.HeavyW bosonswith masseslessthan1.7–3.9 TeV,dependingonthecouplinginthenon-universalG(221)model,areexcluded at95%confidencelevel.Thesearethemoststringentlimitsonthismodeltodate.©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.
1. Introduction
Newchargedheavy gauge bosons, generallyreferred to asW bosons,arepredictedbyvariousextensionsofthestandardmodel (SM). An example is the sequential standard model (SSM) [1], featuring an extended gauge sector, which is often used as a benchmarkmodel.LeptonuniversalityholdsintheSSM;however, there exist models without this assumption. Nonuniversal gauge interaction models (NUGIMs) [2–6] predict an enhanced W bo-son branching fraction to the third generation fermions. In this approach,thehightopquarkmassisassociatedwiththelarge vac-uumexpectationvalueofthecorrespondingHiggsfield.
The analysis presented in this Letter searches for W
→
τ ν
events,wheretheτ
leptondecayshadronically.Theleadingorder FeynmandiagramisshowninFig.1.InthisLetter,thesymbolτ
h willbeusedtodenotethevisiblepartofthehadronicdecayoftheτ
,whichisreconstructedasaτ
jetinthedetector.The hadronic decaysoftheτ
leptonareexperimentallydistinctivebecausethey result in low charged-hadron multiplicity, unlike jets originating fromthehadronizationofpartonsproducedinthehardscattering process,which havehigh charged-hadronmultiplicity.The signa-tureofaW bosoneventissimilartothatofa W bosoneventin whichtheW bosonisproduced“off-shell”withahighmass.SearchesforaWbosondecayingtoa
τ
leptonandaneutrino havebeenperformedpreviouslybytheCMS [7] andATLAS [8]col- E-mail address:cms -publication -committee -chair @cern .ch.
Fig. 1. Leading order Feynman diagram of the expected signal process W→τ ν. laborationsatthe CERNLHC.Searches fora W boson havebeen performedalsoine
+
pmissT ,μ
+
pmissT [9,10],WZ [11,12],qq [13,14] and tb [15,16] channels.The ATLAS experimenthasexcluded anSSMWformassesbelow3.7 TeV inthe
τ
h+
pmissT channel.The CMSexperimenthasexcludedanSSMWformassesbelow5.2 TeV inthecombinationofelectronandmuonchannels.ThisLetter de-scribes a search fora W boson intheτ
h+
pmissT channel using proton-proton (pp)collisionscollectedin2016atacenter-of-mass energyof13 TeV.Thedatasetcorrespondstoan integrated lumi-nosity of 35.9 fb−1.The results are interpreted in the context of twomodels,theSSMandtheNUGIM.2. Physicsmodels
2.1. ThesequentialstandardmodelWboson
In theSSM, the W boson is a heavy analog ofthe W boson. Itisaresonancewithfermionicdecaymodesandbranching
frac-https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.069
0370-2693/©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.
tions similar to those of the SM W boson, with the addition of thedecayW
→
tb,whichbecomesrelevantforW bosonmasses largerthan180 GeV.IftheWbosonisheavyenough todecayto topandbottom quarks,theSSMbranchingfractionforthe decay W→
τ ν
is8.5% [1].Undertheseassumptions, therelativewidth/
M ofthe W bosonis∼
3.3%. Withincreasingmass,a growing fractionofeventsisproduced off-shell andshifted tolowermass values.Assumingeventswithinawindowof±
10%aroundthe ac-tualmassto beon-shell,theoff-shellfractionsare approximately 9,22and66%forWmassesof1,3and5 TeV,respectively.Decays intoWZ depend onthe specificmodelassumptions andare usu-allyconsidered to be suppressed in theSSM, asassumedby the currentsearch.Inaccordancewithpreviousanalyses, itisassumedthatthere isnointerferencebetweentheproductionofthenewparticleand theproductionoftheSMW boson.Suchanabsenceofinterference wouldoccur,forexample,iftheWinteractsviaV+Acoupling [17]. Signal events forthe SSM W boson are simulatedat leading order (LO) with pythia 8.212 [18], using the NNPDF 2.3 [19,20] parton distribution function (PDF) set and tune CUETP8M1 [21]. The W samples are normalized to next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO)crosssectionsfrom fewz [22,23].
2.2. Couplingstrength
The W bosoncouplingstrength, gW, isgivenintermsofthe SM weak coupling strength gW
=
e/
sin2θ
W≈
0.
65. Here,θ
W is the weak mixing angle. If the W is a heavier copy of the SM W boson, their coupling ratio is gW/
gW=
1 and the SSM W theoretical cross sections,signal shapes, andwidths apply. How-ever,different couplingsare possible. Becauseof the dependence ofthewidthofa particleonitscoupling,andtheconsequent ef-fectonthetransversemassdistribution,alimitcanalsobeseton the couplingstrength. For thisstudy, a reweighting procedure is used.SomeselectedsignalsamplesaresimulatedatLOwith Mad-Graph(version 1.5.11)[24],forarangeofcouplingratios gW/
gW from0.01 to 3.These signals exhibit different widths aswell as different cross sections. The generated distributions of the SSM pythiasampleswith gW/
gW=
1 arereweighted to takeinto ac-countthedecaywidthdependence,thusprovidingtheappropriate reconstructed transverse mass distributions for gW/
gW=
1. For gW/
gW=
1,thetheoreticalLOcrosssectionsapply andthis cou-plingstrengthisusedtocomparethestandardSSMsampleswith thereweightedones,allowingthereweightingmethodtobe veri-fied.2.3. Nonuniversalgaugeinteractionmodel
Models with nonuniversal couplings predict an enhanced branchingfractionforthethirdgenerationoffermionsandexplain thelarge massof thetop quark. The nonuniversalgauge interac-tionmodels(NUGIMs)exhibitaSU
(
2)
l×
SU(
2)
h×
U(
1)
symmetry, andthusareoftencalledG(221)models.Heretheindiceslandh refertolightandheavy,respectively.TheweakSM SU(
2)
W group is a low-energy limit oftwo gauge groups, a light SU(
2)
l anda heavy SU(
2)
h, which govern the couplings to the light fermions ofthefirsttwogenerationsandtotheheavyfermionsofthethird generation,respectively.Thesetwogroupsmix,resultinginan SM-likeSU(
2)
Wandanextendedgroup SU(
2)
E.TheSU(
2)
Eextended gauge group gives rise to additionalgauge bosons such asa W. The mixing of the two gauge groupsinvolves a mixing angle of theextendedgroup,θ
E,whichmodifiesthecouplingstotheheavy boson.Consequently,themixingmodifiestheproductioncross sec-tion and, as illustrated in Fig. 2, the branching fractions of theFig. 2. BranchingfractionsB(W)asafunctionofthemixinganglecotθE,forW
bosondecaysintheNUGIMG(221)framework,ascalculatedinRefs. [2,25,26].For cotθE=1 thevaluescorrespondtothoseintheSSM,rescaledtoaccommodatethe
WH decaychannel.
W. For cot
θ
E3 the W decayspredominantly to third genera-tion fermions. The branching fraction to WH issmaller than the branchingfractiontothirdgenerationfermions,asshowninFig.2. Forcotθ
E=
1 thebranchingfractionsarethesameasthoseofthe SSM,andtheW bosoncouplesdemocraticallytoallfermions.For cotθ
E<
1 thedecaysintolightfermionsaredominant.IntheNUGIMG(221),theratioofthecouplings gW
/
gW is re-latedtotheparametercotθ
Ebythefollowingequation [26]:W
=
SSMW(
4+
14)
cot2θ
E+
8 tan2θ
E 12+
14=
SSM W gW gW 2 (1)Becauseofthisfunctionalrelationship,areinterpretation oflimits oncouplingstrengthwillyieldlimitsonNUGIMG(221),andthus itwasnotnecessarytogenerateasignalsampleforthismodel.
3. TheCMSdetector
The central feature of the CMS apparatus is a superconduct-ing solenoid of6 m internal diameter, providing a magneticfield of 3.8 T. Withinthesolenoidvolume are a siliconpixeland strip tracker,aleadtungstatecrystalelectromagneticcalorimeter(ECAL), andabrassandscintillatorhadron calorimeter(HCAL),each com-posed ofa barrelandtwo endcapsections. Forwardcalorimeters extendthepseudorapidity(η)coverageprovidedbythebarreland endcapdetectors. Muonsaredetected ingas-ionization chambers embeddedinthesteelflux-returnyokeoutsidethesolenoid.
Thesilicontrackermeasureschargedparticleswithintherange
|
η
|
<
2.
