• Non ci sono risultati.

fulltext

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "fulltext"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2017-17180-8 Colloquia: LaThuile 2017

Standard-Model precision measurements with W - and Z-bosons

using the ATLAS detector

V. Kouskoura on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Brookhaven National Laboratory - Upton, NY, USA

received 16 September 2017

Summary. — High-precision measurements by the ATLAS Collaboration are pre-sented using data that were collected in proton-proton collisions at the LHC at several centre-of-mass energies. W+, W and Z/γ production cross-sections are measured at √s = 7 and 13 TeV. Ratios of top-quark pair to Z-boson cross-sections measured from proton-proton collisions at the LHC centre-of-mass energies of√s = 13, 8 and 7 TeV are also presented. Finally, a measurement of the mass

of the W -boson is also presented based on the 7 TeV dataset with an integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1.

1. – Precision measurement and interpretation of inclusive W and Z produc-tion cross-secproduc-tions with the ATLAS detector at 7 and 13 TeV

The precise measurement of inclusive W+, W−and Z/γ∗production in proton-proton (pp) scattering at the LHC constitutes a sensitive test of perturbative Quantum Chromo-dynamics (QCD). The differential W+ and W cross-sections are measured in a lepton pseudorapidity range of |η| < 2.5. The differential Z/γ∗ cross-sections are measured as a function of the absolute dilepton rapidity of |y| < 3.6, for three dilepton mass intervals which extend from 46 to 150 GeV. The integrated and differential electron-and muon-channel cross-sections are combined electron-and compared to theoretical predictions using recent sets of parton distribution functions (PDF). The data, together with the final inclusive e±p scattering cross-section data from H1 and ZEUS, are interpreted in a next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD analysis, and a new set of PDFs, ATLAS-epWZ16, is obtained. The ratio of strange-to-light sea-quark densities in the proton is determined more accurately than in previous determinations based on collider data only, and is es-tablished to be close to unity in the sensitivity range of the data. A new measurement of the CKM matrix element |Vcs| is also provided. The complete publication is found in ref. [1].

c

 CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration

(2)

ν l → -W fid σ / ν + l → + W fid σ 1.42 1.44 1.46 1.48 1.5 1.52 1.54 ATLAS -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s Data stat. uncertainty total uncertainty ABM12 CT14 HERAPDF2.0 JR14 MMHT2014 NNPDF3.0 -l + l → * γ Z/ fid σ / ν ± l → ± W fid σ 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 10.2 ATLAS -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s Data stat. uncertainty total uncertainty ABM12 CT14 HERAPDF2.0 JR14 MMHT2014 NNPDF3.0

Fig. 1. – Ratios of the fiducial cross-sections times leptonic branching ratios of

σfidW+→+νfidW→¯ν (left) and σ

fid

W±→±ν/σ

fid

Z/γ∗→+ (right) [1]. The data (solid blue line)

are shown with the statistical (yellow band) and the total uncertainties (green band). Theoret-ical predictions based on various PDF sets are shown with open symbols of different colours. The uncertainties of the theoretical calculations correspond to the PDF uncertainties only.

1.1. Cross-sections. – The ratios of the combined fiducial cross-sections are compared in fig. 1 to NNLO QCD predictions based on various PDF sets. It is observed that the measured W+/W ratio is well reproduced, but all PDF sets predict a higher W±/Z ratio than measured in the data.

The differential cross-sections as a function of lepton pseudorapidity in W± → ν decays and as a function of the dilepton rapidity in Z/γ∗ → ( = e, μ) are shown in fig. 2. The measured cross-section is compared to NNLO perturbative QCD predictions, including NLO EW corrections. The predictions with the ABM12 PDF set match the data particularly well, while the predictions of NNPDF3.0, CT14, MMHT14 and JR14, tend to be below and the HERAPDF2.0 set slightly above the W cross-section data. At the Z peak, where the highest precision is reached for the data, all predictions are below

| l η | 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 | [pb]l η /d|σ d 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 Uncorr. uncertainty Total uncertainty 1.8%) ± luminosity excluded ( Data ABM12 CT14 HERAPDF2.0 JR14 MMHT2014 NNPDF3.0 -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s ν l → -W > 25 GeV T,l p > 25 GeV ν T, p > 40 GeV T m ATLAS | l η | 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Theory/Data 0.95 1 1.05 | ll |y 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 | [pb]ll /d|yσ d 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Uncorr. uncertainty Total uncertainty 1.8%) ± luminosity excluded ( Data ABM12 CT14 HERAPDF2.0 JR14 MMHT2014 NNPDF3.0 -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s -l + l → * γ Z/ < 116 GeV ll 66 < m > 20 GeV T,l p | < 2.5 l η | ATLAS | ll |y 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Theory/Data 0.95 1 1.05

Fig. 2. – Differential dσW−/d|η| (left) cross-section measurement for W±→ ν and dσ/d|y|

for Z/γ∗→  in the Z-peak region, 66 < m< 116 GeV, for central rapidity values (right) [1].

