• Non ci sono risultati.

fulltext

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "fulltext"

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

NOTE BREVI

The effective weak nonleptonic Hamiltonian under both QCD

and one-loop QED corrections

H. WHITE

Department of Mathematics, University of the West Indies - Mona, Jamaica (ricevuto il 14 Luglio 1997; approvato il 22 Settembre 1997)

Summary. — We obtain the effective Hamiltonian for weak nonleptonic decays

under a) QCD leading logarithmic corrections to all orders, b) QCD two-loop nonleading corrections, c) one-loop QED corrections, as in BURASA. J., JAMINM., LAUTENBACHERM. and WEISZP., Nucl. Phys. B, 400 (1993) 75.

PACS 12.28.Cy – Summation of perturbation theory.

PACS 13.40.Ks – Electromagnetic corrections to strong- and weak-interaction pro-cesses.

In ref. [1], the two-loop anomalous dimension matrix for operators relevant to electroweak nonleptonic processes was calculated, and here we proceed to obtain a suitable expression for the effective Hamiltonian for such processes.

We first study the relevant b-functions for the QCD and QED vertices [2]. We define a * 4g2

O4 p , ag4 e2O4 p , where g and e are the renormalized QCD and QED coupling constants, respectively. From [2], the b-functions are given by

da * dt 4 b(a * , ag) , dag dt 4 b g(a * , a g) , where

.

/

´

b * (a * , ag) 4b(a*)2ag]bcga * 1b1cg(a * )2( , bg(a * , a g) 42ag]bgca * 1b gc 2 (a * )2( , b(a) 4b(a, 0) 42ba22 b1a3

(1)

and t 4 ln( p2

O 2 m2).

Here we have omitted all terms in ag2 since we only consider one-loop QED

corrections. As a result we can take for a * in bg(a * , a

g) the pure QCD coupling

(2)

constant, i.e. the solution of the equation da

dt 4 b(a , 0 ) . (2)

The equation dagOdt 4 bg(a , ag) thus possesses the solution

ag4 ag0exp

y

2



a0 a ]bgca 81b2gc(a 8) 2 ( da 8 b(a 8)

z

, (3)

where a and ag take the values a0 and ag0, respectively, when t 40. The term within the integral sign is

bgc ba 1

g

b2gc b 2 bgcb 1 b2

h

1 O(a) . (4)

Thus the solution (3) reduces to

ag4 a0gLaA[ 1 1B(a2a0) ] , (5)

where L(a) 4a0Oa , A 4 bObgc, B 4

(

b2

gc

Ob 2 (bgcb1) Ob2

)

and the expression in square brackets is of order a and a0.

This is the expression for the running QED coupling constant in the presence of QCD corrections alone.

We now consider the solution of da * Odt4b(a*, ag) in (1), and express a * in the form

a * 4a1ag0H(a) , (6)

where a is the solution to (2). The equation for a * gives da dt 1 ag 0 dH dt 4 b(a * , ag) 4b(a*)1agb I (a * ) 4

4 b(a) 1 b 8 (a) a0gH(a) 1agbI(a) 1O(ag0 2) , where from (1) bI (a)4 2(bcga 1b1cga2) . (7) Thus dH dt 2 b 8 (a) H 4 ag a0g bI(a) (8) or b(a) dH da 2 b 8 (a) H 4 ag ag0 bI(a) .

(3)

This equation can be reduced to the form d da

y

H(a) b(a)

z

4 ag ag0 bI(a) b2(a) , which possesses the solution

H(a) b(a) 4 H(a0) b(a0) 1



a0 a a 8g a0g bI(a 8) da8 b2 (a 8) . (9)

We assume here that when t 40, a*04 a0, i.e. H(a0) 40. Thus H(a) 4b(a)



a0 a a 8g a0g bI (a 8) da8 b2 (a 8) . (10)

Using the expressions for b(a) and bI(a) given in (1) and (7) we note that

bI(a) b2(a) 4 2(bcga 1b1cga2) (ba2 1 b1a3)2 4 2b cg b2a3

k

1 1

g

b1cg bcg 2 2 b1 b

h

a

l

. (11)

Using the expression for agin (5), (10) reduces to

H(a) 4b(a) I(a) ,

where

.

/

´

I(a) 4

g

2b cg b2

h

y

1 2Ka0 (A 12) a2 0 ] 1 2 LA 12(a)(1 K]12L A 11(a)( (A 11) a0

z

, K 4b1cgObcg2 2 b1Ob . (12)

We now consider the expression for the effective Hamiltonian Hefffor the processes discussed in ref. [1] in terms of the local operators listed there. If these operators are denoted by Op, then Heff4

!

p cp(t , a0, a 0 g) Op4 c(t , a0, a0g)lO , where c(t , a0, a0g) 4c[0, a , ag] P exp

y

2



0 t G(a * , ag) dt

z

(13)

and t 4 ln(Mw2Om3), t 4 ln( p2O 2 m2), a , ag are the values of a , ag when t 4t, i.e.

p2

4 2 m2, Mwis the mass of the weak bosons which generate the four-quark operators of ref. [1].

G(a * , ag) is the anomalous dimension matrix for the operators. It admits the following expansion to orders a *g and a2:

(4)

The QCD one-loop term a

*B takes into consideration that the QCD coupling constant a * in (1) is not the same for the four quarks. As a result it is of the form

a*B 4aB1ag0H(a) B * , where B * differs from B.

We express G(a * , ag) in the form 2aB1R, where

R 42a0gH(a) B * 2agBg1 a2Gcc21 aagGcg2 (14)

Pexpin (13) denotes the path-ordered exponential. The expression in square brackets in eq. (13) is



a0 a G(a * , ag) b(a) da . (15)

Using (14) and the approximation 1 b(a) 4 21 ba2 1 b1a3 4 2 1 ba2

m

1 2 b1 b a

n

.