5.It consistsof1440siliconpixel and15 148silicon strip detector modules. For nonisolated particles with transverse mo-mentum 1<
pT<
10GeV and|
η
|
<
1.
4,the trackresolutions are typically 1.5% in pT and 25–90 μm in the transverse impact pa-rameterand45–150 μminthelongitudinalimpactparameter.The ECALconsistsof75 848leadtungstatecrystals,whichprovide cov-erage of|
η
|
<
1.
48 in a barrel region (EB) and 1.
48<
|
η
|
<
3.
0 in two endcapregions (EE). The HCALis a samplingcalorimeter, whichutilizesalternating layersofbrassasan absorberand plas-ticscintillatorasactivematerial,coveringtherange|
η
|
<
3.Inthe forward region, the calorimetric coverage is extended to|
η
|
<
5 byasteelandquartzfiberCherenkovhadronforwardcalorimeter. Muonsaremeasuredintherange|
η
|
<
2.
4,withdetectionplanes madeusingthreetechnologies:drifttubes,cathodestripchambers,andresistiveplatechambers. Eventsofinterestareselectedusing atwo-tieredtriggersystem [27].
AmoredetaileddescriptionoftheCMSdetector,togetherwith adefinitionofthecoordinatesystemusedandtherelevant kine-maticvariables,canbefoundinRef. [28].
4. Backgroundsimulation
ThedominantSMbackgroundistheproductionofW+jets.This background is generated at LO using MadGraph5_amc@nlo ver-sion2.2.2withtheMLM merging [24,29] andtheNNPDF 3.0 [19,
20,30] PDF set for on-shell W boson production and using pythia8.212withtheNNPDF 2.3 PDFsetforoff-shellproduction. The differential cross section is reweighted as a function of the invariantmass ofthe SM W bosondecay products,incorporating NNLOquantumchromodynamics(QCD)andnext-to-leading-order (NLO)electroweak(EW)corrections.Theeffectwithrespecttothe LOcalculationcorrespondstoacorrectionfactor(K factor)forthe W bosontransversemassspectrum.TocombinetheQCDandEW differentialcrosssections,two differentmathematicalapproaches could be taken [31]:an additive or a multiplicative combination. Their effects differ by around 5%. The K factor assumed in this analysisisobtainedbytakingtheadditive combinationas recom-mended by Ref. [32] and the difference from the multiplicative combinationistreatedasasystematicuncertainty.The K factoris 1.15ata W massof 0.3 TeV and dropsmonotonically forhigher massesdown to0.6foramassof6 TeV. Thecalculation usesthe generators fewz 3.1 and mcsanc 1.01 [33] for theQCD and elec-troweakcorrections.
Other background processes are: Z
/
γ
∗
→
generated with MadGraph5_amc@nlo version 2.3.2.2 [24] with the NNPDF 3.0 PDFset,dibosonprocessesgeneratedwith pythia 8.212andwith theNNPDF 2.3 PDF set, andtop quark processes generated with powheg 2.0 [34–39] and the NNPDF 3.0 PDF set. Background from jets that are falsely identified asτ
h candidates is domi-nated by Z→
νν
+
jets events,which are simulated with Mad-Graph5_amc@nlo version2.3.2.2andwiththeNNPDF 3.0PDFset. Parton fragmentation and hadronization are performed with pythia8.212 withtheunderlyingeventtune CUETP8M1.The de-tector response is simulated using a detailed description of the CMSdetectorimplementedwiththe Geant4package [40].All sim-ulatedeventsamplesare normalizedto theintegratedluminosity of the recorded data, using the theoretical cross section values. Additional pp collisions during thesame bunch crossing (pileup) istakeninto account by superimposingsimulated minimumbias interactions onto all simulated events. The simulated events are weightedsothatthepileupdistributionmatchesthatofthedata, withanaverageofabout27interactionsperbunchcrossing.5. Reconstructionandidentificationofphysicsobjects
Aparticle-flow(PF)algorithm [41] isusedtocombine informa-tionfromallCMSsubdetectorsinordertoreconstructandidentify individual particles in the event:muons, electrons, photons, and chargedandneutralhadrons.Theresultingsetofparticlesisused to reconstruct the
τ
h candidates, missing transverse momentum (pmissT ),andjets.Thevector pTmissisdefinedasthenegativevector pT sumofall PFcandidates reconstructedintheevent.The mag-nitudeofthisvectorisreferredtoaspmiss
T .TherawpmissT valueis modifiedto account forcorrectionstotheenergy scaleofall the reconstructed jetsin the event [42]. The jets are clusteredusing theanti-kT jetfindingalgorithm [43,44].The reconstructedvertex withthelargestvalueofsummedphysics-objectp2T istakenasthe primaryvertex.
Electrons [45,46] arereconstructedbymatchingenergydeposits intheECALwithtracksegmentsintheinnertracker.Muon recon-struction [47] is performed by matching a track segment recon-structed in the inner trackerwitha track segmentreconstructed inthemuondetectorandperformingaglobalfitofthecharge de-positsfromthetwotracksegments.
The
τ
hreconstructioninCMSstartsfromjetsclusteredfromPF candidates,usingtheanti-kT algorithmwithadistanceparameter of 0.4. Theτ
h candidates are reconstructed using the hadrons-plus-strips algorithm [48,49], which is designed to optimize the performance ofτ
h reconstruction and identification by consider-ingspecificτ
leptondecaymodes.Individualτ
hdecaymodesare reconstructedseparately.Thesignaturesdistinguishedbythe algo-rithm are: a single chargedhadron, a charged hadron andup to twoneutralpions,andthreechargedhadrons.Requiring
τ
hcandidatestopassisolationrequirementsreduces the jet→
τ
h misidentificationprobability.The multivariant-based (MVA-based)τ
h identificationdiscriminantcombineisolation and other variables with sensitivity to theτ
lifetime, to provide the bestpossiblediscriminationforτ
hdecaysagainstquarkandgluon jets. Hadronicallydecayingτ
leptons inthisanalysisare required to satisfy the very loose working point of the MVA-based isola-tion [50]. This workingpoint has an efficiency of about 70% for genuineτ
h, withabout0.4% misidentificationrateforquark- and gluon-initiatedjets,forapTrangetypicalofτ
horiginatingfroma Wbosonofmassof2 TeV.Isolatedelectronshaveahigh probabil-itytobemisidentifiedasτ
hobjectsthatdecaytoasinglecharged hadron(h±orh±π
0).Electronscanemitenergeticbremsstrahlung photonsastheytraversethematerialofthesilicontracker.When thisoccurs, theelectronandaccompanying photonsmaybe mis-takenly reconstructed as a hadronically decayingτ
. Muons can also be reconstructed asτ
h objects in the h± decay mode. Theτ
hcandidatesinthisanalysisarerequiredtopasstheloose work-ingpointoftheantielectrondiscriminator,whichhasanefficiency ofabout85%forgenuineτ
hevents,andamisidentificationrateof about1.5%forelectrons.Theτ
hcandidatesarefurtherrequiredto passthelooseworkingpointoftheantimuondiscriminator,which hasanefficiencyof>
99% forgenuineτ
hevents,witha misiden-tificationrateofabout0.3%formuons [50,51].6. Analysisstrategy
The discriminating variable used in thisanalysis is the trans-versemass,definedasfollows:
mT
=
2pτTpmiss
T
[
1−
cosφ (
pTτ
,
pTmiss
)
],
(2) where pτT is the magnitude of the transverse momentum vector oftheτ
hcandidatepτT,and
φ
isthedifferenceintheazimuthal anglebetweenpτT and
pTmiss.
Thestrategyofthisanalysisistoselectaheavybosoncandidate decayingalmostatresttoahadronicjetconsistentwitha
τ
h can-didate andneutrinos, the latter manifesting themselves as pmissT . Signaleventsareselectedonlinewithaτ
h+
pmissT triggerthat re-quires the pT oftheτ
h candidate tobe greater than 50 GeV and the value of pmissT to be greater than 90 GeV. To ensurethat the triggerismaximallyefficientforselectedevents,theoffline selec-tion requires one isolatedτ
h candidate to have pτT greater than 80 GeV andpmissT tobegreaterthan200 GeV.