Predictions computed at NNLO QCD with NLO EW corrections using various PDF sets (open symbols) are compared to the data (full points). The ratio of theoretical predictions to the data is also shown. The predictions are displaced within each bin for better visibility. The theory uncertainty corresponds to the quadratic sum of the PDF uncertainty and the statistical uncertainty of the calculation.

(3)

-μ + μ → * γ Z/ fid σ / -e + e → * γ Z/ fid σ = Z R 0.95 1 1.05 ν ± μ → ± W fid σ / ν ± e → ± W fid σ = W R 0.95 1 1.05 ATLAS Data -W + W → -e + LEP e W R Z → -e + LEP+SLD e Z R Standard Model -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s

Fig. 3. – Measurement of the electron-to-muon cross-section ratios for the W and Z production,

RW and RZ [1]. The orange and blue, shaded bands represent the combination of the ratios

of electron and muon branching fractions for on-shell W and Z production as obtained at the

e+e− colliders LEP and SLC [2, 3]. The green shaded ellipse represents the 68% CL for the correlated measurement of RW and RZ, while the black error bars give the one dimensional

standard deviation. The SM expectation of RW = RZ= 1 is indicated with an open circle.

the data at central rapidity,|y| < 1, but least for the HERAPDF2.0 set, which quotes the largest uncertainties.

1.2. Test of electron-muon universality. – Ratios (RW and RZ) of the measured W and Z production cross-sections in the electron and muon decay channels are evalu-ated from the corresponding measurements extrapolevalu-ated to the common fiducial phase space. These e/μ cross-section ratios represent direct measurements of the corresponding

s r 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 ABM12 NNPDF3.0 MMHT14 CT14 ATLAS-epWZ12 ATLAS-epWZ16 exp uncertainty exp+mod+par uncertainty exp+mod+par+thy uncertainty ATLAS , x=0.023 2 = 1.9 GeV 2 Q | cs |V 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 ν K l D ν l s D NNPDF1.2 ATLAS-epWZ16 inner uncertainty: exp only outer uncertainty: total

ATLAS CKM fit

Fig. 4. – (Left) Determination of the relative strange-to-down sea quark fraction rs. Bands:

present result and its uncertainty contributions from experimental data, QCD fit, and theoretical uncertainties; closed symbols with horizontal error bars: predictions from different NNLO PDF sets; open square: previous ATLAS result. The ratios are calculated at the initial scale Q20 = 1.9 GeV2and at x = 0.023 corresponding to the point of largest sensitivity at central rapidity of the ATLAS data [1]. (Right)|Vcs| as determined in the global CKM fit cited by the PDG [4] (blue

vertical line) compared to extractions from Ds→ ν and D → Kν decays and the NNPDF1.2

fit [5]. The epWZ16 fit result is shown with uncertainty contributions from the experimental data (inner error bar) and the total uncertainty including all fit and further theoretical uncertainties (outer error bar). The uncertainty in|Vcs| from the CKM fit with unitarity constraint is smaller

(4)

relative branching fractions, which are predicted to be unity in the Standard Model (SM) given that lepton mass effects are negligible. The RW and RZ measurements confirm lepton (e− μ) universality in the weak vector-boson decays and the result is illustrated in fig. 3 as an ellipse.

1.3. QCD analysis. – The differential Drell-Yan production cross-sections of W±→ ν and Z/γ∗ → ( = e, μ) are studied in combination with the final neutral current and charged current deep inelastic scattering (DIS) HERA I+II [6] data within the framework of perturbative QCD.