The integral in (15) reduces to

P exp

y



a0 a

k

2 1 baB 1R A

l

da

z

, (16) where RA4 2a0gI(a) B * 1 ag ba2B g 1 1 b

g

G c 21 b1 b B

h

1 ag ba

g

G cg 2 1 b1 b B g

h

(15) now becomes P exp

y



a0 a

k

2 1 ba B 1R A

l

da 8

z

4 G(a) P exp

y



a0 a G21(a) RAG(a) da

z

, (17) where G(a) 4exp

y



a0 a

k

2 1 ba B

l

da

z

4 [L(a) ] b21B . We let the (distinct) eigenvalues of b21B be d

i so that b21B can be expressed in the form

b21B 4

!

d

iPi, where Piare projection matrix operators satisfying

Pi24 Pi, PiPj4 0 (i c j) ,

!

i

Pi4 I . (18)

Hence G(a) in (17) is given by

G(a) 4 [L(a) ]b21B 4

!

i Ldi(a) P i (19)

(5)

and G21(a) 4

!

i L2di(a) P i. Using (19), (17) becomes

!

i L2di(a) P i1

!

i Ldi(a)



a0 a L2di1 dk(a) P iRAPkda . (20)

Using (16), the second term in (20) can be expressed in the form

!

i PiSikPk, where Sik4 T g ikBg1 TikcB * 1Tikcc

g

Gcc21 bi b B

h

1 T cg ik

g

Gcg1 b1 b B g

h

(21)

and the coefficients Tikg, T

c

iketc. can be expressed in terms of one single integral

Iik (A) 4Ldi(a)



a0 a L2di1 dk1 A(a) da 4 aL dk1 A (a) 2a0Ldi(a) di2 dk2 A 1 1 . (22)

The expressions for Tikg, T

c ik etc. are

.

`

`

`

`

`

/

`

`

`

`

`

´

Tikc4 ag 0 Ldi(a)



a0 a L2di1 dk(a) I(a) da 4 4

g

2 ag 0bcg b2

h

y

12Ka0 (A12) a20 ]I( 0 )ik2I(A12)ik (1 K (A11) a0 ]Iik( 0 )2Iik (A11)(

z

, Tikg4 1 bL di(a)



a0 a L2di1 dk(a) ag a2da 4 4 ag 0 b

k

1 a2 0 Iik (A 12)(12Ba0) 1 1 a0 BIik (A 11)

l

, Tcg ik4 1 bL di(a)



a0 a L2di1dk(a) ag a da4 ag0 b

k

1 a0 Iik

(A12)(12Ba0)1BIik(A)

l

, Tcc ik4 1 bL di(a)



a0 a L2di1 dk(a) da 4 1 bI ik( 0 ) . (23)

In the calculation of the one-loop diagrams, a * is not the same for all four quarks p, n, c, l . We denote by g1the ppAmand ccAm coupling constant and by g2the nnAm and

(6)

Fig. 1.

The graphs in fig. 1 represent one-loop QCD corrections to four-quark operators. Graphs a), b) and c) involve the factors g2

1, g1g2and g 2

2, respectively. From (1), we can express a *64 ( 1 O4 p) g2

6in the form

a6* 4a1l6ag0H(a) and a normalization can be fixed for H(a) such that

l24 1 for quark charge 2 1 O3 , l14 4 for quark change 2 O3 .

Thus g1g24

k

( 4 p) 2 a1a2C a 1 1 2(l11 l2) ag 0 H(a) 4a1 5 2ag 0 H(a) . (24)

Thus the QCD one loop matrix is of the form

aB 1a0gH(a) B * . (25)

Similarly the coefficient c( 0 , a *6, ag) can be calculated from the relevant one-loop diagrams and expressed in the form

c0

1 aci1 a0gH(a) c * 1agcg4 c01 d(a , ag) . (26)

Discarding terms of order a2

0LM(a), a0a(LM(a) etc., the effective Hamiltonian of (13) is Heff4 [

!

L di(a) c0 lPi1

!

L di(a) d(a , a g)lPi1

!

i , k cl0P iSikPk]lO . (27)

The terms independent of a0

g in (27) yield the effective Hamiltonian of ref. [3], (2.18), (6.19) and (6.20). The remaining terms in a0g yield the effective Hamiltonian for the processes discussed in ref. [1].

R E F E R E N C E S

[1] BURASA. J., JAMINM., LAUTENBACHERM. and WEISZP., Nucl. Phys. B, 400 (1993) 75. [2] WHITEH., Nuovo Cimento A, 108 (1995) 643.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

[r]

As consequences of the first application we observe that CG (considered as an iterative method) has a linear rate of convergence, is in general faster than G, and is competitive

In this paper, taking in account the results obtained in [3]-[8], following [12]-[14] and [15]-[18], using the concepts of process and transformation, we construct a geometrical

Solution proposed by Roberto Tauraso, Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`a di Roma “Tor Vergata”, via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma,

(5) 2D scanarea analysis can be finally carried out on homogeneous volumes identified from scanline analysis, characterizing other important fracture network properties, such

The workshop was organised in such a way as to provide a forum for all features of hormone replacement therapy, some of which went be- yond the specific issue and addressed

The hybrid method mentioned above has been combined with other two methods, i.e., the Fast Matrix Generation (FMG) and the Characteristic Basis MoM (CBMoM), which allow

MANTUA CONTRIBUTED TO THE CAUSE OF THE RISORGIMENTO (MOVEMENT FOR NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE) AND WAS JOINED TO THE KINGDOM OF ITALY IN 1866.. HISTORY OF