Althoughthere are two neutrinosin thefinal state, pmissT and the isolated
τ
h candidate are largely produced inopposite direc-tions, which helps to distinguish signal from background events especiallythosecomingfromQCDmultijetproduction.Two selec-tion criteria exploit this behavior to reduce the background: the ratioofthepτT topmissFig. 3. (Left)The
m
Tdistributionafterthefinalselection.Theblacksymbolswitherrorbarsshowdata,whilethefilledhistogramsrepresenttheSMbackgrounds.SignalexamplesforSSMWbosonswithmassesof0.6,1.0,4.0,and5.0 TeV areshownwiththeopenhistograms.(Right)Theintegraltransversemassdistribution,wherethevalue ineachbinisequaltothenumberofeventswithtransversemassequaltoorgreaterthantheleftofthebin.Thelowerpanelsshowtheratioofdatatoprediction,andthe graybandrepresentsthesystematicuncertainties.
andthe angle
φ (
pτT
,
pTmiss
)
has to be greater than 2.4radians. Consequently, the lowest mT value is about 300 GeV. To avoid an overlap with the W boson search in the electron channel, events are rejected if they contain a loosely identified electron withpT>
20GeV and|
η
|
<
2.
5,wherethelooseworkingpointis≈
90% efficientforreal electrons.For similarreasons,events con-tainingalooselyidentified muonwith pT>
20GeV and|
η
|
<
2.
4 arenotconsideredinthisanalysis,wherethelooseworkingpoint is>
99%efficientforrealmuons.Afterallselections, themT distributions fortheobserved data and expected background events are presented in Fig. 3 (left). Fig.3 (right)showsthe integral distribution,which isformed by fillingeachbinofthehistogramwiththesumofthatbinandall followingbins.Thesystematicuncertainties,whicharedetailedin Section7,areillustratedasagray bandinthelowerpanelsofthe plots.TheproductofthesignalefficiencyandacceptanceforSSM W
→
τ ν
eventsdependson theW bosonmass.The totalsignal efficiencyforthestudiedrangeofmT>
300GeV variesfrom14%to about24%asMW increasesfrom1to3 TeV.ForhigherWboson masses,eventsshifttolowermTbecauseoftheincreasingfraction ofoff-shell production(as showninFig. 3for a fewsignal mass points).Forexample,foraW bosonwithamassof5 TeV,the to-talsignalefficiencyisaround17%.Thetriggerthresholdaffectsthe signalefficiencyinthelow-massrange.Theseefficiencyvaluesare obtained assuming the W→
τ ν
branching fraction to be unity. Theefficiencyvaluesare estimatedusing simulatedeventswhere theτ
leptondecayshadronically.The dominantbackground is fromthe off-shelltail ofthe mT distributionoftheSMW boson, andisobtainedfromsimulation. ThebackgroundcontributionsfromZ
(
→
νν
)
+
jets andQCD mul-tijeteventsarealsoobtainedfromsimulation.Thesebackgrounds primarilyariseasaconsequenceofjetsmisidentifiedasτ
h candi-dates.ThecontributionofQCDmultijetbackgroundissmall com-paredtoZ(
→
νν
)
+
jets inthesignalregion.Followingthestrategy inRef. [52],toensurethatthemisidentifiedτ
backgroundis sim-ulated properly, the agreement between data and simulation is checkedinacontrolregiondominatedbyZ(
→
μμ
)
+
jets events, whereajetismisidentifiedasaτ
hcandidate.ThepmissT isrecalcu-latedexcludingthemuonsfromtheZdecayinordertoreproduce the pmissT distribution of Z
→
νν
events. Specifically, the control region is defined as follows. Events are selected online using a dimuon trigger with muon pT thresholds of 17 and 8 GeV.They must contain two oppositely charged muons with pT>
20GeV and|
η
|
<
2.
4, both passing loose identificationand isolation re-quirements.The invariantmass ofthedimuonsystemisrequired to be between 81 and 101 GeV. In addition, the events are re-quired to contain exactly oneτ
h candidate passing the same se-lectionrequirementsasinthesignalregion,withpτT>
20GeV and|
η
τ|
<
2.
1. To remove the overlap between muon andτ
h candi-dates, theseparation betweenthem mustfulfillR
(
μ
,
τ
h)
>
0.
1, whereR isdefinedas
R
=
(
η
)
2+ (φ)
2.Dataand simula-tion arecompared usingdistributions ofthedimuonmass, pmissT , pT/pmissT ,mT,η
τ and pτT.Fig. 4showsthe pτT distributionin the control region.Data andsimulation agree within 50% in all bins except inone bin inthe tailofthe pτT distribution, giving confi-dencethat themisidentifiedτ
h backgroundsource—about22% of thetotalbackground—iscorrectlymodeledinthesimulation.7. Systematicuncertainties
The uncertaintyinthe modelingofthemT distributioncan be split into threecategories: uncertainties affecting shapeand nor-malization, uncertainties affectingonly normalizationandan un-certaintyduetolimitednumbersofeventsinsimulatedsamples.
The dominantuncertaintyofthe firstcategory comesfrom
τ
h reconstruction and identification, affecting background anda po-tential signal in the same way. The uncertainty associated with theτ
h identification is 5% [48]. An additional systematic uncer-tainty, which dominates for high-pTτ
h candidates, is related to thedegreeofconfidencethattheMCsimulationcorrectlymodels the identification efficiency. This additional uncertainty increases linearlywithpτT andamountsto+
5%/−
35% at pτT=
1TeV.The un-certainty isasymmetric becausestudiesindicate that theτ
iden-tification efficiencyissmaller indatathanin simulation,andthe difference increasesasthe pT oftheτ
increases.Theuncertainty in theτ
h energyscale amounts to 3% [48]. The main sources ofFig. 4. Distributionof
p
τT inthecontrolregion.Theblacksymbolswitherrorbarsshowthedata,whilethehistogramsrepresenttheSMbackgrounds.Thelowerpanel showstheratioofdatatoprediction.
pmissT uncertainty from jets are the jet energy scale and jet en-ergyresolution [53].Fortheenergymeasurementsofotherobjects thefollowinguncertainties areapplied:3% [48] for
τ
h,0.6%inEB and1.5% in EE, respectively, for electrons andphotons [54]; and 0.2%formuons [47].The contributiontothe uncertaintyin pmissT associated with unclustered energy is estimated by varying this energyby±
10%.Fortheτ
plus pmissT trigger,ascalefactorof0.9 isapplied.Thescale factorhasan uncertaintyof10%.The uncer-tainty associatedwiththe choice ofthe PDF inthesimulation is evaluatedaccordingtothePDF4LHCprescription [55–57].The val-uesincrease withmT,rangingfromanuncertaintyof1to10%at mT=
0.
5 to4.0 TeV.Forthe K factoroftheW bosonbackground, the difference between additive and multiplicative combination, which is around 5%, is taken to be the systematic uncertainty. Thesimulatedeventsareweighted sothatthepileupdistribution matches the measured one, using a value for the total inelastic crosssectionof69.2 mb,whichhasanuncertaintyof±
4.6% [58].Uncertainties of the second category influence only the nor-malizationof the mT distribution. Kinematic distributions in the Z
(
→
μμ
)
+
jets control region demonstratethat dataand simu-lationagreewithin 50%formisidentifiedτ
h background,whichiscomposedofZ
(
→
νν
)
+
jets andQCDmultijetevents.Thisguides theassignmentofa50% systematicuncertaintyinthe normaliza-tionofthesebackgrounds.Theuncertaintyintheelectron identifi-cationefficiency(veto)is2%andtheuncertaintyintheintegrated luminositymeasurementis2.5% [59].Uncertaintiesin the third category arise fromlimited sizes of eventsamplesinthesimulationofbackgroundprocesses.In con-trasttoallotheruncertainties,theyarenotcorrelatedbetweenthe binsoftheinvariantmassdistribution.
Inthehigh-massregion,whereboththeexpectedandthe ob-served numbers of events are consistent with zero,the effect of thesystematicuncertaintyontheexclusionlimitsisnegligible.