The HERA and ATLAS data are used to obtain a new set of PDFs, termed ATLAS-epWZ16. Special attention is given to the evaluation of the strange-quark distribution, following a QCD fit analysis as in ref. [1], which was found to be larger than the previous expectations based on dimuon data in DIS neutrino-nucleon scattering. The enhanced precision of the present data permits a competitive determination of the magnitude of the CKM matrix element|Vcs|. The relative strange-to-down sea quark fraction rs and the magnitude of the CKM matrix element|Vcs| are illustrated in fig. 4.

1.4. Cross-section ratios at 13 TeV. – Measurements of the W±→ ±ν and Z→ + production cross-sections at 13 TeV are also performed. Cross-section ratios are shown in fig. 5. More results with 13 TeV data can be found in ref. [7].

2. – Top-quark pair to Z-boson cross-section ratios

Ratios of top-quark pair to Z-boson cross-sections measured from pp collisions at the LHC centre-of-mass energies of √s = 13, 8, and 7 TeV are presented in this sec-tion. Single ratios, at a given √s for the two processes and at different √s for each process, as well as double ratios of the two processes at different√s, are evaluated. The ratios are constructed using previously published ATLAS measurements of the t¯t and Z-boson production cross-sections, corrected to a common phase space where required, and a new analysis of Z → + where  = e, μ at s = 13 TeV performed with data collected in 2015 with an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb−1. Correlations of systematic uncertainties are taken into account when evaluating the uncertainties in the ratios. The correlation model is also used to evaluate the combined cross-section of the Z → e+e

-W fid σ / + W fid σ 1.2 1.22 1.24 1.26 1.28 1.3 1.32 1.34 ATLAS -1 13 TeV, 81 pb total uncertainty ± data stat. uncertainty ± data ABM12 CT14nnlo NNPDF3.0 MMHT14nnlo68CL ATLAS-epWZ12nnlo HERAPDF2.0nnlo -W fid σ / + W fid σ = -/W + W R Z fid σ / ± W fid σ 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 ATLAS -1 13 TeV, 81 pb total uncertainty ± data stat. uncertainty ± data ABM12 CT14nnlo NNPDF3.0 MMHT14nnlo68CL ATLAS-epWZ12nnlo HERAPDF2.0nnlo Z fid σ / ± W fid σ = W/Z R

Fig. 5. – Ratios (red line) of W+- to W-boson (left) and W±- to Z-boson (right) combined

production cross-sections in the fiducial region compared to predictions based on different PDF sets [7]. The inner (yellow) shaded band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty while the outer (green) band shows statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The theory predictions are given with only the corresponding PDF uncertainties shown as error bars.

(5)

x -2 10 10-1 Σ /xΣ 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 Z 2 = m 2 Q ATLAS-epWZ12 t ATLAS-epWZ12+t +Z t ATLAS-epWZ12+t ATLAS-epWZ12 t ATLAS-epWZ12+t +Z t ATLAS-epWZ12+t ATLAS -1 13 TeV, 3.2 fb -1 8 TeV, 20.2 fb -1 7 TeV, 4.6 fb x -2 10 10-1 xg/xgδ 0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 t 2 = m 2 Q ATLAS-epWZ12 t ATLAS-epWZ12+t +Z t ATLAS-epWZ12+t ATLAS-epWZ12 t ATLAS-epWZ12+t +Z t ATLAS-epWZ12+t ATLAS -1 13 TeV, 3.2 fb -1 8 TeV, 20.2 fb -1 7 TeV, 4.6 fb

Fig. 6. – Impact of the ATLAS Z-boson and t¯t cross-section data on the determination of PDFs.

The bands represent the uncertainty for the ATLAS-epWZ12 PDF set and the uncertainty of the profiled ATLAS-epWZ12 PDF set using t¯t + Z data as a function of x for the total

light-quark-sea distribution, xΣ, at Q2 ≈ m2Z (left) and for the gluon density, xg, at Q2 ≈ m2t

(right) [8].

and the Z→ μ+μ channels for each s value. The results are compared to calcula-tions performed at next-to-next-to-leading-order accuracy using recent PDF sets. The data demonstrate significant power to constrain the gluon distribution function for the Bjorken-x values near 0.1 and the light-quark sea for x < 0.02. The impact of the ATLAS Z-boson and t¯t cross-section data on the determination of PDFs is shown in fig. 6. The complete publication can be found in ref. [8].