Therelevantsystematicuncertaintiestakenintoaccountinthe estimation of potential signals include those associated with
τ
h identification and energyscale, pmissT , trigger, pile-up simulation, andintegratedluminosity. Theuncertainty inthe signal K factor arisesfromthechoicesofPDFand
αS
.Thecombineduncertainty is evaluated using the PDF4LHC prescription,where in the com-putation of each PDF set, the strong couplingconstant isvaried. Uncertaintiesfromdifferent PDFsets andαS
variation are added inquadrature.8. Results
Thetransversemassdistribution inFig. 3showsnosignificant deviationsfromtheexpectedSMbackground.Signaleventsare ex-pected to be particularlyprominent atthe upper end of themT distribution, where the expected SM background is low. The ex-pected andmeasured yields are summarized inTable 1 together withthedetailedsystematicuncertaintiesdescribedinSection7. 8.1. Statisticalanalysis
Upperlimitsontheproductoftheproductioncrosssectionand branchingfraction,
σ
(
pp→
W)
B(
W→
τ ν
)
,aredeterminedusing aBayesianmethod [60,61] withauniformpositiveprior probabil-ity densityfor the signal cross section (known to have excellent frequentistpropertieswhenusedasatechnicaldevicefor generat-ing frequentistupperlimits).Alllimitspresentedhereareat95% confidencelevel(CL).Thenuisanceparametersassociatedwiththe systematicuncertaintiesaremodeledthroughlog-normal distribu-tions foruncertainties in the normalization. Uncertainties in the shapeofthedistributionsaremodeledthrough“template morph-ing” techniques [62]. The limitsare obtained fromthe entiremT spectrumformT>
320GeV,asdisplayed inFig.3.Thisprocedure is performedfordifferentvaluesof parameters ofeach signal, to obtainlimitsintermsontheseparameters,suchastheW boson mass.Table 1
Expectedyieldsfor thesignalandbackgroundeventscomparedtothemeasured event yieldsindata,forthreeregionsof
m
T.Alsoshownarethetotalsystematicuncertaintiesintheestimateoftheeventnumbers.
Range of mT mT<0.5 TeV 0.5<mT<1 TeV mT>1 TeV
W+jets 786 ± 110 355 ± 68 21.8 ± 6.2 Z→νν+jets 238 ± 120 68 ± 35 0.9 ± 0.5 Multijet 68 ± 35 18 ± 10 <0.1 tt 68 ± 15 14.5 ± 4.5 <0.1 Z→ +jets 35.8 ± 8.7 10.4 ± 5.1 <0.1 Diboson (WW, WZ, Z Z) 24.9 ± 6.4 9.6 ± 3.5 0.7 ± 0.1 Single top quark 21.5 ± 6.5 7.0 ± 2.9 <0.1 Total background 1243 ± 160 485 ± 77 23.4 ± 6.2 SSM WM=600 GeV 28229 ± 4388 14012 ± 2798 45.6 ± 7.7 SSM WM=1 TeV 3767 ± 590 10079 ± 1581 355 ± 98 SSM WM=4 TeV 0.7 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 1.8 11.4 ± 3.9
Fig. 5. Expected(blackdashedline)andobserved(blacksolidline)95%CL upper limitsonthecrosssectionfortheproductionofSSMWboson.Theshadedbands aroundtheexpectedlimitrepresenttheoneandtwostandarddeviation(s.d.) un-certaintyintervals.TheNNLOtheoreticalcrosssectionwiththecorrespondingPDF uncertaintybandisalsoshown.
To determine a model-independent upper limit on the prod-uct of the cross section and branching fraction, all events above a threshold mminT are summed. From the number of background events,signal events,andobserveddataevents,the crosssection limitcanbecalculated.Theresultinglimitcanbereinterpretedin the framework of other models witha
τ
h and pmissT in the final state.8.2. ThesequentialstandardmodelW
The parameter of interest is the product of the signal cross section and the branching fraction,
σ
B(
W→
τ ν
)
. The branch-ing fractionincludes allτ
lepton decay modes, to allow adirect comparisonwiththeWsearchesintheelectronandmuon chan-nels [9].The upper limit on
σ
B(
W→
τ ν
)
as a function of the SSM W boson massis shown inFig. 5. The observed limit is consis-tent withthe expected limit. The SSM W boson isexcluded for masses 0.
4<
MW<
4.
0TeV at 95% CL where the lower limit is mainlydeterminedbythetriggerthresholdandtheupperoneby theavailabledata.Thisresultintheτ
channelmaybecompared with the lower mass limit of 5.2 TeV for an SSM W boson, ob-tained from the combination of electron and muon channels [9,10].
8.3. Limitsonthecouplingstrength
Theupperlimitson thecross sectiondepend not onlyonthe massofa potentialexcess,butalsoon thewidth. Becauseofthe relationbetweenthecoupling ofaparticle anditswidth, a limit canalsobesetonthecouplingstrength.Inordertocomputethe limitforcouplings gW
/
gW=
1,reweightedsamplesareusedthat takeintoaccounttheappropriatesignalwidthandthedifferences in reconstructed mT shapes. For gW/
gW=
1 the theoretical LO cross sectionsapply. Fora givenmass, the crosssection limit as afunctionofthecouplingstrength gW/
gW isdetermined.ForeachsimulatedW bosonmass,theexcluded crosssection isdeterminedfromtheintersectionofthetheoreticalcrosssection curve withthe observed cross section limit. The resulting inter-section pointsprovide theinput forthe exclusionlimitin a two-dimensionalplanemadeofgW
/
gW andMW,asdepictedinFig.6.Fig. 6. Expected(blackdashedline)andobserved(blacksolidline)95%CL upper limits on the ratioofcouplings as afunction ofthe W bosonmass. The val-uesabovetheobservedlimitcontourareexcluded.Theshadedbandsaroundthe expectedlimitrepresenttheoneandtwostandarddeviation(s.d.)uncertainty in-tervals.
Thephasespaceabovetheobservedlimitcontourisexcluded.For lowmasses, gW
/
gW valuesdownto7×
10−2 areexcluded. 8.4. ThenonuniversalgaugeinteractionmodellimitsIn the NUGIM G(221) framework, the ratio of the couplings gW
/
gW is related to the parameter cotθ
E through Eq. (1). Thus cotθ
EcanbeextractedforeachvalueofgW/
gW.Basedonthe lim-itsoncouplingstrengthspresentedinFig.6,thetwo-dimensional limitoncotθ
EisshownasafunctionoftheWbosonmass.Fig.7 (left) shows the width of the W boson as a function of cotθ
E and MW. For cotθ
E>
6.
5, the width becomes so large that the modelisnolongervalid.Thelimit,showninFig.7(right),focuses on theparameter spacecotθ
E≥
1 where theτ
hchannel sets the moststringentbounds, asillustratedinFig.2.Forlowervaluesof cotθ
E,other channelsare moresensitive.Dependingonthevalue ofcotθ
E,themassoftheW bosoncanbeexcludedat95%CL up to3.9 TeV intheNUGIMG(221)framework.8.5. Themodel-independentcrosssectionlimit
TheshapeanalysisassumesacertainsignalshapeinmT. How-ever, alternative new physics processes yielding a
τ
h+
pmissT fi-nal state could cause an excess of a different shape. A model-independent cross section limit isdetermined usinga single bin rangingfromalowerthresholdonmT toinfinity.Noassumptions ontheshapeofthesignalmT distributionhavetobe madeother than that of a flatproduct of acceptancetimes efficiency, A,as a functionofW mass.Inordertodeterminethelimit fora spe-cific model from the model-independent limit shown here, only the model-dependent part of the efficiency needs to be applied. The experimentalefficienciesforthesignalare alreadytakeninto account, includingthe effectof thekinematic selection ofevents containingτ
h and pmissT (the selectionson pT/
pmissT andφ
),the geometrical acceptance (selection onη
), and the trigger thresh-old.A factor fmT that reflects the effectof the thresholdm
min T on the signal is determinedby counting theevents withmT
>
mminT anddividingtheresultbythenumberofgeneratedevents.The re-constructionefficiencyisnearlyconstantovertheentire mTrangeFig. 7. Left:ThewidthoftheWbosonasafunctionof
M
WandmixinganglecotθE intheNUGIMG(221)framework.Right:Expected(blackdashedline)andobserved(blacksolidline)95%CL upperlimitsonthemixinganglecotθEasafunctionoftheWbosonmass.Theregionleftofthesolidlineisexcluded.Theshadedbandsrepresent
theoneandtwostandarddeviation(s.d.)uncertaintybands.
Fig. 8. Expected(blackdashedline)andobserved(blacksolidline)95%CL model-independentupperlimitsontheproductofcrosssection,branchingfraction,and acceptanceforaresonancedecayingintotheτ νchannel.Theshadedbands repre-senttheoneandtwostandarddeviation(s.d.)uncertaintybands.
probed here, therefore fmT can be evaluated at generator level.
A limitontheproductofthecrosssectionandbranchingfraction
(
σ
B
A)
excl canbeobtainedbydividingtheexcludedcrosssection ofthe model-independentlimit(
σ
B
A)
MI given inFig. 8by the calculatedfraction fmT(
m min T)
:(
σ
B
A)
excl=
(
σ
B
A)
MI(
mminT)
fmT(
m min T)
(3)Here,
B
isthe branchingfractionofthenewparticle decayingtoτ
+
ν.
Modelswithatheoreticalcrosssection(
σ
B)
theo largerthan(
σ
B)
excl can be excluded. The procedure described here can be appliedto all models involvingthe two-bodydecayofa massive state,whichexhibit back-to-backkinematics similartothose ofa generic W.If the kinematicpropertiesare different, thefraction ofevents fmT(
mmin
T
)
mustbedeterminedfortheparticularmodel considered.Theresultingcrosssectionlimitasafunctionofmmin
T isshown inFig.8.ThehighestmT eventindatawas foundat1.65 TeV, af-terwhichthe limit becomes flat.The results dependstrongly on thethreshold mminT . Values of theproduct
σ
B
A between 50fb (mminT>
400GeV) and 0.4fb (mminT>
2TeV) are excluded forthe mminT thresholdsgiveninbrackets.
9. Summary
Asearchfornewphysicsinfinalstateswithahadronically de-caying
τ
leptonandmissingtransversemomentumhasbeen per-formedbytheCMSexperiment,usingproton-protoncollisiondata atthecenter-of-massenergy√
s=
13TeV withanintegrated lumi-nosityof35.9 fb−1.Nosignificantexcesscomparedtothestandard model expectation is observed in the transverse mass of theτ
andmissing transverse momentum.A sequential standard model W boson is excluded in the mass range 0
.
4<
MW<
4.
0TeV at 95% confidencelevel.Couplingsthatare weakerthan assumedin thesequentialstandardmodelcanbe excludeddowntovaluesof 7×
10−2 for MW
=
1TeV. Within the nonuniversal gauge inter-action SU(
2)
×
SU(
2)
×
U(
1)
model, the lower limit on the W bosonmassdependsonthecouplingconstantandvariesfrom1.7 to3.9 TeV at95%confidencelevel.Forcotθ
E>
1,theseresults ob-tainedintheτ
channelprovidethemoststringentconstraintson thismodeltodate.Inaddition,amodel-independentlimitis pro-videdallowingtheresultstobeinterpretedinothermodelsgiving thesamefinalstatewithsimilarkinematicdistributions.Acknowledgements
WecongratulateourcolleaguesintheCERNaccelerator depart-ments for the excellent performance of the LHC and thank the technicalandadministrative staffsatCERN andatother CMS in-stitutes for their contributions to the success of the CMS effort. Inaddition,wegratefullyacknowledgethecomputingcentersand personneloftheWorldwideLHCComputingGridfordeliveringso effectivelythe computinginfrastructureessential to ouranalyses. Finally, we acknowledge the enduring support for the construc-tionandoperation oftheLHC andtheCMSdetectorprovidedby thefollowingfundingagencies:BMWFWandFWF(Austria);FNRS and FWO(Belgium); CNPq,CAPES, FAPERJ, FAPERGS, and FAPESP (Brazil); MES (Bulgaria); CERN; CAS, MOST, and NSFC (China); COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); MSES andCSF (Croatia); RPF (Cyprus); SENESCYT(Ecuador);MoER,ERCIUT,andERDF(Estonia);Academy ofFinland,MEC,andHIP(Finland);CEAandCNRS/IN2P3(France); BMBF, DFG, and HGF (Germany); GSRT (Greece); NKFIA (Hun-gary);DAEandDST(India);IPM(Iran);SFI(Ireland);INFN(Italy); MSIPandNRF (RepublicofKorea); MES(Latvia);LAS (Lithuania); MOE and UM (Malaysia); BUAP, CINVESTAV, CONACYT, LNS, SEP, andUASLP-FAI(Mexico);MOS(Montenegro);MBIE(NewZealand); PAEC (Pakistan); MSHE and NSC (Poland); FCT (Portugal); JINR (Dubna);MON,ROSATOM,RAS,RFBR,andNRCKI(Russia);MESTD (Serbia);SEIDI,CPAN,PCTI,andFEDER(Spain);MoSTR (SriLanka);
Swiss Funding Agencies (Switzerland); MST (Taipei); ThEPCenter, IPST, STAR, and NSTDA (Thailand); TÜBITAK and TAEK (Turkey); NASU andSFFR(Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom);DOE andNSF (USA).
Individuals have received support from the Marie-Curie pro-gramme and the European Research Council and Horizon 2020 Grant,contract No. 675440 (EuropeanUnion);theLeventis Foun-dation;the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; the Alexander von Hum-boldt Foundation; the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office; the Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie etdans l’Agriculture (FRIA-Belgium); the Agentschapvoor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium); the F.R.S.-FNRS and FWO (Belgium) under the “Excellence of Science - EOS” - be.h projectn.30820817; theMinistryofEducation,Youth andSports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic; the Lendület (“Momentum”) Pro-gramme and the János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hun-garian Academy of Sciences, the New National Excellence Pro-gram ÚNKP, the NKFIA research grants 123842, 123959, 124845, 124850 and 125105 (Hungary); the Council of Science and In-dustrial Research, India; the HOMING PLUS programme of the Foundation for Polish Science, cofinanced from European Union, Regional DevelopmentFund, theMobility Plusprogrammeofthe Ministry of Science and Higher Education, the National Science Centre (Poland), contractsHarmonia 2014/14/M/ST2/00428, Opus 2014/13/B/ST2/02543, 2014/15/B/ST2/03998, and 2015/19/B/ST2/ 02861,Sonata-bis2012/07/E/ST2/01406;theNationalPriorities Re-search Program by Qatar National Research Fund; the Programa EstataldeFomento delaInvestigación CientíficayTécnica de Ex-celencia María de Maeztu, grant MDM-2015-0509 and the Pro-grama Severo Ochoa del Principado de Asturias; the Thalis and Aristeia programmes cofinanced by EU-ESF andthe Greek NSRF; theRachadapisekSompotFundforPostdoctoralFellowship, Chula-longkornUniversityandtheChulalongkornAcademicintoIts 2nd CenturyProjectAdvancement Project(Thailand);theWelch Foun-dation,contractC-1845;andtheWestonHavensFoundation(USA).
References
[1] G.Altarelli,B.Mele,M.Ruiz-Altaba,Searchingfornewheavyvectorbosons inpp colliders,Z.Phys.C45(1989)109,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /BF01552335; Erratum:https://doi .org /10 .1007 /BF01556677.
[2] C.-W.Chiang,N.G.Deshpande,X.-G.He,J.Jiang,Thefamily
SU
(2)l×SU(2)h×U(1)model,Phys.Rev.D81(2010)015006,https://doi .org /10 .1103 /PhysRevD . 81.015006,arXiv:0911.1480.
[3] X. Li,E.Ma, Gaugemodelofgeneration nonuniversality,Phys. Rev.Lett.47 (1981)1788,https://doi .org /10 .1103 /PhysRevLett .47.1788.
[4] D.J.Muller,S.Nandi,Topflavor:aseparate SU(2)forthethirdfamily,Phys. Lett.B383(1996)345,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0370 -2693(96 )00745 -9,arXiv: hep-ph/9602390.
[5] E. Malkawi,T.M.P.Tait,C.P.Yuan,Amodelofstrongflavordynamicsforthe topquark,Phys.Lett.B385(1996)304,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /0370 -2693(96 ) 00859 -3,arXiv:hep-ph/9603349.
[6] K. Hsieh,K.Schmitz, J.-H.Yu,C.P.Yuan,Globalanalysisofgeneral SU(2)×
SU(2)×U(1)models with precision data, Phys.Rev.D 82(2010) 035011, https://doi .org /10 .1103 /PhysRevD .82 .035011,arXiv:1003.3482.
[7] CMS Collaboration, Search for W decaying totau lepton and neutrino in proton-protoncollisionsat√s=8TeV,Phys.Lett.B755(2016)196,https:// doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2016 .02 .002,arXiv:1508.04308.
[8] ATLAS Collaboration,Searchforhigh-massresonancesdecayingtoτ ν inpp collisionsat√s=13TeV withtheATLASdetector,Phys.Rev.Lett.120(2018) 161802,https://doi .org /10 .1103 /PhysRevLett .120 .161802,arXiv:1801.06992. [9] CMSCollaboration,Searchforhigh-massresonancesinfinalstateswitha
lep-tonandmissingtransversemomentumat√s=13TeV,J.HighEnergyPhys.06 (2018)128,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP06(2018 )128,arXiv:1803.11133. [10] ATLASCollaboration,Searchforanewheavygaugebosonresonancedecaying
intoaleptonandmissingtransversemomentumin36 fb−1ofpp collisionsat
√
s=13TeV withtheATLASexperiment,Eur.Phys.J.C78(2018)401,https:// doi .org /10 .1140 /epjc /s10052 -018 -5877 -y,arXiv:1706.04786.
[11] CMSCollaboration,SearchforaheavyresonancedecayingintoaZ bosonand avectorbosonintheννqq finalstate,J. HighEnergy Phys.07(2018)075, https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP07(2018 )075,arXiv:1803.03838.