3. – Measurement of the mass of the W -boson with the ATLAS detector at 7 TeV

A measurement of the mass of the W -boson is presented in ref. [9] based on pp collision data recorded in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, and corresponding to 4.6 fb−1 of integrated luminosity. The selected data sample

Category [MeV] W m 80200 80250 80300 80350 80400 80450 80500 80550 80600 80650 80700 |<0.6 l η 0.0<| |<1.2 l η 0.6<| |<2.4 l η 1.8<| ATLAS -1 = 7 TeV, 4.6 fb s ν e → ± W ) + (W T p ) − (W T p ) + (W T m ) − (W T m Comb Fit Stat. Unc. Total Unc. Stat. Unc. Total Unc. Total Unc. Category [MeV] W m 80200 80250 80300 80350 80400 80450 80500 80550 80600 80650 80700 |<0.8 l η 0.0<| |<1.4 l η 0.8<| |<2.0 l η 1.4<| |<2.4 l η 2.0<| ATLAS -1 = 7 TeV, 4.1 fb s ν μ → ± W ) + (W T p ) − (W T p ) + (W T m ) − (W T m Comb Fit Stat. Unc. Total Unc. Stat. Unc. Total Unc. Total Unc.

Fig. 7. – Overview of the mW measurements in the (a) electron and (b) muon decay channels [9].

Results are shown for the pTand mTdistributions, for W +

and W−events in the different|η|

categories. The coloured bands and solid lines show the statistical and total uncertainties, respectively. The horizontal line and band show the fully combined result and its uncertainty.

(6)

[MeV] W m 80250 80300 80350 80400 80450 80500 ALEPH DELPHI L3 OPAL CDF D0 + ATLAS W − ATLAS W ± ATLAS W ATLAS Measurement Stat. Uncertainty Full Uncertainty

Fig. 8. – The measured value of mW [9] is compared to other published results. The vertical

bands show the statistical and total uncertainties of the ATLAS measurement, and the horizon-tal bands and lines show the statistical and tohorizon-tal uncertainties of the other published results. Measured values of mW for positively and negatively charged W -bosons are also shown.

consists of 7.8× 106 candidates in the W → μν channel and 5.9 × 106 candidates in the W → eν channel.

Several kinematic distributions that are insensitive to the W -boson mass are used to validate the detector calibration and the physics modelling by comparing data with simulated W -boson signal and backgrounds. Measurements of mW are performed us-ing the p

T and mT distributions (where pT and mT are the transverse momentum of the charged lepton and transverse mass of the W -boson), separately for positively and negatively charged W -bosons, in three bins of|η| in the electron decay channel, and in four bins of|η| in the muon decay channel, leading to a total of 28 mW determinations. Those measurements are illustrated in fig. 7.

The W -boson mass is obtained from template fits to the reconstructed distributions of the charged lepton transverse momentum and of the W -boson transverse mass in the electron and muon decay channels, yielding

mW = 80370± 7 (stat.) ± 11 (exp. syst.) ± 14 (mod. syst.) MeV = 80370 ± 19 MeV,

[MeV] W m

80320 80340 80360 80380 80400 80420

LEP Comb. 80376±33 MeV

Tevatron Comb. 80387±16 MeV

LEP+Tevatron 80385±15 MeV

ATLAS 80370±19 MeV

Electroweak Fit 80356±8 MeV

W m Stat. Uncertainty Full Uncertainty ATLAS [GeV] t m 165 170 175 180 185 [GeV] W m 80.25 80.3 80.35 80.4 80.45 80.5 ATLAS mW = 80.370 ± 0.019 GeV 0.70 GeV ± = 172.84 t m 0.24 GeV ± = 125.09 H m t and m W 68/95% CL of m 68/95% CL of Electroweak t and m W Fit w/o m (Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3046)

Fig. 9. – (Left) The ATLAS measurement of mW [9] is compared to the SM prediction from

the global electroweak fit updated using recent measurements of the top-quark and Higgs-boson masses [19], and to the combined values of mW measured at LEP and the Tevatron. (Right)

The 68% and 95% confidence-level contours of the mW and mtindirect determination from the

global electroweak fit are compared to the 68% and 95% confidence-level contours of the ATLAS measurements of the top-quark and W -boson masses.

(7)

where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second corresponds to the experimental systematic uncertainty, and the third to the physics-modelling systematic uncertainty.