[12] ATLASCollaboration,Searchfordibosonresonanceswithboson-taggedjetsin pp collisionsat√s=13TeV withtheATLASdetector,Phys.Lett.B777(2018) 91,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2017.12 .011,arXiv:1708.04445. [13] CMS√ Collaboration,Searchfordijetresonancesinproton-protoncollisionsat
s=13TeV andconstraintsondarkmatterandothermodels,Phys.Lett.B769 (2017) 520, https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2017.02 .012, arXiv:1611.03568; Corrigendum:https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2017.09 .029.
[14] ATLASCollaboration,Searchfornewphenomenaindijeteventsusing37 fb−1 ofpp collisiondatacollectedat√s=13TeV withtheATLASdetector,Phys. Rev.D96(2017)052004,https://doi .org /10 .1103 /PhysRevD .96 .052004, arXiv: 1703.09127.
[15] CMSCollaboration,Searchforheavyresonancesdecayingtoatopquarkand abottomquark inthe lepton+jetsfinalstateinproton-protoncollisionsat 13TeV,Phys.Lett.B777(2018)39,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2017.12 . 006,arXiv:1708.08539.
[16] ATLASCollaboration,SearchforW→tb decaysinthehadronicfinalstate us-ingpp collisionsat √s=13TeV withtheATLAS detector,Phys.Lett.B781 (2018)327,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2018 .03 .036,arXiv:1801.07893. [17] E.Boos,V.Bunichev,L.Dudko,M.Perfilov,InterferencebetweenWandW in
single-topquarkproductionprocesses,Phys.Lett.B655(2007)245,https:// doi .org /10 .1016 /j .physletb .2007.03 .064,arXiv:hep-ph/0610080.
[18] T. Sjöstrand,S.Ask,J.R. Christiansen,R.Corke,N.Desai,P.Ilten,S. Mrenna, S.Prestel,C.O.Rasmussen,P.Z.Skands, Anintroductionto pythia 8.2, Com-put.Phys.Commun.191(2015)159,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .cpc .2015 .01.024, arXiv:1410.3012.
[19] R.D.Ball,V.Bertone,F.Cerutti,L.DelDebbio,S.Forte,A.Guffanti,J.I.Latorre, J.Rojo,M.Ubiali,Impactofheavyquarkmassesonpartondistributionsand LHCphenomenology,Nucl.Phys.B849(2011)296,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j . nuclphysb .2011.03 .021,arXiv:1101.1300.
[20] R.D.Ball,V.Bertone,S.Carrazza,C.S.Deans,L.DelDebbio,S.Forte,A.Guffanti, N.P.Hartland,J.I.Latorre,J.Rojo,M.Ubiali,PartondistributionswithLHCdata, Nucl.Phys.B867(2013)244,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .nuclphysb .2012 .10 .003, arXiv:1207.1303.
[21] P.Skands,S.Carrazza,J.Rojo,Tuning pythia 8.1:theMonash2013tune,Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3024, https://doi .org /10 .1140 /epjc /s10052 -014 -3024 -y, arXiv:1404.5630.
[22] R.Gavin,Y.Li,F.Petriello,S.Quackenbush,W physicsattheLHCwith fewz 2.1, Comput.Phys.Commun.184(2013)208,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .cpc .2012 .09 . 005,arXiv:1201.5896.
[23] Y. Li, F. Petriello,Combining QCD and electroweak corrections todilepton productionin fewz,Phys. Rev.D86(2012)094034,https://doi .org /10 .1103 / PhysRevD .86 .094034,arXiv:1208.5967.
[24] J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli,M. Zaro,The automated computation of tree-levelandnext-to-leadingorderdifferentialcrosssections,andtheirmatching toparton showersimulations,J. HighEnergy Phys. 07(2014) 079,https:// doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP07(2014 )079,arXiv:1405.0301.
[25] Y.G.Kim,K.Y.Lee,EarlyLHCboundontheWbosonmassinthenonuniversal gaugeinteractionmodel,Phys.Lett.B706(2012)367,https://doi .org /10 .1016 / j .physletb .2011.11.032,arXiv:1105.2653.
[26]L. Edelhauser, A. Knochel, Observing nonstandard Wand Zthrough the third generation and Higgs lens, arXiv:1408 .0914, 2014.
[27] CMS Collaboration, The CMStrigger system,J. Instrum. 12 (2017) P01020, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /12 /01 /P01020,arXiv:1609.02366. [28] CMSCollaboration,TheCMSexperimentattheCERNLHC,J.Instrum.3(2008)
S08004,https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /3 /08 /S08004.
[29] J. Alwall, S. Hoeche, F. Krauss, N. Lavesson, L. Lonnblad, F. Maltoni, M.L. Mangano,M.Moretti,C.G.Papadopoulos,F.Piccinini,S.Schumann,M.Treccani, J.Winter,M.Worek,Comparativestudyofvariousalgorithmsforthemerging ofpartonshowersandmatrixelementsinhadroniccollisions,Eur.Phys.J.C53 (2008)473,https://doi .org /10 .1140 /epjc /s10052 -007 -0490 -5,arXiv:0706.2569. [30] R.D. Ball, et al., NNPDF, Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, J. High EnergyPhys. 04(2015)040,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP04(2015 )040, arXiv: 1410.8849.
[31] G. Balossini, G.Montagna,C.M. Carloni Calame,M.Moretti, O. Nicrosini,F. Piccinini,M.Treccani,A.Vicini,CombinationofelectroweakandQCD correc-tionstosingle Wproduction at the FermilabTevatronand the CERNLHC, J.HighEnergyPhys.01(2010)013,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP01(2010 )013, arXiv:0907.0276.
[32]J.R. Andersen, et al., Les Houches 2013: physics at TeV colliders: standard model working group report, arXiv:1405 .1067, 2014.
[33] S.G.Bondarenko,A.A.Sapronov,NLOEWandQCDproton-protoncrosssection calculationswith MCSANC-v1.01,Comput. Phys.Commun.184(2013) 2343, https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .cpc .2013 .05 .010,arXiv:1301.3687.
[34] S.Frixione,P.Nason,C.Oleari,MatchingNLOQCDcomputationswithparton showersimulations:the powheg method,J.HighEnergyPhys.11(2007)070, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1126 -6708 /2007 /11 /070,arXiv:0709.2092.
[35] P.Nason, Anewmethodfor combiningNLOQCDwithshowerMonteCarlo algorithms,J.HighEnergyPhys.11(2004)040,https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1126 -6708 /2004 /11 /040,arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.
[36] S.Alioli, P.Nason, C. Oleari,E.Re, Ageneral framework for implementing NLOcalculationsinshowerMonteCarloprograms:the powheg box,J.High Energy Phys.06(2010)043,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP06(2010 )043, arXiv: 1002.2581.
[37] S.Alioli,P.Nason,C.Oleari,E.Re,NLOsingle-topproduction matchedwith showerin powheg:
s- and t-channel
contributions,J.HighEnergy Phys.09 (2009) 111, https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP02(2010 )011, arXiv:0907.4076; Erra-tum:https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1126 -6708 /2009 /09 /111.[38] E.Re,Single-topWt-channelproductionmatchedwithpartonshowersusing the powheg method,Eur.Phys.J.C71(2011)1547, https://doi .org /10 .1140 / epjc /s10052 -011 -1547 -z,arXiv:1009.2450.
[39] S.Frixione,P.Nason,G.Ridolfi,Apositive-weightnext-to-leading-orderMonte Carloforheavyflavourhadroproduction,J.HighEnergyPhys.09(2007)126, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1126 -6708 /2007 /09 /126,arXiv:0707.3088.
[40] S.Agostinelli,etal.,Geant4, Geant4—asimulationtoolkit,Nucl.Instrum.Meth. A506(2003)250,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /S0168 -9002(03 )01368 -8.
[41] CMSCollaboration,Particle-flow reconstructionandglobalevent description withtheCMSdetector,J.Instrum.12(2017)P10003,https://doi .org /10 .1088 / 1748 -0221 /12 /10 /P10003,arXiv:1706.04965.
[42] CMSCollaboration,PerformanceoftheCMSmissingtransversemomentum re-constructioninpp dataat√s=8TeV,J.Instrum.10(2015)P02006,https:// doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /10 /02 /P02006,arXiv:1411.0511.
[43] M.Cacciari,G.P.Salam,G.Soyez,Theanti-kTjetclusteringalgorithm,J.High
Energy Phys.04(2008) 063,https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1126 -6708 /2008 /04 /063, arXiv:0802.1189.
[44] M.Cacciari,G.P.Salam,G.Soyez,FastJetusermanual,Eur.Phys.J.C72(2012) 1896,https://doi .org /10 .1140 /epjc /s10052 -012 -1896 -2,arXiv:1111.6097. [45] CMSCollaboration,Performanceofelectronreconstructionandselectionwith
the CMSdetector inproton-proton collisionsat √s=8TeV, J.Instrum. 10 (2015) P06005, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /10 /06 /P06005, arXiv:1502. 02701.
[46] CMSCollaboration, Electron and PhotonPerformanceinCMS withthe Full 2016 Data Sample, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-DP-17-004, 2017, https://cds .cern .ch /record /2255497/.
[47] CMSCollaboration,PerformanceoftheCMSmuondetectorandmuon recon-structionwithproton-protoncollisionsat√s=13TeV,J.Instrum.13(2018) P06015,https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /13 /06 /P06015,arXiv:1804.04528. [48] CMSCollaboration, Reconstruction and identificationof τ leptondecays to
hadronsandντ atCMS,J.Instrum.11(2016)P01019,https://doi .org /10 .1088 / 1748 -0221 /11 /01 /P01019,arXiv:1510.07488.
[49] CMSCollaboration,PerformanceofReconstructionandIdentificationofτ Lep-tonsinTheirDecaystoHadronsandντ inLHCRunII,CMSPhysicsAnalysis SummaryCMS-PAS-TAU-16-002,2016,https://cds .cern .ch /record /2196972.
[50] CMSCollaboration,ObservationoftheHiggsbosondecaytoapairofτleptons withtheCMSdetector,Phys.Lett.B779(2018)283,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j . physletb .2018 .02 .004,arXiv:1708.00373.
[51] CMSCollaboration,Performanceofreconstructionandidentificationofτ lep-tonsdecayingtohadronsandντinpp collisionsat√s=13TeV,J.Instrum.13 (2018) P10005, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /13 /10 /P10005, arXiv:1809. 02816,2018.
[52] CMSCollaboration,Searchfordarkmatterproducedwithanenergeticjetora hadronicallydecayingW orZ bosonat√s=13TeV,J.HighEnergyPhys.07 (2017)014,https://doi .org /10 .1007 /JHEP07(2017 )014,arXiv:1703.01651. [53] CMSCollaboration,PerformanceofMissingEnergyReconstructionin13 TeV pp
CollisionDataUsingtheCMSDetector,CMSPhysicsAnalysisSummary CMS-PAS-JME-16-004,2016,https://cds .cern .ch /record /2205284.
[54] CMS Collaboration,Performance ofphoton reconstructionand identification withtheCMSdetectorinproton-protoncollisionsat√s=8TeV,J.Instrum.10 (2015) P08010, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1748 -0221 /10 /08 /P08010, arXiv:1502. 02702.
[55]M. Botje, J. Butterworth, A. Cooper-Sarkar, A. de Roeck, J. Feltesse, S. Forte, A. Glazov, J. Huston, R. McNulty, T. Sjostrand, R. Thorne, The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations, arXiv:1101.0538, 2011.
[56]S. Alekhin, et al., The PDF4LHC working group interim report, arXiv:1101.0536, 2011.
[57] J.Butterworth, etal., PDF4LHCrecommendationsfor LHCRun II,J.Phys. G 43(2016)023001,https://doi .org /10 .1088 /0954 -3899 /43 /2 /023001,arXiv:1510. 03865.
[58] CMSCollaboration,Measurementoftheinelasticproton-protoncrosssection at √s=13TeV,J. HighEnergy Phys.07(2018)161,https://doi .org /10 .1007 / JHEP07(2018 )161,arXiv:1802.02613,2018.
[59] CMSCollaboration, CMSLuminosity Measurementforthe 2016DataTaking Period, CMSPhysicsAnalysisSummaryCMS-PAS-LUM-17-001,2017, https:// cds .cern .ch /record /2257069.
[60] I. Bertram, G.L. Landsberg, J. Linnemann, R. Partridge, M. Paterno, H.B. Prosper, D0, A Recipe for the Construction of Confidence Limits, Techni-cal report FERMILAB-TM-2104,2000, http://lss .fnal .gov /archive /test -tm /2000 / fermilab -tm -2104 .pdf.
[61] G.Cowan,Statistics,in:C.Patrignani,etal.(Eds.),ParticleDataGroup,Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 100001, https://doi .org /10 .1088 /1674 -1137 /40 /10 /100001 (Ch.39).
[62] M.Baak,S.Gadatsch,R.Harrington,W.Verkerke,Interpolationbetween multi-dimensional histogramsusinganewnon-linearmoment morphingmethod, Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A771(2015)39,https://doi .org /10 .1016 /j .nima .2014 .10 . 033,arXiv:1410.7388.
TheCMSCollaboration
A.M. Sirunyan,
A. Tumasyan
Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia
W. Adam,
F. Ambrogi,
E. Asilar,
T. Bergauer,
J. Brandstetter,
M. Dragicevic,
J. Erö,
A. Escalante Del Valle,
M. Flechl,
R. Frühwirth
1,
V.M. Ghete,
J. Hrubec,
M. Jeitler
1,
N. Krammer,
I. Krätschmer,
D. Liko,
T. Madlener,
I. Mikulec,
N. Rad,
H. Rohringer,
J. Schieck
1,
R. Schöfbeck,
M. Spanring,
D. Spitzbart,
A. Taurok,
W. Waltenberger,
J. Wittmann,
C.-E. Wulz
1,
M. Zarucki
Institut für Hochenergiephysik, Wien, Austria
V. Chekhovsky,
V. Mossolov,
J. Suarez Gonzalez
Institute for Nuclear Problems, Minsk, Belarus
E.A. De Wolf,
D. Di Croce,
X. Janssen,
J. Lauwers,
M. Pieters,
H. Van Haevermaet,
P. Van Mechelen,
N. Van Remortel
Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
S. Abu Zeid,
F. Blekman,
J. D’Hondt,
I. De Bruyn,
J. De Clercq,
K. Deroover,
G. Flouris,
D. Lontkovskyi,
S. Lowette,
I. Marchesini,
S. Moortgat,
L. Moreels,
Q. Python,
K. Skovpen,
S. Tavernier,
W. Van Doninck,
P. Van Mulders,
I. Van Parijs
D. Beghin,
B. Bilin,
H. Brun,
B. Clerbaux,
G. De Lentdecker,
H. Delannoy,
B. Dorney,
G. Fasanella,
L. Favart,
R. Goldouzian,
A. Grebenyuk,
A.K. Kalsi,
T. Lenzi,
J. Luetic,
N. Postiau,
E. Starling,
L. Thomas,
C. Vander Velde,
P. Vanlaer,
D. Vannerom,
Q. Wang
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
T. Cornelis,
D. Dobur,
A. Fagot,
M. Gul,
I. Khvastunov
2,
D. Poyraz,
C. Roskas,
D. Trocino,
M. Tytgat,
W. Verbeke,
B. Vermassen,
M. Vit,
N. Zaganidis
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
H. Bakhshiansohi,
O. Bondu,
S. Brochet,
G. Bruno,
C. Caputo,
P. David,
C. Delaere,
M. Delcourt,
B. Francois,
A. Giammanco,
G. Krintiras,
V. Lemaitre,
A. Magitteri,
A. Mertens,
M. Musich,
K. Piotrzkowski,
A. Saggio,
M. Vidal Marono,
S. Wertz,
J. Zobec
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
F.L. Alves,
G.A. Alves,
M. Correa Martins Junior,
G. Correia Silva,
C. Hensel,
A. Moraes,
M.E. Pol,
P. Rebello Teles
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
E. Belchior Batista Das Chagas,
W. Carvalho,
J. Chinellato
3,
E. Coelho,
E.M. Da Costa,
G.G. Da Silveira
4,
D. De Jesus Damiao,
C. De Oliveira Martins,
S. Fonseca De Souza,
H. Malbouisson,
D. Matos Figueiredo,
M. Melo De Almeida,
C. Mora Herrera,
L. Mundim,
H. Nogima,
W.L. Prado Da Silva,
L.J. Sanchez Rosas,
A. Santoro,
A. Sznajder,
M. Thiel,
E.J. Tonelli Manganote
3,
F. Torres Da Silva De Araujo,
A. Vilela Pereira
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
S. Ahuja
a,
C.A. Bernardes
a,
L. Calligaris
a,
T.R. Fernandez Perez Tomei
a,
E.M. Gregores
b,
P.G. Mercadante
b,
S.F. Novaes
a,
S.S. Padula
aaUniversidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil bUniversidade Federal do ABC, São Paulo, Brazil
A. Aleksandrov,
R. Hadjiiska,
P. Iaydjiev,
A. Marinov,
M. Misheva,
M. Rodozov,
M. Shopova,
G. Sultanov
Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
A. Dimitrov,
L. Litov,
B. Pavlov,
P. Petkov
University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
W. Fang
5,
X. Gao
5,
L. Yuan
Beihang University, Beijing, China
M. Ahmad,
J.G. Bian,
G.M. Chen,
H.S. Chen,
M. Chen,
Y. Chen,
C.H. Jiang,
D. Leggat,
H. Liao,
Z. Liu,
F. Romeo,
S.M. Shaheen
6,
A. Spiezia,
J. Tao,
C. Wang,
Z. Wang,
E. Yazgan,
H. Zhang,
S. Zhang,
J. Zhao
Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
Y. Ban,
G. Chen,
A. Levin,
J. Li,
L. Li,
Q. Li,
Y. Mao,
S.J. Qian,
D. Wang,
Z. Xu
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China
Y. Wang
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
C. Avila,
A. Cabrera,
C.A. Carrillo Montoya,
L.F. Chaparro Sierra,
C. Florez,
C.F. González Hernández,
M.A. Segura Delgado
B. Courbon,
N. Godinovic,
D. Lelas,
I. Puljak,
T. Sculac
University of Split, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Split, Croatia