The W -boson mass measurement is compatible with the current world average of mW = 80385±15 MeV [4], and similar in precision to the currently leading measurements performed by the CDF and D0 Collaborations [10, 11]. An overview of the different mW measurements is shown in fig. 8 where the measured value of mW is compared to other published results, including measurements from the LEP experiments ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL [12-15], and from the Tevatron collider experiments CDF and D0 [10, 11]. The compatibility of the measured value of mW in the context of the global electroweak fit [16] is illustrated in fig. 9. Figure 9 compares the present measurement with earlier results combining values of the mW measured at LEP [2] and the Tevatron [17], and with the SM prediction updated with regard to ref. [16] using recent measurements of the top-quark [18] and Higgs boson masses [19]. This update gives a numerical value for the SM prediction of mW = 80356± 8 MeV. The corresponding two-dimensional 68% and 95% confidence limits for mW and mtare shown in the same figure, and compared to the present measurement of mW and the average of the top-quark mass determinations performed by ATLAS.

The determination of the W -boson mass from the global fit of the electroweak param-eters has an uncertainty of 8 MeV, which sets a natural target for the precision of the experimental measurement of the mass of the W -boson. The modelling uncertainties, which currently dominate the overall uncertainty of the mW measurement, need to be reduced in order to fully exploit the larger data samples that were provided by the LHC and are available at centre-of-mass energies of 8 and 13 TeV.

4. – Conclusion

Cross-section measurements of the W - and Z-bosons using the ATLAS detector are presented. The data that were used in those measurements were collected in pp collisions at the LHC at 7 and 13 TeV centre-of mass energies. Ratios of top-quark pair to Z-boson cross-sections measured from pp collisions at the LHC centre-of-mass energies of√s = 13, 8 and 7 TeV are also presented. The measurement of the mass of the W -boson has been based on the 7 TeV dataset with integrated luminosity of 4.6 fb−1. The measured value is compatible with the current world average and similar in precision to the available measurements from the CDF and D0 Collaborations at Tevatron.

REFERENCES

[1] ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (2012) 012001.

[2] DELPHI, OPAL, LEP Electroweak, ALEPH, L3 Collaborations, Phys. Rep., 532 (2013) 119.

[3] SLD Electroweak Group, DELPHI, ALEPH, SLD, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group, L3 Collaborations, Phys. Rep., 427 (2006) 257.

[4] Particle Data Group (Olive K. A. et al.), Chin. Phys. C, 38 (2014) 090001. [5] NNPDF Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. B, 823 (2009) 195.

[6] ZEUS, H1 Collaborations, Eur. Phys. J. C, 75 (2015) 12580. [7] ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B, 759 (2016) 601. [8] ATLAS Collaboration, JHEP, 02 (2017) 117.

[9] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the W -boson mass in pp collisions at √s =

(8)

[10] CDF Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012) 151803. [11] D0 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012) 151804. [12] ALEPH Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C, 47 (2006) 309. [13] DELPHI Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C, 55 (2008) 1. [14] L3 Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C, 45 (2006) 569. [15] OPAL Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C, 45 (2006) 307.

[16] Baak M. M., Cuth J., Haller J., Hoecker A., Kogler R., Mnig K., Schott M. and Stelzer J., Eur. Phys. J. C, 74 (2014) 3046.

[17] CDF and D0 Collaborations, Phys. Rev. D, 88 (2013) 5052018. [18] ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B, 761 (2016) 350.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

We describe here a the case of a family with clear cut criteria for Gorlin-Goltz syndrome presenting the association of cranio-facial and skeletal anomalies together with a

17 I Maloselli rappresentano una ricca famiglia mantovana di mercanti di lana per i quali si dispone di una documentazione alquanto interessante: sono state con- servate (Archivio

Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/4/416/s1 , Figure S1: Mass evolution during water uptake test for oriented CP36

The difference with tuple spaces and CArtAgO itself is that 2COMM4JADE arti- facts reify social relationships as commitments, giving them that normative value that, jointly with

The axial velocity of mode 1 at frequency ω = 2.7, which is the most amplified coherent perturbation according to spatial analysis, is reported in figure 6 at different

Ora, lo sconforto haeckeriano per il tradimento della cultura tedesca rispetto alla propria missione e al proprio ruolo di «Führer des Geistes», di «guida dello spirito», al punto

Regional LORETA solutions (distributed EEG sources) relative to a statistical ANOVA interaction among factors Group (Nold, mild AD , mild AD+), Band (delta, theta, alpha 1, alpha

come si dice...» Una esitazione lascia emergere una deglutizione più profonda da parte di Giovanni e numerosi schiocchi della bocca che precedono la frase successiva, una lunga