Z. Antunovic,
M. Kovac
University of Split, Faculty of Science, Split, Croatia
V. Brigljevic,
D. Ferencek,
K. Kadija,
B. Mesic,
A. Starodumov
7,
T. Susa
Institute Rudjer Boskovic, Zagreb, Croatia
M.W. Ather,
A. Attikis,
M. Kolosova,
G. Mavromanolakis,
J. Mousa,
C. Nicolaou,
F. Ptochos,
P.A. Razis,
H. Rykaczewski
University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
M. Finger
8,
M. Finger Jr.
8Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
E. Ayala
Escuela Politecnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador
E. Carrera Jarrin
Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
Y. Assran
9,
10,
S. Elgammal
10,
S. Khalil
11Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt, Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics, Cairo, Egypt
S. Bhowmik,
A. Carvalho Antunes De Oliveira,
R.K. Dewanjee,
K. Ehataht,
M. Kadastik,
M. Raidal,
C. Veelken
National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Tallinn, Estonia
P. Eerola,
H. Kirschenmann,
J. Pekkanen,
M. Voutilainen
Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
J. Havukainen,
J.K. Heikkilä,
T. Järvinen,
V. Karimäki,
R. Kinnunen,
T. Lampén,
K. Lassila-Perini,
S. Laurila,
S. Lehti,
T. Lindén,
P. Luukka,
T. Mäenpää,
H. Siikonen,
E. Tuominen,
J. Tuominiemi
Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki, Finland
T. Tuuva
Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
M. Besancon,
F. Couderc,
M. Dejardin,
D. Denegri,
J.L. Faure,
F. Ferri,
S. Ganjour,
A. Givernaud,
P. Gras,
G. Hamel de Monchenault,
P. Jarry,
C. Leloup,
E. Locci,
J. Malcles,
G. Negro,
J. Rander,
A. Rosowsky,
M.Ö. Sahin,
M. Titov
IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
A. Abdulsalam
12,
C. Amendola,
I. Antropov,
F. Beaudette,
P. Busson,
C. Charlot,
R. Granier de Cassagnac,
I. Kucher,
A. Lobanov,
J. Martin Blanco,
M. Nguyen,
C. Ochando,
G. Ortona,
P. Paganini,
P. Pigard,
R. Salerno,
J.B. Sauvan,
Y. Sirois,
A.G. Stahl Leiton,
A. Zabi,
A. Zghiche
Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Ecole polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Université Paris-Saclay, Palaiseau, France
J.-L. Agram
13,
J. Andrea,
D. Bloch,
J.-M. Brom,
E.C. Chabert,
V. Cherepanov,
C. Collard,
E. Conte
13,
J.-C. Fontaine
13,
D. Gelé,
U. Goerlach,
M. Jansová,
A.-C. Le Bihan,
N. Tonon,
P. Van Hove
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Strasbourg, France
S. Gadrat
Centre de Calcul de l’Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules, CNRS/IN2P3, Villeurbanne, France
S. Beauceron,
C. Bernet,
G. Boudoul,
N. Chanon,
R. Chierici,
D. Contardo,
P. Depasse,
H. El Mamouni,
J. Fay,
L. Finco,
S. Gascon,
M. Gouzevitch,
G. Grenier,
B. Ille,
F. Lagarde,
I.B. Laktineh,
H. Lattaud,
M. Lethuillier,
L. Mirabito,
A.L. Pequegnot,
S. Perries,
A. Popov
14,
V. Sordini,
G. Touquet,
M. Vander Donckt,
S. Viret
Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS-IN2P3, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
A. Khvedelidze
8Georgian Technical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
Z. Tsamalaidze
8Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
C. Autermann,
L. Feld,
M.K. Kiesel,
K. Klein,
M. Lipinski,
M. Preuten,
M.P. Rauch,
C. Schomakers,
J. Schulz,
M. Teroerde,
B. Wittmer,
V. Zhukov
14RWTH Aachen University, I. Physikalisches Institut, Aachen, Germany
A. Albert,
D. Duchardt,
M. Endres,
M. Erdmann,
S. Ghosh,
A. Güth,
T. Hebbeker,
C. Heidemann,
K. Hoepfner,
H. Keller,
L. Mastrolorenzo,
M. Materok,
M. Merschmeyer,
A. Meyer,
P. Millet,
S. Mukherjee,
T. Pook,
M. Radziej,
H. Reithler,
M. Rieger,
A. Schmidt,
D. Teyssier,
S. Wiedenbeck
RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
G. Flügge,
O. Hlushchenko,
T. Kress,
A. Künsken,
T. Müller,
A. Nehrkorn,
A. Nowack,
C. Pistone,
O. Pooth,
D. Roy,
H. Sert,
A. Stahl
15RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut B, Aachen, Germany
M. Aldaya Martin,
T. Arndt,
C. Asawatangtrakuldee,
I. Babounikau,
K. Beernaert,
O. Behnke,
U. Behrens,
A. Bermúdez Martínez,
D. Bertsche,
A.A. Bin Anuar,
K. Borras
16,
V. Botta,
A. Campbell,
P. Connor,
C. Contreras-Campana,
F. Costanza,
V. Danilov,
A. De Wit,
M.M. Defranchis,
C. Diez Pardos,
D. Domínguez Damiani,
G. Eckerlin,
T. Eichhorn,
A. Elwood,
E. Eren,
E. Gallo
17,
A. Geiser,
J.M. Grados Luyando,
A. Grohsjean,
P. Gunnellini,
M. Guthoff,
M. Haranko,
A. Harb,
J. Hauk,
H. Jung,
M. Kasemann,
J. Keaveney,
C. Kleinwort,
J. Knolle,
D. Krücker,
W. Lange,
A. Lelek,
T. Lenz,
K. Lipka,
W. Lohmann
18,
R. Mankel,
I.-A. Melzer-Pellmann,
A.B. Meyer,
M. Meyer,
M. Missiroli,
G. Mittag,
J. Mnich,
V. Myronenko,
S.K. Pflitsch,
D. Pitzl,
A. Raspereza,
M. Savitskyi,
P. Saxena,
P. Schütze,
C. Schwanenberger,
R. Shevchenko,
A. Singh,
H. Tholen,
O. Turkot,
A. Vagnerini,
G.P. Van Onsem,
R. Walsh,
Y. Wen,
K. Wichmann,
C. Wissing,
O. Zenaiev
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, Hamburg, Germany
R. Aggleton,
S. Bein,
L. Benato,
A. Benecke,
V. Blobel,
M. Centis Vignali,
T. Dreyer,
E. Garutti,
D. Gonzalez,
J. Haller,
A. Hinzmann,
A. Karavdina,
G. Kasieczka,
R. Klanner,
R. Kogler,
N. Kovalchuk,
S. Kurz,
V. Kutzner,
J. Lange,
D. Marconi,
J. Multhaup,
M. Niedziela,
D. Nowatschin,
A. Perieanu,
A. Reimers,
O. Rieger,
C. Scharf,
P. Schleper,
S. Schumann,
J. Schwandt,
J. Sonneveld,
H. Stadie,
G. Steinbrück,
F.M. Stober,
M. Stöver,
A. Vanhoefer,
B. Vormwald,
I. Zoi
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany